Репозиторијум Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду
Универзитет у Београду - Правни факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Преглед записа
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG

Нема приказа
Аутори
Kroll, Stefan
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
CC BY
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
The article deals with the controversial question of which parties bears the burden to proof the non-conformity of the goods at the time the risk passes. It analyses the various approaches adopted practice and the CISG literature and advocates a graded approach balancing the allocation of the burden of proof with evidentiary privileges at the preceding evidentiary stage.
Кључне речи:
presumption / non-conformity of the goods / burden of proof
Извор:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2011, 59, 3, 162-180

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1526
Колекције
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kroll, Stefan
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1526
AB  - The article deals with the controversial question of which parties bears the burden to proof the non-conformity of the goods at the time the risk passes. It analyses the various approaches adopted practice and the CISG literature and advocates a graded approach balancing the allocation of the burden of proof with evidentiary privileges at the preceding evidentiary stage.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG
EP  - 180
IS  - 3
SP  - 162
VL  - 59
UR  - conv_3091
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kroll, Stefan",
year = "2011",
abstract = "The article deals with the controversial question of which parties bears the burden to proof the non-conformity of the goods at the time the risk passes. It analyses the various approaches adopted practice and the CISG literature and advocates a graded approach balancing the allocation of the burden of proof with evidentiary privileges at the preceding evidentiary stage.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG",
pages = "180-162",
number = "3",
volume = "59",
url = "conv_3091"
}
Kroll, S.. (2011). The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59(3), 162-180.
conv_3091
Kroll S. The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2011;59(3):162-180.
conv_3091 .
Kroll, Stefan, "The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59, no. 3 (2011):162-180,
conv_3091 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумГрупеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB