Приказ основних података о документу

Proposals for Constitutional reform in the part relating to the judiciary: The review of the national strategy

dc.creatorPetrov, Vladan
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T14:33:43Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T14:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0350-8501
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/762
dc.description.abstractNacionalna strategija za reformu pravosuđa (za period 2013-2018) usvojena je u Narodnoj skupštini jula 2013. godine. U njoj se navodi da 'pojedina opredeljenja ove strategije zahtevaju promenu Ustava'. Autor analizira deo Strategije koji se odnosi na promenu tzv. ustavnog okvira o pravosuđu. Među definisanim ciljevima, koje treba ostvariti do 2018. godine, on naročito spornim smatra predviđanje Pravosudne akademije kao obaveznog uslova za prvi izbor na sudijsku i tužilačku funkciju. Ne osporavajući značaj Pravosudne akademije i neophodnost njene reforme, autor je mišljenja da Akademija ne može biti ustavna kategorija, kao što ni uslovi za izbor sudija i javnih tužilaca nisu ustavna materija. S druge strane, on se zalaže za vraćanje u Ustav osnova za prestanak sudijske i javnotužilačke funkcije, kao i razloga za njihovo razrešenje, što je, prema važećem ustavnom rešenju, zakonska materija.sr
dc.description.abstractThe National Strategy for the Reform of the Judiciary (2013 - 2018) is adopted in the National Assembly in June 2013. It is said that 'some commitments of this Strategy demand the revision of the Constitution'. The author analizes the part of the Strategy relating to the change of so-called constitutional framework of the judiciary. Among defined goals, which should be realized by 2018, he considers particularly disputable the prediction of the Judical Academy as a mandatory condition for the first election of judges and prosecutors. Without denying the importance of the Judicial Academy and the necessity of its reform, the author believes that the Academy should not be a constitutional category, just as the conditions for the election of judges and prosecutors are not a constitutional matter. On the other hand, the author advocates a return of the basis for the termination of judicial and prosecutorial functions, as well as the reasons for their dismissal, into the Constitution which are currently in the law.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Nišu - Pravni fakultet, Niš
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceZbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu
dc.subjectVisoki savet sudstvasr
dc.subjectReforma pravosuđasr
dc.subjectPravosudna akademijasr
dc.subjectOdluka Ustavnog suda o neustavnosti odredaba Zakona o Pravosudnoj akademijisr
dc.subjectizbor sudija i prestanak sudijske funkcijesr
dc.subjectizbor javnih tužilaca i prestanak javnotužilačke funkcijesr
dc.subjectThe Judicial reformen
dc.subjectThe Judicial Academyen
dc.subjectThe High Judicial Councilen
dc.subjectThe election of public prosecutors and the termination of their functionen
dc.subjectThe election of judges and dismissal of judgesen
dc.subjectThe Decision of the Constitutional Court on the unconstitutionaen
dc.titlePredlozi za reformu ustava u delu koji se odnosi na pravosuđe - preispitivanje nacionalne strategijesr
dc.titleProposals for Constitutional reform in the part relating to the judiciary: The review of the national strategyen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-SA
dc.citation.epage108
dc.citation.issue68
dc.citation.other(68): 97-108
dc.citation.rankM51
dc.citation.spage97
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/zrpfni1468097P
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/462/759.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1669
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу