Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Prinudni propisi u novijoj domaćoj sudskoj i ugovornoj praksi

Mandatory rules in recent Serbian jurisprudence and contractual practice

Thumbnail
2022
Download 🢃
1850.pdf (328.8Kb)
Authors
Hiber, Dragor
Article (Published version)
CC BY
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Sloboda ugovaranja i dispozitivne norme zakona karakteristične su za ugovorno pravo. Imperativne su izuzetak i njihovo kršenje vodi nevažnosti ugovora ili drugim posledicama. Otuda je u svakom konkretnom slučaju bitno utvrditi da li je norma ugovornog prava koju treba primeniti dispozitivna ili imperativna. U skladu sa slobodom ugovaranja, u zakonu se polazi od pretpostavke da su norme dispozitivne, izuzetak treba utvrditi. U pojedinim slučajevima praksa se kolebala, a sudovi su stav da su u pitanju imperativne norme branili neprihvatljivim argumentom da zakonom nije izričito dozvoljeno drugačije ugovaranje. Suprotno, u pojedine međunarodne ugovore, za koje je kao merodavno ugovoreno pravo Srbije, naročito o prodaji udela u privrednom društvu, sve češće se unose ustanove koje potiču iz anglosaksonskog prava, Representations and Warranties i Put option. Praksa tada nije uvek spremna da prepozna i primeni imperativne norme srpskog prava. U članku se kritički analiziraju primeri takve pra...kse.

Freedom of contract and non-mandatory statutory rules are characteristics of the law on contracts. Mandatory provisions are exceptional and their violation leads to the invalidity of contract and other consequences. Freedom of contract assumes that the rules are non-mandatory, while the exception is to be determined. In a number of cases jurisprudence wavered, and the courts tend to defend their position that a rule is mandatory by invoking the unacceptable position that the Statute has not explicitly allowed different contracting. By contrast, Anglo-Saxon legal institutions representations and warranties and put option are often incorporated in international agreements in which Serbias law is accepted as applicable, especially in agreements on the sale of shares in limited liability companies. In such cases the jurisprudence is not always willing to recognise and apply mandatory provisions of Serbias law. In the paper the examples of such practice are subject to a critical analysis.
Keywords:
sloboda ugovaranja / pretpostavka dispozitivnosti / napuštanje pretpostavke dispozitivnosti u sudskoj praksi / imperativne norme / domaće imperativne norme i preuzete ustanove stranog prava / mandatory rules / local mandatory rules and institutions transplanted from foreign law / freedom of contract / assumption of non-mandatoriness / abandonment of the assumption of non-mandatoriness in jurisprudence
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2022, 70, poseban, 451-476

DOI: 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK16A

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1857
Collections
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hiber, Dragor
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1857
AB  - Sloboda ugovaranja i dispozitivne norme zakona karakteristične su za ugovorno pravo. Imperativne su izuzetak i njihovo kršenje vodi nevažnosti ugovora ili drugim posledicama. Otuda je u svakom konkretnom slučaju bitno utvrditi da li je norma ugovornog prava koju treba primeniti dispozitivna ili imperativna. U skladu sa slobodom ugovaranja, u zakonu se polazi od pretpostavke da su norme dispozitivne, izuzetak treba utvrditi. U pojedinim slučajevima praksa se kolebala, a sudovi su stav da su u pitanju imperativne norme branili neprihvatljivim argumentom da zakonom nije izričito dozvoljeno drugačije ugovaranje. Suprotno, u pojedine međunarodne ugovore, za koje je kao merodavno ugovoreno pravo Srbije, naročito o prodaji udela u privrednom društvu, sve češće se unose ustanove koje potiču iz anglosaksonskog prava, Representations and Warranties i Put option. Praksa tada nije uvek spremna da prepozna i primeni imperativne norme srpskog prava. U članku se kritički analiziraju primeri takve prakse.
AB  - Freedom of contract and non-mandatory statutory rules are characteristics of the law on contracts. Mandatory provisions are exceptional and their violation leads to the invalidity of contract and other consequences. Freedom of contract assumes that the rules are non-mandatory, while the exception is to be determined. In a number of cases jurisprudence wavered, and the courts tend to defend their position that a rule is mandatory by invoking the unacceptable position that the Statute has not explicitly allowed different contracting. By contrast, Anglo-Saxon legal institutions representations and warranties and put option are often incorporated in international agreements in which Serbias law is accepted as applicable, especially in agreements on the sale of shares in limited liability companies. In such cases the jurisprudence is not always willing to recognise and apply mandatory provisions of Serbias law. In the paper the examples of such practice are subject to a critical analysis.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Prinudni propisi u novijoj domaćoj sudskoj i ugovornoj praksi
T1  - Mandatory rules in recent Serbian jurisprudence and contractual practice
EP  - 476
IS  - poseban
SP  - 451
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK16A
UR  - conv_3411
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hiber, Dragor",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Sloboda ugovaranja i dispozitivne norme zakona karakteristične su za ugovorno pravo. Imperativne su izuzetak i njihovo kršenje vodi nevažnosti ugovora ili drugim posledicama. Otuda je u svakom konkretnom slučaju bitno utvrditi da li je norma ugovornog prava koju treba primeniti dispozitivna ili imperativna. U skladu sa slobodom ugovaranja, u zakonu se polazi od pretpostavke da su norme dispozitivne, izuzetak treba utvrditi. U pojedinim slučajevima praksa se kolebala, a sudovi su stav da su u pitanju imperativne norme branili neprihvatljivim argumentom da zakonom nije izričito dozvoljeno drugačije ugovaranje. Suprotno, u pojedine međunarodne ugovore, za koje je kao merodavno ugovoreno pravo Srbije, naročito o prodaji udela u privrednom društvu, sve češće se unose ustanove koje potiču iz anglosaksonskog prava, Representations and Warranties i Put option. Praksa tada nije uvek spremna da prepozna i primeni imperativne norme srpskog prava. U članku se kritički analiziraju primeri takve prakse., Freedom of contract and non-mandatory statutory rules are characteristics of the law on contracts. Mandatory provisions are exceptional and their violation leads to the invalidity of contract and other consequences. Freedom of contract assumes that the rules are non-mandatory, while the exception is to be determined. In a number of cases jurisprudence wavered, and the courts tend to defend their position that a rule is mandatory by invoking the unacceptable position that the Statute has not explicitly allowed different contracting. By contrast, Anglo-Saxon legal institutions representations and warranties and put option are often incorporated in international agreements in which Serbias law is accepted as applicable, especially in agreements on the sale of shares in limited liability companies. In such cases the jurisprudence is not always willing to recognise and apply mandatory provisions of Serbias law. In the paper the examples of such practice are subject to a critical analysis.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Prinudni propisi u novijoj domaćoj sudskoj i ugovornoj praksi, Mandatory rules in recent Serbian jurisprudence and contractual practice",
pages = "476-451",
number = "poseban",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK16A",
url = "conv_3411"
}
Hiber, D.. (2022). Prinudni propisi u novijoj domaćoj sudskoj i ugovornoj praksi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70(poseban), 451-476.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK16A
conv_3411
Hiber D. Prinudni propisi u novijoj domaćoj sudskoj i ugovornoj praksi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(poseban):451-476.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK16A
conv_3411 .
Hiber, Dragor, "Prinudni propisi u novijoj domaćoj sudskoj i ugovornoj praksi" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. poseban (2022):451-476,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK16A .,
conv_3411 .

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Poverioci u kompanijskom pravu i instrumenti njihove zaštite / Creditor protection in company law 

    Jevremović-Petrović, Tatjana (Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2011)
  • Nepoštovanje ustavnosti u oblasti oporezivanja zarada u Srbiji / Constitutionality issues within the taxation of salaries in Serbia 

    Kostić, Svetislav (Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2018)
  • O uslovljenoj i usmerenoj slobodi ugovaranja privrednih subjekata / On conditioned and directed freedom of contrats between business entity 

    Đurđević, Marko; Pavić, Dragan (Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2016)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB