Приказ основних података о документу

Contract and judgement

dc.creatorĐurđević, Marko
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T14:53:33Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T14:53:33Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0354-3501
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/972
dc.description.abstractUgovor i presuda su dva pojedinačna pravna akta koja stvaraju pojedinačne pravne norme i dva različita načina uređenja društvenih od- nosa. Oni se susreću kada se pred sudom pojavi spor u vezi sa ugovorom. U opštim odredbama o ugovoru u Zakonu o obligacionim odnosima uočava se da ova pravila određuju nekoliko funkcija koje sudija ima u odnosu na ugovor. Svrha ovoga rada je da se utvrdi povezanost tih funkcija i ugovora kao pravne norme. U tom cilju analizirane su dve vrste zakonskih odredaba, one o nevažnosti ugovora u kojima je naglašeno da sud pazi na ništavost po službenoj dužnosti i one po kojima sud može, pod određenim pretpostavkama, da izmeni ugovor. U analizu su bile uključene i funkcije koje sudiji normalno pripadaju: da tumači sporne ugovorne odredbe i odlučuje o pravnozaštitnom zahtevu. U radu je pokazano da su te funkcije vezane ili za važenje ili efikasnost ili pravičnost ugovorne norme.sr
dc.description.abstractContract and judgment are two individual legal acts creating individual legal norms. They represent two different ways of regulating social relations. Contract and judgment are faced when judge has to deal with the case involving contracts. It can be noticed that norms of general part of the Law on Contracts and Torts regulating contracts define several functions belonging to judge in relation to contracts. The aim of this paper is to determine connection between these functions and contracts as legal norms. For that purpose two types of rules are analyzed. On the one hand, the study focuses on invalid contracts provisions that emphasize judge ex officio duty to pay due attention on contract nullity, and on the other hand, on provisions that authorize judge to perform modification of contracts, under certain conditions. The analysis also involves the functions that judge is normally entitled to, such as interpretation of disputed contract's norms, and deciding on legal claim. The paper shows that these functions are attached to one of three features of contract's norm: validity, efficiency or equity.en
dc.publisherUdruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePravo i privreda
dc.subjectvaženje ugovorasr
dc.subjectugovorsr
dc.subjecttumačenje ugovorasr
dc.subjectsadržina ugovorasr
dc.subjectpresudasr
dc.subjectpojedinačni pravni aktsr
dc.subjectizvršenje ugovorasr
dc.subjectvalidity of contracten
dc.subjectperformance of contracten
dc.subjectjudgmenten
dc.subjectinterpretation of contracten
dc.subjectindividual legal acten
dc.subjectcontracten
dc.subjectcontent of contracten
dc.titleUgovor i presudasr
dc.titleContract and judgementen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage74
dc.citation.issue7-9
dc.citation.other55(7-9): 58-74
dc.citation.rankM51
dc.citation.spage58
dc.citation.volume55
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2215
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу