An early critique of Kelsens pure theory of law: Slobodan Jovanović on the basic norm and primacy of international law
Abstract
The keystone of Kelsen s Pure Theory of Law is his doctrine of the basic norm. The basic norm is therefore the subject of Jovanović s critique of Kelsen s entire theory. According to Kelsen, the basic norm precedes the authority of a state, since it is positioned between the factual social force, which establishes the authority of the state, and the state. According to Jovanović, there is neither the law without a state, nor a state without the law; hence neither can Kelsenian legal norm, perceived as a norm prior to the state, be a positive legal norm, but an abstract, natural law norm. Jovanović discusses and criticizes Kelsen s solution to the problem of the relationship between national and international law, which depends on the establishment of the basic norm.
Keywords:
State law / Sovereignty / Pure Theory of Law / Philosophy of Law / International law / Basic normSource:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2013, 61, 3, 151-167Funding / projects:
- History of Political Ideas and Institutions in the Balkans in the 19th and 20th Centuries (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-177011)
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Milosavljević, Boris PY - 2013 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1571 AB - The keystone of Kelsen s Pure Theory of Law is his doctrine of the basic norm. The basic norm is therefore the subject of Jovanović s critique of Kelsen s entire theory. According to Kelsen, the basic norm precedes the authority of a state, since it is positioned between the factual social force, which establishes the authority of the state, and the state. According to Jovanović, there is neither the law without a state, nor a state without the law; hence neither can Kelsenian legal norm, perceived as a norm prior to the state, be a positive legal norm, but an abstract, natural law norm. Jovanović discusses and criticizes Kelsen s solution to the problem of the relationship between national and international law, which depends on the establishment of the basic norm. T2 - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu T1 - An early critique of Kelsens pure theory of law: Slobodan Jovanović on the basic norm and primacy of international law EP - 167 IS - 3 SP - 151 VL - 61 UR - conv_3204_6 ER -
@article{ author = "Milosavljević, Boris", year = "2013", abstract = "The keystone of Kelsen s Pure Theory of Law is his doctrine of the basic norm. The basic norm is therefore the subject of Jovanović s critique of Kelsen s entire theory. According to Kelsen, the basic norm precedes the authority of a state, since it is positioned between the factual social force, which establishes the authority of the state, and the state. According to Jovanović, there is neither the law without a state, nor a state without the law; hence neither can Kelsenian legal norm, perceived as a norm prior to the state, be a positive legal norm, but an abstract, natural law norm. Jovanović discusses and criticizes Kelsen s solution to the problem of the relationship between national and international law, which depends on the establishment of the basic norm.", journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu", title = "An early critique of Kelsens pure theory of law: Slobodan Jovanović on the basic norm and primacy of international law", pages = "167-151", number = "3", volume = "61", url = "conv_3204_6" }
Milosavljević, B.. (2013). An early critique of Kelsens pure theory of law: Slobodan Jovanović on the basic norm and primacy of international law. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61(3), 151-167. conv_3204_6
Milosavljević B. An early critique of Kelsens pure theory of law: Slobodan Jovanović on the basic norm and primacy of international law. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(3):151-167. conv_3204_6 .
Milosavljević, Boris, "An early critique of Kelsens pure theory of law: Slobodan Jovanović on the basic norm and primacy of international law" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 3 (2013):151-167, conv_3204_6 .