Приказ основних података о документу

Constitutional Law’s constitutionality : When should Constitutional Court decide on constitutional law’s constitutionality?

dc.creatorVučić, Olivera
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-10T12:36:09Z
dc.date.available2024-09-10T12:36:09Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-7630-341-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1904
dc.description.abstractУ пракси некадашње Југославије, али и у Србији и након њеног ус- тавотворног осамостаљeња, често је прибегавано доношењу уставних закона. Ова врста општих аката доношена је по поступцима различите сложености, чиме је мењана њихова правна снага и тиме однос са важећим уставима, што је било узроковано различитим правним и, чешће, политичким мотивима. Та неуједначеност пратила је и однос уставног судства према овој врсти акта, које се, без ваљаног упоришта у јасним ставовима уставноправне науке, различито односило према питању оцене сагласности уставних закона са уставом.sr
dc.description.abstractThe Constitutional Law represents a special sort of act which had different meanings in former socialist Yugoslavia. One of these is related to the FPRY’s Constitutional Law of 1953, which, being adopted under the procedure for the adoption and amendment of the constitution and regulating the particular constitutional materia, represented the constitution itself. Second type of constitutional laws, which is known both by the socialist constitutionalism and that established after the fall of socialism, in the first place by the Serbian Constitution of 1990 and followed later by the actual Constitution of 2006, are the implementing laws which are adopted, as the constitutional creators themselves regulate, under the different procedure from that designed for the constitutional amendment and which contents are defined by their aim, which is the implementation of the constitutional amendment. As for the nature of these acts, constitutional doctrine is unanimous – their legal force is of lesser value than the constitution. One open question is the relation of the constitutional court to the constitutional law. The Constitutional court refuses to establish its jurisdiction to revise the constitutionality of laws and other general acts over the constitutional law itself, basing this position on the fact that the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia does not explicitly acknowledge this jurisdiction.sr
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.publisherBeograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanjesr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179059/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourcePerspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume Isr
dc.subjectUstavni zakonsr
dc.subjectSprovedbeni zakonsr
dc.subjectUstavni sudsr
dc.subjectOcena ustavnosti ustavnog sudasr
dc.subjectConstitutional lawsr
dc.subjectImplementing lawsr
dc.subjectConstitutional courtsr
dc.subjectRevision of constitutional law’s constitutionalitysr
dc.titleUstavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona?sr
dc.titleConstitutional Law’s constitutionality : When should Constitutional Court decide on constitutional law’s constitutionality?sr
dc.typebookPartsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.citation.epage131
dc.citation.spage118
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2680/bitstream_2680.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу