Рад је усмерен на утврђивање правне природе правно неоснованог
обогаћења у српском праву. Најпре се разматра назив овог института,
потом историјски развој његова два основна елемента – кондикције и
тужбе de in rem verso. На крају се анализирају важеће норме правно не-
основаног обогаћења у српском праву и закључује да је њима регулисана
општа тужба из неоснованог обогаћења, одређене врсте кондикција, као
и тужба de in rem verso.
The aim of the paper is to examine the legal nature of the unjust enrichment
in the law of Serbia. The author first considers the title of the institute and
concludes that the legally unjust enrichment is the most appropriate term. In
the following chapter briefly given is the history of two constitutional elements
of the unjust enrichment – condictio and actio de in rem verso, beginning from
the Roman law, to glossators’ and postglossators’ work and different perceptions
of these institutes in the Prussian, Austrian, French and German legal history.
Finally given is the regulation of the unjust enrichment in the Serbian legal history
and the valid Law of Contract and Torts, as well as a brief review of the
Draft of the future Serbian Civil Code. In the valid Serbian law of unjust enrichment
present are main characteristics of both elements condictio and actio
de in rem verso. It is a justifiable conclusion that the Law of Contract and Torts
in art. 210 contains a general a...ction for prevention of enrichment. Besides the
cases of condictio and actio de in rem verso, this article includes certain cases
which do not belong to these remedies (condictio and actio de in rem verso) but
they undoubtedly do represent unjust enrichment. With certain departures, it
can be said that the scope of application of conditions is in limitations set by
Justinian law. On the other hand, Serbian actio de in rem verso in comparison
to the one in the Roman law, has practically nothing in common. Its formulation
in art. 217 and 218 of the Law of Contract and Torts is similar to the actio
de in rem verso given in art. 1041 and 1042 of the Austrian Civil Code.
Кључне речи:
Pravno neosnovano obogaćenje / Condictio / Actio de in rem verso / Unjust enrichment / Actio de in rem verso
Извор:
Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II, 2012, 302-316
Издавач:
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
TY - CHAP
AU - Cvetković Đorđević, Valentina
PY - 2012
UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1935
AB - Рад је усмерен на утврђивање правне природе правно неоснованог
обогаћења у српском праву. Најпре се разматра назив овог института,
потом историјски развој његова два основна елемента – кондикције и
тужбе de in rem verso. На крају се анализирају важеће норме правно не-
основаног обогаћења у српском праву и закључује да је њима регулисана
општа тужба из неоснованог обогаћења, одређене врсте кондикција, као
и тужба de in rem verso.
AB - The aim of the paper is to examine the legal nature of the unjust enrichment
in the law of Serbia. The author first considers the title of the institute and
concludes that the legally unjust enrichment is the most appropriate term. In
the following chapter briefly given is the history of two constitutional elements
of the unjust enrichment – condictio and actio de in rem verso, beginning from
the Roman law, to glossators’ and postglossators’ work and different perceptions
of these institutes in the Prussian, Austrian, French and German legal history.
Finally given is the regulation of the unjust enrichment in the Serbian legal history
and the valid Law of Contract and Torts, as well as a brief review of the
Draft of the future Serbian Civil Code. In the valid Serbian law of unjust enrichment
present are main characteristics of both elements condictio and actio
de in rem verso. It is a justifiable conclusion that the Law of Contract and Torts
in art. 210 contains a general action for prevention of enrichment. Besides the
cases of condictio and actio de in rem verso, this article includes certain cases
which do not belong to these remedies (condictio and actio de in rem verso) but
they undoubtedly do represent unjust enrichment. With certain departures, it
can be said that the scope of application of conditions is in limitations set by
Justinian law. On the other hand, Serbian actio de in rem verso in comparison
to the one in the Roman law, has practically nothing in common. Its formulation
in art. 217 and 218 of the Law of Contract and Torts is similar to the actio
de in rem verso given in art. 1041 and 1042 of the Austrian Civil Code.
PB - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2 - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II
T1 - Pravno neosnovano obogaćenje u srpskom pravu
T1 - Unjust enrichment in Serbian Law
EP - 316
SP - 302
ER -
@inbook{
author = "Cvetković Đorđević, Valentina",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Рад је усмерен на утврђивање правне природе правно неоснованог
обогаћења у српском праву. Најпре се разматра назив овог института,
потом историјски развој његова два основна елемента – кондикције и
тужбе de in rem verso. На крају се анализирају важеће норме правно не-
основаног обогаћења у српском праву и закључује да је њима регулисана
општа тужба из неоснованог обогаћења, одређене врсте кондикција, као
и тужба de in rem verso., The aim of the paper is to examine the legal nature of the unjust enrichment
in the law of Serbia. The author first considers the title of the institute and
concludes that the legally unjust enrichment is the most appropriate term. In
the following chapter briefly given is the history of two constitutional elements
of the unjust enrichment – condictio and actio de in rem verso, beginning from
the Roman law, to glossators’ and postglossators’ work and different perceptions
of these institutes in the Prussian, Austrian, French and German legal history.
Finally given is the regulation of the unjust enrichment in the Serbian legal history
and the valid Law of Contract and Torts, as well as a brief review of the
Draft of the future Serbian Civil Code. In the valid Serbian law of unjust enrichment
present are main characteristics of both elements condictio and actio
de in rem verso. It is a justifiable conclusion that the Law of Contract and Torts
in art. 210 contains a general action for prevention of enrichment. Besides the
cases of condictio and actio de in rem verso, this article includes certain cases
which do not belong to these remedies (condictio and actio de in rem verso) but
they undoubtedly do represent unjust enrichment. With certain departures, it
can be said that the scope of application of conditions is in limitations set by
Justinian law. On the other hand, Serbian actio de in rem verso in comparison
to the one in the Roman law, has practically nothing in common. Its formulation
in art. 217 and 218 of the Law of Contract and Torts is similar to the actio
de in rem verso given in art. 1041 and 1042 of the Austrian Civil Code.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II",
booktitle = "Pravno neosnovano obogaćenje u srpskom pravu, Unjust enrichment in Serbian Law",
pages = "316-302"
}
Cvetković Đorđević, V.. (2012). Pravno neosnovano obogaćenje u srpskom pravu. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 302-316.
Cvetković Đorđević V. Pravno neosnovano obogaćenje u srpskom pravu. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II. 2012;:302-316..
Cvetković Đorđević, Valentina, "Pravno neosnovano obogaćenje u srpskom pravu" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II (2012):302-316.
