Show simple item record

dc.creatorVuković, Danilo
dc.creatorMrakovčić, Marko
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:25:19Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:25:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0966-8136
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1355
dc.description.abstractDrawing on a 2018 survey on a convenience sample of 716 Serbian and 393 Croatian legal professionals, we assess their attitudes towards Serbian and Croatian judiciaries against their key dimensions: independence, efficiency, quality, and fairness and impartiality. Legal professionals in both countries have little confidence in their judiciary, which we take as a proxy for legitimacy. Hence, both judiciaries are faced with an internal crisis of legitimacy. Respondents also scored judiciaries low on each of the key dimensions, while regression analysis confirmed that these attitudes are strong predictors of legitimacy. The results indicate that apparent differences in historical trajectories have not undermined common post-transitional political struggles over the role of judiciaries.en
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceEurope-Asia Studies
dc.titleLegitimacy, Independence and Impartiality: How do Serbian and Croatian Legal Professionals Assess Their Judiciaries?en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage967
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.other74(6): 945-967
dc.citation.spage945
dc.citation.volume74
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09668136.2021.2019195
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3148
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124097297
dc.identifier.wos000750119200001
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record