Shvatiti analogiju ozbiljno - uloga zakonske analogije u stvaranju i tumačenju prava
Taking analogy seriously: Statutory analogy in creation and interpretation of law
Апстракт
U članku se analizira analogija, kao način rasuđivanja, a naročito u pravu. Analogija uopšte se određuje kroz svoju argumentativnu formu i kroz kognitivno-psihološku sadržinu. Kada je reč o analogiji u pravu, tradicionalna podela na analogia legis i analogia iuris se potiskuje kao nepotpuna i nedovoljno rasvetljujuća za ono što se zaista događa u pravnoj praksi. Umesto nje, u tekstu se, kao početna, postulira podela analogija u pravu na kazuističku i zakonsku. I dok se u common law sistemima više primenjuje i proučava ova prva, u kontinentalnim sistemima je, zbog primata pisanih izvora prava, interesantnije razmotriti drugu. Zakonska analogija se razmatra, takođe, s aspekta njene forme i sadržine, a zatim se izlažu njene osnovne vrste, da bi se na kraju, kroz nekoliko primera iz domaće sudske prakse, ilustrovalo kako se zakonska analogija u našoj praksi primenjuje samo intuitivno, shodno tome i nedovoljno obrazloženo a, na kraju krajeva, i neispravno.
In the article, author analyzes analogy generally and analogy in law, as a way of reasoning. The traditional division of the application of analogy in law into analogia legis and analogia iuris is perceived as incomplete and insufficiently clarifying for what is really happening in the practice of law. Instead, as a starting point, it emphasizes the division of analogies in law into casuistic and statutory analogy. While in common law systems the former is more applied and studied, in continental legal systems, due to the primacy of written sources of law, it is more interesting to consider the latter. The statutory analogy is firstly analyzed from the aspect of its form and content (retrieval and mapping). After that, its basic types are described. The first is the analogy extra legem, which serves to fill legal gaps, or more precisely, which attributes legal consequences to facts that are not explicitly described in the applicable legal provision. The second type of statutory analogy... is analogy intra legem, in which the argument of analogy is used to interpret legal norms. In the article are particularly depicted the two "incarnations" of analogy intra legem, extensive interpretation and systemic interpretative argument of analogy. Finally, through several cases from judicial practice of Serbian courts, it is illustrated how the statutory analogy is applied in this practice only intuitively, and therefore insufficiently explained, and, after all, incorrect.
Кључне речи:
zakonska analogija / tumačenje prava / otkrivanje / mapiranje / analogija extra i intra legem / statutory analogy / retrieval / mapping / interpretation of law / analogy intra legem / analogy extra legemИзвор:
Pravni zapisi, 2020, 11, 2, 461-503Издавач:
- Univerzitet Union - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Projekat Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu: Identitetski preobražaj Srbije
Колекције
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Dajović, Goran PY - 2020 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1183 AB - U članku se analizira analogija, kao način rasuđivanja, a naročito u pravu. Analogija uopšte se određuje kroz svoju argumentativnu formu i kroz kognitivno-psihološku sadržinu. Kada je reč o analogiji u pravu, tradicionalna podela na analogia legis i analogia iuris se potiskuje kao nepotpuna i nedovoljno rasvetljujuća za ono što se zaista događa u pravnoj praksi. Umesto nje, u tekstu se, kao početna, postulira podela analogija u pravu na kazuističku i zakonsku. I dok se u common law sistemima više primenjuje i proučava ova prva, u kontinentalnim sistemima je, zbog primata pisanih izvora prava, interesantnije razmotriti drugu. Zakonska analogija se razmatra, takođe, s aspekta njene forme i sadržine, a zatim se izlažu njene osnovne vrste, da bi se na kraju, kroz nekoliko primera iz domaće sudske prakse, ilustrovalo kako se zakonska analogija u našoj praksi primenjuje samo intuitivno, shodno tome i nedovoljno obrazloženo a, na kraju krajeva, i neispravno. AB - In the article, author analyzes analogy generally and analogy in law, as a way of reasoning. The traditional division of the application of analogy in law into analogia legis and analogia iuris is perceived as incomplete and insufficiently clarifying for what is really happening in the practice of law. Instead, as a starting point, it emphasizes the division of analogies in law into casuistic and statutory analogy. While in common law systems the former is more applied and studied, in continental legal systems, due to the primacy of written sources of law, it is more interesting to consider the latter. The statutory analogy is firstly analyzed from the aspect of its form and content (retrieval and mapping). After that, its basic types are described. The first is the analogy extra legem, which serves to fill legal gaps, or more precisely, which attributes legal consequences to facts that are not explicitly described in the applicable legal provision. The second type of statutory analogy is analogy intra legem, in which the argument of analogy is used to interpret legal norms. In the article are particularly depicted the two "incarnations" of analogy intra legem, extensive interpretation and systemic interpretative argument of analogy. Finally, through several cases from judicial practice of Serbian courts, it is illustrated how the statutory analogy is applied in this practice only intuitively, and therefore insufficiently explained, and, after all, incorrect. PB - Univerzitet Union - Pravni fakultet, Beograd T2 - Pravni zapisi T1 - Shvatiti analogiju ozbiljno - uloga zakonske analogije u stvaranju i tumačenju prava T1 - Taking analogy seriously: Statutory analogy in creation and interpretation of law EP - 503 IS - 2 SP - 461 VL - 11 DO - 10.5937/pravzap0-29531 UR - conv_2816 ER -
@article{ author = "Dajović, Goran", year = "2020", abstract = "U članku se analizira analogija, kao način rasuđivanja, a naročito u pravu. Analogija uopšte se određuje kroz svoju argumentativnu formu i kroz kognitivno-psihološku sadržinu. Kada je reč o analogiji u pravu, tradicionalna podela na analogia legis i analogia iuris se potiskuje kao nepotpuna i nedovoljno rasvetljujuća za ono što se zaista događa u pravnoj praksi. Umesto nje, u tekstu se, kao početna, postulira podela analogija u pravu na kazuističku i zakonsku. I dok se u common law sistemima više primenjuje i proučava ova prva, u kontinentalnim sistemima je, zbog primata pisanih izvora prava, interesantnije razmotriti drugu. Zakonska analogija se razmatra, takođe, s aspekta njene forme i sadržine, a zatim se izlažu njene osnovne vrste, da bi se na kraju, kroz nekoliko primera iz domaće sudske prakse, ilustrovalo kako se zakonska analogija u našoj praksi primenjuje samo intuitivno, shodno tome i nedovoljno obrazloženo a, na kraju krajeva, i neispravno., In the article, author analyzes analogy generally and analogy in law, as a way of reasoning. The traditional division of the application of analogy in law into analogia legis and analogia iuris is perceived as incomplete and insufficiently clarifying for what is really happening in the practice of law. Instead, as a starting point, it emphasizes the division of analogies in law into casuistic and statutory analogy. While in common law systems the former is more applied and studied, in continental legal systems, due to the primacy of written sources of law, it is more interesting to consider the latter. The statutory analogy is firstly analyzed from the aspect of its form and content (retrieval and mapping). After that, its basic types are described. The first is the analogy extra legem, which serves to fill legal gaps, or more precisely, which attributes legal consequences to facts that are not explicitly described in the applicable legal provision. The second type of statutory analogy is analogy intra legem, in which the argument of analogy is used to interpret legal norms. In the article are particularly depicted the two "incarnations" of analogy intra legem, extensive interpretation and systemic interpretative argument of analogy. Finally, through several cases from judicial practice of Serbian courts, it is illustrated how the statutory analogy is applied in this practice only intuitively, and therefore insufficiently explained, and, after all, incorrect.", publisher = "Univerzitet Union - Pravni fakultet, Beograd", journal = "Pravni zapisi", title = "Shvatiti analogiju ozbiljno - uloga zakonske analogije u stvaranju i tumačenju prava, Taking analogy seriously: Statutory analogy in creation and interpretation of law", pages = "503-461", number = "2", volume = "11", doi = "10.5937/pravzap0-29531", url = "conv_2816" }
Dajović, G.. (2020). Shvatiti analogiju ozbiljno - uloga zakonske analogije u stvaranju i tumačenju prava. in Pravni zapisi Univerzitet Union - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 11(2), 461-503. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-29531 conv_2816
Dajović G. Shvatiti analogiju ozbiljno - uloga zakonske analogije u stvaranju i tumačenju prava. in Pravni zapisi. 2020;11(2):461-503. doi:10.5937/pravzap0-29531 conv_2816 .
Dajović, Goran, "Shvatiti analogiju ozbiljno - uloga zakonske analogije u stvaranju i tumačenju prava" in Pravni zapisi, 11, no. 2 (2020):461-503, https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-29531 ., conv_2816 .