Razvoj poslovodstva bez naloga bio je uslovljen potrebom rešavanja slučajeva
koji su imali sličnosti sa tipičnim slučajevima te ustanove, ali im je nedostajao
subjektivan element – animus aliena negotia gerendi, koji je, prema
mišljenju značajnog broja romanista, bio suštinski element poslovodstva bez
naloga. I sami rimski pravnici su u svrhu rešavanja tih slučajeva odustajali od
subjektivnog elementa, čime su proširivali domen primene poslovodstva bez naloga.
U radu se ističu pojedina sporna pitanja i odgovori povodom instituta
poslovodstvo bez naloga, čime se posredno utvrđuje njegov odnos s pravno neosnovanim
obogaćenjem.
Negotiorum gestio is a complex institute as it combines opposite tendencies:
on one hand it promotes undertaking of business in order to gain benefits in
the interest of another, while on the other hand sanctions the unjust gaining of
benefits at the detriment of another. In modern legal systems an indispensable element of negotiorum gestio is an intervener’s intention to act in the interest
of another. This subjective element is an important criterion of demarcation
between the benevolent intervention of another’s affairs and unjust enrichment.
Unlike contemporary law, in Roman law there was no legal basis for unjust
enrichment as a general and independent institute. Therefore cases of unjust
gaining of benefit were solved by the application of individual procedural resources
such as condictio, actio negotiorum gestorum and actio de in rem verso.
All three resources are based on the idea of prohibition of unjust enrichment,
while they differ from each other according to con...ditions of application reflected
in different causes of their legal creation. However Roman jurists did not strictly
establish the conditions of application of these institutions as any requirement of
absolute fulfillment of all conditions would be an obstacle to their freedom for a
fair solution to be reached in a specific case. Therefore in some cases condictio is
granted without the existence of datio or actio negotiorum gestorum in the lack
of intention of a gestor to act in the interest of a dominus. As just solutions required
prevention of unjust enrichment at the detriment of another, the reason
of given decisions should be sought in the idea of unjust enrichment. Every attitude
which aims at establishing absolute and precise conditions of application
of actiones negotiorum gestorum in Roman Law is an unhistorical approach to
the historical phenomena. Roman jurists primarily tried to find just solutions
whereas existing institutions served as a means to achieve that aim. Insisting on
the subjective conception of negotiorum gestio which takes into account intention
of a gestor to act in the interest of another or objective conception which
neglects such an intention is contrary to both the Roman Law resources and
methods Roman jurists worked with. On the contrary, various cases of application
of action negotiorum gestorum gave incentive to the development of the
existing and creation of new institutes.
Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII, 2018, 289-297
Izdavač:
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
TY - CHAP
AU - Cvetković Đorđević, Valentina
PY - 2018
UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2083
AB - Razvoj poslovodstva bez naloga bio je uslovljen potrebom rešavanja slučajeva
koji su imali sličnosti sa tipičnim slučajevima te ustanove, ali im je nedostajao
subjektivan element – animus aliena negotia gerendi, koji je, prema
mišljenju značajnog broja romanista, bio suštinski element poslovodstva bez
naloga. I sami rimski pravnici su u svrhu rešavanja tih slučajeva odustajali od
subjektivnog elementa, čime su proširivali domen primene poslovodstva bez naloga.
U radu se ističu pojedina sporna pitanja i odgovori povodom instituta
poslovodstvo bez naloga, čime se posredno utvrđuje njegov odnos s pravno neosnovanim
obogaćenjem.
AB - Negotiorum gestio is a complex institute as it combines opposite tendencies:
on one hand it promotes undertaking of business in order to gain benefits in
the interest of another, while on the other hand sanctions the unjust gaining of
benefits at the detriment of another. In modern legal systems an indispensable element of negotiorum gestio is an intervener’s intention to act in the interest
of another. This subjective element is an important criterion of demarcation
between the benevolent intervention of another’s affairs and unjust enrichment.
Unlike contemporary law, in Roman law there was no legal basis for unjust
enrichment as a general and independent institute. Therefore cases of unjust
gaining of benefit were solved by the application of individual procedural resources
such as condictio, actio negotiorum gestorum and actio de in rem verso.
All three resources are based on the idea of prohibition of unjust enrichment,
while they differ from each other according to conditions of application reflected
in different causes of their legal creation. However Roman jurists did not strictly
establish the conditions of application of these institutions as any requirement of
absolute fulfillment of all conditions would be an obstacle to their freedom for a
fair solution to be reached in a specific case. Therefore in some cases condictio is
granted without the existence of datio or actio negotiorum gestorum in the lack
of intention of a gestor to act in the interest of a dominus. As just solutions required
prevention of unjust enrichment at the detriment of another, the reason
of given decisions should be sought in the idea of unjust enrichment. Every attitude
which aims at establishing absolute and precise conditions of application
of actiones negotiorum gestorum in Roman Law is an unhistorical approach to
the historical phenomena. Roman jurists primarily tried to find just solutions
whereas existing institutions served as a means to achieve that aim. Insisting on
the subjective conception of negotiorum gestio which takes into account intention
of a gestor to act in the interest of another or objective conception which
neglects such an intention is contrary to both the Roman Law resources and
methods Roman jurists worked with. On the contrary, various cases of application
of action negotiorum gestorum gave incentive to the development of the
existing and creation of new institutes.
PB - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2 - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII
T1 - Poslovodstvo bez naloga i pravno neosnovano obogaćenje
T1 - Negotiorum Gestio and Unjust Enrichment
EP - 297
SP - 289
ER -
@inbook{
author = "Cvetković Đorđević, Valentina",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Razvoj poslovodstva bez naloga bio je uslovljen potrebom rešavanja slučajeva
koji su imali sličnosti sa tipičnim slučajevima te ustanove, ali im je nedostajao
subjektivan element – animus aliena negotia gerendi, koji je, prema
mišljenju značajnog broja romanista, bio suštinski element poslovodstva bez
naloga. I sami rimski pravnici su u svrhu rešavanja tih slučajeva odustajali od
subjektivnog elementa, čime su proširivali domen primene poslovodstva bez naloga.
U radu se ističu pojedina sporna pitanja i odgovori povodom instituta
poslovodstvo bez naloga, čime se posredno utvrđuje njegov odnos s pravno neosnovanim
obogaćenjem., Negotiorum gestio is a complex institute as it combines opposite tendencies:
on one hand it promotes undertaking of business in order to gain benefits in
the interest of another, while on the other hand sanctions the unjust gaining of
benefits at the detriment of another. In modern legal systems an indispensable element of negotiorum gestio is an intervener’s intention to act in the interest
of another. This subjective element is an important criterion of demarcation
between the benevolent intervention of another’s affairs and unjust enrichment.
Unlike contemporary law, in Roman law there was no legal basis for unjust
enrichment as a general and independent institute. Therefore cases of unjust
gaining of benefit were solved by the application of individual procedural resources
such as condictio, actio negotiorum gestorum and actio de in rem verso.
All three resources are based on the idea of prohibition of unjust enrichment,
while they differ from each other according to conditions of application reflected
in different causes of their legal creation. However Roman jurists did not strictly
establish the conditions of application of these institutions as any requirement of
absolute fulfillment of all conditions would be an obstacle to their freedom for a
fair solution to be reached in a specific case. Therefore in some cases condictio is
granted without the existence of datio or actio negotiorum gestorum in the lack
of intention of a gestor to act in the interest of a dominus. As just solutions required
prevention of unjust enrichment at the detriment of another, the reason
of given decisions should be sought in the idea of unjust enrichment. Every attitude
which aims at establishing absolute and precise conditions of application
of actiones negotiorum gestorum in Roman Law is an unhistorical approach to
the historical phenomena. Roman jurists primarily tried to find just solutions
whereas existing institutions served as a means to achieve that aim. Insisting on
the subjective conception of negotiorum gestio which takes into account intention
of a gestor to act in the interest of another or objective conception which
neglects such an intention is contrary to both the Roman Law resources and
methods Roman jurists worked with. On the contrary, various cases of application
of action negotiorum gestorum gave incentive to the development of the
existing and creation of new institutes.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII",
booktitle = "Poslovodstvo bez naloga i pravno neosnovano obogaćenje, Negotiorum Gestio and Unjust Enrichment",
pages = "297-289"
}
Cvetković Đorđević, V.. (2018). Poslovodstvo bez naloga i pravno neosnovano obogaćenje. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 289-297.
Cvetković Đorđević V. Poslovodstvo bez naloga i pravno neosnovano obogaćenje. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII. 2018;:289-297..
Cvetković Đorđević, Valentina, "Poslovodstvo bez naloga i pravno neosnovano obogaćenje" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII (2018):289-297.
