Empirijsko istraživanje efekta uokviravanja kao vida kognitivne pristrasnosti
Empirical study of the framing effect as a cognitive bias
dc.creator | Mojašević, Aleksandar S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-21T11:14:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-21T11:14:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2565 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1764 | |
dc.description.abstract | U radu se prikazuju tipične kognitivne pristrasnosti predstavnika pravnih profesija (sudija, arbitara, advokata, medijatora) i drugih učesnika sudskog (parničnog) postupka (porotnika, parničnih stranaka). Poseban deo rada posvećen je teoriji izgleda i efektu uokviravanja zbog njihovog značaja za proučavanje i predviđanje ponašanja stranaka u postupku. S tim u vezi, sprovedeno je empirijsko istraživanje na uzorku studenata prava. Pošli smo od toga da između grupe tužilaca i tuženih postoji značajna razlika u izboru poravnanja u parnicama sa umerenom ili visokom verovatnoćom dobitaka ili gubitaka, odnosno parnicama sa niskom verovatnoćom dobitaka ili gubitaka. Rezultati istraživanja potvrđuju da su ispitanici podložni efektu uokviravanja samo u parnicama sa umerenom ili visokom verovatnoćom dobitaka ili gubitaka. To istraživanje otvara i određena pitanja, a pre svega ko je u najboljoj poziciji da utiče na okvir u kojem stranke odlučuju. Autor iznosi stav da su, uprkos određenim ograničenjima, u takvoj poziciji medijatori. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | The paper presents typical cognitive biases of legal professionals (judges, arbitrators, lawyers, mediators) and other participants in judicial (civil) proceedings (jurors, parties). A special part is devoted to prospect theory and the framing effect. In this regard, an empirical study was conducted on a sample of law students. We started from the fact that between the two groups there is a significant difference in the choice of settlement in litigation, with moderate or high likelihood of gains or losses, as well as in litigation with low likelihood of gains or losses. The results confirm that the respondents were susceptible to framing effect only in litigation with moderate/high probability of gains/losses. This study raises some questions, primarily who is in the best position to affect the framework within which the parties decide. The author expresses the view that, despite certain limitations, mediators are in such a position. | en |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179046/RS// | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.source | Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu | |
dc.subject | Teorija izgleda | sr |
dc.subject | Pravne profesije | sr |
dc.subject | Kognitivne pristrasnosti | sr |
dc.subject | Efekat uokviravanja | sr |
dc.subject | Prospect theory | en |
dc.subject | Legal professions | en |
dc.subject | Framing effect | en |
dc.subject | Cognitive biases | en |
dc.title | Empirijsko istraživanje efekta uokviravanja kao vida kognitivne pristrasnosti | sr |
dc.title | Empirical study of the framing effect as a cognitive bias | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
dc.citation.epage | 101 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.other | 67(2): 79-101 | |
dc.citation.rank | M24 | |
dc.citation.spage | 79 | |
dc.citation.volume | 67 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5937/AnaliPFB1902083M | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1865/1757.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | conv_3046 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |