Privilegije na brodu u situaciji stečaja brodovlasnika
Maritime liens in case of shipowner's bancruptcy
Апстракт
U članku se uočava nedostatak pravne uređenosti veze stečajnog i plovidbenog prava koja se naročito ispoljava u slučaju stečaja brodovlasnika čiji brod je opterećen privilegijama. U toj situaciji javlja se problem kom pravu dati prednost u primeni - stečajnom ili plovidbenom, s obzirom na to da i jedno i drugo sadrže različita pravila namirenja iz prodajne vrednosti dužnikove imovine. Jednovremena primena ovih pravila je nemoguća, pa je neophodno utvrditi redosled namirenja stečajnih i plovidbenih poverilaca kada je predmet namirenja (brod) nedovoljan za potpuno namirenje svih poverilaca. U tom slučaju, autor se zalaže za primenu plovidbenog prava. Razlog davanja prednosti ovoj grani prava objašnjava se činjenicom da sticalac privilegije na brodu, najčešće, ne može da zna da je nad vlasnikom konkretnog broda otvoren postupak stečaja, a još manje da se nalazi u predstečajnom stanju, pa bi, shodno tome, trebalo da se namiruje mimo stečajnog postupka i njegovih pravila.
In this article author compares two separated branches of law (Admiralty and Bankruptcy) which are connected in case when maritime lien applies on ship whose owner is in bankruptcy. The problem which arises here is to which of two aforementioned branches of law should be given the preference in the application, because these two can't be applied simultaneously. This is because of shortage in value of ship in question which is not enough to settle both admiralty and bankruptcy creditors. Therefore, it is necessary to make the order of priority in which different types of creditors settle their (un)secured claims. Particular problem arises for the claims which are created some short time before and after commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings due to Bankruptcy Law deprives these creditors of secured status. From these reasons, author proposes resolution in preference of Admiralty Law in competition with Bankruptcy Law. The main argument for this reasoning is contained in the fact tha...t maritime lienor doesn't know nor can know that shipowner gets into bankruptcy (or already is in bankruptcy). This conclusion is sup- ported by the fact that maritime lienor usually acquires maritime lien on the ship which is distanced from the owner for miles.
Кључне речи:
Stečajno pravo / redosled namirenja / razlučni i založni poverioci / privilegije na brodu / Plovidbeno pravo / secured creditors / order of priority / maritime lien / Bankruptcy law / Admiralty lawИзвор:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2016, 64, 1, 196-213Издавач:
- Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Janković, Svetislav PY - 2016 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/910 AB - U članku se uočava nedostatak pravne uređenosti veze stečajnog i plovidbenog prava koja se naročito ispoljava u slučaju stečaja brodovlasnika čiji brod je opterećen privilegijama. U toj situaciji javlja se problem kom pravu dati prednost u primeni - stečajnom ili plovidbenom, s obzirom na to da i jedno i drugo sadrže različita pravila namirenja iz prodajne vrednosti dužnikove imovine. Jednovremena primena ovih pravila je nemoguća, pa je neophodno utvrditi redosled namirenja stečajnih i plovidbenih poverilaca kada je predmet namirenja (brod) nedovoljan za potpuno namirenje svih poverilaca. U tom slučaju, autor se zalaže za primenu plovidbenog prava. Razlog davanja prednosti ovoj grani prava objašnjava se činjenicom da sticalac privilegije na brodu, najčešće, ne može da zna da je nad vlasnikom konkretnog broda otvoren postupak stečaja, a još manje da se nalazi u predstečajnom stanju, pa bi, shodno tome, trebalo da se namiruje mimo stečajnog postupka i njegovih pravila. AB - In this article author compares two separated branches of law (Admiralty and Bankruptcy) which are connected in case when maritime lien applies on ship whose owner is in bankruptcy. The problem which arises here is to which of two aforementioned branches of law should be given the preference in the application, because these two can't be applied simultaneously. This is because of shortage in value of ship in question which is not enough to settle both admiralty and bankruptcy creditors. Therefore, it is necessary to make the order of priority in which different types of creditors settle their (un)secured claims. Particular problem arises for the claims which are created some short time before and after commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings due to Bankruptcy Law deprives these creditors of secured status. From these reasons, author proposes resolution in preference of Admiralty Law in competition with Bankruptcy Law. The main argument for this reasoning is contained in the fact that maritime lienor doesn't know nor can know that shipowner gets into bankruptcy (or already is in bankruptcy). This conclusion is sup- ported by the fact that maritime lienor usually acquires maritime lien on the ship which is distanced from the owner for miles. PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd T2 - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu T1 - Privilegije na brodu u situaciji stečaja brodovlasnika T1 - Maritime liens in case of shipowner's bancruptcy EP - 213 IS - 1 SP - 196 VL - 64 DO - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1601196J UR - conv_396 ER -
@article{ author = "Janković, Svetislav", year = "2016", abstract = "U članku se uočava nedostatak pravne uređenosti veze stečajnog i plovidbenog prava koja se naročito ispoljava u slučaju stečaja brodovlasnika čiji brod je opterećen privilegijama. U toj situaciji javlja se problem kom pravu dati prednost u primeni - stečajnom ili plovidbenom, s obzirom na to da i jedno i drugo sadrže različita pravila namirenja iz prodajne vrednosti dužnikove imovine. Jednovremena primena ovih pravila je nemoguća, pa je neophodno utvrditi redosled namirenja stečajnih i plovidbenih poverilaca kada je predmet namirenja (brod) nedovoljan za potpuno namirenje svih poverilaca. U tom slučaju, autor se zalaže za primenu plovidbenog prava. Razlog davanja prednosti ovoj grani prava objašnjava se činjenicom da sticalac privilegije na brodu, najčešće, ne može da zna da je nad vlasnikom konkretnog broda otvoren postupak stečaja, a još manje da se nalazi u predstečajnom stanju, pa bi, shodno tome, trebalo da se namiruje mimo stečajnog postupka i njegovih pravila., In this article author compares two separated branches of law (Admiralty and Bankruptcy) which are connected in case when maritime lien applies on ship whose owner is in bankruptcy. The problem which arises here is to which of two aforementioned branches of law should be given the preference in the application, because these two can't be applied simultaneously. This is because of shortage in value of ship in question which is not enough to settle both admiralty and bankruptcy creditors. Therefore, it is necessary to make the order of priority in which different types of creditors settle their (un)secured claims. Particular problem arises for the claims which are created some short time before and after commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings due to Bankruptcy Law deprives these creditors of secured status. From these reasons, author proposes resolution in preference of Admiralty Law in competition with Bankruptcy Law. The main argument for this reasoning is contained in the fact that maritime lienor doesn't know nor can know that shipowner gets into bankruptcy (or already is in bankruptcy). This conclusion is sup- ported by the fact that maritime lienor usually acquires maritime lien on the ship which is distanced from the owner for miles.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd", journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu", title = "Privilegije na brodu u situaciji stečaja brodovlasnika, Maritime liens in case of shipowner's bancruptcy", pages = "213-196", number = "1", volume = "64", doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1601196J", url = "conv_396" }
Janković, S.. (2016). Privilegije na brodu u situaciji stečaja brodovlasnika. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 64(1), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1601196J conv_396
Janković S. Privilegije na brodu u situaciji stečaja brodovlasnika. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2016;64(1):196-213. doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1601196J conv_396 .
Janković, Svetislav, "Privilegije na brodu u situaciji stečaja brodovlasnika" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 64, no. 1 (2016):196-213, https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1601196J ., conv_396 .