Репозиторијум Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду
Универзитет у Београду - Правни факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • Преглед записа
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The title of samoderzhets (autokrator) in Serbia and Russia: two ways of Byzantine heritage development

Thumbnail
2017
Преузимање 🢃
951.pdf (617.1Kb)
Аутори
Kršljanin, Nina
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
The title of autokrator first appeared in the Rhomaian Empire (Byzantium). Translated as samoderzhets, it was taken up by Slavic countries that followed Rhomaian tradition. Taking as her starting point the indispensable 1935 work by George Ostrogorsky Autokrator and Samoderzhets, the author has analysed similarities and differences in the development of the title of samoderzhets in Serbia and Russia. Three phases have been analysed, of which the first two in more detail: the beginning of the use of this title; the development of the title and its significance; the diverging of the ways of Serbia and Russia. The first phase shows that the adoption of the title in both countries is preceded by both an increase of the country's actual power and the improvement of its position among other Christian (Orthodox) countries. A significant difference appears in the second phase: Serbian kings have used the title of samoderzhets, but it was no longer in use after Stefan Dusan's coronation as Empe...ror; after the fall of the Empire, Serbian rulers began to use it again. In Russia it was the other way around: the use of the title was more frequent after Ivan IV's coronation. It seems that the title was mainly used in Serbia to underline independence where there was no obvious proof for it, and thus was not needed during the Serbian Empire, while Russian rulers, on the contrary, used it only when they had earned it through the actual power of their country. In the third phase both countries abandoned the Rhomaian model. Russia turned to Western models from the time of Peter I, while the development of Serbia was interrupted by its fall under Ottoman rule.

Кључне речи:
title / Serbia / samoderzhets / Russia / medieval law / Byzantium (Rhomaian Empire) / autokrator / autocracy
Извор:
Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet-Vestnik-Seriya 4-Istoriya Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 2017, 22, 5, 162-183
Издавач:
  • Volgograd State Univ, Volgograd

DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.5.16

ISSN: 1998-9938

WoS: 000416998200016

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/954
Колекције
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kršljanin, Nina
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/954
AB  - The title of autokrator first appeared in the Rhomaian Empire (Byzantium). Translated as samoderzhets, it was taken up by Slavic countries that followed Rhomaian tradition. Taking as her starting point the indispensable 1935 work by George Ostrogorsky Autokrator and Samoderzhets, the author has analysed similarities and differences in the development of the title of samoderzhets in Serbia and Russia. Three phases have been analysed, of which the first two in more detail: the beginning of the use of this title; the development of the title and its significance; the diverging of the ways of Serbia and Russia. The first phase shows that the adoption of the title in both countries is preceded by both an increase of the country's actual power and the improvement of its position among other Christian (Orthodox) countries. A significant difference appears in the second phase: Serbian kings have used the title of samoderzhets, but it was no longer in use after Stefan Dusan's coronation as Emperor; after the fall of the Empire, Serbian rulers began to use it again. In Russia it was the other way around: the use of the title was more frequent after Ivan IV's coronation. It seems that the title was mainly used in Serbia to underline independence where there was no obvious proof for it, and thus was not needed during the Serbian Empire, while Russian rulers, on the contrary, used it only when they had earned it through the actual power of their country. In the third phase both countries abandoned the Rhomaian model. Russia turned to Western models from the time of Peter I, while the development of Serbia was interrupted by its fall under Ottoman rule.
PB  - Volgograd State Univ, Volgograd
T2  - Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet-Vestnik-Seriya 4-Istoriya Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya
T1  - The title of samoderzhets (autokrator) in Serbia and Russia: two ways of Byzantine heritage development
EP  - 183
IS  - 5
SP  - 162
VL  - 22
DO  - 10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.5.16
UR  - conv_2966
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kršljanin, Nina",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The title of autokrator first appeared in the Rhomaian Empire (Byzantium). Translated as samoderzhets, it was taken up by Slavic countries that followed Rhomaian tradition. Taking as her starting point the indispensable 1935 work by George Ostrogorsky Autokrator and Samoderzhets, the author has analysed similarities and differences in the development of the title of samoderzhets in Serbia and Russia. Three phases have been analysed, of which the first two in more detail: the beginning of the use of this title; the development of the title and its significance; the diverging of the ways of Serbia and Russia. The first phase shows that the adoption of the title in both countries is preceded by both an increase of the country's actual power and the improvement of its position among other Christian (Orthodox) countries. A significant difference appears in the second phase: Serbian kings have used the title of samoderzhets, but it was no longer in use after Stefan Dusan's coronation as Emperor; after the fall of the Empire, Serbian rulers began to use it again. In Russia it was the other way around: the use of the title was more frequent after Ivan IV's coronation. It seems that the title was mainly used in Serbia to underline independence where there was no obvious proof for it, and thus was not needed during the Serbian Empire, while Russian rulers, on the contrary, used it only when they had earned it through the actual power of their country. In the third phase both countries abandoned the Rhomaian model. Russia turned to Western models from the time of Peter I, while the development of Serbia was interrupted by its fall under Ottoman rule.",
publisher = "Volgograd State Univ, Volgograd",
journal = "Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet-Vestnik-Seriya 4-Istoriya Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya",
title = "The title of samoderzhets (autokrator) in Serbia and Russia: two ways of Byzantine heritage development",
pages = "183-162",
number = "5",
volume = "22",
doi = "10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.5.16",
url = "conv_2966"
}
Kršljanin, N.. (2017). The title of samoderzhets (autokrator) in Serbia and Russia: two ways of Byzantine heritage development. in Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet-Vestnik-Seriya 4-Istoriya Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya
Volgograd State Univ, Volgograd., 22(5), 162-183.
https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.5.16
conv_2966
Kršljanin N. The title of samoderzhets (autokrator) in Serbia and Russia: two ways of Byzantine heritage development. in Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet-Vestnik-Seriya 4-Istoriya Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya. 2017;22(5):162-183.
doi:10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.5.16
conv_2966 .
Kršljanin, Nina, "The title of samoderzhets (autokrator) in Serbia and Russia: two ways of Byzantine heritage development" in Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet-Vestnik-Seriya 4-Istoriya Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 22, no. 5 (2017):162-183,
https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2017.5.16 .,
conv_2966 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумГрупеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB