Most institutions that play crucial role in enforcement of EU law regulating judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation today had existed before the enactment of the Lisbon Treaty, which transformed the nature of European legislation in that area from intergovernmental to supranational. The Lisbon Treaty afforded judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation a pronounced idiosyncrasy: the greatest degree of flexibility of Member State participation. The experience gained in applying the mechanism of enhanced cooperation, including the concept of the European public order, contributes to the utility of the entire body of law on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation as the new unifying factor of the EU.
Keywords:
security and justice / Lisbon treaty / European public order / enhanced cooperation / area of freedom
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2016, 64, 3, 140-153
TY - JOUR
AU - Lukić, Maja
PY - 2016
UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/907
AB - Most institutions that play crucial role in enforcement of EU law regulating judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation today had existed before the enactment of the Lisbon Treaty, which transformed the nature of European legislation in that area from intergovernmental to supranational. The Lisbon Treaty afforded judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation a pronounced idiosyncrasy: the greatest degree of flexibility of Member State participation. The experience gained in applying the mechanism of enhanced cooperation, including the concept of the European public order, contributes to the utility of the entire body of law on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation as the new unifying factor of the EU.
PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2 - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1 - The new theatre of the struggle for EU unity: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation confronts member state sovereignty
EP - 153
IS - 3
SP - 140
VL - 64
DO - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1603140L
UR - conv_410
ER -
@article{
author = "Lukić, Maja",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Most institutions that play crucial role in enforcement of EU law regulating judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation today had existed before the enactment of the Lisbon Treaty, which transformed the nature of European legislation in that area from intergovernmental to supranational. The Lisbon Treaty afforded judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation a pronounced idiosyncrasy: the greatest degree of flexibility of Member State participation. The experience gained in applying the mechanism of enhanced cooperation, including the concept of the European public order, contributes to the utility of the entire body of law on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation as the new unifying factor of the EU.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "The new theatre of the struggle for EU unity: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation confronts member state sovereignty",
pages = "153-140",
number = "3",
volume = "64",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1603140L",
url = "conv_410"
}
Lukić, M.. (2016). The new theatre of the struggle for EU unity: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation confronts member state sovereignty. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 64(3), 140-153.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1603140L
conv_410
Lukić M. The new theatre of the struggle for EU unity: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation confronts member state sovereignty. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2016;64(3):140-153.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1603140L
conv_410 .
Lukić, Maja, "The new theatre of the struggle for EU unity: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation confronts member state sovereignty" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 64, no. 3 (2016):140-153,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1603140L .,
conv_410 .
