TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Marko
AU  - Pavić, Dragan
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/931
AB  - Pojam uslovljena sloboda ugovaranja pojavio se u našoj pravnoj teoriji pre donošenja Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, a pojam usmerena sloboda ugovaranja posle stupanja Zakona na pravnu snagu. Oba su korišćena da označe transformacije slobode ugovaranja u pravu koje je bilo zasnovano na ideologiji socijalizma, društvenoj svojini i dirigovanoj, potom, dogovornoj ekonomiji. Uslovljena sloboda ugovaranja proizašla je iz prava korišćenja koje su preduzeća imala na sredstvima u društvenoj svojini i konstrukcije o dve komponente društvene svojine, javnopravnoj i privatnopravnoj. Prva je ograničavala drugu posredstvom normi iz pojedinačnog administrativnog akta i administrativnog propisa. Kao izrazi državne volje oni potčinjavaju ugovor: pojedinačni administrativni akt je uslov za nastanak ugovora, a administrativni propis omogućava, uslovljava, njegovo važenje. Usmerena sloboda ugovaranja je sloboda ugovaranja usmeravana ekonomskim poretkom utvrđenim ustavnopravnim okvirom, sistemskim zakonima i delimično normama Osnovnih načela Zakona o obligacionim odnosima koje su važile za društveno pravna preduzeća. Za slobodu ugovaranja privrednih subjekata i danas se može reći da je usmerena pravnim principima i normama privrednopravnog (ekonomskopravnog) javnog poretka kojima se sprovodi državna intervencija u privredene aktivnosti.
AB  - The term conditioned freedom of contracts appeared in our legal theory before the adoption of the Obligations Relations Act, whereas the term directed freedom of contracts occurred after the Act's entry into force. Both terms were used to signify transformation of freedom of con tracts within the legal system based on ideology of socialism, social ownership of the means of production and government ruled economy and, afterwards, 'coordinated economy'. Conditioned freedom of contracts originated from the right to use the means of production in social ownership. This right, which belonged to social (state-owned) companies, consisted of two components. The first, public-law component conditioned the second, private law component, by means of norms in individual administrative acts and administrative regulations. As these norms were an expression of state power, they make the contract subordinate: individual administrative act is a condition for the conclusion of contract, and administrative regulations for its validity. Directed freedom of contracts is freedom of making contracts directed by economic order established by the Constitution, systemic laws, and partially by the norms of the basic principles of the Obligations Relations Act which are related to social companies. As regards freedom of contracts it can be said that even today it is directed by legal principles and norms of economic-legal public policy through which the state interferes in business enterprises.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - O uslovljenoj i usmerenoj slobodi ugovaranja privrednih subjekata
T1  - On conditioned and directed freedom of contrats between business entity
EP  - 104
IS  - 1
SP  - 84
VL  - 64
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1601084D
UR  - conv_392
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Marko and Pavić, Dragan",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Pojam uslovljena sloboda ugovaranja pojavio se u našoj pravnoj teoriji pre donošenja Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, a pojam usmerena sloboda ugovaranja posle stupanja Zakona na pravnu snagu. Oba su korišćena da označe transformacije slobode ugovaranja u pravu koje je bilo zasnovano na ideologiji socijalizma, društvenoj svojini i dirigovanoj, potom, dogovornoj ekonomiji. Uslovljena sloboda ugovaranja proizašla je iz prava korišćenja koje su preduzeća imala na sredstvima u društvenoj svojini i konstrukcije o dve komponente društvene svojine, javnopravnoj i privatnopravnoj. Prva je ograničavala drugu posredstvom normi iz pojedinačnog administrativnog akta i administrativnog propisa. Kao izrazi državne volje oni potčinjavaju ugovor: pojedinačni administrativni akt je uslov za nastanak ugovora, a administrativni propis omogućava, uslovljava, njegovo važenje. Usmerena sloboda ugovaranja je sloboda ugovaranja usmeravana ekonomskim poretkom utvrđenim ustavnopravnim okvirom, sistemskim zakonima i delimično normama Osnovnih načela Zakona o obligacionim odnosima koje su važile za društveno pravna preduzeća. Za slobodu ugovaranja privrednih subjekata i danas se može reći da je usmerena pravnim principima i normama privrednopravnog (ekonomskopravnog) javnog poretka kojima se sprovodi državna intervencija u privredene aktivnosti., The term conditioned freedom of contracts appeared in our legal theory before the adoption of the Obligations Relations Act, whereas the term directed freedom of contracts occurred after the Act's entry into force. Both terms were used to signify transformation of freedom of con tracts within the legal system based on ideology of socialism, social ownership of the means of production and government ruled economy and, afterwards, 'coordinated economy'. Conditioned freedom of contracts originated from the right to use the means of production in social ownership. This right, which belonged to social (state-owned) companies, consisted of two components. The first, public-law component conditioned the second, private law component, by means of norms in individual administrative acts and administrative regulations. As these norms were an expression of state power, they make the contract subordinate: individual administrative act is a condition for the conclusion of contract, and administrative regulations for its validity. Directed freedom of contracts is freedom of making contracts directed by economic order established by the Constitution, systemic laws, and partially by the norms of the basic principles of the Obligations Relations Act which are related to social companies. As regards freedom of contracts it can be said that even today it is directed by legal principles and norms of economic-legal public policy through which the state interferes in business enterprises.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "O uslovljenoj i usmerenoj slobodi ugovaranja privrednih subjekata, On conditioned and directed freedom of contrats between business entity",
pages = "104-84",
number = "1",
volume = "64",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1601084D",
url = "conv_392"
}

Đurđević, M.,& Pavić, D.. (2016). O uslovljenoj i usmerenoj slobodi ugovaranja privrednih subjekata. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 64(1), 84-104.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1601084D
conv_392

Đurđević M, Pavić D. O uslovljenoj i usmerenoj slobodi ugovaranja privrednih subjekata. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2016;64(1):84-104.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1601084D
conv_392 .

Đurđević, Marko, Pavić, Dragan, "O uslovljenoj i usmerenoj slobodi ugovaranja privrednih subjekata" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 64, no. 1 (2016):84-104,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1601084D .,
conv_392 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Marko
AU  - Pavić, Dragan
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/923
AB  - Do donošenja Zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o obligacionim odnosima od 1993. godine sloboda ugovaranja sadržine ugovora iz člana 10 bila je ograničena prinudnim propisima, ustavom utvrđenim načelima društvenog uređenja i moralom socijalističkog samoupravnog društva. Posle njegovog stupanja na pravnu snagu sloboda ugovaranja je ograničena prinudnim propisima, javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima. Prepravka člana 10 ZOO otvorila je pitanja utvrđivanja sadržine i kontura ovih pojmova. Prinudni propisi označavaju opšte imperativne norme sadržane u zakonima i propisima donetim na osnovu zakona. Imperativnost može proizlaziti iz formulacije ili smisla norme. Dobri običaji ne označavaju faktički običaj, ponašanje koje praktikuje većina u društvu, niti apstraktno shvaćeni moral. Prema shvatanju koje se može nazreti iz sudskih odluka, dobri običaji su norma o moralnosti, o običaju savesnih ljudi. Javni poredak je neodređeni pravni pojam. Jezgro pojma sačinjavaju opšta pravna načela koja su izražena u ustavnim normama, ali u njegov sastav ulaze i opšti principi obligacionog prava, poput načela za- štite slabije strane u ugovoru, koje se može izvesti iz sadržine i cilja zakonskih normi.
AB  - In Obligations Relations Act the freedom of regulating contents of contract was limited by constitutionally determined principles of social system, mandatory rules and the moral of socialist self-managed society. After the changes in 1993 freedom of contracts has been limited by mandatory rules, public policy (l'ordre public) and good morals (boni mores). More than two decades of using these legal limitations in our law, a question of frame and content of these terms is still actual. Mandatory rules are general imperative norms contained in laws and regulations made according to law. The imperative quality of norms can be explicit or potential when it originates from the concept of the norm. In the second case it is a judge that determines the cogent character of the norm. The notion good morals is similar to potential mandatory norms in terms of it depending on the judge to determine whether a norm is good morals. This notion neither implies factual usages, i.e. behaviour of the majority of citizens, nor moral in abstract sense. The conclusion that can be drawn from court decisions, good morals is norm related to morality, the norm of how conscientious people act. Public policy is not a clearly defined legal term. Its content is almost identical with the content of the term of constitutionally determined principles of social system from the original version of the Obligations Relations Act made in 1978. The core of the concept is made of fundamental law principles expressed in constitution norms, but it includes also general principles of contract law, that can be found in the content and aim of a larger number of legal norms. As an example we can mention the principle of the protection of the weak party to the contract.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Nekoliko misli o ograničenjima slobode uređivanja sadržine ugovora u našem savremenom pravu
T1  - A few thoughts about the limitations of freedom of regulating contents of contract in our modern law
EP  - 61
IS  - 7-9
SP  - 45
VL  - 54
UR  - conv_2181
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Marko and Pavić, Dragan",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Do donošenja Zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o obligacionim odnosima od 1993. godine sloboda ugovaranja sadržine ugovora iz člana 10 bila je ograničena prinudnim propisima, ustavom utvrđenim načelima društvenog uređenja i moralom socijalističkog samoupravnog društva. Posle njegovog stupanja na pravnu snagu sloboda ugovaranja je ograničena prinudnim propisima, javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima. Prepravka člana 10 ZOO otvorila je pitanja utvrđivanja sadržine i kontura ovih pojmova. Prinudni propisi označavaju opšte imperativne norme sadržane u zakonima i propisima donetim na osnovu zakona. Imperativnost može proizlaziti iz formulacije ili smisla norme. Dobri običaji ne označavaju faktički običaj, ponašanje koje praktikuje većina u društvu, niti apstraktno shvaćeni moral. Prema shvatanju koje se može nazreti iz sudskih odluka, dobri običaji su norma o moralnosti, o običaju savesnih ljudi. Javni poredak je neodređeni pravni pojam. Jezgro pojma sačinjavaju opšta pravna načela koja su izražena u ustavnim normama, ali u njegov sastav ulaze i opšti principi obligacionog prava, poput načela za- štite slabije strane u ugovoru, koje se može izvesti iz sadržine i cilja zakonskih normi., In Obligations Relations Act the freedom of regulating contents of contract was limited by constitutionally determined principles of social system, mandatory rules and the moral of socialist self-managed society. After the changes in 1993 freedom of contracts has been limited by mandatory rules, public policy (l'ordre public) and good morals (boni mores). More than two decades of using these legal limitations in our law, a question of frame and content of these terms is still actual. Mandatory rules are general imperative norms contained in laws and regulations made according to law. The imperative quality of norms can be explicit or potential when it originates from the concept of the norm. In the second case it is a judge that determines the cogent character of the norm. The notion good morals is similar to potential mandatory norms in terms of it depending on the judge to determine whether a norm is good morals. This notion neither implies factual usages, i.e. behaviour of the majority of citizens, nor moral in abstract sense. The conclusion that can be drawn from court decisions, good morals is norm related to morality, the norm of how conscientious people act. Public policy is not a clearly defined legal term. Its content is almost identical with the content of the term of constitutionally determined principles of social system from the original version of the Obligations Relations Act made in 1978. The core of the concept is made of fundamental law principles expressed in constitution norms, but it includes also general principles of contract law, that can be found in the content and aim of a larger number of legal norms. As an example we can mention the principle of the protection of the weak party to the contract.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Nekoliko misli o ograničenjima slobode uređivanja sadržine ugovora u našem savremenom pravu, A few thoughts about the limitations of freedom of regulating contents of contract in our modern law",
pages = "61-45",
number = "7-9",
volume = "54",
url = "conv_2181"
}

Đurđević, M.,& Pavić, D.. (2016). Nekoliko misli o ograničenjima slobode uređivanja sadržine ugovora u našem savremenom pravu. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 54(7-9), 45-61.
conv_2181

Đurđević M, Pavić D. Nekoliko misli o ograničenjima slobode uređivanja sadržine ugovora u našem savremenom pravu. in Pravo i privreda. 2016;54(7-9):45-61.
conv_2181 .

Đurđević, Marko, Pavić, Dragan, "Nekoliko misli o ograničenjima slobode uređivanja sadržine ugovora u našem savremenom pravu" in Pravo i privreda, 54, no. 7-9 (2016):45-61,
conv_2181 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pavić, Dragan N.
AU  - Đurđević, Marko
PY  - 1993
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/59
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravni život
T1  - Šteta i njena naknada
EP  - 218
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 201
VL  - 42
UR  - conv_1508
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Pavić, Dragan N. and Đurđević, Marko",
year = "1993",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Šteta i njena naknada",
pages = "218-201",
number = "1-2",
volume = "42",
url = "conv_1508"
}

Pavić, D. N.,& Đurđević, M.. (1993). Šteta i njena naknada. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 42(1-2), 201-218.
conv_1508

Pavić DN, Đurđević M. Šteta i njena naknada. in Pravni život. 1993;42(1-2):201-218.
conv_1508 .

Pavić, Dragan N., Đurđević, Marko, "Šteta i njena naknada" in Pravni život, 42, no. 1-2 (1993):201-218,
conv_1508 .