Repozitorijum Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Srpski (latinica) 
    • Engleski
    • Srpski (ćirilica)
    • Srpski (latinica)
  • Prijava
Pregled zapisa 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Pregled zapisa
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Pregled zapisa
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava

Relationship between human rights law and international humanitarian law

Thumbnail
2018
Preuzimanje 🢃
1696.pdf (216.9Kb)
Autori
Jutronić, Antonia
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
CC BY
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentu
Apstrakt
U radu se ispituje odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava, polazeći od stanovišta da se norme ta dva pravna režima međusobno ne isključuju već da mogu biti komplementarne, pogotovo imajući u vidu da su praksa međunarodnih organa i jurisprudencija međunarodnih sudova pokazale da stanje oružanog sukoba ne podrazumeva neprimenjivanje ljudskih prava. Iako su tradicionalno međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava i međunarodno humanitarno pravo posmatrani kao dve odvojene grane prava, koje koegzistiraju u okviru međunarodnog prava, počev od nedostatka volje kreatora Univerzalne deklaracije o ljudskim pravima i Ženevskih konvencija da ljudska prava dovedu u formalnu vezu sa stanjem oružanih sukoba, kroz praksu se došlo do zaključka da se ljudska prava primenjuju i u doba rata. Štaviše, neka prava ne mogu biti derogirana ni u vreme rata, te pravila međunarodnog humanitarnog prava ne predstavljaju automatski lex specialis. S druge strane, kada je reč o pravu na život... - najosnovnijem ljudskom pravu bez kojeg ne mogu biti ostvarena druga prava, međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava i međunarodno humanitarno pravo se u značajnoj meri razilaze. .

Traditionally, Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law had represented two separated legal regimes. Since their creation and the historical adoption of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and four Geneva Conventions at the end of 1940s, they had been treated as if they coexisted within the international law. In one hand, Human Rights Law had been dealing with the protection of persons from abusive power, and in the other International Humanitarian Law had been dealing with the conduct of parties to an armed conflict. Moreover, the developing international jurisprudence and the work of international institutions led to the recognition that two bodies of law substantially overlapped in practice. They appeared to be complementary and mutually reinforcing. However, in spite of their growing convergence, various perspectives must be taken into account when considering the nature of the relation between two legal regimes. Some significant differences still remain, particularly ...with regard to right to life because International Humanitarian Law tolerates at some specified degree killings, what is not the case within the regime of Human Rights Law. This article examines the theoretical relationship between two bodies of law (I), secondly, it analyses the jurisprudence and practice of international institutions and finally it demonstrates the divergence between Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law when it comes to one of the fundamental human rights - right to life (III).

Ključne reči:
pravo na život / međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava / međunarodno humanitarno pravo / Lex specialis / komplementarnost / right to life / Lex Specialis / international humanitarian law / human rights law / complementarity
Izvor:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2018, 66, 3, 348-367

DOI: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1803348J

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1703
Kolekcije
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Institucija/grupa
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jutronić, Antonia
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1703
AB  - U radu se ispituje odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava, polazeći od stanovišta da se norme ta dva pravna režima međusobno ne isključuju već da mogu biti komplementarne, pogotovo imajući u vidu da su praksa međunarodnih organa i jurisprudencija međunarodnih sudova pokazale da stanje oružanog sukoba ne podrazumeva neprimenjivanje ljudskih prava. Iako su tradicionalno međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava i međunarodno humanitarno pravo posmatrani kao dve odvojene grane prava, koje koegzistiraju u okviru međunarodnog prava, počev od nedostatka volje kreatora Univerzalne deklaracije o ljudskim pravima i Ženevskih konvencija da ljudska prava dovedu u formalnu vezu sa stanjem oružanih sukoba, kroz praksu se došlo do zaključka da se ljudska prava primenjuju i u doba rata. Štaviše, neka prava ne mogu biti derogirana ni u vreme rata, te pravila međunarodnog humanitarnog prava ne predstavljaju automatski lex specialis. S druge strane, kada je reč o pravu na život - najosnovnijem ljudskom pravu bez kojeg ne mogu biti ostvarena druga prava, međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava i međunarodno humanitarno pravo se u značajnoj meri razilaze. .
AB  - Traditionally, Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law had represented two separated legal regimes. Since their creation and the historical adoption of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and four Geneva Conventions at the end of 1940s, they had been treated as if they coexisted within the international law. In one hand, Human Rights Law had been dealing with the protection of persons from abusive power, and in the other International Humanitarian Law had been dealing with the conduct of parties to an armed conflict. Moreover, the developing international jurisprudence and the work of international institutions led to the recognition that two bodies of law substantially overlapped in practice. They appeared to be complementary and mutually reinforcing. However, in spite of their growing convergence, various perspectives must be taken into account when considering the nature of the relation between two legal regimes. Some significant differences still remain, particularly with regard to right to life because International Humanitarian Law tolerates at some specified degree killings, what is not the case within the regime of Human Rights Law. This article examines the theoretical relationship between two bodies of law (I), secondly, it analyses the jurisprudence and practice of international institutions and finally it demonstrates the divergence between Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law when it comes to one of the fundamental human rights - right to life (III).
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava
T1  - Relationship between human rights law and international humanitarian law
EP  - 367
IS  - 3
SP  - 348
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1803348J
UR  - conv_3065
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jutronić, Antonia",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U radu se ispituje odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava, polazeći od stanovišta da se norme ta dva pravna režima međusobno ne isključuju već da mogu biti komplementarne, pogotovo imajući u vidu da su praksa međunarodnih organa i jurisprudencija međunarodnih sudova pokazale da stanje oružanog sukoba ne podrazumeva neprimenjivanje ljudskih prava. Iako su tradicionalno međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava i međunarodno humanitarno pravo posmatrani kao dve odvojene grane prava, koje koegzistiraju u okviru međunarodnog prava, počev od nedostatka volje kreatora Univerzalne deklaracije o ljudskim pravima i Ženevskih konvencija da ljudska prava dovedu u formalnu vezu sa stanjem oružanih sukoba, kroz praksu se došlo do zaključka da se ljudska prava primenjuju i u doba rata. Štaviše, neka prava ne mogu biti derogirana ni u vreme rata, te pravila međunarodnog humanitarnog prava ne predstavljaju automatski lex specialis. S druge strane, kada je reč o pravu na život - najosnovnijem ljudskom pravu bez kojeg ne mogu biti ostvarena druga prava, međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava i međunarodno humanitarno pravo se u značajnoj meri razilaze. ., Traditionally, Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law had represented two separated legal regimes. Since their creation and the historical adoption of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and four Geneva Conventions at the end of 1940s, they had been treated as if they coexisted within the international law. In one hand, Human Rights Law had been dealing with the protection of persons from abusive power, and in the other International Humanitarian Law had been dealing with the conduct of parties to an armed conflict. Moreover, the developing international jurisprudence and the work of international institutions led to the recognition that two bodies of law substantially overlapped in practice. They appeared to be complementary and mutually reinforcing. However, in spite of their growing convergence, various perspectives must be taken into account when considering the nature of the relation between two legal regimes. Some significant differences still remain, particularly with regard to right to life because International Humanitarian Law tolerates at some specified degree killings, what is not the case within the regime of Human Rights Law. This article examines the theoretical relationship between two bodies of law (I), secondly, it analyses the jurisprudence and practice of international institutions and finally it demonstrates the divergence between Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law when it comes to one of the fundamental human rights - right to life (III).",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava, Relationship between human rights law and international humanitarian law",
pages = "367-348",
number = "3",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1803348J",
url = "conv_3065"
}
Jutronić, A.. (2018). Odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(3), 348-367.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1803348J
conv_3065
Jutronić A. Odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(3):348-367.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1803348J
conv_3065 .
Jutronić, Antonia, "Odnos međunarodnog prava ljudskih prava i međunarodnog humanitarnog prava" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 3 (2018):348-367,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1803348J .,
conv_3065 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
O repozitorijumu RALF | Pošaljite zapažanja

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Kompletan repozitorijumGrupeAutoriNasloviTemeOva institucijaAutoriNasloviTeme

Statistika

Pregled statistika

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
O repozitorijumu RALF | Pošaljite zapažanja

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB