Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorJovanović, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T14:52:33Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T14:52:33Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/960
dc.description.abstractAllen Buchanan offered the first systematic account of secession, and contributed to the normative classification of the growing body of literature in this field of study. Apart from the unilateral right to secession, Buchanan acknowledges the ‘consensual’ type of secession, which ‘results either from a negotiated agreement between the state and the secessionists or through constitutional processes’. This sub-type of consensual secession may take the forms of, first, an explicit constitutional right to secession; and second, an implicit constitutional right to secession, recognised as such through the process of constitutional interpretation, by the respective constitutional tribunal, and subsequently legally spelled out through an adequate constitutional amending formula. Buchanan initially divides all normative theories into two groupRemedial Right Only Theory and Primary Right Theories. This chapter examines whether the recent case of the consensual secession of Montenegro can contribute to creating such practice.en
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceOn the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation
dc.titleConsensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?en
dc.typebookPart
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage148
dc.citation.other: 133-148
dc.citation.spage133
dc.identifier.doi10.4324/9781315247656-8
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3375
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145512579
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу