Репозиторијум Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду
Универзитет у Београду - Правни факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • Преглед записа
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The execution of final judgments and vested rights

Нема приказа
Аутори
Jakšić, Aleksandar
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
The European Court of Human Rights [hereinafter Eur. Ct. H.R.] renders declaratory judgments with which it determines that a violation of a right guaranteed under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [hereinafter ECHR] has occurred. A problem arises when the Eur. Ct. H.R. exceeds its remit and examines a questio facti or questio juris which falls outside the scope of the facts put forward by the parties. This usually takes place in cases in which applicants complain of the failure to enforce res judicata judicial decisions. Because of the excessive length of procedures before the Eur. Ct. H.R. it may occur that, during the period, a third person becomes vested with some property right in assets that is subject to execution by the Defendant State. In such types of cases it is not unusual for the Eur. Ct. H.R. to declare that i) the enforcement is either no longer possible, or ii) it would disproportionately interfere with the rights of thir...d parties. This article considers the clash between the right to have a final judgment fully executed and the right to have vested rights protected. It demonstrates that the Eur. Ct. H.R. has a duty to examine, under all circumstances, whether there has been a violation of Art. 6, even if it had simultaneously determined a violation of Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1. One cannot find the ground in the ECHR's protection system which would empower the Eur. Ct. H.R. to sacrifice the guaranteed right of an individual to have a final judgment fully executed for the benefit of any third party.

Кључне речи:
violation of Art. 6(1) ECHR / vested rights / enforcement of a final judicial decision / deprivation of an acquired property position
Извор:
Russian Law Journal, 2014, 2, 3, 62-79
Издавач:
  • Statut Publ House, Moscow

ISSN: 2309-8678

WoS: 000218663900006

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/812
Колекције
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jakšić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/812
AB  - The European Court of Human Rights [hereinafter Eur. Ct. H.R.] renders declaratory judgments with which it determines that a violation of a right guaranteed under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [hereinafter ECHR] has occurred. A problem arises when the Eur. Ct. H.R. exceeds its remit and examines a questio facti or questio juris which falls outside the scope of the facts put forward by the parties. This usually takes place in cases in which applicants complain of the failure to enforce res judicata judicial decisions. Because of the excessive length of procedures before the Eur. Ct. H.R. it may occur that, during the period, a third person becomes vested with some property right in assets that is subject to execution by the Defendant State. In such types of cases it is not unusual for the Eur. Ct. H.R. to declare that i) the enforcement is either no longer possible, or ii) it would disproportionately interfere with the rights of third parties. This article considers the clash between the right to have a final judgment fully executed and the right to have vested rights protected. It demonstrates that the Eur. Ct. H.R. has a duty to examine, under all circumstances, whether there has been a violation of Art. 6, even if it had simultaneously determined a violation of Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1. One cannot find the ground in the ECHR's protection system which would empower the Eur. Ct. H.R. to sacrifice the guaranteed right of an individual to have a final judgment fully executed for the benefit of any third party.
PB  - Statut Publ House, Moscow
T2  - Russian Law Journal
T1  - The execution of final judgments and vested rights
EP  - 79
IS  - 3
SP  - 62
VL  - 2
UR  - conv_2880
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jakšić, Aleksandar",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The European Court of Human Rights [hereinafter Eur. Ct. H.R.] renders declaratory judgments with which it determines that a violation of a right guaranteed under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [hereinafter ECHR] has occurred. A problem arises when the Eur. Ct. H.R. exceeds its remit and examines a questio facti or questio juris which falls outside the scope of the facts put forward by the parties. This usually takes place in cases in which applicants complain of the failure to enforce res judicata judicial decisions. Because of the excessive length of procedures before the Eur. Ct. H.R. it may occur that, during the period, a third person becomes vested with some property right in assets that is subject to execution by the Defendant State. In such types of cases it is not unusual for the Eur. Ct. H.R. to declare that i) the enforcement is either no longer possible, or ii) it would disproportionately interfere with the rights of third parties. This article considers the clash between the right to have a final judgment fully executed and the right to have vested rights protected. It demonstrates that the Eur. Ct. H.R. has a duty to examine, under all circumstances, whether there has been a violation of Art. 6, even if it had simultaneously determined a violation of Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1. One cannot find the ground in the ECHR's protection system which would empower the Eur. Ct. H.R. to sacrifice the guaranteed right of an individual to have a final judgment fully executed for the benefit of any third party.",
publisher = "Statut Publ House, Moscow",
journal = "Russian Law Journal",
title = "The execution of final judgments and vested rights",
pages = "79-62",
number = "3",
volume = "2",
url = "conv_2880"
}
Jakšić, A.. (2014). The execution of final judgments and vested rights. in Russian Law Journal
Statut Publ House, Moscow., 2(3), 62-79.
conv_2880
Jakšić A. The execution of final judgments and vested rights. in Russian Law Journal. 2014;2(3):62-79.
conv_2880 .
Jakšić, Aleksandar, "The execution of final judgments and vested rights" in Russian Law Journal, 2, no. 3 (2014):62-79,
conv_2880 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумГрупеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB