Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Patrimonium principis

Patrimonium principis

No Thumbnail
Authors
Milošević, Miroslav
Article (Published version)
CC BY
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
U istraživanjima posvećenim promenama koje je rimskom pravu i shvatanju države donelo uvođenje principata značajno mesto ima rasprava o pravnoj prirodi princepsove blagajne (fiscus) i njegove imovine (patrimonium). Autor razmatra rezultate do kojih se došlo u literaturi i zaključuje da se problem ne može rešiti sa stanovišta rimskog klasičnog prava, jer je sam položaj princepsa, i inače teško uskladiv sa tradicionalnim rimskim shvatanjem države, pravno dograđivan rešenjima samih princepsa, često uz narušavanje tradicionalnih granica javne i privatne sfere. Ovome je doprinosila i unutrašnja organizacija princepsovog domena, koja je sistematski građena kao autonomni pravni prostor izolovan od načela klasičnog prava.
In the studies devoted to the changes the introduction of principate brought to the roman law and the roman comprehension of state, discussion of the legal nature of the princeps treasury (fiscus) and its property (patrimonium) has a significant place. The author reviews results achieved in the literature so far, and concludes that the problem can not be solved from the standpoint of the classical Roman law, because the very position of princeps was hard enough to synchronize with the traditional Roman understanding of the state. Moreover, this position was legally upgraded by the principes themselves, often with the violation of traditional boundaries of public and private spheres. Internal organization of the imperial domains has additionally contributed to this, being systematically constructed as an autonomous legal space isolated from the classical principles of law.
Keywords:
procurator / principat / princeps / patrimonium principis / fiscus / procurator / principate / princeps / patrimonium principis / fiscus
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2010, 58, 1, 150-167

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1484
Collections
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milošević, Miroslav
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1484
AB  - U istraživanjima posvećenim promenama koje je rimskom pravu i shvatanju države donelo uvođenje principata značajno mesto ima rasprava o pravnoj prirodi princepsove blagajne (fiscus) i njegove imovine (patrimonium). Autor razmatra rezultate do kojih se došlo u literaturi i zaključuje da se problem ne može rešiti sa stanovišta rimskog klasičnog prava, jer je sam položaj princepsa, i inače teško uskladiv sa tradicionalnim rimskim shvatanjem države, pravno dograđivan rešenjima samih princepsa, često uz narušavanje tradicionalnih granica javne i privatne sfere. Ovome je doprinosila i unutrašnja organizacija princepsovog domena, koja je sistematski građena kao autonomni pravni prostor izolovan od načela klasičnog prava.
AB  - In the studies devoted to the changes the introduction of principate brought to the roman law and the roman comprehension of state, discussion of the legal nature of the princeps treasury (fiscus) and its property (patrimonium) has a significant place. The author reviews results achieved in the literature so far, and concludes that the problem can not be solved from the standpoint of the classical Roman law, because the very position of princeps was hard enough to synchronize with the traditional Roman understanding of the state. Moreover, this position was legally upgraded by the principes themselves, often with the violation of traditional boundaries of public and private spheres. Internal organization of the imperial domains has additionally contributed to this, being systematically constructed as an autonomous legal space isolated from the classical principles of law.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Patrimonium principis
T1  - Patrimonium principis
EP  - 167
IS  - 1
SP  - 150
VL  - 58
UR  - conv_3086
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Milošević, Miroslav",
year = "2010",
abstract = "U istraživanjima posvećenim promenama koje je rimskom pravu i shvatanju države donelo uvođenje principata značajno mesto ima rasprava o pravnoj prirodi princepsove blagajne (fiscus) i njegove imovine (patrimonium). Autor razmatra rezultate do kojih se došlo u literaturi i zaključuje da se problem ne može rešiti sa stanovišta rimskog klasičnog prava, jer je sam položaj princepsa, i inače teško uskladiv sa tradicionalnim rimskim shvatanjem države, pravno dograđivan rešenjima samih princepsa, često uz narušavanje tradicionalnih granica javne i privatne sfere. Ovome je doprinosila i unutrašnja organizacija princepsovog domena, koja je sistematski građena kao autonomni pravni prostor izolovan od načela klasičnog prava., In the studies devoted to the changes the introduction of principate brought to the roman law and the roman comprehension of state, discussion of the legal nature of the princeps treasury (fiscus) and its property (patrimonium) has a significant place. The author reviews results achieved in the literature so far, and concludes that the problem can not be solved from the standpoint of the classical Roman law, because the very position of princeps was hard enough to synchronize with the traditional Roman understanding of the state. Moreover, this position was legally upgraded by the principes themselves, often with the violation of traditional boundaries of public and private spheres. Internal organization of the imperial domains has additionally contributed to this, being systematically constructed as an autonomous legal space isolated from the classical principles of law.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Patrimonium principis, Patrimonium principis",
pages = "167-150",
number = "1",
volume = "58",
url = "conv_3086"
}
Milošević, M.. (2010). Patrimonium principis. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58(1), 150-167.
conv_3086
Milošević M. Patrimonium principis. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2010;58(1):150-167.
conv_3086 .
Milošević, Miroslav, "Patrimonium principis" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58, no. 1 (2010):150-167,
conv_3086 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB