Show simple item record

Empirical study of the framing effect as a cognitive bias

dc.creatorMojašević, Aleksandar S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T11:14:26Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T11:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1764
dc.description.abstractU radu se prikazuju tipične kognitivne pristrasnosti predstavnika pravnih profesija (sudija, arbitara, advokata, medijatora) i drugih učesnika sudskog (parničnog) postupka (porotnika, parničnih stranaka). Poseban deo rada posvećen je teoriji izgleda i efektu uokviravanja zbog njihovog značaja za proučavanje i predviđanje ponašanja stranaka u postupku. S tim u vezi, sprovedeno je empirijsko istraživanje na uzorku studenata prava. Pošli smo od toga da između grupe tužilaca i tuženih postoji značajna razlika u izboru poravnanja u parnicama sa umerenom ili visokom verovatnoćom dobitaka ili gubitaka, odnosno parnicama sa niskom verovatnoćom dobitaka ili gubitaka. Rezultati istraživanja potvrđuju da su ispitanici podložni efektu uokviravanja samo u parnicama sa umerenom ili visokom verovatnoćom dobitaka ili gubitaka. To istraživanje otvara i određena pitanja, a pre svega ko je u najboljoj poziciji da utiče na okvir u kojem stranke odlučuju. Autor iznosi stav da su, uprkos određenim ograničenjima, u takvoj poziciji medijatori.sr
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents typical cognitive biases of legal professionals (judges, arbitrators, lawyers, mediators) and other participants in judicial (civil) proceedings (jurors, parties). A special part is devoted to prospect theory and the framing effect. In this regard, an empirical study was conducted on a sample of law students. We started from the fact that between the two groups there is a significant difference in the choice of settlement in litigation, with moderate or high likelihood of gains or losses, as well as in litigation with low likelihood of gains or losses. The results confirm that the respondents were susceptible to framing effect only in litigation with moderate/high probability of gains/losses. This study raises some questions, primarily who is in the best position to affect the framework within which the parties decide. The author expresses the view that, despite certain limitations, mediators are in such a position.en
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179046/RS//
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectTeorija izgledasr
dc.subjectPravne profesijesr
dc.subjectKognitivne pristrasnostisr
dc.subjectEfekat uokviravanjasr
dc.subjectProspect theoryen
dc.subjectLegal professionsen
dc.subjectFraming effecten
dc.subjectCognitive biasesen
dc.titleEmpirijsko istraživanje efekta uokviravanja kao vida kognitivne pristrasnostisr
dc.titleEmpirical study of the framing effect as a cognitive biasen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.citation.epage101
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other67(2): 79-101
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage79
dc.citation.volume67
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/AnaliPFB1902083M
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1865/1757.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3046
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record