Normativnost međunarodnog prava

Abstract

U knjizi "The Nature of International Law", Miodrag Jovanović nastoji da objasni prirodu međunarodnog prava tako što analizira tipične karakteristike prototipskog pojma prava (institucionalnost, normativnost, prinudnost i podobnost za pravednost), a zatim sagledava savremeno međunarodno pravo kroz prizmu tih karakteristika. U članku se posebna pažnja posvećuje njegovoj analizi normativnosti (međunarodnog) prava. Osnovna intencija ovog članka nije da kritikuje Jovanovićeve teze o normativnosti prava kao takvog, već da ukaže da one nisu najbolji mogući okvir za objašnjenje normativnosti međunarodnog prava. Stoga se izlaže drugačiji konceptualni okvir od onog koji je on ponudio u ključu Razove ideje pravnih normi kao isključujućih razloga za delanje i praktičke racionalnosti. Taj okvir čini dobro poznata Hartova ideja internog stajališta ili interne tačke gledišta. Izložena argumentacija pokazuje da bi, unutar takvog okvira, normativnost međunarodnog prava mogla bolje da se objasni i razume, a u njega se, čini se, dobro uklapaju i pojedine uvrežene intuicije o međunarodnom pravu.

In The Nature of International Law, Miodrag Jovanović, generally speaking, tries to explain the concept of international law. He analyzes few typical characteristics of the prototype concept of law (institutionality, normativity, coercion and justice-aptness), and then he looks at contemporary international law through "the lenses" of these characteristics. The article pays special attention to his analysis of the normativity of (international) law. The main intention is not to criticize Jovanović's theses about the normativity of law, as such, but to point out that they are not the best possible framework for explaining the normativity of international law. Therefore, a different and more appropriate conceptual framework is presented than the one he offered in the key of Raz's idea of legal norms as exclusionary reasons for action and practical rationality. This framework is grounded on Hart's well-known idea of an internal point of view. The presented argumentation shows that within such a framework, the normativity of international law could be better explained and understood, and also it seems that certain ingrained intuitions about international law fit well into it.