Krivična odgovornost stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku
Criminal liability for a false statement of a party in civil, execution and administrative procedure
Apstrakt
Autor se u radu bavi pitanjem krivične odgovornosti stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku, a koja je predviđena odredbom člana 206/2. KZ Srbije i predstavlja drugi osnovni oblik krivičnog dela davanja lažnog iskaza. Pravni značaj i kompleksna priroda ove inkriminacije opredelila je strukturu i sadržinu rada, tako da je materijalnopravna analiza ovog oblika krivičnog dela davanja lažnog iskaza upotpunjena i prikazom pojedinih procesnih odredaba, pri čemu je određen značaj dat parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku. Na kraju rada, dat je kraći prikaz istorijskog razvoja inkriminacije lažnog iskaza stranke u odgovarajućim postupcima u jugoslovenskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu.
In this paper the author discusses the question of criminal liability of a party for a false statement given in civil, execution and administrative procedure. The author has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of article 206/2 of the Criminal Code of Serbia which establishes the second basic form of the criminal offence of giving a false statement, which, according to the statutory definition, exists if the following requirements are fulfilled: that the false statement was given by a party to particular procedure; that the party has given the false statement during the hearing as a witness, and that the false statement served as a basis for the decision made in such procedure. With respect to the nature of this incrimination, special attention has been paid to the objective condition of incrimination. The author discusses the objective condition of incrimination, first at a general theoretical level, presenting the opinions of some authors concerning the legal nature and implementation... of the objective condition of incrimination. Afterwards, the objective condition of incrimination is analyzed within the context of giving a false statement as a criminal offence. Namely, in case of this form of criminal offence of giving a false statement, the objective condition of incrimination is determined as a consequence of the criminal offence and consists in a decision of competent authority based on a false statement given by the party to the proceedings. After that, the substantive law analysis of this form of giving a false statement is supplemented by procedural analysis with respect to civil, execution and administrative procedure. In addition to the positive aspect, this paper also contains a historical aspect which deals with the emergence of incrimination of giving a false statement of a party in respective procedures in Yugoslav legislation, as well as a review of theoretical standpoints of some important criminal law scholars and characteristic cases.
Izvor:
Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 2002, 88, 1-2, 87-122Izdavač:
- Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd
Institucija/grupa
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Delić, Nataša PY - 2002 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/185 AB - Autor se u radu bavi pitanjem krivične odgovornosti stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku, a koja je predviđena odredbom člana 206/2. KZ Srbije i predstavlja drugi osnovni oblik krivičnog dela davanja lažnog iskaza. Pravni značaj i kompleksna priroda ove inkriminacije opredelila je strukturu i sadržinu rada, tako da je materijalnopravna analiza ovog oblika krivičnog dela davanja lažnog iskaza upotpunjena i prikazom pojedinih procesnih odredaba, pri čemu je određen značaj dat parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku. Na kraju rada, dat je kraći prikaz istorijskog razvoja inkriminacije lažnog iskaza stranke u odgovarajućim postupcima u jugoslovenskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu. AB - In this paper the author discusses the question of criminal liability of a party for a false statement given in civil, execution and administrative procedure. The author has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of article 206/2 of the Criminal Code of Serbia which establishes the second basic form of the criminal offence of giving a false statement, which, according to the statutory definition, exists if the following requirements are fulfilled: that the false statement was given by a party to particular procedure; that the party has given the false statement during the hearing as a witness, and that the false statement served as a basis for the decision made in such procedure. With respect to the nature of this incrimination, special attention has been paid to the objective condition of incrimination. The author discusses the objective condition of incrimination, first at a general theoretical level, presenting the opinions of some authors concerning the legal nature and implementation of the objective condition of incrimination. Afterwards, the objective condition of incrimination is analyzed within the context of giving a false statement as a criminal offence. Namely, in case of this form of criminal offence of giving a false statement, the objective condition of incrimination is determined as a consequence of the criminal offence and consists in a decision of competent authority based on a false statement given by the party to the proceedings. After that, the substantive law analysis of this form of giving a false statement is supplemented by procedural analysis with respect to civil, execution and administrative procedure. In addition to the positive aspect, this paper also contains a historical aspect which deals with the emergence of incrimination of giving a false statement of a party in respective procedures in Yugoslav legislation, as well as a review of theoretical standpoints of some important criminal law scholars and characteristic cases. PB - Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd T2 - Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke T1 - Krivična odgovornost stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku T1 - Criminal liability for a false statement of a party in civil, execution and administrative procedure EP - 122 IS - 1-2 SP - 87 VL - 88 UR - conv_813 ER -
@article{ author = "Delić, Nataša", year = "2002", abstract = "Autor se u radu bavi pitanjem krivične odgovornosti stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku, a koja je predviđena odredbom člana 206/2. KZ Srbije i predstavlja drugi osnovni oblik krivičnog dela davanja lažnog iskaza. Pravni značaj i kompleksna priroda ove inkriminacije opredelila je strukturu i sadržinu rada, tako da je materijalnopravna analiza ovog oblika krivičnog dela davanja lažnog iskaza upotpunjena i prikazom pojedinih procesnih odredaba, pri čemu je određen značaj dat parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku. Na kraju rada, dat je kraći prikaz istorijskog razvoja inkriminacije lažnog iskaza stranke u odgovarajućim postupcima u jugoslovenskom krivičnom zakonodavstvu., In this paper the author discusses the question of criminal liability of a party for a false statement given in civil, execution and administrative procedure. The author has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of article 206/2 of the Criminal Code of Serbia which establishes the second basic form of the criminal offence of giving a false statement, which, according to the statutory definition, exists if the following requirements are fulfilled: that the false statement was given by a party to particular procedure; that the party has given the false statement during the hearing as a witness, and that the false statement served as a basis for the decision made in such procedure. With respect to the nature of this incrimination, special attention has been paid to the objective condition of incrimination. The author discusses the objective condition of incrimination, first at a general theoretical level, presenting the opinions of some authors concerning the legal nature and implementation of the objective condition of incrimination. Afterwards, the objective condition of incrimination is analyzed within the context of giving a false statement as a criminal offence. Namely, in case of this form of criminal offence of giving a false statement, the objective condition of incrimination is determined as a consequence of the criminal offence and consists in a decision of competent authority based on a false statement given by the party to the proceedings. After that, the substantive law analysis of this form of giving a false statement is supplemented by procedural analysis with respect to civil, execution and administrative procedure. In addition to the positive aspect, this paper also contains a historical aspect which deals with the emergence of incrimination of giving a false statement of a party in respective procedures in Yugoslav legislation, as well as a review of theoretical standpoints of some important criminal law scholars and characteristic cases.", publisher = "Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd", journal = "Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke", title = "Krivična odgovornost stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku, Criminal liability for a false statement of a party in civil, execution and administrative procedure", pages = "122-87", number = "1-2", volume = "88", url = "conv_813" }
Delić, N.. (2002). Krivična odgovornost stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 88(1-2), 87-122. conv_813
Delić N. Krivična odgovornost stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. 2002;88(1-2):87-122. conv_813 .
Delić, Nataša, "Krivična odgovornost stranke za lažni iskaz dat u parničnom, vanparničnom, izvršnom i upravnom postupku" in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 88, no. 1-2 (2002):87-122, conv_813 .