U ovom radu, autor analizira pravni standard 'istaknuti pravnik' kao poseban uslov za izbor sudija ustavnog suda. On, najpre, objašnjava zašto je ovaj uslov tako kasno propisan Ustavom u Republici Srbiji. Zatim, izlaže koje su prednosti, a koji nedostaci preciznijeg definisanja ovog uslova. Autor, takođe, daje svoje viđenje šta je, u suštini, istaknuti pravnik. On analizira i druge ustavne odredbe o Ustavnom sudu Srbije koje su u vezi s ovim uslovom. Na kraju, predlaže šta u Ustavu, a šta u ustavnoj kulturi treba menjati da bi Ustavni sud postao središte 'pravničke aristokratije'.
In this article, the author analyzes the legal standard 'prominent lawyer' as a special condition for the election of judges of the Constitutional Court. Firstly, he explains why this condition is prescribed so late in the Republic of Serbia. Then, he explains the advantages and the disadvantages of the precized definition of the condition. The author also gives his explanation of the meaning of the expression 'prominent lawyer'. He analyzes other constitutional provisions related to this condition. Finally, he suggests the changes in the Constitution as well in the constitutional culture in order to create the Constitutional Court a center of legal aristocracy.
Keywords:
Zakon o Ustavnom sudu od 2007 / Ustav Srbije od 2006 / pravnička aristokratija / pravni standard 'istaknuti pravnik' / the Law on the Constitutional Court of 2007 / the Constitution of Serbia of 2006 / prominent lawyer / legal aristocracy
TY - JOUR
AU - Petrov, Vladan
PY - 2013
UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/724
AB - U ovom radu, autor analizira pravni standard 'istaknuti pravnik' kao poseban uslov za izbor sudija ustavnog suda. On, najpre, objašnjava zašto je ovaj uslov tako kasno propisan Ustavom u Republici Srbiji. Zatim, izlaže koje su prednosti, a koji nedostaci preciznijeg definisanja ovog uslova. Autor, takođe, daje svoje viđenje šta je, u suštini, istaknuti pravnik. On analizira i druge ustavne odredbe o Ustavnom sudu Srbije koje su u vezi s ovim uslovom. Na kraju, predlaže šta u Ustavu, a šta u ustavnoj kulturi treba menjati da bi Ustavni sud postao središte 'pravničke aristokratije'.
AB - In this article, the author analyzes the legal standard 'prominent lawyer' as a special condition for the election of judges of the Constitutional Court. Firstly, he explains why this condition is prescribed so late in the Republic of Serbia. Then, he explains the advantages and the disadvantages of the precized definition of the condition. The author also gives his explanation of the meaning of the expression 'prominent lawyer'. He analyzes other constitutional provisions related to this condition. Finally, he suggests the changes in the Constitution as well in the constitutional culture in order to create the Constitutional Court a center of legal aristocracy.
PB - Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd
T2 - NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1 - 'Istaknuti pravnik' - poseban uslov za izbor sudija Ustavnog suda ili prazna ustavna norma?
T1 - 'Prominent lawyer': A special condition for the election of Constitutional judges or an empty constitutional provision?
EP - 52
IS - 3
SP - 41
VL - 18
UR - conv_2511
ER -
@article{
author = "Petrov, Vladan",
year = "2013",
abstract = "U ovom radu, autor analizira pravni standard 'istaknuti pravnik' kao poseban uslov za izbor sudija ustavnog suda. On, najpre, objašnjava zašto je ovaj uslov tako kasno propisan Ustavom u Republici Srbiji. Zatim, izlaže koje su prednosti, a koji nedostaci preciznijeg definisanja ovog uslova. Autor, takođe, daje svoje viđenje šta je, u suštini, istaknuti pravnik. On analizira i druge ustavne odredbe o Ustavnom sudu Srbije koje su u vezi s ovim uslovom. Na kraju, predlaže šta u Ustavu, a šta u ustavnoj kulturi treba menjati da bi Ustavni sud postao središte 'pravničke aristokratije'., In this article, the author analyzes the legal standard 'prominent lawyer' as a special condition for the election of judges of the Constitutional Court. Firstly, he explains why this condition is prescribed so late in the Republic of Serbia. Then, he explains the advantages and the disadvantages of the precized definition of the condition. The author also gives his explanation of the meaning of the expression 'prominent lawyer'. He analyzes other constitutional provisions related to this condition. Finally, he suggests the changes in the Constitution as well in the constitutional culture in order to create the Constitutional Court a center of legal aristocracy.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd",
journal = "NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "'Istaknuti pravnik' - poseban uslov za izbor sudija Ustavnog suda ili prazna ustavna norma?, 'Prominent lawyer': A special condition for the election of Constitutional judges or an empty constitutional provision?",
pages = "52-41",
number = "3",
volume = "18",
url = "conv_2511"
}
Petrov, V.. (2013). 'Istaknuti pravnik' - poseban uslov za izbor sudija Ustavnog suda ili prazna ustavna norma?. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd., 18(3), 41-52.
conv_2511
Petrov V. 'Istaknuti pravnik' - poseban uslov za izbor sudija Ustavnog suda ili prazna ustavna norma?. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2013;18(3):41-52.
conv_2511 .
Petrov, Vladan, "'Istaknuti pravnik' - poseban uslov za izbor sudija Ustavnog suda ili prazna ustavna norma?" in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 18, no. 3 (2013):41-52,
conv_2511 .
