Preispitivanje sudske odluke od Ustavnog suda Srbije

Abstract

Nije jasno da li je namera ustavotvorca bila da Ustavni sud preispituje sudske odluke po ustavnoj žalbi. U praksi, Ustavni sud kao vansudski državni organ ne samo da preispituje sudske odluke već ih i poništava, čime se faktički pretvara u „Nadvrhovni kasacioni sud“. Uzimajući u obzir pravnopolitičke razloge čiji je cilj poštovanje ljudskih i manjinskih prava i sloboda prihvatljivo je da Ustavni sud utvrđuje da je sudskom odlukom povređeno pravo ili sloboda, ali ne i da poništava sudsku odluku.

It is not clear whether it was the constitution maker’s decision that court decisions can also be reviewed by the Constitutional Court. Although Constitutional Court does not belong to judicial power, in practice, it acts like its part and not only does it review but also annulls court decisions. Doing this, Constitutional Court practically turns to be above the Supreme Court of Cassation. Taking into account the reasons of the legal policy in the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms protection, it is acceptable to allow Constitutional Court to review court decisions and establish the violation of the appellant’s right or freedom but not to annull the decision in question.