TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1389
AB  - U radu se razmatra problematika pravne prirode i dokaznog značaja podataka pribavljenih nadzorom i dekodiranjem kriptovanih komunikacionih platformi EncroChat i Sky ECC. Prvi deo rada bavi se načinom na koji je sproveden nadzor nad ovim platformama, pravnom uporištu takvih radnji, pravnom osnovu za dostavljanje pribavljenih podataka drugim državama, njihovoj oceni i daljoj upotrebi u krivičnom postupku. U drugom delu bavimo se pravnom prirodom pribavljenih podataka kroz dilemu da li se radilo o ciljanom nadzoru u krivičnom postupku ili masovnom nadzoru sprovedenom od strane obaveštajnih službi kao i praksom ESLJP vezanom za ova pitanja i zaštitu člana 8 EKLJP. Imajući u vidu da mnogi podaci vezani za otkrivanje i obelodanjivanje ovih platformi još uvek nisu dostupni javnosti, analiza je mahom rađena na osnovu raspoloživih izveštaja pojedinih organizacija i odluka donetih od strane sudova u Nemačkoj i Velikoj Britaniji.
AB  - Technological development and new forms of crime require redefinition of existing legal frameworks at domestic and international level. EncroChat and SkyEcc cases highlighted these problems, throwing the courts before the old Packer's dilemma, whether to give priority to crime control or due process model. While the protection of citizens' rights prevailed for many years, guided by the maxims that "the democracy of a society is measured by the provisions of its criminal procedure" and that "it is better 100 guilty persons to escape than that one innocent person suffer" it seems that in the era of information technologies, another model prevails, legitimizing almost unimaginable concepts such as mass surveillance of communications with derogation of the principle of territorial sovereignty. The "problem" escalated and came to the attention of many European countries after the "breaking" of the communication platforms EncroChat and SKY Ecc, which certainly contributed to the detection (and prevention) of numerous criminal acts by criminal groups, while at the same time opened many questions, starting from the method of discovering communication, delivering material to other countries and using it in criminal proceedings, the validity and admissibility of the so-called of "mass surveillance" that affects not only "criminals" but also "ordinary citizens", i.e. all users of certain communication platforms. The first part of the paper deals with the issues how these networks were break down, the legal basis for such actions, the legal basis for providing the obtained data to other countries, their evaluation and further use in criminal proceedings. As different countries have different procedural rules, the question is whether a domestic judge is authorized to evaluate the legality of evidence obtained abroad and according to what criteria? In this regard, a distinction is made between EU member states where European investigative orders and the principle of mutual recognition apply and other countries in the system of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters. In the second part, we deal with the legal nature of the obtained data through the dilemma of whether it was targeted surveillance in criminal proceedings, or mass surveillance carried out by the intelligence services, as well as the ECtHR's practice related to these issues. Bearing in mind that these investigations are still under the "veil of silence", the study was based on Europol/Eurojust data and few publicly available decisions of courts in Germany and the United Kingdom about the admissibility of these evidence.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Crimen (Beograd)
T1  - EncroChat i SKY ECC komunikacija kao dokaz u krivičnom postupku
T1  - Evidence from the EncroChat and SKY ECC encrypted phones
EP  - 179
IS  - 2
SP  - 154
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.5937/crimen2202154B
UR  - conv_2800
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U radu se razmatra problematika pravne prirode i dokaznog značaja podataka pribavljenih nadzorom i dekodiranjem kriptovanih komunikacionih platformi EncroChat i Sky ECC. Prvi deo rada bavi se načinom na koji je sproveden nadzor nad ovim platformama, pravnom uporištu takvih radnji, pravnom osnovu za dostavljanje pribavljenih podataka drugim državama, njihovoj oceni i daljoj upotrebi u krivičnom postupku. U drugom delu bavimo se pravnom prirodom pribavljenih podataka kroz dilemu da li se radilo o ciljanom nadzoru u krivičnom postupku ili masovnom nadzoru sprovedenom od strane obaveštajnih službi kao i praksom ESLJP vezanom za ova pitanja i zaštitu člana 8 EKLJP. Imajući u vidu da mnogi podaci vezani za otkrivanje i obelodanjivanje ovih platformi još uvek nisu dostupni javnosti, analiza je mahom rađena na osnovu raspoloživih izveštaja pojedinih organizacija i odluka donetih od strane sudova u Nemačkoj i Velikoj Britaniji., Technological development and new forms of crime require redefinition of existing legal frameworks at domestic and international level. EncroChat and SkyEcc cases highlighted these problems, throwing the courts before the old Packer's dilemma, whether to give priority to crime control or due process model. While the protection of citizens' rights prevailed for many years, guided by the maxims that "the democracy of a society is measured by the provisions of its criminal procedure" and that "it is better 100 guilty persons to escape than that one innocent person suffer" it seems that in the era of information technologies, another model prevails, legitimizing almost unimaginable concepts such as mass surveillance of communications with derogation of the principle of territorial sovereignty. The "problem" escalated and came to the attention of many European countries after the "breaking" of the communication platforms EncroChat and SKY Ecc, which certainly contributed to the detection (and prevention) of numerous criminal acts by criminal groups, while at the same time opened many questions, starting from the method of discovering communication, delivering material to other countries and using it in criminal proceedings, the validity and admissibility of the so-called of "mass surveillance" that affects not only "criminals" but also "ordinary citizens", i.e. all users of certain communication platforms. The first part of the paper deals with the issues how these networks were break down, the legal basis for such actions, the legal basis for providing the obtained data to other countries, their evaluation and further use in criminal proceedings. As different countries have different procedural rules, the question is whether a domestic judge is authorized to evaluate the legality of evidence obtained abroad and according to what criteria? In this regard, a distinction is made between EU member states where European investigative orders and the principle of mutual recognition apply and other countries in the system of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters. In the second part, we deal with the legal nature of the obtained data through the dilemma of whether it was targeted surveillance in criminal proceedings, or mass surveillance carried out by the intelligence services, as well as the ECtHR's practice related to these issues. Bearing in mind that these investigations are still under the "veil of silence", the study was based on Europol/Eurojust data and few publicly available decisions of courts in Germany and the United Kingdom about the admissibility of these evidence.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Crimen (Beograd)",
title = "EncroChat i SKY ECC komunikacija kao dokaz u krivičnom postupku, Evidence from the EncroChat and SKY ECC encrypted phones",
pages = "179-154",
number = "2",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.5937/crimen2202154B",
url = "conv_2800"
}

Bajović, V.. (2022). EncroChat i SKY ECC komunikacija kao dokaz u krivičnom postupku. in Crimen (Beograd)
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd., 13(2), 154-179.
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2202154B
conv_2800

Bajović V. EncroChat i SKY ECC komunikacija kao dokaz u krivičnom postupku. in Crimen (Beograd). 2022;13(2):154-179.
doi:10.5937/crimen2202154B
conv_2800 .

Bajović, Vanja, "EncroChat i SKY ECC komunikacija kao dokaz u krivičnom postupku" in Crimen (Beograd), 13, no. 2 (2022):154-179,
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2202154B .,
conv_2800 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1099
AB  - Američki institut sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela uveden je u naše pravo 2009. godine sa primarnim ciljem da se postupci pojednostave, učine efikasnijim i bržim, a sudovi i tužilaštva rasterete prevelikog broja predmeta. Kako ovaj institut pogoduje svim procesnim akterima kritike na njegov račun u našoj teoriji su retke, čime se prećutkuje činjenica da se njime zarad efikasnoti žrtvuje činjenična tačnost. Osnovno pitanje ove analize je da li je tačna konstatacija pojedinih američkih autora da je nagodba zapravo " savršen sistem za osudu nevinih"? U vezi sa tim razmatraju se pitanja da li i zašto i nevina lica priznaju krivicu, u kojoj meri stroga kaznena politika pogoduje zaključivanju sporazuma i na koji način tužioci koriste zaključene sporazume u cilju olakšavanja dokaznog tereta u drugim predmetima.
AB  - Plea bargaining is a procedural mechanism through which criminal case is resolved without trial, by consensus of the parties. The agreement consists of the defendant pleading guilty in exchange for prosecutor's promise to charge him less serious than is supported by the evidence, not to charge him for some crimes or to request certain sentence. Plea bargaining is product and significant part of the American criminal justice, where the vast majority of criminal cases are settled on that way. This institute was introduced in Serbian law in 2009, with the aim to simplify criminal procedure, making it more efficient and faster. In the Article is discussed the extent of plea bargaining's innocence problem. The basic question is whether is true the statement of Professor Alshuler that a plea bargaining is " a nearly perfect system for convicting the innocent". In regard with that, the questions that are discussed are why innocent plead guilty, whether policy of 'zero tolerance ' on criminality favour plea agreements, haw the prosecutor becomes the most importunate figure of the criminal justice system etc. According to Serbian CPC defence is not allowed to cross-examine co-defendant who is already convicted or prosecuted in severed criminal proceedings, but instead of that judge just read the transcript of his testimony (Art. 406). The Highest Court of Cassation even more broadened the effects of this problematic provision, allowing as evidence against defendant the statement of co-defendant given in the plea agreement, instead of his direct examination! in the last part of the paper is analysed this problematic view and the extended effect of plea agreement in Serbian case law.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Tamna strana sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela
T1  - Dark side of the plea bargaining
EP  - 251
IS  - 1
SP  - 233
VL  - 53
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns53-21955
UR  - conv_2584
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Američki institut sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela uveden je u naše pravo 2009. godine sa primarnim ciljem da se postupci pojednostave, učine efikasnijim i bržim, a sudovi i tužilaštva rasterete prevelikog broja predmeta. Kako ovaj institut pogoduje svim procesnim akterima kritike na njegov račun u našoj teoriji su retke, čime se prećutkuje činjenica da se njime zarad efikasnoti žrtvuje činjenična tačnost. Osnovno pitanje ove analize je da li je tačna konstatacija pojedinih američkih autora da je nagodba zapravo " savršen sistem za osudu nevinih"? U vezi sa tim razmatraju se pitanja da li i zašto i nevina lica priznaju krivicu, u kojoj meri stroga kaznena politika pogoduje zaključivanju sporazuma i na koji način tužioci koriste zaključene sporazume u cilju olakšavanja dokaznog tereta u drugim predmetima., Plea bargaining is a procedural mechanism through which criminal case is resolved without trial, by consensus of the parties. The agreement consists of the defendant pleading guilty in exchange for prosecutor's promise to charge him less serious than is supported by the evidence, not to charge him for some crimes or to request certain sentence. Plea bargaining is product and significant part of the American criminal justice, where the vast majority of criminal cases are settled on that way. This institute was introduced in Serbian law in 2009, with the aim to simplify criminal procedure, making it more efficient and faster. In the Article is discussed the extent of plea bargaining's innocence problem. The basic question is whether is true the statement of Professor Alshuler that a plea bargaining is " a nearly perfect system for convicting the innocent". In regard with that, the questions that are discussed are why innocent plead guilty, whether policy of 'zero tolerance ' on criminality favour plea agreements, haw the prosecutor becomes the most importunate figure of the criminal justice system etc. According to Serbian CPC defence is not allowed to cross-examine co-defendant who is already convicted or prosecuted in severed criminal proceedings, but instead of that judge just read the transcript of his testimony (Art. 406). The Highest Court of Cassation even more broadened the effects of this problematic provision, allowing as evidence against defendant the statement of co-defendant given in the plea agreement, instead of his direct examination! in the last part of the paper is analysed this problematic view and the extended effect of plea agreement in Serbian case law.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Tamna strana sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela, Dark side of the plea bargaining",
pages = "251-233",
number = "1",
volume = "53",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns53-21955",
url = "conv_2584"
}

Bajović, V.. (2019). Tamna strana sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 53(1), 233-251.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns53-21955
conv_2584

Bajović V. Tamna strana sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2019;53(1):233-251.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns53-21955
conv_2584 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Tamna strana sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 53, no. 1 (2019):233-251,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns53-21955 .,
conv_2584 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vuković, Igor
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/992
AB  - Pomilovanje predstavlja akt 'milosti' predsednika Srbije, kojim se određeno lice poimenično oslobađa od krivičnog gonjenja, potpuno ili delimično oslobađa od izvršenja kazne, izrečena kazna mu se zamenjuje blažom kaznom ili uslovnom osudom ili mu se daje rehabilitacija. U radu se razmatraju pojedina sporna pitanja u vezi sa tim institutom i njegovom praktičnom primenom. Da li se delimično oslobađanje od izvršenja kazne mora kretati u granicama predviđenim Krivičnim zakonikom za ublažavanje kazne po meri? Može li se aktom pomilovanja odrediti izvršenje izrečene kazne zatvora u kućnim uslovima? Da li se abolicija odnosno oslobađanje od krivičnog gonjenja može opravdati pravnim argumentima ili je zasnovana prevashodno na razlozima političke prirode? Da li se izrečena kazna može zameniti kaznom blažom po meri ili se taj vid milosti odnosi samo na zamenu izrečene kazne blažom vrstom kazne? Može li se aktom pomilovanja izrečena zatvorska kazna zameniti uslovnom osudom? Cilj analize je da odgovorom na ta pitanja pruži određene smernice za primenu i bolje razumevanje instituta pomilovanja.
AB  - The granting of a pardon to a person who has committed a criminal offence or who has been convicted of a criminal offence is an act of mercy vested in heads of the President of Republic. According to the Criminal Code, pardon shall release a specifically named person from criminal prosecution and grant full or partial remittance of punishment, replace the pronounced penalty by a lighter penalty or suspended sentence, grant rehabilitation, order shorter duration of legal consequences of conviction or repeal particular or all legal consequences of conviction. Contrary to many comparative jurisdictions, Serbian President is vested with the power to release defendant from criminal prosecution, what is considered as a special form of pardon, so-called 'abolition'. Although rarely implemented in the practice, such solution is strongly criticized by the author, given the fact that it is motivated more with political than with the legal reasons, and practically means intrusion of executive power in the domain of judicial branches. In the paper are further analyzed particular forms of pardon mentioned above and certain disputable issues related to them. The pardon is mainly granted in the form of partial remittance from the execution of punishment, but the question is whether such remittance must be within the limits prescribed by the CC related to the mitigation of punishment? Whether is possible for the President to grant by the act of pardon execution of prison sentence at prisoner home, under certain condition? Whether is possible to substitute pronounced prison sentence with suspended sentence by an act of pardon? In addition to that, the authors also deal with issues of pardon that repeal or order shorter duration of certain security measures, grant rehabilitation or alter legal consequences of conviction.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Sadržina pomilovanja i pojedine nedoumice u njegovoj primeni
T1  - Content of pardon and some doubts regarding its implementation
EP  - 81
IS  - 1
SP  - 59
VL  - 65
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1701059V
UR  - conv_416
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vuković, Igor and Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Pomilovanje predstavlja akt 'milosti' predsednika Srbije, kojim se određeno lice poimenično oslobađa od krivičnog gonjenja, potpuno ili delimično oslobađa od izvršenja kazne, izrečena kazna mu se zamenjuje blažom kaznom ili uslovnom osudom ili mu se daje rehabilitacija. U radu se razmatraju pojedina sporna pitanja u vezi sa tim institutom i njegovom praktičnom primenom. Da li se delimično oslobađanje od izvršenja kazne mora kretati u granicama predviđenim Krivičnim zakonikom za ublažavanje kazne po meri? Može li se aktom pomilovanja odrediti izvršenje izrečene kazne zatvora u kućnim uslovima? Da li se abolicija odnosno oslobađanje od krivičnog gonjenja može opravdati pravnim argumentima ili je zasnovana prevashodno na razlozima političke prirode? Da li se izrečena kazna može zameniti kaznom blažom po meri ili se taj vid milosti odnosi samo na zamenu izrečene kazne blažom vrstom kazne? Može li se aktom pomilovanja izrečena zatvorska kazna zameniti uslovnom osudom? Cilj analize je da odgovorom na ta pitanja pruži određene smernice za primenu i bolje razumevanje instituta pomilovanja., The granting of a pardon to a person who has committed a criminal offence or who has been convicted of a criminal offence is an act of mercy vested in heads of the President of Republic. According to the Criminal Code, pardon shall release a specifically named person from criminal prosecution and grant full or partial remittance of punishment, replace the pronounced penalty by a lighter penalty or suspended sentence, grant rehabilitation, order shorter duration of legal consequences of conviction or repeal particular or all legal consequences of conviction. Contrary to many comparative jurisdictions, Serbian President is vested with the power to release defendant from criminal prosecution, what is considered as a special form of pardon, so-called 'abolition'. Although rarely implemented in the practice, such solution is strongly criticized by the author, given the fact that it is motivated more with political than with the legal reasons, and practically means intrusion of executive power in the domain of judicial branches. In the paper are further analyzed particular forms of pardon mentioned above and certain disputable issues related to them. The pardon is mainly granted in the form of partial remittance from the execution of punishment, but the question is whether such remittance must be within the limits prescribed by the CC related to the mitigation of punishment? Whether is possible for the President to grant by the act of pardon execution of prison sentence at prisoner home, under certain condition? Whether is possible to substitute pronounced prison sentence with suspended sentence by an act of pardon? In addition to that, the authors also deal with issues of pardon that repeal or order shorter duration of certain security measures, grant rehabilitation or alter legal consequences of conviction.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Sadržina pomilovanja i pojedine nedoumice u njegovoj primeni, Content of pardon and some doubts regarding its implementation",
pages = "81-59",
number = "1",
volume = "65",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1701059V",
url = "conv_416"
}

Vuković, I.,& Bajović, V.. (2017). Sadržina pomilovanja i pojedine nedoumice u njegovoj primeni. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 65(1), 59-81.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1701059V
conv_416

Vuković I, Bajović V. Sadržina pomilovanja i pojedine nedoumice u njegovoj primeni. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2017;65(1):59-81.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1701059V
conv_416 .

Vuković, Igor, Bajović, Vanja, "Sadržina pomilovanja i pojedine nedoumice u njegovoj primeni" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 65, no. 1 (2017):59-81,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1701059V .,
conv_416 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/990
AB  - U radu se razmatra pitanje legitimnosti i efikasnosti krivičnih dela vezanih za opojne droge, sa posebnim akcentom na delo iz člana 246a KZ-a. Za razliku od ponašanja koja su u svakom društvu, vremenu ili sistemu smatrana moralno i društveno neprihvatljivim, stavovi prema korišćenju opojnih droga su prilično ambivalentni i do njihove zabrane dolazi tek u XX veku, kada se razvija svest o njihovoj štetnosti. Međutim pedesetogodišnja praksa je pokazala da se korišćenje opojnih droga ne može iskoreniti strogom kaznenom politikom, a da je zabranom određenih supstanci za kojima postoji potražnja, njihovo tržište samo prebačeno u ruke organizovanih kriminalnih grupa. Poslednjih godina sve su jači glasovi za ublažavanjem pristupa, što ima odjeka u zakonima mnogih zemalja. Na narkomaniju počinje da se gleda kao na zdravstveni, a ne krivičnopravni problem i sve više se insistira na merama lečenja i odvikavanja, umesto na kažnjavanje korisnika. Ova problematika retko je razmatrana u našoj javnosti, ali veliki broj zatvorenika zbog krivičnih dela vezanih za opojne droge, kao i konstantno prisustvo droga na crnom tržištu uprkos strogim kaznama, ukazuje na neophodnost da joj se posveti pažnja.
AB  - The paper deals with the issue whether the measures of criminal justice are an adequate weapon in the 'war against illegal drugs'. Unlike the behaviors that are in every society, time or system perceived morally and socially unacceptable (murder, theft, rape, etc.), attitudes toward illegal drugs are rather ambivalent. Psychoactive substances have accompanied humanity throughout its whole history. Some of them, such as alcohol or tobacco are legally accepted, others are recognized and prescribed as medicines, and some are legally prohibited. Despite the prohibition, every year hundreds of millions people around the world use illicit drugs, and predominant approach of governments around the world is to punish and criminalize them. But such approach and prohibitions only created a criminal market which will exist as long as there is a demand for illegal drugs. Particularly problematic is criminalization of the possession of small quantities of drugs for personal use, since there is no harm to others, and person should be free to decide about its own health. The first part of paper explains the history of the prohibition of illegal drugs. In the second part are analyzed the consequences of the prohibition, and after that are presented a new more liberal tendencies. Fourth part gives a comparative drug policy and in the last part is analyzed Serbian law, where possession of small quantities of illegal drugs was criminalized in 2003, contrary to overall global tendencies toward decriminalization.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Crimen (Beograd)
T1  - Zloupotreba opojnih droga i legitimnost krivičnopravne zaštite
T1  - Nonefficiency of criminal justice to deal with illegal drugs
EP  - 538
IS  - 3
SP  - 517
VL  - 8
UR  - conv_2781
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U radu se razmatra pitanje legitimnosti i efikasnosti krivičnih dela vezanih za opojne droge, sa posebnim akcentom na delo iz člana 246a KZ-a. Za razliku od ponašanja koja su u svakom društvu, vremenu ili sistemu smatrana moralno i društveno neprihvatljivim, stavovi prema korišćenju opojnih droga su prilično ambivalentni i do njihove zabrane dolazi tek u XX veku, kada se razvija svest o njihovoj štetnosti. Međutim pedesetogodišnja praksa je pokazala da se korišćenje opojnih droga ne može iskoreniti strogom kaznenom politikom, a da je zabranom određenih supstanci za kojima postoji potražnja, njihovo tržište samo prebačeno u ruke organizovanih kriminalnih grupa. Poslednjih godina sve su jači glasovi za ublažavanjem pristupa, što ima odjeka u zakonima mnogih zemalja. Na narkomaniju počinje da se gleda kao na zdravstveni, a ne krivičnopravni problem i sve više se insistira na merama lečenja i odvikavanja, umesto na kažnjavanje korisnika. Ova problematika retko je razmatrana u našoj javnosti, ali veliki broj zatvorenika zbog krivičnih dela vezanih za opojne droge, kao i konstantno prisustvo droga na crnom tržištu uprkos strogim kaznama, ukazuje na neophodnost da joj se posveti pažnja., The paper deals with the issue whether the measures of criminal justice are an adequate weapon in the 'war against illegal drugs'. Unlike the behaviors that are in every society, time or system perceived morally and socially unacceptable (murder, theft, rape, etc.), attitudes toward illegal drugs are rather ambivalent. Psychoactive substances have accompanied humanity throughout its whole history. Some of them, such as alcohol or tobacco are legally accepted, others are recognized and prescribed as medicines, and some are legally prohibited. Despite the prohibition, every year hundreds of millions people around the world use illicit drugs, and predominant approach of governments around the world is to punish and criminalize them. But such approach and prohibitions only created a criminal market which will exist as long as there is a demand for illegal drugs. Particularly problematic is criminalization of the possession of small quantities of drugs for personal use, since there is no harm to others, and person should be free to decide about its own health. The first part of paper explains the history of the prohibition of illegal drugs. In the second part are analyzed the consequences of the prohibition, and after that are presented a new more liberal tendencies. Fourth part gives a comparative drug policy and in the last part is analyzed Serbian law, where possession of small quantities of illegal drugs was criminalized in 2003, contrary to overall global tendencies toward decriminalization.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Crimen (Beograd)",
title = "Zloupotreba opojnih droga i legitimnost krivičnopravne zaštite, Nonefficiency of criminal justice to deal with illegal drugs",
pages = "538-517",
number = "3",
volume = "8",
url = "conv_2781"
}

Bajović, V.. (2017). Zloupotreba opojnih droga i legitimnost krivičnopravne zaštite. in Crimen (Beograd)
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd., 8(3), 517-538.
conv_2781

Bajović V. Zloupotreba opojnih droga i legitimnost krivičnopravne zaštite. in Crimen (Beograd). 2017;8(3):517-538.
conv_2781 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Zloupotreba opojnih droga i legitimnost krivičnopravne zaštite" in Crimen (Beograd), 8, no. 3 (2017):517-538,
conv_2781 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
AU  - Manojlović, S.
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/838
T2  - Corruption, Economic Growth and Globalization
T1  - Corruption and political party financing: The case of Serbia
EP  - 149
SP  - 131
DO  - 10.4324/9781315776828
UR  - conv_3363
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bajović, Vanja and Manojlović, S.",
year = "2015",
journal = "Corruption, Economic Growth and Globalization",
booktitle = "Corruption and political party financing: The case of Serbia",
pages = "149-131",
doi = "10.4324/9781315776828",
url = "conv_3363"
}

Bajović, V.,& Manojlović, S.. (2015). Corruption and political party financing: The case of Serbia. in Corruption, Economic Growth and Globalization, 131-149.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776828
conv_3363

Bajović V, Manojlović S. Corruption and political party financing: The case of Serbia. in Corruption, Economic Growth and Globalization. 2015;:131-149.
doi:10.4324/9781315776828
conv_3363 .

Bajović, Vanja, Manojlović, S., "Corruption and political party financing: The case of Serbia" in Corruption, Economic Growth and Globalization (2015):131-149,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776828 .,
conv_3363 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/817
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Milan Škulić: Organizovani kriminalitet - pojam, pojavni oblici, krivična dela i krivični postupak, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2015
EP  - 236
IS  - 2
SP  - 233
VL  - 63
UR  - conv_377
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2015",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Milan Škulić: Organizovani kriminalitet - pojam, pojavni oblici, krivična dela i krivični postupak, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2015",
pages = "236-233",
number = "2",
volume = "63",
url = "conv_377"
}

Bajović, V.. (2015). Milan Škulić: Organizovani kriminalitet - pojam, pojavni oblici, krivična dela i krivični postupak, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2015. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 63(2), 233-236.
conv_377

Bajović V. Milan Škulić: Organizovani kriminalitet - pojam, pojavni oblici, krivična dela i krivični postupak, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2015. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2015;63(2):233-236.
conv_377 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Milan Škulić: Organizovani kriminalitet - pojam, pojavni oblici, krivična dela i krivični postupak, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2015" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 63, no. 2 (2015):233-236,
conv_377 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/863
AB  - Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela doveo je u pitanje jednu od osnovnih sudijskih funkcija individualizacije odnosno odmeravanja kazne. U vezi sa tim, najpre se analizira sam način odmeravanja kazne posebno u slučaju kada okrivljeni na glavnom pretresu prizna krivicu, te se nameće pitanje da li tada, uprkos zakonskim odredbama, uopšte i dolazi do utvrđivanja činjenica relevantnih za odlučivanje o kazni. Zatim se, u drugom delu, autor osvrće na američki sistem odmeravanja kazne, u skladu sa Smernicama za kažnjavanje, sa ciljem da se objasni zašto u SAD (odakle sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela vodi poreklo) ovaj institut nije doveo u pitanje tradicionalna sudijska ovlašćenja u pogledu određivanja sankcije. Na kraju se razmatraju neka sporna pitanja tzv. stranačkog ugovaranja kazne kod sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela.
AB  - Determination of the sentence is traditionally considered as one of the most importunate judicial role in criminal procedure that, in addition to legal education, requires certain knowledge from other fields, like sociology, psychology, etc. According to the Serbian Criminal Code, when determining the punishment the judge must take into account the sentencing range prescribed by the law, the purpose of the punishment (special and general prevention) and mitigating and aggravating circumstances like a degree of culpability, the motives of perpetrator, his personality and so on (Article 54 of the Serbian CC). Public trust in courts and judiciary in general largely depends on common agreement about fairness and adequacy of imposed penalties. That is the reason why individualization of the sentence is considered as one of the most importunate principles in the policy of crime prevention. Introduction and widespread implementation of plea-bargaining put into the question this traditional judicial role to determine the sentence, having in mind that here the judge only passes the sentence previously determined by the parties. Consequently, it raises questions whether the article 54 of Serbian CC could apply on this 'arranged' sentence and whether the purpose of the punishment, reflected in general and special prevention, could be achieved likewise. Taking into consideration that plea-bargaining is a product of American practice, a comparative analysis of the US sentencing system served as starting point for searching. Part I deals with general issues related to determination of the sentence and circumstances that judge, performing this task, must consider. Contrary to the American law where the sentence is always determined by the judge at the special sentencing hearing, the Serbian law, despite the transition to the adversarial model of criminal procedure, is not familiar with separate sentencing hearing. Instead of that, the sentence is always determined at the main hearing which raises the question of proof of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in the situation when the accused pleads guilty at the trial. Part II explains in details determination of the sentence in the US, according to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. It explains why the parties do not precise the sentence in the plea-agreement, but narrow sentencing ranges enable them to precisely predict 'judicial' sentence, that will be passed for a certain crime. Prosecutorial determination of the sentence in Serbian plea-agreement and judicial control of such sentence is analyzed in the last - third part.
PB  - Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd
T2  - NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija
T1  - Odmeravanje kazne i sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela
T1  - Determination of the sentence and plea-agreement
EP  - 193
IS  - 2
SP  - 179
VL  - 20
DO  - 10.5937/NBP1502179B
UR  - conv_2519
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela doveo je u pitanje jednu od osnovnih sudijskih funkcija individualizacije odnosno odmeravanja kazne. U vezi sa tim, najpre se analizira sam način odmeravanja kazne posebno u slučaju kada okrivljeni na glavnom pretresu prizna krivicu, te se nameće pitanje da li tada, uprkos zakonskim odredbama, uopšte i dolazi do utvrđivanja činjenica relevantnih za odlučivanje o kazni. Zatim se, u drugom delu, autor osvrće na američki sistem odmeravanja kazne, u skladu sa Smernicama za kažnjavanje, sa ciljem da se objasni zašto u SAD (odakle sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela vodi poreklo) ovaj institut nije doveo u pitanje tradicionalna sudijska ovlašćenja u pogledu određivanja sankcije. Na kraju se razmatraju neka sporna pitanja tzv. stranačkog ugovaranja kazne kod sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela., Determination of the sentence is traditionally considered as one of the most importunate judicial role in criminal procedure that, in addition to legal education, requires certain knowledge from other fields, like sociology, psychology, etc. According to the Serbian Criminal Code, when determining the punishment the judge must take into account the sentencing range prescribed by the law, the purpose of the punishment (special and general prevention) and mitigating and aggravating circumstances like a degree of culpability, the motives of perpetrator, his personality and so on (Article 54 of the Serbian CC). Public trust in courts and judiciary in general largely depends on common agreement about fairness and adequacy of imposed penalties. That is the reason why individualization of the sentence is considered as one of the most importunate principles in the policy of crime prevention. Introduction and widespread implementation of plea-bargaining put into the question this traditional judicial role to determine the sentence, having in mind that here the judge only passes the sentence previously determined by the parties. Consequently, it raises questions whether the article 54 of Serbian CC could apply on this 'arranged' sentence and whether the purpose of the punishment, reflected in general and special prevention, could be achieved likewise. Taking into consideration that plea-bargaining is a product of American practice, a comparative analysis of the US sentencing system served as starting point for searching. Part I deals with general issues related to determination of the sentence and circumstances that judge, performing this task, must consider. Contrary to the American law where the sentence is always determined by the judge at the special sentencing hearing, the Serbian law, despite the transition to the adversarial model of criminal procedure, is not familiar with separate sentencing hearing. Instead of that, the sentence is always determined at the main hearing which raises the question of proof of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in the situation when the accused pleads guilty at the trial. Part II explains in details determination of the sentence in the US, according to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. It explains why the parties do not precise the sentence in the plea-agreement, but narrow sentencing ranges enable them to precisely predict 'judicial' sentence, that will be passed for a certain crime. Prosecutorial determination of the sentence in Serbian plea-agreement and judicial control of such sentence is analyzed in the last - third part.",
publisher = "Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd",
journal = "NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija",
title = "Odmeravanje kazne i sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela, Determination of the sentence and plea-agreement",
pages = "193-179",
number = "2",
volume = "20",
doi = "10.5937/NBP1502179B",
url = "conv_2519"
}

Bajović, V.. (2015). Odmeravanje kazne i sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd., 20(2), 179-193.
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1502179B
conv_2519

Bajović V. Odmeravanje kazne i sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela. in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija. 2015;20(2):179-193.
doi:10.5937/NBP1502179B
conv_2519 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Odmeravanje kazne i sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela" in NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 20, no. 2 (2015):179-193,
https://doi.org/10.5937/NBP1502179B .,
conv_2519 .

TY  - THES
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/2629
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=1769
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:9410/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=513284529
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12
AB  - Doktorska disertacija pod nazivom ''Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravnosnažnim sudskim odlukama'' prevashodno se bavi činjeničnim pitanjima u krivičnom postupku kako sa aspekta decenijama zastupljenog mešovitog modela postupka, tako i sa aspekta raspravnog ili stranačkog modela, prihvaćenog Zakonikom o krivičnom postupku Republike Srbije iz 2011. godine. Osnovni cilj istraživanja je da pruži određene praktično primenjive odgovore na pitanja iz navedene ''činjenične sfere'' koja su se i do sada pokazivala problematičnim u sudskoj praksi, a koja zahtevaju drugačije rešavanje u skladu sa novousvojenim procesnim modelom. Predmet istraživanja je i detaljna obrada instituta sudske konstatacije odnosno pojma i dejstva opštepoznatih i pravnosnažno utvrđenih činjenica u unutrašnjem, komparativnom i međunarodnom krivičnom pravu. U tom cilju detaljno je analizirana praksa međunarodnih krivičnih tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju i Ruandu vezana za pravilo 94 Pravila o postupku i dokazima, koja reguliše formalno primanje na znanje opštepoznatih i pravnosnažno utvrđenih činjenica. Analiza je pokazala da su osnovni problemi kod primene ovog instituta proizilazili iz nerazlikovanja činjeničnog i pravnog, nekonzistentnosti prakse posebno u pogledu česte promene i različitog tumačenja kriterijuma prihvatljivosti, konstatovanja pravnosnažnih činjenica i mimo stranačke saglasnosti, prebacivanja tereta dokazivanja tj. osporavanja na odbranu, čime su dovedeni u pitanje osnovni postulati pravičnog suđenja. Ova pitanja nisu mogla biti analizirana odvojeno od problematike činjenica uopšte i njihovog utvrđivanja u različitim procesnim modelima. Krivični postupak Srbije, oduvek zasnovan na istražnoj maksimi koja je podrazumevala dokazno aktivan sud, poslednjih godina doživeo je korenite reforme prelaskom na stranački model u kome sva dokazna aktivnnost prelazi na stranke.
AB  - Doctoral dissertation about ‘’Generally Known and Adjudicated Facts in Criminal Procedure- Judicial Notice’’, mostly deals with facts and factual issues in criminal procedure, both in terms of mixed and inquisitorial model of procedure, traditionally represented in the countries of continental Europe, and from the perspective of adversarial model, that was introduced in Serbia by the CPC of 2011. Basic purpose of the research was to provide certain, practically implemented answers on these ‘’factual issues’’, that were showed as the most problematic in the practice of the courts, and which require a different answers, in accordance with the newly adopted procedural model. In addition, the subject of research is the institute of judicial notice, related to generally known and adjudicated facts in Serbian, comparative and international criminal law. Regarding this, case-law of the International Criminal Tribunals for former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, related to Rule 94 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence is matter of detailed analysis. The research showed that the main problems in the application of the Rule 94 emerged from unclear distinction between factual and legal categories, uncertain Tribunal’s jurisprudence that frequently changed and differently interpreted the admissibility requirements, that judicially noticed adjudicated facts without the consent of the parties, what resulted in transfer of the burden of the proof on the defendant, and put under the question the other principles of the fair trial. The issue of judicial notice, adjudicated and generally known facts could not be analyzed separately from the issue of the facts in general and their determination in different procedural models. Serbian criminal procedure traditionally based on the ‘’principle of truth’’ that implies the active judge and passive parties, recently experienced the radical reforms, transferring to the adversarial model where the parties have the ‘’main word’’ in collection and presentation of evidence. Therefore, the old procedural dilemmas like differentiation between facts and law, identity of the indictment and judgment, burden of proof and presumptions, etc, are analyzed through the lens of recently adopted adversarial model, adjusted to Serbian circumstances.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet
T1  - Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravosnažnim sudskim odlukama
UR  - t-2315
ER  - 

@phdthesis{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Doktorska disertacija pod nazivom ''Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravnosnažnim sudskim odlukama'' prevashodno se bavi činjeničnim pitanjima u krivičnom postupku kako sa aspekta decenijama zastupljenog mešovitog modela postupka, tako i sa aspekta raspravnog ili stranačkog modela, prihvaćenog Zakonikom o krivičnom postupku Republike Srbije iz 2011. godine. Osnovni cilj istraživanja je da pruži određene praktično primenjive odgovore na pitanja iz navedene ''činjenične sfere'' koja su se i do sada pokazivala problematičnim u sudskoj praksi, a koja zahtevaju drugačije rešavanje u skladu sa novousvojenim procesnim modelom. Predmet istraživanja je i detaljna obrada instituta sudske konstatacije odnosno pojma i dejstva opštepoznatih i pravnosnažno utvrđenih činjenica u unutrašnjem, komparativnom i međunarodnom krivičnom pravu. U tom cilju detaljno je analizirana praksa međunarodnih krivičnih tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju i Ruandu vezana za pravilo 94 Pravila o postupku i dokazima, koja reguliše formalno primanje na znanje opštepoznatih i pravnosnažno utvrđenih činjenica. Analiza je pokazala da su osnovni problemi kod primene ovog instituta proizilazili iz nerazlikovanja činjeničnog i pravnog, nekonzistentnosti prakse posebno u pogledu česte promene i različitog tumačenja kriterijuma prihvatljivosti, konstatovanja pravnosnažnih činjenica i mimo stranačke saglasnosti, prebacivanja tereta dokazivanja tj. osporavanja na odbranu, čime su dovedeni u pitanje osnovni postulati pravičnog suđenja. Ova pitanja nisu mogla biti analizirana odvojeno od problematike činjenica uopšte i njihovog utvrđivanja u različitim procesnim modelima. Krivični postupak Srbije, oduvek zasnovan na istražnoj maksimi koja je podrazumevala dokazno aktivan sud, poslednjih godina doživeo je korenite reforme prelaskom na stranački model u kome sva dokazna aktivnnost prelazi na stranke., Doctoral dissertation about ‘’Generally Known and Adjudicated Facts in Criminal Procedure- Judicial Notice’’, mostly deals with facts and factual issues in criminal procedure, both in terms of mixed and inquisitorial model of procedure, traditionally represented in the countries of continental Europe, and from the perspective of adversarial model, that was introduced in Serbia by the CPC of 2011. Basic purpose of the research was to provide certain, practically implemented answers on these ‘’factual issues’’, that were showed as the most problematic in the practice of the courts, and which require a different answers, in accordance with the newly adopted procedural model. In addition, the subject of research is the institute of judicial notice, related to generally known and adjudicated facts in Serbian, comparative and international criminal law. Regarding this, case-law of the International Criminal Tribunals for former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, related to Rule 94 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence is matter of detailed analysis. The research showed that the main problems in the application of the Rule 94 emerged from unclear distinction between factual and legal categories, uncertain Tribunal’s jurisprudence that frequently changed and differently interpreted the admissibility requirements, that judicially noticed adjudicated facts without the consent of the parties, what resulted in transfer of the burden of the proof on the defendant, and put under the question the other principles of the fair trial. The issue of judicial notice, adjudicated and generally known facts could not be analyzed separately from the issue of the facts in general and their determination in different procedural models. Serbian criminal procedure traditionally based on the ‘’principle of truth’’ that implies the active judge and passive parties, recently experienced the radical reforms, transferring to the adversarial model where the parties have the ‘’main word’’ in collection and presentation of evidence. Therefore, the old procedural dilemmas like differentiation between facts and law, identity of the indictment and judgment, burden of proof and presumptions, etc, are analyzed through the lens of recently adopted adversarial model, adjusted to Serbian circumstances.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet",
title = "Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravosnažnim sudskim odlukama",
url = "t-2315"
}

Bajović, V.. (2014). Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravosnažnim sudskim odlukama. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet..
t-2315

Bajović V. Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravosnažnim sudskim odlukama. 2014;.
t-2315 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Procesnopravni značaj opštepoznatih činjenica i činjenica utvrđenih u pravosnažnim sudskim odlukama" (2014),
t-2315 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/708
AB  - U radu se razmatra problem objektivnog identiteta presude i optužbe, odnosno pitanje u kojoj je meri sud vezan činjeničnim opisom dela navedenim u optužnom aktu, a u kojoj meri i u pogledu kojih činjenica od istog može odstupiti. Može li sud optuženog koga optužba tereti, primera radi da je držao opojnu drogu s ciljem prodaje oglasiti krivim za držanje opojne droge za sopstvenu upotrebu ili da je izvršenjem krivičnog dela pribavio imovinsku korist u vrednosti od 500.000 dinara oglasiti krivim za pribavljanje imovinske koristi u većem ili manjem iznosu? U teoriji je bilo svega par nastojanja da se ovaj problem reši postavljanjem opšteg principa koji bi važio u svim slučajevima, a praksa već decenijama luta rešavajući ovaj problem na različite načine od slučaja do slučaja. Autor smatra da bi u rešavanju ovog problema najpre trebalo napraviti jasno razgraničenje između činjeničnog i pravnog, imajući u vidu da pravna ocena dela data od strane tužioca ne obavezuje sud. I drugo, autor smatra da pitanje povrede identiteta ne treba posmatrati polazeći od toga da 'utvrđene činjenice nisu na štetu okrivljenog' kako se to obično čini, već pre svega iz konteksta prava na odbranu i dužnosti da se optuženom ovo pravo omogući.
AB  - One of the basic principles of modern criminal procedure is that the judgment does not exceed the facts and circumstances described in the charges. In order to adequately prepare for the proceedings, the defendant must be properly informed about factual allegations he or she is accused of. The question that remains unresolved is to what extent is the court limited by the facts and circumstances presented by the prosecutor, and whether it is authorized to depart from them, depending on the result of the trial. For example, if the prosecutor states that the defendant had the intention to sell the drugs, would it be possible for the judge to find that the defendant is guilty not of supplying, but possession of prohibited drugs? This concern in fact represents the focus of this paper. As it presents, in common-law adversarial systems of jury-trial, the problem of identity does not exist, having in mind that the jury is not permitted to give the reasons for their verdict, but only to find the defendant guilty or not guilty in regards of prosecutor's allegations. However, in the systems of trials without jury, the judge is obliged to give reasons for every charge and to explain the facts and circumstances that constitute the elements of the crime that the accused has committed. Thus, it would be possible to check if the defendant was found guilty based on the factual allegations of the charge, or under the facts determined during proceedings. According to the law, the judgment may relate only to the offense which is the subject of the charges while the court is not bound by the prosecutor's legal qualification of the offense. Factual findings established in the judgment do not have to be fully identical to factual allegations from the indictment, but the question is where the border of allowed deviation lies? As the discussion within the paper shows, this is still regarded as an extremely complex issue in court practice, while only a few scholars tried to find definitive, compact answers that could be utilized in a universal manner. The paper analysis presents both the theory of 'another' crime (that allows for factual modification of indictment by the court according to results of the trial, as any deviation is allowed as long as the crime stays within the same (or lighter) legal qualification) and the theory of factual sets (according to which the defendant could be found guilty only on the basis of facts stated in the indictment (all or some of them) - where any factual modification according to result of the trial would not be regarded as allowed). Following the comparative overview of the theoretical approaches to this issue, the paper critically examines the practice of Serbian courts and the actual scope of application of the above-mentioned theories, offering a practical 'solving-key' for this problem the relies on differentiation between factual and legal categories, special regard of factual issues, as well observance of the issue of identity from a perspective of the right to defense.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Objektivni identitet presude i optužbe
T1  - Factual identity of charge and judgment
EP  - 222
IS  - 1
SP  - 198
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_289
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2013",
abstract = "U radu se razmatra problem objektivnog identiteta presude i optužbe, odnosno pitanje u kojoj je meri sud vezan činjeničnim opisom dela navedenim u optužnom aktu, a u kojoj meri i u pogledu kojih činjenica od istog može odstupiti. Može li sud optuženog koga optužba tereti, primera radi da je držao opojnu drogu s ciljem prodaje oglasiti krivim za držanje opojne droge za sopstvenu upotrebu ili da je izvršenjem krivičnog dela pribavio imovinsku korist u vrednosti od 500.000 dinara oglasiti krivim za pribavljanje imovinske koristi u većem ili manjem iznosu? U teoriji je bilo svega par nastojanja da se ovaj problem reši postavljanjem opšteg principa koji bi važio u svim slučajevima, a praksa već decenijama luta rešavajući ovaj problem na različite načine od slučaja do slučaja. Autor smatra da bi u rešavanju ovog problema najpre trebalo napraviti jasno razgraničenje između činjeničnog i pravnog, imajući u vidu da pravna ocena dela data od strane tužioca ne obavezuje sud. I drugo, autor smatra da pitanje povrede identiteta ne treba posmatrati polazeći od toga da 'utvrđene činjenice nisu na štetu okrivljenog' kako se to obično čini, već pre svega iz konteksta prava na odbranu i dužnosti da se optuženom ovo pravo omogući., One of the basic principles of modern criminal procedure is that the judgment does not exceed the facts and circumstances described in the charges. In order to adequately prepare for the proceedings, the defendant must be properly informed about factual allegations he or she is accused of. The question that remains unresolved is to what extent is the court limited by the facts and circumstances presented by the prosecutor, and whether it is authorized to depart from them, depending on the result of the trial. For example, if the prosecutor states that the defendant had the intention to sell the drugs, would it be possible for the judge to find that the defendant is guilty not of supplying, but possession of prohibited drugs? This concern in fact represents the focus of this paper. As it presents, in common-law adversarial systems of jury-trial, the problem of identity does not exist, having in mind that the jury is not permitted to give the reasons for their verdict, but only to find the defendant guilty or not guilty in regards of prosecutor's allegations. However, in the systems of trials without jury, the judge is obliged to give reasons for every charge and to explain the facts and circumstances that constitute the elements of the crime that the accused has committed. Thus, it would be possible to check if the defendant was found guilty based on the factual allegations of the charge, or under the facts determined during proceedings. According to the law, the judgment may relate only to the offense which is the subject of the charges while the court is not bound by the prosecutor's legal qualification of the offense. Factual findings established in the judgment do not have to be fully identical to factual allegations from the indictment, but the question is where the border of allowed deviation lies? As the discussion within the paper shows, this is still regarded as an extremely complex issue in court practice, while only a few scholars tried to find definitive, compact answers that could be utilized in a universal manner. The paper analysis presents both the theory of 'another' crime (that allows for factual modification of indictment by the court according to results of the trial, as any deviation is allowed as long as the crime stays within the same (or lighter) legal qualification) and the theory of factual sets (according to which the defendant could be found guilty only on the basis of facts stated in the indictment (all or some of them) - where any factual modification according to result of the trial would not be regarded as allowed). Following the comparative overview of the theoretical approaches to this issue, the paper critically examines the practice of Serbian courts and the actual scope of application of the above-mentioned theories, offering a practical 'solving-key' for this problem the relies on differentiation between factual and legal categories, special regard of factual issues, as well observance of the issue of identity from a perspective of the right to defense.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Objektivni identitet presude i optužbe, Factual identity of charge and judgment",
pages = "222-198",
number = "1",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_289"
}

Bajović, V.. (2013). Objektivni identitet presude i optužbe. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 61(1), 198-222.
conv_289

Bajović V. Objektivni identitet presude i optužbe. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(1):198-222.
conv_289 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Objektivni identitet presude i optužbe" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 1 (2013):198-222,
conv_289 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/576
AB  - Predmet analize su osnovne karakteristike krivičnog postupka Narodne Republike Kine. Imajući u vidu teškoće u pronalaženju radova o kineskom pravu na drugim jezicima, osim kineskog, analiza je zasnovana prevashodno na odredbama Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Nakon uvodnih napomena i istorijskog osvrta, prvi deo rada posvećen je krivičnoprocesnim subjektima, dok je u drugom delu u kratkim crtama izložen tok krivičnog postupka.
AB  - The subject of this analysis includes the fundamental characteristics of criminal procedure of the People's Republic of China. Having in mind the difficulties when it comes to finding papers on Chinese law written in other languages apart from Chinese, the analysis is primarily based upon the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. After introductory remarks and historical retrospective, the first part of the paper is dedicated to the subjects of criminal procedure, whereas the second part comprises a brief description of the course of criminal procedure.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Krivični postupak Narodne Republike Kine
T1  - Criminal procedure of the People's Republic of China
EP  - 553
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 541
VL  - 49
UR  - conv_2737
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Predmet analize su osnovne karakteristike krivičnog postupka Narodne Republike Kine. Imajući u vidu teškoće u pronalaženju radova o kineskom pravu na drugim jezicima, osim kineskog, analiza je zasnovana prevashodno na odredbama Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Nakon uvodnih napomena i istorijskog osvrta, prvi deo rada posvećen je krivičnoprocesnim subjektima, dok je u drugom delu u kratkim crtama izložen tok krivičnog postupka., The subject of this analysis includes the fundamental characteristics of criminal procedure of the People's Republic of China. Having in mind the difficulties when it comes to finding papers on Chinese law written in other languages apart from Chinese, the analysis is primarily based upon the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. After introductory remarks and historical retrospective, the first part of the paper is dedicated to the subjects of criminal procedure, whereas the second part comprises a brief description of the course of criminal procedure.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Krivični postupak Narodne Republike Kine, Criminal procedure of the People's Republic of China",
pages = "553-541",
number = "2-3",
volume = "49",
url = "conv_2737"
}

Bajović, V.. (2011). Krivični postupak Narodne Republike Kine. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 49(2-3), 541-553.
conv_2737

Bajović V. Krivični postupak Narodne Republike Kine. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2011;49(2-3):541-553.
conv_2737 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Krivični postupak Narodne Republike Kine" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 49, no. 2-3 (2011):541-553,
conv_2737 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/512
AB  - Right to silence and privilege against self-incrimination are generally accepted principles that lie at the heart of the notion of a fair procedure. In spite of the fact that this guaranties are often considered as 'one and the same thing', they must be seen as a two partly overlapping circles. The right to silence is narrower and it refers to verbal communication alone the right of accused not to speak. The privilege goes further and means protection of any person not to present evidence at the own expense. Both privileges originated from the common-law system, and even today they have various meaning and implementation in accusatorial system typical for the common law countries, and mixed procedural model, characteristic for the countries of continental Europe. Illustrative example is the fact that in the mixed system, accused rarely used his right to silence during the main hearing, while in the common law countries the accused rarely used his right to speak on the own trial. Practical application of right to silence in Serbian and American criminal procedure is given as an illustration of differences between two opposite models. First part of the Article deal with the historical development of the guarantees, their regulation in international documents and interpretation in the practice of European Court of Human Rights. In the second part is explained right to silence during the police interrogation and Miranda warnings, while the third part copes with the using of this right during the trial. At the same time are clarified the differences between common law trial and European main hearing, as well as diverse role of the defense counsel, what all together contribute (and explain) various practical application of the right to silence.
PB  - Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
T1  - Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem
T1  - Right to silence
EP  - 65
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 52
VL  - 123
UR  - conv_1827
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Right to silence and privilege against self-incrimination are generally accepted principles that lie at the heart of the notion of a fair procedure. In spite of the fact that this guaranties are often considered as 'one and the same thing', they must be seen as a two partly overlapping circles. The right to silence is narrower and it refers to verbal communication alone the right of accused not to speak. The privilege goes further and means protection of any person not to present evidence at the own expense. Both privileges originated from the common-law system, and even today they have various meaning and implementation in accusatorial system typical for the common law countries, and mixed procedural model, characteristic for the countries of continental Europe. Illustrative example is the fact that in the mixed system, accused rarely used his right to silence during the main hearing, while in the common law countries the accused rarely used his right to speak on the own trial. Practical application of right to silence in Serbian and American criminal procedure is given as an illustration of differences between two opposite models. First part of the Article deal with the historical development of the guarantees, their regulation in international documents and interpretation in the practice of European Court of Human Rights. In the second part is explained right to silence during the police interrogation and Miranda warnings, while the third part copes with the using of this right during the trial. At the same time are clarified the differences between common law trial and European main hearing, as well as diverse role of the defense counsel, what all together contribute (and explain) various practical application of the right to silence.",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije",
title = "Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem, Right to silence",
pages = "65-52",
number = "3-4",
volume = "123",
url = "conv_1827"
}

Bajović, V.. (2010). Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd., 123(3-4), 52-65.
conv_1827

Bajović V. Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije. 2010;123(3-4):52-65.
conv_1827 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem" in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije, 123, no. 3-4 (2010):52-65,
conv_1827 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Van Duyne, P.
AU  - Stocco, E.
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
AU  - Milenović, M.
AU  - Lojpur, E.E.
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/511
AB  - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of the state of corruption in Serbia, based on available empirical evidence produced by the penal law-enforcement agencies themselves. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses an analysis of available documents, criminal cases of the Municipal Court of Belgrade, data from the Public Prosecution Office and the National Statistical Bureau. Given the scarcity of research in Serbia, the usual inaccessibility of judicial sources, the study is a first reconnaissance based on what is available at present. Findings – The basic finding is a huge gap between what the people experience about corruption and what is eventually prosecuted. The law-enforcement agencies address this phenomenon haphazardly and in a fragmented manner, displaying a fundamental lack of data management, resulting in lack of transparency. Research limitations/implications – Research in such a sensitive area and within a political culture of opacity, addressing incomplete data, will in its first stage yield limited results. The project will be continued with additional interviews with knowledgeable people, extension of the statistics and validation and comparison of other anti-corruption bodies as far as they have a measurable output. Practical implications – The short-term practical implication is that researchers “got over the threshold” and entered the law enforcement “chambers”. Practical applications concern the contribution to transparency, which is required for doing research and impacts on the way the practitioners address their own practice. Originality/value – The paper addresses a certain field in a country that has so far been only scantly researched.
T2  - Journal of Financial Crime
T1  - Searching for corruption in Serbia
EP  - 46
IS  - 1
SP  - 22
VL  - 17
DO  - 10.1108/13590791011009356
UR  - conv_3444
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Van Duyne, P. and Stocco, E. and Bajović, Vanja and Milenović, M. and Lojpur, E.E.",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of the state of corruption in Serbia, based on available empirical evidence produced by the penal law-enforcement agencies themselves. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses an analysis of available documents, criminal cases of the Municipal Court of Belgrade, data from the Public Prosecution Office and the National Statistical Bureau. Given the scarcity of research in Serbia, the usual inaccessibility of judicial sources, the study is a first reconnaissance based on what is available at present. Findings – The basic finding is a huge gap between what the people experience about corruption and what is eventually prosecuted. The law-enforcement agencies address this phenomenon haphazardly and in a fragmented manner, displaying a fundamental lack of data management, resulting in lack of transparency. Research limitations/implications – Research in such a sensitive area and within a political culture of opacity, addressing incomplete data, will in its first stage yield limited results. The project will be continued with additional interviews with knowledgeable people, extension of the statistics and validation and comparison of other anti-corruption bodies as far as they have a measurable output. Practical implications – The short-term practical implication is that researchers “got over the threshold” and entered the law enforcement “chambers”. Practical applications concern the contribution to transparency, which is required for doing research and impacts on the way the practitioners address their own practice. Originality/value – The paper addresses a certain field in a country that has so far been only scantly researched.",
journal = "Journal of Financial Crime",
title = "Searching for corruption in Serbia",
pages = "46-22",
number = "1",
volume = "17",
doi = "10.1108/13590791011009356",
url = "conv_3444"
}

Van Duyne, P., Stocco, E., Bajović, V., Milenović, M.,& Lojpur, E.E.. (2010). Searching for corruption in Serbia. in Journal of Financial Crime, 17(1), 22-46.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791011009356
conv_3444

Van Duyne P, Stocco E, Bajović V, Milenović M, Lojpur E. Searching for corruption in Serbia. in Journal of Financial Crime. 2010;17(1):22-46.
doi:10.1108/13590791011009356
conv_3444 .

Van Duyne, P., Stocco, E., Bajović, Vanja, Milenović, M., Lojpur, E.E., "Searching for corruption in Serbia" in Journal of Financial Crime, 17, no. 1 (2010):22-46,
https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791011009356 .,
conv_3444 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/485
AB  - Uvođenjem odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela krivičnopravnoj teoriji i praksi nametnute su brojne dileme. Klasična krivičnopravna i procesna načela prilagođena čoveku tj. fizičkom licu kao jedinom mogućem učiniocu krivičnog dela, bilo je neophodno prilagoditi ovoj novoj kategoriji okrivljenih. Pravno lice nema svest ni volju a samim tim ni psihički, subjektivni odnos prema delu, ono ne može preduzeti radnju izvršenja u fizičkom smislu te reči, ne može davati iskaz u krivičnom postupku ne može biti lišeno slobode, prava koja poseduje ne mogu se poistovetiti sa pravima čoveka. U članku se najpre razmatraju pitanja materijalnog krivičnog prava pre svega pitanje radnje izvršenja i krivice pravnog lica, dok je drugi deo posvećen položaju i specifičnostima pravnog lica kao okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku.
AB  - Criminal liability of legal persons, recently introduced in Serbian law, is a new challenge for legal theory and practice. Basic principles and rules of criminal law and procedure that were created according to natural person as the only possible perpetrator of criminal offence, should be adjusted to this new category of off enders. Legal person cannot be arrested nor interrogated in criminal procedure, it does not have conscience or will like human beings nor capacity to act in physical sense, what raises the question if it can meet the requirements of actus reus and mens rea of the crime. The first part of this paper analyzes grounds for criminal liability of legal persons, their capability to form material and mental elements of crime and the base of their culpability, while the second part is dedicated to the position of legal person as a defendant in criminal procedure.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravno lice kao okrivljeni u krivičnom postupku
T1  - Legal person as a defendant in criminal procedure
EP  - 503
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 488
VL  - 47
UR  - conv_2013
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Uvođenjem odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela krivičnopravnoj teoriji i praksi nametnute su brojne dileme. Klasična krivičnopravna i procesna načela prilagođena čoveku tj. fizičkom licu kao jedinom mogućem učiniocu krivičnog dela, bilo je neophodno prilagoditi ovoj novoj kategoriji okrivljenih. Pravno lice nema svest ni volju a samim tim ni psihički, subjektivni odnos prema delu, ono ne može preduzeti radnju izvršenja u fizičkom smislu te reči, ne može davati iskaz u krivičnom postupku ne može biti lišeno slobode, prava koja poseduje ne mogu se poistovetiti sa pravima čoveka. U članku se najpre razmatraju pitanja materijalnog krivičnog prava pre svega pitanje radnje izvršenja i krivice pravnog lica, dok je drugi deo posvećen položaju i specifičnostima pravnog lica kao okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku., Criminal liability of legal persons, recently introduced in Serbian law, is a new challenge for legal theory and practice. Basic principles and rules of criminal law and procedure that were created according to natural person as the only possible perpetrator of criminal offence, should be adjusted to this new category of off enders. Legal person cannot be arrested nor interrogated in criminal procedure, it does not have conscience or will like human beings nor capacity to act in physical sense, what raises the question if it can meet the requirements of actus reus and mens rea of the crime. The first part of this paper analyzes grounds for criminal liability of legal persons, their capability to form material and mental elements of crime and the base of their culpability, while the second part is dedicated to the position of legal person as a defendant in criminal procedure.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravno lice kao okrivljeni u krivičnom postupku, Legal person as a defendant in criminal procedure",
pages = "503-488",
number = "4-6",
volume = "47",
url = "conv_2013"
}

Bajović, V.. (2010). Pravno lice kao okrivljeni u krivičnom postupku. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 47(4-6), 488-503.
conv_2013

Bajović V. Pravno lice kao okrivljeni u krivičnom postupku. in Pravo i privreda. 2010;47(4-6):488-503.
conv_2013 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Pravno lice kao okrivljeni u krivičnom postupku" in Pravo i privreda, 47, no. 4-6 (2010):488-503,
conv_2013 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/426
PB  - Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
T1  - Položaj i ovlašćenja tužioca u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama
T1  - The position and authorization of the prosecutor in the United States of America
EP  - 146
IS  - 1
SP  - 131
VL  - 122
UR  - conv_1821
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2009",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije",
title = "Položaj i ovlašćenja tužioca u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama, The position and authorization of the prosecutor in the United States of America",
pages = "146-131",
number = "1",
volume = "122",
url = "conv_1821"
}

Bajović, V.. (2009). Položaj i ovlašćenja tužioca u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd., 122(1), 131-146.
conv_1821

Bajović V. Položaj i ovlašćenja tužioca u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije. 2009;122(1):131-146.
conv_1821 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Položaj i ovlašćenja tužioca u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama" in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije, 122, no. 1 (2009):131-146,
conv_1821 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/465
AB  - Pregovaranje o priznanju krivice je mehanizam putem koga se krivični slučaj razrešava bez suđenja, sporazumom uključenih strana. Sporazum se sastoji u priznanju krivice od strane optuženog u zamenu za tužiočevo obećanje da će ga teretiti za manje nego što omogućavaju dokazi, da ga neće teretiti za neka dela ili da će tražiti određenu kaznu. Sporazum je produkt i važan deo američke krivične pravde gde se velika većina krivičnih slučajeva razrešava na ovaj način. Poslednjih godina, većina evropskih zemalja, tradicionalnih zastupnika istražnog ili mešovitog krivičnog postupka, uvela je sporazum o priznanju krivice na različite načine, uglavnom sa ciljem da ubrza, pojednostavi i učini jeftinijim krivični postupak. Iako se evropska verzija pregovaranja o priznanju krivice razlikuje od svog američkog 'modela', svi ovi mehanizmi se zasnivaju na istoj ideji da se ubrza i pojednostavi krivični postupak donošenjem presude bez suđenja. Svrha ovog rada je analiza pregovaranja o priznanju krivice u Srbiji koja je uvedena u septembru 2009., novom reformom krivičnog postupka. Prema ovim odredbama, krivični prekršaji koji se kažnjavaju sa maksimalno dvanaest godina zatvorske kazne, mogu se razrešiti sporazumom o priznanju krivice. Obe strane (tužilac i optuženi ili njegov zastupnik) mogu inicirati pregovore, ali pregovori o priznanju krivice se ne regulišu zakonom već su prepušteni stranama koje pregovaraju. Sporazum o priznanju krivice mora da bude napisan i da ima formu klasičnog ugovora. Obavezni elementi takvog sporazuma su priznanje krivice, kazna, troškovi postupka i izričito odricanje prava na žalbu. Osim toga, sporazumom o priznanju krivice tužilac može da se obaveže da će okončati tužbu za neke krivične prestupe (pregovaranje o naknadi) ukoliko se optuženi obaveže da će ispuniti određene obaveze, tj. nadoknaditi štetu žrtvi, dati izvesnu sumu nekoj humanitarnoj organizaciji, obaviti neku civilnu službu ili nešto slično. Sve ovo je tema prvog dela članka. Sudija donosi konačnu odluku vezano za sporazum o priznanju krivice na specijalnom javnom saslušanju. Saslušanje se ne može održati bez prisustva optuženog i njegovog branioca, dok je prisustvo javnog tužioca poželjno ali nije neophodno, što izgleda neshvatljivo iz američke perspektive! Razlog za takvo rešenje je uverenje da optuženi ne bi trebalo da trpi negativne posledice tužiočeve nemarnosti. Sudija može da odbaci, odbije ili prihvati sporazum o priznanju krivice, nakon što je razmotrio ukoliko optuženi voljno i opravdano prizna krivicu svestan svih posledica (naročito da će se slučaj razrešiti bez suđenja i da neće imati pravo da se žali), ukoliko je sporazum zaključen u skladu sa ZKP, ukoliko su interesi žrtve zaštićeni sporazumom, adekvatnost predložene kazne itd. Sudija donosi posebnu pisanu odluku o sporazumu između strana, što je specifičnost pregovaranja o priznanju krivice u Srbiji. U svim ostalim zemljama, ukoliko sudija prihvati sporazum on donosi presudu u skladu sa tim, ukoliko ne, slučaj ide na sud. Donošenje pisane odluke pre presude se opravdava činjenicom da stranke ne mogu da se žale na odluku o sporazumu o priznanju krivice (žrtva ukoliko je sudija prihvati, stranke ukoliko odbije), i kada ova odluka postane konačna, sudija donosi presudu u skladu sa njom. Postupak pre suda i sudska presuda o sporazumu o priznanju krivice se dalje objašnjavaju u drugom delu članka.
AB  - Plea bargaining is a procedural mechanism through which criminal case is resolved without trial, by consensus of the parties. The agreement consists of the defendant pleading guilty in exchange for prosecutor's promise to charge him less serious than is supported by the evidence, not to charge him for some crimes or to request certain sentence. It is product and significant part of the American criminal justice, where the vast majority of criminal cases are settled on that way. In the last years, majority of European countries, traditional representatives of inquisitorial or mixed criminal procedure, introduced plea agreements in various modalities, mostly with the purpose to make criminal procedure faster, cheaper and more effective. Although European versions of plea bargaining differs from its American 'pattern', all these mechanisms are based on same idea- to accelerate and simplify criminal procedure bringing the verdict without trial. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Serbian plea-bargaining, introduced in September 2009, by the new reform of the criminal procedure. According to these provisions, criminal offences punishable by the maximum of twelve years of imprisonment could be resolved by plea agreement. Both parties (prosecutor and defendant or his council) could initiate negotiations, but plea negotiations are not regulated by the law, but left to the parties. Plea agreement must be in writings, and has the form of classical contract. Obligatory elements of such agreements are guilty plea, sentence, costs of the procedure and explicit denial of the right to appeal. Besides, by the plea agreement prosecutor could pledge to terminate the prosecution for some criminal offences (charge bargaining), while the defendant could oblige himself to fulfill certain obligations i.e., compensate the damage to the victim, pay certain amount to some humanitarian organization, perform some civil services, and the like. All these issues are analyzed in the first part of the paper. The judge brings the final decision about plea agreement at the special public hearing. The hearing could not be held without defendant and his lawyer, while the presence of public prosecutor is preferable but not necessary, what could be incomprehensible from American perspectives! The reason for that solution is belief that defendant should not suffer negative consequences caused by prosecutor's carelessness. The judge can dismiss, refuse or accept plea negotiation, after reviewing if defendant voluntary and reasonably plead guilty aware of all consequences (particularly that the case will be resolved without trial and he will not have the right to appeal), if agreement was concluded according to CPC, if the interests of victim are protected by agreement, adequacy of proposed sentence, etc… The judge passes particular written decision about parties' agreement, what is specific feature of Serbian plea bargaining procedure. In all other countries, if the judge accepts agreement he brings a verdict according to it if not, the case go to trial. Bringing the written decision before the verdict is justified by the fact that the parties could not appeal on the verdict brought according to plea agreement. Actually, the parties and victim could appeal on decision about plea agreement (the victim if the judge accept it, the parties if reject), and when this decision become final, the judge pass a verdict according to it. The procedure before the court and judicial decisions about plea agreement are further explained in the second part of the paper.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Sporazum o priznanju krivice
T1  - Plea agreement
EP  - 333
IS  - 3
SP  - 319
VL  - 47
UR  - conv_2729
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Pregovaranje o priznanju krivice je mehanizam putem koga se krivični slučaj razrešava bez suđenja, sporazumom uključenih strana. Sporazum se sastoji u priznanju krivice od strane optuženog u zamenu za tužiočevo obećanje da će ga teretiti za manje nego što omogućavaju dokazi, da ga neće teretiti za neka dela ili da će tražiti određenu kaznu. Sporazum je produkt i važan deo američke krivične pravde gde se velika većina krivičnih slučajeva razrešava na ovaj način. Poslednjih godina, većina evropskih zemalja, tradicionalnih zastupnika istražnog ili mešovitog krivičnog postupka, uvela je sporazum o priznanju krivice na različite načine, uglavnom sa ciljem da ubrza, pojednostavi i učini jeftinijim krivični postupak. Iako se evropska verzija pregovaranja o priznanju krivice razlikuje od svog američkog 'modela', svi ovi mehanizmi se zasnivaju na istoj ideji da se ubrza i pojednostavi krivični postupak donošenjem presude bez suđenja. Svrha ovog rada je analiza pregovaranja o priznanju krivice u Srbiji koja je uvedena u septembru 2009., novom reformom krivičnog postupka. Prema ovim odredbama, krivični prekršaji koji se kažnjavaju sa maksimalno dvanaest godina zatvorske kazne, mogu se razrešiti sporazumom o priznanju krivice. Obe strane (tužilac i optuženi ili njegov zastupnik) mogu inicirati pregovore, ali pregovori o priznanju krivice se ne regulišu zakonom već su prepušteni stranama koje pregovaraju. Sporazum o priznanju krivice mora da bude napisan i da ima formu klasičnog ugovora. Obavezni elementi takvog sporazuma su priznanje krivice, kazna, troškovi postupka i izričito odricanje prava na žalbu. Osim toga, sporazumom o priznanju krivice tužilac može da se obaveže da će okončati tužbu za neke krivične prestupe (pregovaranje o naknadi) ukoliko se optuženi obaveže da će ispuniti određene obaveze, tj. nadoknaditi štetu žrtvi, dati izvesnu sumu nekoj humanitarnoj organizaciji, obaviti neku civilnu službu ili nešto slično. Sve ovo je tema prvog dela članka. Sudija donosi konačnu odluku vezano za sporazum o priznanju krivice na specijalnom javnom saslušanju. Saslušanje se ne može održati bez prisustva optuženog i njegovog branioca, dok je prisustvo javnog tužioca poželjno ali nije neophodno, što izgleda neshvatljivo iz američke perspektive! Razlog za takvo rešenje je uverenje da optuženi ne bi trebalo da trpi negativne posledice tužiočeve nemarnosti. Sudija može da odbaci, odbije ili prihvati sporazum o priznanju krivice, nakon što je razmotrio ukoliko optuženi voljno i opravdano prizna krivicu svestan svih posledica (naročito da će se slučaj razrešiti bez suđenja i da neće imati pravo da se žali), ukoliko je sporazum zaključen u skladu sa ZKP, ukoliko su interesi žrtve zaštićeni sporazumom, adekvatnost predložene kazne itd. Sudija donosi posebnu pisanu odluku o sporazumu između strana, što je specifičnost pregovaranja o priznanju krivice u Srbiji. U svim ostalim zemljama, ukoliko sudija prihvati sporazum on donosi presudu u skladu sa tim, ukoliko ne, slučaj ide na sud. Donošenje pisane odluke pre presude se opravdava činjenicom da stranke ne mogu da se žale na odluku o sporazumu o priznanju krivice (žrtva ukoliko je sudija prihvati, stranke ukoliko odbije), i kada ova odluka postane konačna, sudija donosi presudu u skladu sa njom. Postupak pre suda i sudska presuda o sporazumu o priznanju krivice se dalje objašnjavaju u drugom delu članka., Plea bargaining is a procedural mechanism through which criminal case is resolved without trial, by consensus of the parties. The agreement consists of the defendant pleading guilty in exchange for prosecutor's promise to charge him less serious than is supported by the evidence, not to charge him for some crimes or to request certain sentence. It is product and significant part of the American criminal justice, where the vast majority of criminal cases are settled on that way. In the last years, majority of European countries, traditional representatives of inquisitorial or mixed criminal procedure, introduced plea agreements in various modalities, mostly with the purpose to make criminal procedure faster, cheaper and more effective. Although European versions of plea bargaining differs from its American 'pattern', all these mechanisms are based on same idea- to accelerate and simplify criminal procedure bringing the verdict without trial. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Serbian plea-bargaining, introduced in September 2009, by the new reform of the criminal procedure. According to these provisions, criminal offences punishable by the maximum of twelve years of imprisonment could be resolved by plea agreement. Both parties (prosecutor and defendant or his council) could initiate negotiations, but plea negotiations are not regulated by the law, but left to the parties. Plea agreement must be in writings, and has the form of classical contract. Obligatory elements of such agreements are guilty plea, sentence, costs of the procedure and explicit denial of the right to appeal. Besides, by the plea agreement prosecutor could pledge to terminate the prosecution for some criminal offences (charge bargaining), while the defendant could oblige himself to fulfill certain obligations i.e., compensate the damage to the victim, pay certain amount to some humanitarian organization, perform some civil services, and the like. All these issues are analyzed in the first part of the paper. The judge brings the final decision about plea agreement at the special public hearing. The hearing could not be held without defendant and his lawyer, while the presence of public prosecutor is preferable but not necessary, what could be incomprehensible from American perspectives! The reason for that solution is belief that defendant should not suffer negative consequences caused by prosecutor's carelessness. The judge can dismiss, refuse or accept plea negotiation, after reviewing if defendant voluntary and reasonably plead guilty aware of all consequences (particularly that the case will be resolved without trial and he will not have the right to appeal), if agreement was concluded according to CPC, if the interests of victim are protected by agreement, adequacy of proposed sentence, etc… The judge passes particular written decision about parties' agreement, what is specific feature of Serbian plea bargaining procedure. In all other countries, if the judge accepts agreement he brings a verdict according to it if not, the case go to trial. Bringing the written decision before the verdict is justified by the fact that the parties could not appeal on the verdict brought according to plea agreement. Actually, the parties and victim could appeal on decision about plea agreement (the victim if the judge accept it, the parties if reject), and when this decision become final, the judge pass a verdict according to it. The procedure before the court and judicial decisions about plea agreement are further explained in the second part of the paper.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Sporazum o priznanju krivice, Plea agreement",
pages = "333-319",
number = "3",
volume = "47",
url = "conv_2729"
}

Bajović, V.. (2009). Sporazum o priznanju krivice. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 47(3), 319-333.
conv_2729

Bajović V. Sporazum o priznanju krivice. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2009;47(3):319-333.
conv_2729 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Sporazum o priznanju krivice" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 47, no. 3 (2009):319-333,
conv_2729 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2008
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/400
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem
T1  - Right to remain silent
EP  - 17
IS  - 10
SP  - 5
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_1433
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2008",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem, Right to remain silent",
pages = "17-5",
number = "10",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_1433"
}

Bajović, V.. (2008). Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 57(10), 5-17.
conv_1433

Bajović V. Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem. in Pravni život. 2008;57(10):5-17.
conv_1433 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Pravo na odbranu ćutanjem" in Pravni život, 57, no. 10 (2008):5-17,
conv_1433 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2008
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/391
AB  - Pravo okrivljenog da se smatra nevinim dok se njegova krivica ne dokaže pravnosnažnom sudskom odlukom predstavlja jednu od osnovnih ustavnih i međunarodnopravnih garancija položaja okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku. Pravo okrivljenog da se smatra nevinim do okončanja krivičnog postupka obavezuje sva druga lica da poštuju ovu pretpostavku, te da svojim javnim izjavama o krivičnom postupku koji je u toku ne vređaju druga pravila postupka, prava okrivljenog i oštećenog, kao i načelo sudske nezavisnosti. Sloboda medija kao i pravo građana na obaveštenost, takođe predstavljaju značajne civilizacijske tekovine, proklamovane Ustavom Republike Srbije, kao i brojnim međunarodnim dokumentima. Cilj ovog rada je da ispita kako uskladiti kontradiktorne zahteve za poštovanjem pretpostavke nevinosti i sudske nezavisnosti s jedne, i slobode medija i prava građana na obaveštenost, s druge strane. U njemu se analizira regulativa ove oblasti u pravu Srbije, u pravnim sistemima drugih evropskih država, kao i praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava.
AB  - The presumption of innocence is a right of the accused to be presumed as innocent until and unless his guilt has been proved by final verdict of a court. This right of the accused obliges others to respect this presumption and not to violate, by their public statements, other rules of procedure rights of the defendant and injured party, judicial independence and impartiality. Freedom of media and the right of citizens to be informed, are also proclaimed by numerous international documents, as well as by the Serbian Constitution. The purpose of this article is to examine how to harmonize these conflicting requests for observation of presumption of innocence from one, and freedom of media from the other side. The Article deals with regulation of this conflict in Serbian legal system, regulations in other European countries, as well as the practice of the European court of Human Rights related to this topic.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pretpostavka nevinosti i sloboda štampe
T1  - Presumption of innocence and freedom of media
EP  - 210
IS  - 1
SP  - 194
VL  - 56
UR  - conv_123
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Pravo okrivljenog da se smatra nevinim dok se njegova krivica ne dokaže pravnosnažnom sudskom odlukom predstavlja jednu od osnovnih ustavnih i međunarodnopravnih garancija položaja okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku. Pravo okrivljenog da se smatra nevinim do okončanja krivičnog postupka obavezuje sva druga lica da poštuju ovu pretpostavku, te da svojim javnim izjavama o krivičnom postupku koji je u toku ne vređaju druga pravila postupka, prava okrivljenog i oštećenog, kao i načelo sudske nezavisnosti. Sloboda medija kao i pravo građana na obaveštenost, takođe predstavljaju značajne civilizacijske tekovine, proklamovane Ustavom Republike Srbije, kao i brojnim međunarodnim dokumentima. Cilj ovog rada je da ispita kako uskladiti kontradiktorne zahteve za poštovanjem pretpostavke nevinosti i sudske nezavisnosti s jedne, i slobode medija i prava građana na obaveštenost, s druge strane. U njemu se analizira regulativa ove oblasti u pravu Srbije, u pravnim sistemima drugih evropskih država, kao i praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava., The presumption of innocence is a right of the accused to be presumed as innocent until and unless his guilt has been proved by final verdict of a court. This right of the accused obliges others to respect this presumption and not to violate, by their public statements, other rules of procedure rights of the defendant and injured party, judicial independence and impartiality. Freedom of media and the right of citizens to be informed, are also proclaimed by numerous international documents, as well as by the Serbian Constitution. The purpose of this article is to examine how to harmonize these conflicting requests for observation of presumption of innocence from one, and freedom of media from the other side. The Article deals with regulation of this conflict in Serbian legal system, regulations in other European countries, as well as the practice of the European court of Human Rights related to this topic.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pretpostavka nevinosti i sloboda štampe, Presumption of innocence and freedom of media",
pages = "210-194",
number = "1",
volume = "56",
url = "conv_123"
}

Bajović, V.. (2008). Pretpostavka nevinosti i sloboda štampe. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 56(1), 194-210.
conv_123

Bajović V. Pretpostavka nevinosti i sloboda štampe. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2008;56(1):194-210.
conv_123 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Pretpostavka nevinosti i sloboda štampe" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 56, no. 1 (2008):194-210,
conv_123 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2007
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/321
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Medijacija u krivičnom postupku
T1  - Mediation in criminal procedure
EP  - 132
IS  - 10
SP  - 121
VL  - 56
UR  - conv_1407
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2007",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Medijacija u krivičnom postupku, Mediation in criminal procedure",
pages = "132-121",
number = "10",
volume = "56",
url = "conv_1407"
}

Bajović, V.. (2007). Medijacija u krivičnom postupku. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 56(10), 121-132.
conv_1407

Bajović V. Medijacija u krivičnom postupku. in Pravni život. 2007;56(10):121-132.
conv_1407 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Medijacija u krivičnom postupku" in Pravni život, 56, no. 10 (2007):121-132,
conv_1407 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2006
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/313
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Položaj i zaštita svedoka saradnika
T1  - Position and protection of witnesses turning state's evidence
EP  - 1189
IS  - 9
SP  - 1177
VL  - 55
UR  - conv_1375
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2006",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Položaj i zaštita svedoka saradnika, Position and protection of witnesses turning state's evidence",
pages = "1189-1177",
number = "9",
volume = "55",
url = "conv_1375"
}

Bajović, V.. (2006). Položaj i zaštita svedoka saradnika. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 55(9), 1177-1189.
conv_1375

Bajović V. Položaj i zaštita svedoka saradnika. in Pravni život. 2006;55(9):1177-1189.
conv_1375 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Položaj i zaštita svedoka saradnika" in Pravni život, 55, no. 9 (2006):1177-1189,
conv_1375 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bajović, Vanja
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/210
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Rešavanje sporova putem Interneta - online arbitraže
T1  - Online arbitration via Internet
EP  - 640
IS  - 11
SP  - 631
VL  - 53
UR  - conv_1340
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Bajović, Vanja",
year = "2004",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Rešavanje sporova putem Interneta - online arbitraže, Online arbitration via Internet",
pages = "640-631",
number = "11",
volume = "53",
url = "conv_1340"
}

Bajović, V.. (2004). Rešavanje sporova putem Interneta - online arbitraže. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 53(11), 631-640.
conv_1340

Bajović V. Rešavanje sporova putem Interneta - online arbitraže. in Pravni život. 2004;53(11):631-640.
conv_1340 .

Bajović, Vanja, "Rešavanje sporova putem Interneta - online arbitraže" in Pravni život, 53, no. 11 (2004):631-640,
conv_1340 .