Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Odgovornost prodavca za materijalne nedostatke stvari - pregled i reklamacija robe

Product liability of the seller

No Thumbnail
Authors
Stojanović, Srđan D.
Jakšić, Aleksandar
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Pitanje kontrole kvaliteta i reklamacije je u svakodnevnoj poslovnoj praksi interesantno, kako iz ugla međunarodnog privatnog prava, tako i iz ugla merodavnog materijalnog prava. Mi ćemo se stoga ukratko osvrnuti na međunarodno privatno pravnu problematiku, da bismo se zatim bliže i detaljnije posvetili rešenjima predviđenim u materijalnom jugoslovenskom pravu, uključujući i međunarodne izvore prava. Pri tome ćemo posebnu pažnju dati i teorijskim pitanjima vezanim za pravnu prirodu kontrole i reklamacije kvaliteta i predložiti neka nova terminološka rešenja.
This paper gives, in the first place, an analysis of private international law aspects of the problem of inspection of goods and complaints for possible product liability. After that, by making use of a comparative law analysis, the author ascertains that the necessity for inspection of goods by the buyer and making of possible objections regarding the quality of goods is not to be considered as a duty (Pflicht) of the buyer, but as a specific category of civil law termed Obliegenheit. As the terms used by the authors in this country are descriptive (duty in one's own interest, etc) the author proposes a new term - necessity. In our substantive law this question has been regulated by the Vienna Convention (within the field of its enforcement), by the Obligations Act, as well as by other provisions referred to by this Act. In the last part of this paper the author analyses in more detail the solutions provided by these legal sources.
Source:
Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 2001, 87, 4, 505-520
Publisher:
  • Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd

ISSN: 0004-1270

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/170
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Stojanović, Srđan D.
AU  - Jakšić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2001
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/170
AB  - Pitanje kontrole kvaliteta i reklamacije je u svakodnevnoj poslovnoj praksi interesantno, kako iz ugla međunarodnog privatnog prava, tako i iz ugla merodavnog materijalnog prava. Mi ćemo se stoga ukratko osvrnuti na međunarodno privatno pravnu problematiku, da bismo se zatim bliže i detaljnije posvetili rešenjima predviđenim u materijalnom jugoslovenskom pravu, uključujući i međunarodne izvore prava. Pri tome ćemo posebnu pažnju dati i teorijskim pitanjima vezanim za pravnu prirodu kontrole i reklamacije kvaliteta i predložiti neka nova terminološka rešenja.
AB  - This paper gives, in the first place, an analysis of private international law aspects of the problem of inspection of goods and complaints for possible product liability. After that, by making use of a comparative law analysis, the author ascertains that the necessity for inspection of goods by the buyer and making of possible objections regarding the quality of goods is not to be considered as a duty (Pflicht) of the buyer, but as a specific category of civil law termed Obliegenheit. As the terms used by the authors in this country are descriptive (duty in one's own interest, etc) the author proposes a new term - necessity. In our substantive law this question has been regulated by the Vienna Convention (within the field of its enforcement), by the Obligations Act, as well as by other provisions referred to by this Act. In the last part of this paper the author analyses in more detail the solutions provided by these legal sources.
PB  - Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
T1  - Odgovornost prodavca za materijalne nedostatke stvari - pregled i reklamacija robe
T1  - Product liability of the seller
EP  - 520
IS  - 4
SP  - 505
VL  - 87
UR  - conv_811
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Stojanović, Srđan D. and Jakšić, Aleksandar",
year = "2001",
abstract = "Pitanje kontrole kvaliteta i reklamacije je u svakodnevnoj poslovnoj praksi interesantno, kako iz ugla međunarodnog privatnog prava, tako i iz ugla merodavnog materijalnog prava. Mi ćemo se stoga ukratko osvrnuti na međunarodno privatno pravnu problematiku, da bismo se zatim bliže i detaljnije posvetili rešenjima predviđenim u materijalnom jugoslovenskom pravu, uključujući i međunarodne izvore prava. Pri tome ćemo posebnu pažnju dati i teorijskim pitanjima vezanim za pravnu prirodu kontrole i reklamacije kvaliteta i predložiti neka nova terminološka rešenja., This paper gives, in the first place, an analysis of private international law aspects of the problem of inspection of goods and complaints for possible product liability. After that, by making use of a comparative law analysis, the author ascertains that the necessity for inspection of goods by the buyer and making of possible objections regarding the quality of goods is not to be considered as a duty (Pflicht) of the buyer, but as a specific category of civil law termed Obliegenheit. As the terms used by the authors in this country are descriptive (duty in one's own interest, etc) the author proposes a new term - necessity. In our substantive law this question has been regulated by the Vienna Convention (within the field of its enforcement), by the Obligations Act, as well as by other provisions referred to by this Act. In the last part of this paper the author analyses in more detail the solutions provided by these legal sources.",
publisher = "Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke",
title = "Odgovornost prodavca za materijalne nedostatke stvari - pregled i reklamacija robe, Product liability of the seller",
pages = "520-505",
number = "4",
volume = "87",
url = "conv_811"
}
Stojanović, S. D.,& Jakšić, A.. (2001). Odgovornost prodavca za materijalne nedostatke stvari - pregled i reklamacija robe. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 87(4), 505-520.
conv_811
Stojanović SD, Jakšić A. Odgovornost prodavca za materijalne nedostatke stvari - pregled i reklamacija robe. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. 2001;87(4):505-520.
conv_811 .
Stojanović, Srđan D., Jakšić, Aleksandar, "Odgovornost prodavca za materijalne nedostatke stvari - pregled i reklamacija robe" in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 87, no. 4 (2001):505-520,
conv_811 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB