Show simple item record

Contractual liability of warehousekeeper

dc.creatorMišković, Maša
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:10:56Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:10:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0354-3501
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1184
dc.description.abstractU ovom radu se razmatra odgovornost skladištara za gubitak i oštećenje robe tokom uskladištenja. Iako je većinsko shvatanje u srpskoj pravnoj teoriji da je ugovorna odgovornost skladištara objektivna, autor navodi više argumenata u prilog njegove de lege lata subjektivne odgovornosti. Iako postoje opravdani razlozi da odgovornost skladištara de lege ferenda bude objektivna, na osnovu analize odredbe Zakona o obligacionim odnosima o oslobođenju skladištara od odgovornosti ne može se doneti nesumnjiv zaključak da skladištar odgovara objektivno, odnosno bez obzira na svoju krivicu. Osim Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, autor razmatra i odredbe drugih zakona koji regulišu ovo pitanje. Rad sadrži i analizu uporednog prava kako bi se uvidelo kakva je regulativa ovog pitanja u stranom zakonodavstvu i da li ono može poslužiti kao uzor prilikom eventualnih izmena našeg zakonskog teksta.sr
dc.description.abstractIn this paper the author analyzes liability of warehousekeeper for loss of or damage to goods in the course of storage. Although there is a majority opinion in Serbian legal doctrine that the contractual liability of warehousekeeper is strict one, the author makes several arguments in favor of his de lege lata fault-based liability. Despite the fact that there are justifiable reasons for strict liability of the warehousekeeper de lege ferenda, on the basis of the analysis of the provisions of Serbian Law of Contracts and Torts (Law on Obligations) on warehousekeeper's exemption from contractual liability, no indisputable conclusion can be drawn that the warehousekeeper's liability is strict one, i.e. no-fault liability. In addition to the provisions of the Law on Obligations, the author also considers the provisions of other Serbian laws that regulate this issue. This paper also contains an analysis of comparative law in order to observe the regulation of this issue in foreign countries' law and make the conclusion whether comparative law could serve as a model for any amendments of Serbian legislation.en
dc.publisherUdruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
dc.relationProjekat Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu: Identitetski preobražaj Srbije
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePravo i privreda
dc.subjectugovorna odgovornostsr
dc.subjectugovor o uskladištenjusr
dc.subjectskladištesr
dc.subjectskladištarsr
dc.subjectwarehousekeeperen
dc.subjectwarehouseen
dc.subjectstorage agreementen
dc.subjectcontractual liabilityen
dc.subjectbailmenten
dc.titleUgovorna odgovornost skladištarasr
dc.titleContractual liability of warehousekeeperen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage234
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other58(2): 199-234
dc.citation.rankM52
dc.citation.spage199
dc.citation.volume58
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/PiP2002199M
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/158/1181.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2320
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record