TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1332
AB  - Ovaj rad je posvećen uporednoj analizi predloga zakonskog uređenja ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i predloga koji je učinjen u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije. U tekstu se prikazuje istorija razvoja ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u srpskom zakonodavstvu i objašnjavaju okolnosti koje su ga oblikovale i postavile u propis posvećen naslednom pravu. Autor posebno kritikuje predloge u Prednacrtu zato što njegovi redaktori nisu iskoristili priliku da stvore nova pravila koja bi odgovarala savremenim okolnostima već su po inerciji preuzeli postojeća pravila iz Zakona o nasleđivanju, u kojima su odavno uočeni značajni nedostaci. Autor zaključuje da ugovor o doživotnom izdržavanju zavređuje novo i sveobuhvatnije zakonsko uređenje koje bi odgovaralo potrebama prakse i koje bi rešilo dosadašnje dileme.
AB  - The article provides a comparative analysis of the legislative proposals contained in the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts and the Predraft of the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. The text explains the historical development of the life care contract in Serbian legislation and the circumstances that formed it and placed it into codification devoted to law on inheritance. The author is strongly critical of the proposals in the Predraft because its authors did not take advantage of the opportunity to create new rules that would be adequate in contemporary circumstances, but rather copied the existing rules of the Law on Inheritance, which have long been recognized as deficient in certain aspects. The author concludes that the life care contract deserves a new and more comprehensive legislative regime, which would respond to practical needs and solve existing dilemmas.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Normativno uobličavanje ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije
T1  - Normative construction of the life care contract in the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts and in the Predraft of the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia
EP  - 301
IS  - poseban
SP  - 289
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK10A
UR  - conv_561
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Ovaj rad je posvećen uporednoj analizi predloga zakonskog uređenja ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i predloga koji je učinjen u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije. U tekstu se prikazuje istorija razvoja ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u srpskom zakonodavstvu i objašnjavaju okolnosti koje su ga oblikovale i postavile u propis posvećen naslednom pravu. Autor posebno kritikuje predloge u Prednacrtu zato što njegovi redaktori nisu iskoristili priliku da stvore nova pravila koja bi odgovarala savremenim okolnostima već su po inerciji preuzeli postojeća pravila iz Zakona o nasleđivanju, u kojima su odavno uočeni značajni nedostaci. Autor zaključuje da ugovor o doživotnom izdržavanju zavređuje novo i sveobuhvatnije zakonsko uređenje koje bi odgovaralo potrebama prakse i koje bi rešilo dosadašnje dileme., The article provides a comparative analysis of the legislative proposals contained in the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts and the Predraft of the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. The text explains the historical development of the life care contract in Serbian legislation and the circumstances that formed it and placed it into codification devoted to law on inheritance. The author is strongly critical of the proposals in the Predraft because its authors did not take advantage of the opportunity to create new rules that would be adequate in contemporary circumstances, but rather copied the existing rules of the Law on Inheritance, which have long been recognized as deficient in certain aspects. The author concludes that the life care contract deserves a new and more comprehensive legislative regime, which would respond to practical needs and solve existing dilemmas.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Normativno uobličavanje ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije, Normative construction of the life care contract in the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts and in the Predraft of the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia",
pages = "301-289",
number = "poseban",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK10A",
url = "conv_561"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2022). Normativno uobličavanje ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(poseban), 289-301.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK10A
conv_561

Đurđević D. Normativno uobličavanje ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(poseban):289-301.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK10A
conv_561 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Normativno uobličavanje ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. poseban (2022):289-301,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK10A .,
conv_561 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1251
AB  - Autor analizira kako je rešeno obavljanje javnobeležničke delatnosti u uslovima vanrednog stanja. Poseban osvrt dat je na mogućnost da se negativan uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost prevaziđe primenom opštih pravila javnobeležničke delatnosti (prekid vanparničnog postupka), kao i na preporuke Ministarstva pravde za rad javnih beležnika za vreme vanrednog stanja proglašenog 15. marta 2020. godine.
AB  - The main topic of this paper is the manner in which the notary service has been organized and provided in Serbia during the state of emergency, which was declared on March 15, 2020 due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The author gives special attention to the possibility to resolve practical problems by adherence to the general rules and principles of the notary service (especially the rules on stay of non-contentious proceedings). The author also examines the contents and applicability of the recommendations issued by the Ministry of Justice of Serbia during the state of emergency.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost
T1  - The influence of the epidemic on notary service
EP  - 488
IS  - 4
SP  - 473
VL  - 59
DO  - 10.5937/PiP2104473D
UR  - conv_2348
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Autor analizira kako je rešeno obavljanje javnobeležničke delatnosti u uslovima vanrednog stanja. Poseban osvrt dat je na mogućnost da se negativan uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost prevaziđe primenom opštih pravila javnobeležničke delatnosti (prekid vanparničnog postupka), kao i na preporuke Ministarstva pravde za rad javnih beležnika za vreme vanrednog stanja proglašenog 15. marta 2020. godine., The main topic of this paper is the manner in which the notary service has been organized and provided in Serbia during the state of emergency, which was declared on March 15, 2020 due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The author gives special attention to the possibility to resolve practical problems by adherence to the general rules and principles of the notary service (especially the rules on stay of non-contentious proceedings). The author also examines the contents and applicability of the recommendations issued by the Ministry of Justice of Serbia during the state of emergency.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost, The influence of the epidemic on notary service",
pages = "488-473",
number = "4",
volume = "59",
doi = "10.5937/PiP2104473D",
url = "conv_2348"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2021). Uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 59(4), 473-488.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2104473D
conv_2348

Đurđević D. Uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost. in Pravo i privreda. 2021;59(4):473-488.
doi:10.5937/PiP2104473D
conv_2348 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Uticaj epidemije na javnobeležničku delatnost" in Pravo i privreda, 59, no. 4 (2021):473-488,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2104473D .,
conv_2348 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1206
AB  - Pozivanje naslednika oglasom predstavlja kompromis između istražnog načela u ostavinskom postupku i težnje da se ostavinska rasprava okonča u razumnom roku. Ako ostavinski sud ne može da utvrdi da li uopšte postoji neki privatnopravni subjekt koji bi mogao i hteo da nasledi ili ako sumnja da pored privatnopravnog subjekta za kojeg zna postoje još neki koji imaju isto ili jače pravo na nasleđe, on će pozvati potencijalne naslednike da se prijave na oglas u roku od godinu dana. Posledice nemogućnosti da se rasvetli ko su sve potencijalni naslednici nakon isteka jednogodišnjeg roka za prijavljivanje na oglas u srpskom pravu su različite, u zavisnosti od toga da li tada zaostavštinu treba dodeliti privatnopravnom subjektu ili državi. U takvoj situaciji ostavinski sud će privatnopravnog subjekta oglasiti za naslednika, dok će državi predati zaostavštinu na uživanje, uz mogućnost da stekne svojinu na pokretnim i nepokretnim stvarima iz zaostavštine istekom trogodišnjeg, odnosno desetogodišnjeg roka za održaj, koji se računa od momenta ostaviočeve smrti. Nakon analize praktičnih konsekvenci primene navedenih pravila, autor zaključuje da je zakonodavac propisivanjem posebnog naslednopravnog režima za državu kada se naslednici pozivaju oglasom nju privilegovao kao naslednika i time olakšao prelazak ostavinske mase iz režima privatne u režim javne svojine, što je u suprotnosti sa principom privatnopravnog karaktera nasleđivanja. Osim toga, pravila o dodeljivanju zaostavštine na uživanje Republici Srbiji su i pravno-dogmatski manjkava, jer su u suprotnosti kako sa principom univerzalne sukcesije i ex lege nasleđivanja (u momentu ostaviočeve smrti niko ne postaje naslednik, pa samim tim ni sopstvenik stvari iz zaostavštine), tako i sa opštim stvarnopravnim pravilima o sticanju svojine održajem (omogućuje da subjekt koji drži stvar kao plodouživalac istekom određenih rokova postane sopstvenik).
AB  - If it is unknown to the court whether the decedent has any heirs, or if the court suspects that the person who has a claim on the inheritance may not be the only or the closest relative of the decedent, the court shall publish a notice inviting people who have a claim on the inheritance to report to the court within one year from the publication of the notice. The public notice or invitation to the possible unknown heirs represents a compromise between the investigative principle in the probate proceedings and the need to bring such proceedings to an end within reasonable time. Following the public invitation by the court, the consequences of failure to identify all possible remaining inheritors shall depend on the identity of the known heir(s). If the known heir is a private entity, the court will declare them as heir. But, if the sole inheritor is the State, it will only acquire the usufruct of the estate, not legal ownership, with the possibility of acquisition of a title or right to property by uninterrupted and undisputed possession for a prescribed term of three years for movables and ten years for real estate. Th ese time limits run from the moment of the decedent's death. After examining the practical consequences of these rules, the author concludes that, by prescribing a special regime of succession for the State as inheritor when the unknown heirs are invited by public notice, the legislator has put the State in a privileged legal position in comparison to private entities. Th e special regime facilitates the transition of the estate from private to public ownership, which is contrary to the principle of the private legal nature of succession. In addition, the rules for allocating inheritance to the State are legally and dogmatically deficient because they are contrary to the principle of universal succession and ex lege inheritance (since at the moment of the decedent's death no one becomes the heir and the legal owner of the estate) and with the general rules on the acquisition of property by acquisitive prescription (as the existing rules enable the usufructuary to become the owner after the passage of the prescribed time period).
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pozivanje naslednika oglasom i naslednopravni položaj države u srpskom pravu
T1  - Public invitation to the heirs in probate proceedings and the State as an heir in Serbian law
EP  - 24
IS  - 4
SP  - 7
VL  - 58
DO  - 10.5937/PiP2004007D
UR  - conv_2334
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Pozivanje naslednika oglasom predstavlja kompromis između istražnog načela u ostavinskom postupku i težnje da se ostavinska rasprava okonča u razumnom roku. Ako ostavinski sud ne može da utvrdi da li uopšte postoji neki privatnopravni subjekt koji bi mogao i hteo da nasledi ili ako sumnja da pored privatnopravnog subjekta za kojeg zna postoje još neki koji imaju isto ili jače pravo na nasleđe, on će pozvati potencijalne naslednike da se prijave na oglas u roku od godinu dana. Posledice nemogućnosti da se rasvetli ko su sve potencijalni naslednici nakon isteka jednogodišnjeg roka za prijavljivanje na oglas u srpskom pravu su različite, u zavisnosti od toga da li tada zaostavštinu treba dodeliti privatnopravnom subjektu ili državi. U takvoj situaciji ostavinski sud će privatnopravnog subjekta oglasiti za naslednika, dok će državi predati zaostavštinu na uživanje, uz mogućnost da stekne svojinu na pokretnim i nepokretnim stvarima iz zaostavštine istekom trogodišnjeg, odnosno desetogodišnjeg roka za održaj, koji se računa od momenta ostaviočeve smrti. Nakon analize praktičnih konsekvenci primene navedenih pravila, autor zaključuje da je zakonodavac propisivanjem posebnog naslednopravnog režima za državu kada se naslednici pozivaju oglasom nju privilegovao kao naslednika i time olakšao prelazak ostavinske mase iz režima privatne u režim javne svojine, što je u suprotnosti sa principom privatnopravnog karaktera nasleđivanja. Osim toga, pravila o dodeljivanju zaostavštine na uživanje Republici Srbiji su i pravno-dogmatski manjkava, jer su u suprotnosti kako sa principom univerzalne sukcesije i ex lege nasleđivanja (u momentu ostaviočeve smrti niko ne postaje naslednik, pa samim tim ni sopstvenik stvari iz zaostavštine), tako i sa opštim stvarnopravnim pravilima o sticanju svojine održajem (omogućuje da subjekt koji drži stvar kao plodouživalac istekom određenih rokova postane sopstvenik)., If it is unknown to the court whether the decedent has any heirs, or if the court suspects that the person who has a claim on the inheritance may not be the only or the closest relative of the decedent, the court shall publish a notice inviting people who have a claim on the inheritance to report to the court within one year from the publication of the notice. The public notice or invitation to the possible unknown heirs represents a compromise between the investigative principle in the probate proceedings and the need to bring such proceedings to an end within reasonable time. Following the public invitation by the court, the consequences of failure to identify all possible remaining inheritors shall depend on the identity of the known heir(s). If the known heir is a private entity, the court will declare them as heir. But, if the sole inheritor is the State, it will only acquire the usufruct of the estate, not legal ownership, with the possibility of acquisition of a title or right to property by uninterrupted and undisputed possession for a prescribed term of three years for movables and ten years for real estate. Th ese time limits run from the moment of the decedent's death. After examining the practical consequences of these rules, the author concludes that, by prescribing a special regime of succession for the State as inheritor when the unknown heirs are invited by public notice, the legislator has put the State in a privileged legal position in comparison to private entities. Th e special regime facilitates the transition of the estate from private to public ownership, which is contrary to the principle of the private legal nature of succession. In addition, the rules for allocating inheritance to the State are legally and dogmatically deficient because they are contrary to the principle of universal succession and ex lege inheritance (since at the moment of the decedent's death no one becomes the heir and the legal owner of the estate) and with the general rules on the acquisition of property by acquisitive prescription (as the existing rules enable the usufructuary to become the owner after the passage of the prescribed time period).",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pozivanje naslednika oglasom i naslednopravni položaj države u srpskom pravu, Public invitation to the heirs in probate proceedings and the State as an heir in Serbian law",
pages = "24-7",
number = "4",
volume = "58",
doi = "10.5937/PiP2004007D",
url = "conv_2334"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2020). Pozivanje naslednika oglasom i naslednopravni položaj države u srpskom pravu. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 58(4), 7-24.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2004007D
conv_2334

Đurđević D. Pozivanje naslednika oglasom i naslednopravni položaj države u srpskom pravu. in Pravo i privreda. 2020;58(4):7-24.
doi:10.5937/PiP2004007D
conv_2334 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Pozivanje naslednika oglasom i naslednopravni položaj države u srpskom pravu" in Pravo i privreda, 58, no. 4 (2020):7-24,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2004007D .,
conv_2334 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/670
AB  - Priznanje javnobeležničkog zapisa (rekognicija) predstavlja centralni stadijum notarskog postupka, u kome notar upoznaje stranku sa sadržinom isprave koju je sa nju sačinio, da bi nakon toga stranka odobrila ispravu i potpisala se. Zakon o javnom beležništvu nije u potpunosti uredio ovaj stadijum, tj. nije regulisao kako se stranka upoznaje sa sadržinom javnobeležničkog zapisa i kako ga odobrava. Polazeći od značaja koji rekognicija ima za ostvarenje preventivne funkcije javnog beležništva, autor razmatra načine za popunjavanje ove pravne praznine. Na osnovu shodne primene pravila vanparničnog postupka i tumačenja čl. 76 ZJB, dolazi do zaključka da se stadijum priznanja javnobeležničkog zapisa u srpskom pravu sprovodi tako što notar čita stranci tekst pravnog posla sa izvornika javnobeležničkog zapisa, nakon čega ona izjavljuje da je njena volja verno uneta i potpisuje se na javnobeležničkom zapisu. Sve ove radnje se prostorno i vremenski nadovezuju čineći jedinstven akt kome moraju neprekidno prisustvovati i stranka i javni beležnik (princip unitas actus).
AB  - In the course of performing a notarial act (Notariatsakt), notary public should inform a party of the contents of the document he has drawn up for them, so that the party may approve of the document and sign it. This phase of the notarial proceedings, which includes presentation of the document to the party, her acceptance and signing thereof, may be described as the acknowledgment (Rekognition) of the notarial writing by the party before the notary public. Regrettably, the new Serbian Law on Notary Public (2011) does not regulate the aforesaid acknowledgment comprehensively, as it lacks specific provisions relating to the manner in which the party could get acquainted with the contents of the document prepared by the notary, and in which she may approve of it. The author recognizes this deficit as a legal gap or lacuna, sees it as an impediment to the preventive function of the notaries public, and considers the ways of filling it. On the basis of Article 76 of the Law on Notary Public, and the mutatis mutandis application of the existing rules of non-contentious proceedings, the author concludes that the stage of acknowledgement of the document prepared by the notary public occurs at a single time and place (unitas actus), in a manner that the notary reads the content of the deed to the party from the original document, the party affirms that her will was truthfully presented, and puts her signature to the notarial act.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Priznanje notarskog zapisa
T1  - Acknowledgement before the notary public
EP  - 184
IS  - 1
SP  - 159
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_251
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Priznanje javnobeležničkog zapisa (rekognicija) predstavlja centralni stadijum notarskog postupka, u kome notar upoznaje stranku sa sadržinom isprave koju je sa nju sačinio, da bi nakon toga stranka odobrila ispravu i potpisala se. Zakon o javnom beležništvu nije u potpunosti uredio ovaj stadijum, tj. nije regulisao kako se stranka upoznaje sa sadržinom javnobeležničkog zapisa i kako ga odobrava. Polazeći od značaja koji rekognicija ima za ostvarenje preventivne funkcije javnog beležništva, autor razmatra načine za popunjavanje ove pravne praznine. Na osnovu shodne primene pravila vanparničnog postupka i tumačenja čl. 76 ZJB, dolazi do zaključka da se stadijum priznanja javnobeležničkog zapisa u srpskom pravu sprovodi tako što notar čita stranci tekst pravnog posla sa izvornika javnobeležničkog zapisa, nakon čega ona izjavljuje da je njena volja verno uneta i potpisuje se na javnobeležničkom zapisu. Sve ove radnje se prostorno i vremenski nadovezuju čineći jedinstven akt kome moraju neprekidno prisustvovati i stranka i javni beležnik (princip unitas actus)., In the course of performing a notarial act (Notariatsakt), notary public should inform a party of the contents of the document he has drawn up for them, so that the party may approve of the document and sign it. This phase of the notarial proceedings, which includes presentation of the document to the party, her acceptance and signing thereof, may be described as the acknowledgment (Rekognition) of the notarial writing by the party before the notary public. Regrettably, the new Serbian Law on Notary Public (2011) does not regulate the aforesaid acknowledgment comprehensively, as it lacks specific provisions relating to the manner in which the party could get acquainted with the contents of the document prepared by the notary, and in which she may approve of it. The author recognizes this deficit as a legal gap or lacuna, sees it as an impediment to the preventive function of the notaries public, and considers the ways of filling it. On the basis of Article 76 of the Law on Notary Public, and the mutatis mutandis application of the existing rules of non-contentious proceedings, the author concludes that the stage of acknowledgement of the document prepared by the notary public occurs at a single time and place (unitas actus), in a manner that the notary reads the content of the deed to the party from the original document, the party affirms that her will was truthfully presented, and puts her signature to the notarial act.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Priznanje notarskog zapisa, Acknowledgement before the notary public",
pages = "184-159",
number = "1",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_251"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2012). Priznanje notarskog zapisa. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 60(1), 159-184.
conv_251

Đurđević D. Priznanje notarskog zapisa. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(1):159-184.
conv_251 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Priznanje notarskog zapisa" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 1 (2012):159-184,
conv_251 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/636
AB  - Stečaj nad zaostavštinom predstavlja posebnu vrstu individualnog stečajnog postupka koji se vodi nad imovinom umrlog fizičkog lica. Autor obrađuje karakteristična obeležja stečaja nad zaostavštinom po kojima se on razlikuje od opšteg stečajnog postupka. Ta obeležja se odnose na: stečajne razloge, lica koja su ovlašćena da pokrenu postupak, svojstvo stečajnog dužnika, stečajnu masu, isplatne redove kao i na separatio bonorum, koji predstavlja specifičnu materijalnopravnu posledicu otvaranja stečaja nad zaostavštinom. U zaključnim razmatranjima ukazuje se na potrebu uvođenja stečaja nad zaostavštinom u srpsko pravo da bi se obezbedio ravnopravan i pravičan tretman ostaviočevih poverilaca, postiglo njihovo najpovoljnije namirenje, ali i zaštitio naslednik koji je nasledio prezaduženu zaostavštinu.
AB  - Insolvency of the deceased's estate represents a special type of insolvency proceedings, which may be instituted over an estate of a deceased natural person. In the main focus of this paper are the ways in which the insolvency of estate differs from the insolvency proceedings in general. The differences between the two types of insolvency relate to: the reasons for initiating the insolvency proceedings, persons entitled to initiate the proceedings, legal personhood and attributes of the insolvent debtor, bankruptcy estate, payment priorities, as well as the separatio bonorum as a distinctive consequence of the opening of insolvency proceedings over the deceased's estate. The author calls attention to the need of introducing the insolvency proceedings over the estate of a natural person into Serbian law. This would ensure equal and fair treatment of the deceased's creditors, ascertain adequate payment priorities, but also protect the heirs who have inherited insolvent estates.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Stečaj nad zaostavštinom
T1  - Insolvency proceedings over the estate of a natural person
EP  - 37
IS  - 1-3
SP  - 9
VL  - 49
UR  - conv_2054
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Stečaj nad zaostavštinom predstavlja posebnu vrstu individualnog stečajnog postupka koji se vodi nad imovinom umrlog fizičkog lica. Autor obrađuje karakteristična obeležja stečaja nad zaostavštinom po kojima se on razlikuje od opšteg stečajnog postupka. Ta obeležja se odnose na: stečajne razloge, lica koja su ovlašćena da pokrenu postupak, svojstvo stečajnog dužnika, stečajnu masu, isplatne redove kao i na separatio bonorum, koji predstavlja specifičnu materijalnopravnu posledicu otvaranja stečaja nad zaostavštinom. U zaključnim razmatranjima ukazuje se na potrebu uvođenja stečaja nad zaostavštinom u srpsko pravo da bi se obezbedio ravnopravan i pravičan tretman ostaviočevih poverilaca, postiglo njihovo najpovoljnije namirenje, ali i zaštitio naslednik koji je nasledio prezaduženu zaostavštinu., Insolvency of the deceased's estate represents a special type of insolvency proceedings, which may be instituted over an estate of a deceased natural person. In the main focus of this paper are the ways in which the insolvency of estate differs from the insolvency proceedings in general. The differences between the two types of insolvency relate to: the reasons for initiating the insolvency proceedings, persons entitled to initiate the proceedings, legal personhood and attributes of the insolvent debtor, bankruptcy estate, payment priorities, as well as the separatio bonorum as a distinctive consequence of the opening of insolvency proceedings over the deceased's estate. The author calls attention to the need of introducing the insolvency proceedings over the estate of a natural person into Serbian law. This would ensure equal and fair treatment of the deceased's creditors, ascertain adequate payment priorities, but also protect the heirs who have inherited insolvent estates.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Stečaj nad zaostavštinom, Insolvency proceedings over the estate of a natural person",
pages = "37-9",
number = "1-3",
volume = "49",
url = "conv_2054"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2012). Stečaj nad zaostavštinom. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 49(1-3), 9-37.
conv_2054

Đurđević D. Stečaj nad zaostavštinom. in Pravo i privreda. 2012;49(1-3):9-37.
conv_2054 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Stečaj nad zaostavštinom" in Pravo i privreda, 49, no. 1-3 (2012):9-37,
conv_2054 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/615
AB  - Za sticanje nasledničkog svojstva u nemačkom pravu nije potrebna konstitutivna sudska odluka, jer zaostavština ex lege prelazi na naslednika u trenutku ostaviočeve smrti. Da bi olakšalo nasledniku dokazivanje njegovog svojstva, nemačko pravo predviđa ustanovu nasledničkog uverenja (Erbschein). To je uverenje o naslednom pravu i veličini naslednog dela koje nasledniku na njegov zahtev izdaje ostavinski sud. Funkciju koju u nemačkom pravu ima nasledničko uverenje, u srpskom pravu vrši ostavinsko rešenje. Autor analizira vrste nasledničkih uverenja, sudski postupak za njihovo izdavanje, kao i pravna dejstva koja se odnose na pretpostavku tačnosti i zaštitu pouzdanja savesnih pribavilaca u tačnost nasledničkog uverenja. Posebna pažnja posvećena je ukazivanju na razlike između nemačkog nasledničkog uverenja i srpskog ostavinskog rešenja.
AB  - In German law, the succession is determined either by law, or by disposition in contemplation of death. The heirs, or the residuary devisees of the deceased step into the shoes of the decedent at his death, by virtue of law. In other words, transmission of property at death occurs ex lege; it does not require a constructive decision of the probate court. The certificate of inheritance (Erbschein) is a document, issued by the probate court in Germany, at the successor’s request, as a proof of his right as beneficiary. This certificate states who became heir(s), and at which share, and is indispensable for the heir(s) to dispose of real estate, or bank assets. The author examines different types of certificates of inheritance, the proceedings before surrogate courts in which they are issued, presumption of accuracy of these certificates, and legal protection of the reliance in their accuracy in good faith. The author calls special attention to comparative differences between the German legal institute of certificate of inheritance, and the decisions rendered by the Serbian courts in probate proceedings.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Nasledničko uverenje (Erbschein) u nemačkom pravu
T1  - The Certificate of inheritance (Erbschein) in German law
EP  - 93
IS  - 2
SP  - 71
UR  - conv_1147
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Za sticanje nasledničkog svojstva u nemačkom pravu nije potrebna konstitutivna sudska odluka, jer zaostavština ex lege prelazi na naslednika u trenutku ostaviočeve smrti. Da bi olakšalo nasledniku dokazivanje njegovog svojstva, nemačko pravo predviđa ustanovu nasledničkog uverenja (Erbschein). To je uverenje o naslednom pravu i veličini naslednog dela koje nasledniku na njegov zahtev izdaje ostavinski sud. Funkciju koju u nemačkom pravu ima nasledničko uverenje, u srpskom pravu vrši ostavinsko rešenje. Autor analizira vrste nasledničkih uverenja, sudski postupak za njihovo izdavanje, kao i pravna dejstva koja se odnose na pretpostavku tačnosti i zaštitu pouzdanja savesnih pribavilaca u tačnost nasledničkog uverenja. Posebna pažnja posvećena je ukazivanju na razlike između nemačkog nasledničkog uverenja i srpskog ostavinskog rešenja., In German law, the succession is determined either by law, or by disposition in contemplation of death. The heirs, or the residuary devisees of the deceased step into the shoes of the decedent at his death, by virtue of law. In other words, transmission of property at death occurs ex lege; it does not require a constructive decision of the probate court. The certificate of inheritance (Erbschein) is a document, issued by the probate court in Germany, at the successor’s request, as a proof of his right as beneficiary. This certificate states who became heir(s), and at which share, and is indispensable for the heir(s) to dispose of real estate, or bank assets. The author examines different types of certificates of inheritance, the proceedings before surrogate courts in which they are issued, presumption of accuracy of these certificates, and legal protection of the reliance in their accuracy in good faith. The author calls special attention to comparative differences between the German legal institute of certificate of inheritance, and the decisions rendered by the Serbian courts in probate proceedings.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Nasledničko uverenje (Erbschein) u nemačkom pravu, The Certificate of inheritance (Erbschein) in German law",
pages = "93-71",
number = "2",
url = "conv_1147"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2012). Nasledničko uverenje (Erbschein) u nemačkom pravu. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(2), 71-93.
conv_1147

Đurđević D. Nasledničko uverenje (Erbschein) u nemačkom pravu. in Strani pravni život. 2012;(2):71-93.
conv_1147 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Nasledničko uverenje (Erbschein) u nemačkom pravu" in Strani pravni život, no. 2 (2012):71-93,
conv_1147 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/571
AB  - Prethodni i potonji naslednik mogu da se pojave u srpskom pravu kada zaveštalac imenuje naslednika pod uslovom ili rokom. Sumarna pravila srpskog ZON-a, koja prethodnog naslednika upodobljavaju sa plodouživaocem otvorila su dva ključna problema, kojima je posvećen ovaj rad. Prvi se tiče pravne prirode položaja prethodnog naslednika (da li on na dobrima iz zaostavštine ima plodouživanje ili vremenski ograničenu svojinu), a drugi se odnosi se na njegovo pravo da raspolaže dobrima iz zaostavštine. Analizirajući različita rešenja u uporednom pravu, kao i različita stanovišta koja su došla do izražaja u domaćoj i inostranoj teoriji i sudskoj praksi, autor dolazi do zaključka da prethodni naslednik nema plodouživanje na zaostavštini, već da u momentu ostaviočeve smrti nasleđuje zaostavštinu u svojinu koja je vremenski i sadržinski ograničena. Kada je reč o pravu prethodnog naslednika da raspolaže dobrima iz zaostavštine, autor smatra da je u interesu kako pravnog prometa, tako i prethodnog i potonjeg naslednika da budući Građanski zakonik napusti austrijski sistem potpuno ograničene slobode raspolaganja i da se prikloni sistemu liberaliteta. Za sistem liberaliteta karakteristično je što prethodni naslednik ima delimično ograničenu slobodu raspolaganja, pri čemu se interesi potonjeg naslednika prevashodno štite putem pravila o realnoj subrogaciji. Takav sistem omogućuje da se u periodu od ostaviočeve smrti do nastupanja supstitucionog slučaja ekonomski celishodnije upravlja zaostavštinom, jer prethodni naslednik može nasleđena dobra da razmeni za neke druge predmete koji manje gube na vrednosti i koji su podobni da daju veći prihod.
AB  - Under Serbian law, preceding and subsequent inheritor occur when testator appoints a successor under condition or with time limit. Terse rules of the Serbian Law on Inheritance qualify a preceding inheritor as an usufructuary. This opens up at least two questions. Firstly, what is the nature of the preceding inheritor's legal position? Does he have a usufruct of the estate, or a sort of time-limited property rights? Secondly, does he have a right to dispose of the estate? The author starts off with comparative analysis of a number of legislative, doctrinal and judicial outlooks on these issues, and concludes that preceding inheritor may only hold a position of proprietor, limited in time and content. He may not be qualified as an usufructuary. On the occasion of the testator's death, the preceding inheritor succeeds to his estate. His property rights are time-limited and restricted in substance. When it comes to the preceding inheritor's right to dispose of the inherited goods, it is the author's firm belief that the creators of the future Serbian civil codification should renounce the presently accepted Austrian system of prohibited disposition, and agree to the much more convenient system of liberality. The latter should accelerate legal transactions, and serve more adequately the interests of both the preceding and the subsequent inheritor. The system of liberality allows the preceding inheritor to dispose of the estate without excessive restrictions, while it protects interests of the subsequent inheritor via the rules on real subrogation. It facilitates a more efficient management of the estate in the time between the decease and expiration of the time-limit, or fulfillment of the condition; as the preceding inheritor may trade the inherited goods for other possessions, which may generate more income, or be less prone to losing value.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pravni položaj prethodnog naslednika
T1  - Legal position of the preceding inheritor
EP  - 132
IS  - 1
SP  - 104
VL  - 59
UR  - conv_219
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Prethodni i potonji naslednik mogu da se pojave u srpskom pravu kada zaveštalac imenuje naslednika pod uslovom ili rokom. Sumarna pravila srpskog ZON-a, koja prethodnog naslednika upodobljavaju sa plodouživaocem otvorila su dva ključna problema, kojima je posvećen ovaj rad. Prvi se tiče pravne prirode položaja prethodnog naslednika (da li on na dobrima iz zaostavštine ima plodouživanje ili vremenski ograničenu svojinu), a drugi se odnosi se na njegovo pravo da raspolaže dobrima iz zaostavštine. Analizirajući različita rešenja u uporednom pravu, kao i različita stanovišta koja su došla do izražaja u domaćoj i inostranoj teoriji i sudskoj praksi, autor dolazi do zaključka da prethodni naslednik nema plodouživanje na zaostavštini, već da u momentu ostaviočeve smrti nasleđuje zaostavštinu u svojinu koja je vremenski i sadržinski ograničena. Kada je reč o pravu prethodnog naslednika da raspolaže dobrima iz zaostavštine, autor smatra da je u interesu kako pravnog prometa, tako i prethodnog i potonjeg naslednika da budući Građanski zakonik napusti austrijski sistem potpuno ograničene slobode raspolaganja i da se prikloni sistemu liberaliteta. Za sistem liberaliteta karakteristično je što prethodni naslednik ima delimično ograničenu slobodu raspolaganja, pri čemu se interesi potonjeg naslednika prevashodno štite putem pravila o realnoj subrogaciji. Takav sistem omogućuje da se u periodu od ostaviočeve smrti do nastupanja supstitucionog slučaja ekonomski celishodnije upravlja zaostavštinom, jer prethodni naslednik može nasleđena dobra da razmeni za neke druge predmete koji manje gube na vrednosti i koji su podobni da daju veći prihod., Under Serbian law, preceding and subsequent inheritor occur when testator appoints a successor under condition or with time limit. Terse rules of the Serbian Law on Inheritance qualify a preceding inheritor as an usufructuary. This opens up at least two questions. Firstly, what is the nature of the preceding inheritor's legal position? Does he have a usufruct of the estate, or a sort of time-limited property rights? Secondly, does he have a right to dispose of the estate? The author starts off with comparative analysis of a number of legislative, doctrinal and judicial outlooks on these issues, and concludes that preceding inheritor may only hold a position of proprietor, limited in time and content. He may not be qualified as an usufructuary. On the occasion of the testator's death, the preceding inheritor succeeds to his estate. His property rights are time-limited and restricted in substance. When it comes to the preceding inheritor's right to dispose of the inherited goods, it is the author's firm belief that the creators of the future Serbian civil codification should renounce the presently accepted Austrian system of prohibited disposition, and agree to the much more convenient system of liberality. The latter should accelerate legal transactions, and serve more adequately the interests of both the preceding and the subsequent inheritor. The system of liberality allows the preceding inheritor to dispose of the estate without excessive restrictions, while it protects interests of the subsequent inheritor via the rules on real subrogation. It facilitates a more efficient management of the estate in the time between the decease and expiration of the time-limit, or fulfillment of the condition; as the preceding inheritor may trade the inherited goods for other possessions, which may generate more income, or be less prone to losing value.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pravni položaj prethodnog naslednika, Legal position of the preceding inheritor",
pages = "132-104",
number = "1",
volume = "59",
url = "conv_219"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2011). Pravni položaj prethodnog naslednika. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 59(1), 104-132.
conv_219

Đurđević D. Pravni položaj prethodnog naslednika. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2011;59(1):104-132.
conv_219 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Pravni položaj prethodnog naslednika" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59, no. 1 (2011):104-132,
conv_219 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/539
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Rainer Hausmann, Gerhard Hohloch (Hrsg): Handbuch des erbrechts, 2. Auflage, Erich Schmidt verlag, Berlin, 2010
EP  - 409
IS  - 2
SP  - 404
VL  - 58
UR  - conv_207
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2010",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Rainer Hausmann, Gerhard Hohloch (Hrsg): Handbuch des erbrechts, 2. Auflage, Erich Schmidt verlag, Berlin, 2010",
pages = "409-404",
number = "2",
volume = "58",
url = "conv_207"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2010). Rainer Hausmann, Gerhard Hohloch (Hrsg): Handbuch des erbrechts, 2. Auflage, Erich Schmidt verlag, Berlin, 2010. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 58(2), 404-409.
conv_207

Đurđević D. Rainer Hausmann, Gerhard Hohloch (Hrsg): Handbuch des erbrechts, 2. Auflage, Erich Schmidt verlag, Berlin, 2010. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2010;58(2):404-409.
conv_207 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Rainer Hausmann, Gerhard Hohloch (Hrsg): Handbuch des erbrechts, 2. Auflage, Erich Schmidt verlag, Berlin, 2010" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58, no. 2 (2010):404-409,
conv_207 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/535
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Dieter Leipold: Erbrecht - ein Lehrbuch mit fallen und kontrollfragen, 18. Neubearbeitete auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, 2010
EP  - 394
IS  - 1
SP  - 388
VL  - 58
UR  - conv_195
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2010",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Dieter Leipold: Erbrecht - ein Lehrbuch mit fallen und kontrollfragen, 18. Neubearbeitete auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, 2010",
pages = "394-388",
number = "1",
volume = "58",
url = "conv_195"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2010). Dieter Leipold: Erbrecht - ein Lehrbuch mit fallen und kontrollfragen, 18. Neubearbeitete auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, 2010. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 58(1), 388-394.
conv_195

Đurđević D. Dieter Leipold: Erbrecht - ein Lehrbuch mit fallen und kontrollfragen, 18. Neubearbeitete auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, 2010. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2010;58(1):388-394.
conv_195 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Dieter Leipold: Erbrecht - ein Lehrbuch mit fallen und kontrollfragen, 18. Neubearbeitete auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, 2010" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58, no. 1 (2010):388-394,
conv_195 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/524
AB  - Član 64 Porodičnog zakona predviđa da svaki maloletnik može samostalno da preduzima neutralne pravne poslove, tj. poslove kojima ne stiče ni prava ni obaveze. Ovo pravilo, nastalo po uzoru na nemačko pravo, izazvalo je brojne kontroverze među srpskim pravnicima. Dok jedni negiraju kategoriju neutralnog pravnog posla, smatrajući da on predstavlja contradictio in adjecto, autori koji ga ne osporavaju nemaju jedinstven stav u pogledu toga za koje pravne poslove se može kazati da su neutralni. U prvom delu rada izložena su shvatanja o neutralnom pravnom poslu koja su razvijena u uporednom pravu, analizirane su situacije u kojima se takvi poslovi pojavljuju, kritikovana je definicija neutralnog pravnog posla predviđena u čl. 64 Porodičnog zakona i zauzeto je stanovište da neutralne pravne poslove treba razumeti kao pravne poslove koji ne donose nikakvu pravnu korist niti pravni uštrb licu koje ih preduzima. Pošto konstatuje da je preduzimanje svakog pravnog posla skopčano za određenim uštrbima (pravnim, vaspitnim direktnim, indirektnim, izvesnim i neizvesnim), autor u drugom delu rada analizira koje uštrbe treba smatrati relevantnim. Nakon izlaganja različitih shvatanja koja postoje u stranoj teoriji i sudskoj praksi (teorija o razlikovanju neposrednih i posrednih uštrba, teorija o ekonomskom načinu posmatranja, teorija o starateljskom načinu posmatranja), autor zauzima stanovište da su relevantni svi izvesni pravni uštrbi, tj. oni uštrbi koji se ispoljavaju u pravnoj sferi i koji nastaju na osnovu činjenica koje su objektivno utvrdive u momentu preduzimanja pravnog posla.
AB  - Under Article 64 of the Serbian Family Law Act (2005), a minor can independently undertake neutral legal transactions (neutrale Rechtsgeschafte), i.e. the transactions by which he or she does not assume any rights or obligations. This rule, shaped after a similar rule of German law, caused a number of controversies amongst Serbian lawyers and legal scholars. While some of them negate the idea of neutral legal transaction claiming that it represents a contradiction in terms; others do not reject the notion of neutral legal transactions, but have no settled catalogue of the legal transactions which qualify as neutral. The author offers a scrupulous and detailed comparative analysis of the rules on, and theoretical readings of, the neutral legal transactions; and lays open some practical situations in which these rules may apply. The author disapproves of the way in which the abovementioned rule of Serbian law is phrased, and argues that the term 'neutral legal transaction' should correspond to a legal transaction which does not produce any relevant legal advantage or disadvantage to the person who is undertaking it. The focal point of the notion of neutral legal transactions is the absence of any relevant legal benefits or drawbacks to the subject entering into such transaction, and not merely the fact that he or she does not assume any rights or obligations. The author asserts that every legal transaction causes certain drawbacks (legal, instructional, direct, indirect, certain, uncertain) to the subject and thus tries to detect the drawbacks which should be deemed relevant. To this end, the author scrutinizes different theories developed in some foreign legal doctrines, such as the theory of direct v. indirect drawbacks the theory of economic drawback, the custodian theory. He concludes that relevant legal disadvantages (drawbacks) should be those which are certain that is those which manifest themselves in the legal sphere, and originate from the facts which are objectively detectable at the moment of entering a neutral legal transaction.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Neutralni pravni poslovi
T1  - Neutral legal transactions
EP  - 107
IS  - 2
SP  - 77
VL  - 58
UR  - conv_197
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Član 64 Porodičnog zakona predviđa da svaki maloletnik može samostalno da preduzima neutralne pravne poslove, tj. poslove kojima ne stiče ni prava ni obaveze. Ovo pravilo, nastalo po uzoru na nemačko pravo, izazvalo je brojne kontroverze među srpskim pravnicima. Dok jedni negiraju kategoriju neutralnog pravnog posla, smatrajući da on predstavlja contradictio in adjecto, autori koji ga ne osporavaju nemaju jedinstven stav u pogledu toga za koje pravne poslove se može kazati da su neutralni. U prvom delu rada izložena su shvatanja o neutralnom pravnom poslu koja su razvijena u uporednom pravu, analizirane su situacije u kojima se takvi poslovi pojavljuju, kritikovana je definicija neutralnog pravnog posla predviđena u čl. 64 Porodičnog zakona i zauzeto je stanovište da neutralne pravne poslove treba razumeti kao pravne poslove koji ne donose nikakvu pravnu korist niti pravni uštrb licu koje ih preduzima. Pošto konstatuje da je preduzimanje svakog pravnog posla skopčano za određenim uštrbima (pravnim, vaspitnim direktnim, indirektnim, izvesnim i neizvesnim), autor u drugom delu rada analizira koje uštrbe treba smatrati relevantnim. Nakon izlaganja različitih shvatanja koja postoje u stranoj teoriji i sudskoj praksi (teorija o razlikovanju neposrednih i posrednih uštrba, teorija o ekonomskom načinu posmatranja, teorija o starateljskom načinu posmatranja), autor zauzima stanovište da su relevantni svi izvesni pravni uštrbi, tj. oni uštrbi koji se ispoljavaju u pravnoj sferi i koji nastaju na osnovu činjenica koje su objektivno utvrdive u momentu preduzimanja pravnog posla., Under Article 64 of the Serbian Family Law Act (2005), a minor can independently undertake neutral legal transactions (neutrale Rechtsgeschafte), i.e. the transactions by which he or she does not assume any rights or obligations. This rule, shaped after a similar rule of German law, caused a number of controversies amongst Serbian lawyers and legal scholars. While some of them negate the idea of neutral legal transaction claiming that it represents a contradiction in terms; others do not reject the notion of neutral legal transactions, but have no settled catalogue of the legal transactions which qualify as neutral. The author offers a scrupulous and detailed comparative analysis of the rules on, and theoretical readings of, the neutral legal transactions; and lays open some practical situations in which these rules may apply. The author disapproves of the way in which the abovementioned rule of Serbian law is phrased, and argues that the term 'neutral legal transaction' should correspond to a legal transaction which does not produce any relevant legal advantage or disadvantage to the person who is undertaking it. The focal point of the notion of neutral legal transactions is the absence of any relevant legal benefits or drawbacks to the subject entering into such transaction, and not merely the fact that he or she does not assume any rights or obligations. The author asserts that every legal transaction causes certain drawbacks (legal, instructional, direct, indirect, certain, uncertain) to the subject and thus tries to detect the drawbacks which should be deemed relevant. To this end, the author scrutinizes different theories developed in some foreign legal doctrines, such as the theory of direct v. indirect drawbacks the theory of economic drawback, the custodian theory. He concludes that relevant legal disadvantages (drawbacks) should be those which are certain that is those which manifest themselves in the legal sphere, and originate from the facts which are objectively detectable at the moment of entering a neutral legal transaction.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Neutralni pravni poslovi, Neutral legal transactions",
pages = "107-77",
number = "2",
volume = "58",
url = "conv_197"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2010). Neutralni pravni poslovi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 58(2), 77-107.
conv_197

Đurđević D. Neutralni pravni poslovi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2010;58(2):77-107.
conv_197 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Neutralni pravni poslovi" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58, no. 2 (2010):77-107,
conv_197 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/431
AB  - Autor analizira razloge za nedostojnost koje je predložila Komisija za izradu Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije (koju je imenovala Vlada Republike Srbije 2006. godine) i konstatuje da su učinjene dve izmene. Jedna izmena je učinjena po uzoru na § 2339. st. 1. Nemačkog građanskog zakonika i predviđa da je nedostojan onaj ko umišljajno dovede ostavioca u stanje stalne nesposobnosti za sačinjavanje testamenta. Druga izmena se ogleda u uvođenju novog razloga za nedostojnost koji predviđa da je nedostojan onaj koji je onemogućio ili pokušao da onemogući ostvarenje onog reda nasleđivanja koji je ostavilac odredio ili hteo da odredi ili sa kojim je ostavilac računao. Autor konstatuje da učinjene izmene nisu unapredile postojeći sistem nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje. Predložene odredbe ne poseduju potrebnu preciznost, niti su u stanju da odgovore pravno-političkim ciljevima ustanove nedostojnosti. S druge strane, Komisija je propustila da otkloni nedostatke razloga za nedostojnost koji se tiče težeg ogrešenja o zakonsku obavezu izdržavanja prema ostaviocu. Autor predlaže da se Komisija za izradu Građanskog zakonika osloni na postojeća rešenja, koja su nastala po uzoru na čl. 540. Švajcarskog građanskog zakonika. Najbitnije izmene ticale bi se preciznijeg formulisanja razloga za nedostojnost koji se tiče povrede zakonske obaveze izdržavanja prema ostaviocu. Takođe, predlaže se da lišenje roditeljskog prava prema ostaviocu bude uvršćeno u katalog razloga za nedostojnost, jer bi se time afirmisao princip porodičnopravne pravičnosti i zaštita prava deteta.
AB  - The author analyzes the reasons for unworthiness to inherit that are proposed by the Commission working on the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia (which was appointed by the Government of the Republic of Serbia in 2006) and concludes that two changes have been made. The first change has been done following the example of the § 2339. item 1. of the German Civil Code and it provides that the person is unworthy to inherit if he/she willingly puts the testator in the state of permanent incapability to make a will. The second change relates to the introduction of the new reason for the unworthiness to inherit, proclaiming that the person is unworthy to inherit if he/she obstructs or tries to obstruct the line of inheritance established by the testator or intended to be established by the testator or counted on by the testator. The author concludes that the changes did not improve the existing system of unworthiness to inherit. The proposed changes do not posses a necessary accuracy, and they are not able to respond to the legal and political goals of the concept of unworthiness to inherit. On the other hand, the Commission omitted to remove the shortcoming of the unworthiness reason related to the major infringement of a duty to financially support the testator. The author proposes that the Commission working on the Civil Code shall rely on the existing solutions that were created following the example of Article 540 of the Swiss Civil Code. The most significant changes would relate to a more precise establishment of the reasons for unworthiness to inherit that relate to the infringement of a duty to financially support the testator. In addition to that, a proposal has been made to include the deprivation of the parental right into the reasons for unworthiness to inherit, because that would support the principle of family law justice and child protection.
PB  - Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad
T2  - Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
T1  - O reformi razloga nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje
T1  - On the reform of the reasons for unworthiness to inherit
EP  - 227
IS  - 6
SP  - 211
VL  - 81
DO  - 10.5937/gakv0906211D
UR  - conv_1026
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Autor analizira razloge za nedostojnost koje je predložila Komisija za izradu Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije (koju je imenovala Vlada Republike Srbije 2006. godine) i konstatuje da su učinjene dve izmene. Jedna izmena je učinjena po uzoru na § 2339. st. 1. Nemačkog građanskog zakonika i predviđa da je nedostojan onaj ko umišljajno dovede ostavioca u stanje stalne nesposobnosti za sačinjavanje testamenta. Druga izmena se ogleda u uvođenju novog razloga za nedostojnost koji predviđa da je nedostojan onaj koji je onemogućio ili pokušao da onemogući ostvarenje onog reda nasleđivanja koji je ostavilac odredio ili hteo da odredi ili sa kojim je ostavilac računao. Autor konstatuje da učinjene izmene nisu unapredile postojeći sistem nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje. Predložene odredbe ne poseduju potrebnu preciznost, niti su u stanju da odgovore pravno-političkim ciljevima ustanove nedostojnosti. S druge strane, Komisija je propustila da otkloni nedostatke razloga za nedostojnost koji se tiče težeg ogrešenja o zakonsku obavezu izdržavanja prema ostaviocu. Autor predlaže da se Komisija za izradu Građanskog zakonika osloni na postojeća rešenja, koja su nastala po uzoru na čl. 540. Švajcarskog građanskog zakonika. Najbitnije izmene ticale bi se preciznijeg formulisanja razloga za nedostojnost koji se tiče povrede zakonske obaveze izdržavanja prema ostaviocu. Takođe, predlaže se da lišenje roditeljskog prava prema ostaviocu bude uvršćeno u katalog razloga za nedostojnost, jer bi se time afirmisao princip porodičnopravne pravičnosti i zaštita prava deteta., The author analyzes the reasons for unworthiness to inherit that are proposed by the Commission working on the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia (which was appointed by the Government of the Republic of Serbia in 2006) and concludes that two changes have been made. The first change has been done following the example of the § 2339. item 1. of the German Civil Code and it provides that the person is unworthy to inherit if he/she willingly puts the testator in the state of permanent incapability to make a will. The second change relates to the introduction of the new reason for the unworthiness to inherit, proclaiming that the person is unworthy to inherit if he/she obstructs or tries to obstruct the line of inheritance established by the testator or intended to be established by the testator or counted on by the testator. The author concludes that the changes did not improve the existing system of unworthiness to inherit. The proposed changes do not posses a necessary accuracy, and they are not able to respond to the legal and political goals of the concept of unworthiness to inherit. On the other hand, the Commission omitted to remove the shortcoming of the unworthiness reason related to the major infringement of a duty to financially support the testator. The author proposes that the Commission working on the Civil Code shall rely on the existing solutions that were created following the example of Article 540 of the Swiss Civil Code. The most significant changes would relate to a more precise establishment of the reasons for unworthiness to inherit that relate to the infringement of a duty to financially support the testator. In addition to that, a proposal has been made to include the deprivation of the parental right into the reasons for unworthiness to inherit, because that would support the principle of family law justice and child protection.",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad",
journal = "Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine",
title = "O reformi razloga nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje, On the reform of the reasons for unworthiness to inherit",
pages = "227-211",
number = "6",
volume = "81",
doi = "10.5937/gakv0906211D",
url = "conv_1026"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2009). O reformi razloga nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad., 81(6), 211-227.
https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv0906211D
conv_1026

Đurđević D. O reformi razloga nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine. 2009;81(6):211-227.
doi:10.5937/gakv0906211D
conv_1026 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "O reformi razloga nedostojnosti za nasleđivanje" in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 81, no. 6 (2009):211-227,
https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv0906211D .,
conv_1026 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/441
AB  - Srpsko pravo zabranjuje ugovor o nasleđivanju. Ta zabrana se pravda njegovom nepotrebnošću, neelastičnošću, špekulativnim karakterom, kao i tvrdnjom da ovaj ugovor preterano komplikuje ostavinske rasprave. Vladina Komisija za izradu Građanskog zakonika predlaže otvaranje šire rasprave o tome da li treba uvesti ugovor o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo. U radu je ukaza- no na karakteristike ugovora o nasleđivanju kroz analizu rešenja u nemačkom pravu gde je ovaj institut najšire zastupljen. Autor iznosi argumente pro et contra ugovora o nasleđivanju. Analizirane su situacije u kojima postoji opravdanje da zaveštalac bude vezan svojim raspolaganjima za slučaj smrti i negirano je stanovište o nepotrebnosti ugovora o nasleđivanju. Prednosti neopozivih naslednopravnih raspolaganja prećutno su priznate i prilikom donošenja SZON-a iz 1955. godine, koji je pokušao da nadomesti zabranu ugovora o nasleđivanju afirmisanjem ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju. Autor smatra da ugovor o nasleđivanju ima brojne prednosti u odnosu na ugovor o doživotnom izdržavanju i da ništa manje ne komplikuje ostavinske rasprave od instituta koje poznaje srpsko pravo. Najveći nedostatak ugovora o nasleđivanju je što ne ograničava zaveštaočevu slobodu da preduzima pravne poslove inter vivos. Zbog ograničene pravne zaštite koja se pruža ugovornim naslednicima zaveštalac može, kroz ugovore o poklonu, da izigra njihov naslednopravni položaj. Ovaj nedostatak ugovornog nasleđivanja ne ispoljava se u situacijama gde se kao ugovorne strane pojavljuju supružnici, odnosno članovi porodične zajednice, ukoliko ugovor obuhvata dobra koja predstavljaju njihovu zajedničku imovinu. Zbog toga, autor predlaže da se u srpskom pravu dozvoli sklapanje ugovora o nasleđivanju između supružnika i članova porodične zajednice u pogledu dobara koja se nalaze u režimu zajedničke imovine.
AB  - Inheritance contracts are prohibited under Serbian law, due to their alleged uselessness, rigidity, devious nature and propensity to make the probate proceedings overly complicated. However, it has been recently proposed by the Serbian Civil Code Drafting Commission to reconsider such prohibition. The main objective of this article is to examine the arguments for and against introduction of the inheritance contracts into Serbian law. The author starts off with the comparative analysis of German rules on inheritance contracts (Erbvertrag), seeing that German law sets out the most delicate provisions on this type of agreement as to future succession. The author examines situations in which it is justified to hold the testator obliged by his contractual dispositions in prospect of death (mortis causa), and disagrees with the claim that inheritance contracts are useless. Utility of the inheritance contracts was tacitly recognized by the legislator as early as 1955, with the legislative attempt to make up for the ban on inheritance contracts by fostering the rules on contracts for lifelong maintenance. The author shows advantages of the inheritance contract over the contract for lifelong maintenance, and asserts that the inheritance contract would not set hurdles for probate proceedings more than other institutions known to Serbian law. The main shortcoming of the inheritance contract is that it does not prevent the testator from further contractual dispositions between the living (inter vivos). The testator may circumvent the provisions of inheritance contract by subsequent gifts to third parties. Yet, the inheritance contract does not suffer from such shortcoming in cases when it is concluded between the spouses, or between family members, in relation to their community property, i.e. the property which is owned jointly, in equal undivided shares. This is exactly what the author recommends: to allow the spouses and family members to conclude inheritance contracts in respect of the items of their community property.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Uvođenje ugovora o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo
T1  - Introducing inheritance contracts into Serbian law
EP  - 211
IS  - 2
SP  - 186
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_160
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Srpsko pravo zabranjuje ugovor o nasleđivanju. Ta zabrana se pravda njegovom nepotrebnošću, neelastičnošću, špekulativnim karakterom, kao i tvrdnjom da ovaj ugovor preterano komplikuje ostavinske rasprave. Vladina Komisija za izradu Građanskog zakonika predlaže otvaranje šire rasprave o tome da li treba uvesti ugovor o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo. U radu je ukaza- no na karakteristike ugovora o nasleđivanju kroz analizu rešenja u nemačkom pravu gde je ovaj institut najšire zastupljen. Autor iznosi argumente pro et contra ugovora o nasleđivanju. Analizirane su situacije u kojima postoji opravdanje da zaveštalac bude vezan svojim raspolaganjima za slučaj smrti i negirano je stanovište o nepotrebnosti ugovora o nasleđivanju. Prednosti neopozivih naslednopravnih raspolaganja prećutno su priznate i prilikom donošenja SZON-a iz 1955. godine, koji je pokušao da nadomesti zabranu ugovora o nasleđivanju afirmisanjem ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju. Autor smatra da ugovor o nasleđivanju ima brojne prednosti u odnosu na ugovor o doživotnom izdržavanju i da ništa manje ne komplikuje ostavinske rasprave od instituta koje poznaje srpsko pravo. Najveći nedostatak ugovora o nasleđivanju je što ne ograničava zaveštaočevu slobodu da preduzima pravne poslove inter vivos. Zbog ograničene pravne zaštite koja se pruža ugovornim naslednicima zaveštalac može, kroz ugovore o poklonu, da izigra njihov naslednopravni položaj. Ovaj nedostatak ugovornog nasleđivanja ne ispoljava se u situacijama gde se kao ugovorne strane pojavljuju supružnici, odnosno članovi porodične zajednice, ukoliko ugovor obuhvata dobra koja predstavljaju njihovu zajedničku imovinu. Zbog toga, autor predlaže da se u srpskom pravu dozvoli sklapanje ugovora o nasleđivanju između supružnika i članova porodične zajednice u pogledu dobara koja se nalaze u režimu zajedničke imovine., Inheritance contracts are prohibited under Serbian law, due to their alleged uselessness, rigidity, devious nature and propensity to make the probate proceedings overly complicated. However, it has been recently proposed by the Serbian Civil Code Drafting Commission to reconsider such prohibition. The main objective of this article is to examine the arguments for and against introduction of the inheritance contracts into Serbian law. The author starts off with the comparative analysis of German rules on inheritance contracts (Erbvertrag), seeing that German law sets out the most delicate provisions on this type of agreement as to future succession. The author examines situations in which it is justified to hold the testator obliged by his contractual dispositions in prospect of death (mortis causa), and disagrees with the claim that inheritance contracts are useless. Utility of the inheritance contracts was tacitly recognized by the legislator as early as 1955, with the legislative attempt to make up for the ban on inheritance contracts by fostering the rules on contracts for lifelong maintenance. The author shows advantages of the inheritance contract over the contract for lifelong maintenance, and asserts that the inheritance contract would not set hurdles for probate proceedings more than other institutions known to Serbian law. The main shortcoming of the inheritance contract is that it does not prevent the testator from further contractual dispositions between the living (inter vivos). The testator may circumvent the provisions of inheritance contract by subsequent gifts to third parties. Yet, the inheritance contract does not suffer from such shortcoming in cases when it is concluded between the spouses, or between family members, in relation to their community property, i.e. the property which is owned jointly, in equal undivided shares. This is exactly what the author recommends: to allow the spouses and family members to conclude inheritance contracts in respect of the items of their community property.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Uvođenje ugovora o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo, Introducing inheritance contracts into Serbian law",
pages = "211-186",
number = "2",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_160"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2009). Uvođenje ugovora o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 57(2), 186-211.
conv_160

Đurđević D. Uvođenje ugovora o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2009;57(2):186-211.
conv_160 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Uvođenje ugovora o nasleđivanju u srpsko pravo" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 57, no. 2 (2009):186-211,
conv_160 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/434
AB  - Rad se bavi reformom naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori do koje je došlo krajem 2008. godine, kada je stupio na snagu novi Zakon o nasljeđivanju. Autor izlaže osnovne principe reformisanog crnogorskog naslednog prava i ukazuje na propuste u redakciji novog zakona koji su narušili njegov unutrašnji sklad. U radu su posebno kritikovani instituti (isključenje prava predstavljanja u slučaju negativne nasledne izjave; ugovor o odricanju od nasledstva koje nije otvoreno) koji u praktičnoj primeni mogu olakšati izigravanje ustavnog principa o rodnoj ravnopravnosti i dovesti do diskriminacije ženske dece u pravu na nasleđe. Na kraju je izveden zaključak da reforma crnogorskog naslednog prava nije uspela, jer novi Zakon o nasljeđivanju nije postavio sistem naslednog prava koji priliči građanskom i demokratskom društvu, čije se ekonomsko uređenje zasniva na privatnoj svojini i tržišnoj privredi.
AB  - The long process of inheritance law reform in the Republic of Montenegro was rounded off by the end of year 2008, with the enactment of the new Law on Inheritance. The author presents basic principles of the newly reformed Montenegrin law of inheritance, and calls attention to the flawed drafting which has resulted in vagueness of the Law and its internal inconsistencies. The author especially criticizes those legal institutions that are prone to facilitate circumvention of the constitutional principle of gender equality and to deprive female heirs of their succession rights. First of all, the author disapproves of the rule under which the title is prevented from passing to the next intestate successor when the heir refuses to keep the inheritance. This means that disclaimer or denunciation of the inheritance bars the succession to the next intestate successor. Secondly, the author draws attention to the arguments against the inheritance waiver contract (the renunciation of inheritance rights contract, Erbverzichtsvertrag). After a methodical and thoroughgoing analysis, the author concludes that the inheritance law reform in Montenegro did not turn out well, as the new Law on Inheritance fell short of setting up a system of rules of inheritance appropriate to the needs of democratic society, market economy and the protection of private ownership.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Aktuelna reforma naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori
T1  - The current reform of the law of inheritance in the Republic of Montenegro
EP  - 282
IS  - 1
SP  - 265
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_150
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Rad se bavi reformom naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori do koje je došlo krajem 2008. godine, kada je stupio na snagu novi Zakon o nasljeđivanju. Autor izlaže osnovne principe reformisanog crnogorskog naslednog prava i ukazuje na propuste u redakciji novog zakona koji su narušili njegov unutrašnji sklad. U radu su posebno kritikovani instituti (isključenje prava predstavljanja u slučaju negativne nasledne izjave; ugovor o odricanju od nasledstva koje nije otvoreno) koji u praktičnoj primeni mogu olakšati izigravanje ustavnog principa o rodnoj ravnopravnosti i dovesti do diskriminacije ženske dece u pravu na nasleđe. Na kraju je izveden zaključak da reforma crnogorskog naslednog prava nije uspela, jer novi Zakon o nasljeđivanju nije postavio sistem naslednog prava koji priliči građanskom i demokratskom društvu, čije se ekonomsko uređenje zasniva na privatnoj svojini i tržišnoj privredi., The long process of inheritance law reform in the Republic of Montenegro was rounded off by the end of year 2008, with the enactment of the new Law on Inheritance. The author presents basic principles of the newly reformed Montenegrin law of inheritance, and calls attention to the flawed drafting which has resulted in vagueness of the Law and its internal inconsistencies. The author especially criticizes those legal institutions that are prone to facilitate circumvention of the constitutional principle of gender equality and to deprive female heirs of their succession rights. First of all, the author disapproves of the rule under which the title is prevented from passing to the next intestate successor when the heir refuses to keep the inheritance. This means that disclaimer or denunciation of the inheritance bars the succession to the next intestate successor. Secondly, the author draws attention to the arguments against the inheritance waiver contract (the renunciation of inheritance rights contract, Erbverzichtsvertrag). After a methodical and thoroughgoing analysis, the author concludes that the inheritance law reform in Montenegro did not turn out well, as the new Law on Inheritance fell short of setting up a system of rules of inheritance appropriate to the needs of democratic society, market economy and the protection of private ownership.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Aktuelna reforma naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori, The current reform of the law of inheritance in the Republic of Montenegro",
pages = "282-265",
number = "1",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_150"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2009). Aktuelna reforma naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 57(1), 265-282.
conv_150

Đurđević D. Aktuelna reforma naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2009;57(1):265-282.
conv_150 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Aktuelna reforma naslednog prava u Crnoj Gori" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 57, no. 1 (2009):265-282,
conv_150 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2006
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/279
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Ništavost zaveštanja zbog povrede morala u domenu seksualnih odnosa
T1  - Nullity of legacy due to offences against the moral in the domain of sexual relations
EP  - 825
IS  - 10
SP  - 815
VL  - 55
UR  - conv_1388
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2006",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Ništavost zaveštanja zbog povrede morala u domenu seksualnih odnosa, Nullity of legacy due to offences against the moral in the domain of sexual relations",
pages = "825-815",
number = "10",
volume = "55",
url = "conv_1388"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2006). Ništavost zaveštanja zbog povrede morala u domenu seksualnih odnosa. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 55(10), 815-825.
conv_1388

Đurđević D. Ništavost zaveštanja zbog povrede morala u domenu seksualnih odnosa. in Pravni život. 2006;55(10):815-825.
conv_1388 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Ništavost zaveštanja zbog povrede morala u domenu seksualnih odnosa" in Pravni život, 55, no. 10 (2006):815-825,
conv_1388 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/228
AB  - Pošto je testament dobročin pravni posao, zaveštočevi motivi uvek ulaze u kauzu. Ako je zaveštalac prilikom sačinjavanja testamenta bio vođen nedozvoljenim pobudama, takav testament će biti apsolutno ništav. O nedozvoljenoj pobudi se govori u sledećim slučajevima: 1) kada zaveštalac teži da putem testamenta utiče na naslednika ili isporukoprimca na ponašanje koje je samo po sebi u suprotnosti s prinudnim propisima, javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima, 2) kada zaveštalac teži da putem raspolaganja za slučaj smrti utiče na naslednika ili legatara na preduzimanje radnje koja sama po sebi nije u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima, ali to postaje kada se dovede u vezu s imovinskom korišću iz testamenta i 3) kada nagrada ili kazna koju zaveštalac čini putem testamenta nije u harmoniji s javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima. Teret dokazivanja nedozvoljenosti zaveštočevih pobuda pada na ona lica koja se pozivaju na ništavost kao svoju prednost. U slučaju kumulacije dozvoljenih i nedozvoljenih motiva, testament će biti apsolutno ništav samo ako nedozvoljeni motivi budu odlučujuće uticali na zaveštaoca da raspolaže za slučaj smrti.
AB  - This paper discusses the influence of a testator's motives on the validity of a will. The introductory explanations deal with Art. 53 of the ZOO (Law on Obligations), which envisages that a prohibited motive will render gratuitous promises null and void if it has essentially influenced the donor's decision to make such a promise. The author goes on to analyze the distinction between the cause and the motive, and the ratio legis of the different treatment of an prohibited motive in contracts and gratuitous promises. In practice, the most important problem is to establish the testator's motives. The motives are the personal domain of the testator and, as such, they may not be known to others. Even so, it is the court's obligation by means of any evidence at all to establish the specific motives that led the testator to draw up his will. The court should seek these indications in the behavior and the personal qualities of the testator, and those of his legal successors and the persons who stand to benefit from the will, and in their mutual relations. The mention of the motives in the will itself is not binding for the court which can establish that the testator disposed of his possessions for reasons other than those he mentioned in his will. At the same time, it is irrelevant whether the motives the testator mentioned in his will are permitted or prohibited. Another problem on the practical level, is with whom the burden of proof lies as to the testator's motives. According to German theory and case, the burden of proof of prohibited motives lies with the persons who invoke the nullity of the will in their interest. For instance, in a will in favor of a mistress, the person who invokes nullity, should prove both the existence of a love affair and the fact that the testator wished by means of his will to reward his mistress for her sexual favors. It may happen that in the same will, there are both permitted and prohibited motives. In that case the outcome of the will depends on whether the prohibited motive played a decisive role in the testator's decision to draw up such a will.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Uticaj nedozvoljenog motiva na punovažnost testamenta
T1  - The influence of a prohibited motive on the validity of a will
EP  - 486
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 447
VL  - 52
UR  - conv_38
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2004",
abstract = "Pošto je testament dobročin pravni posao, zaveštočevi motivi uvek ulaze u kauzu. Ako je zaveštalac prilikom sačinjavanja testamenta bio vođen nedozvoljenim pobudama, takav testament će biti apsolutno ništav. O nedozvoljenoj pobudi se govori u sledećim slučajevima: 1) kada zaveštalac teži da putem testamenta utiče na naslednika ili isporukoprimca na ponašanje koje je samo po sebi u suprotnosti s prinudnim propisima, javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima, 2) kada zaveštalac teži da putem raspolaganja za slučaj smrti utiče na naslednika ili legatara na preduzimanje radnje koja sama po sebi nije u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima, ali to postaje kada se dovede u vezu s imovinskom korišću iz testamenta i 3) kada nagrada ili kazna koju zaveštalac čini putem testamenta nije u harmoniji s javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima. Teret dokazivanja nedozvoljenosti zaveštočevih pobuda pada na ona lica koja se pozivaju na ništavost kao svoju prednost. U slučaju kumulacije dozvoljenih i nedozvoljenih motiva, testament će biti apsolutno ništav samo ako nedozvoljeni motivi budu odlučujuće uticali na zaveštaoca da raspolaže za slučaj smrti., This paper discusses the influence of a testator's motives on the validity of a will. The introductory explanations deal with Art. 53 of the ZOO (Law on Obligations), which envisages that a prohibited motive will render gratuitous promises null and void if it has essentially influenced the donor's decision to make such a promise. The author goes on to analyze the distinction between the cause and the motive, and the ratio legis of the different treatment of an prohibited motive in contracts and gratuitous promises. In practice, the most important problem is to establish the testator's motives. The motives are the personal domain of the testator and, as such, they may not be known to others. Even so, it is the court's obligation by means of any evidence at all to establish the specific motives that led the testator to draw up his will. The court should seek these indications in the behavior and the personal qualities of the testator, and those of his legal successors and the persons who stand to benefit from the will, and in their mutual relations. The mention of the motives in the will itself is not binding for the court which can establish that the testator disposed of his possessions for reasons other than those he mentioned in his will. At the same time, it is irrelevant whether the motives the testator mentioned in his will are permitted or prohibited. Another problem on the practical level, is with whom the burden of proof lies as to the testator's motives. According to German theory and case, the burden of proof of prohibited motives lies with the persons who invoke the nullity of the will in their interest. For instance, in a will in favor of a mistress, the person who invokes nullity, should prove both the existence of a love affair and the fact that the testator wished by means of his will to reward his mistress for her sexual favors. It may happen that in the same will, there are both permitted and prohibited motives. In that case the outcome of the will depends on whether the prohibited motive played a decisive role in the testator's decision to draw up such a will.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Uticaj nedozvoljenog motiva na punovažnost testamenta, The influence of a prohibited motive on the validity of a will",
pages = "486-447",
number = "3-4",
volume = "52",
url = "conv_38"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2004). Uticaj nedozvoljenog motiva na punovažnost testamenta. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 52(3-4), 447-486.
conv_38

Đurđević D. Uticaj nedozvoljenog motiva na punovažnost testamenta. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2004;52(3-4):447-486.
conv_38 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Uticaj nedozvoljenog motiva na punovažnost testamenta" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 52, no. 3-4 (2004):447-486,
conv_38 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/227
AB  - The law of inheritance of the Republic of Srpska accepts the parentelar-linear system of succession by the operation of law. Specificity thereof, comparing to other systems, include the following: the circle of legal successors within the third inheritance order is restricted and does not encompass deceased's paternal- and maternal-uncle brothers and sisters aunts-brothers and sisters an their descendants; deceased 's grandfathers and grandmothers can not inherit when in competition with the deceased's spouse. The author criticises the above legislative solution on the ground of legal policy, since the text of the Law on Inheritance was inspired by the former socialist way of thinking about the institution of family that had to be atomised The relevant basis, consequently, has been the wrong conception of domination of the category of socialist ownership. The change of legal and economic basis of society where private property is taking over points at the need of changing the inheritance law regime in the Republic of Srpska in order to better preserving private ownership, while taking into account the importance of blood relationship as far as succession by operation of law is concerned. That is why, according to the author of the present article, it is unacceptable that a spouse can exclude deceased's grandfathers and grandmothers from the inheritance by operation of law.
PB  - Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
T1  - Treći nasledni red u pravu Republike Srpske
T1  - Third inheritance order in the law of the Republic of srpska
EP  - 388
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 375
VL  - 90
UR  - conv_828
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2004",
abstract = "The law of inheritance of the Republic of Srpska accepts the parentelar-linear system of succession by the operation of law. Specificity thereof, comparing to other systems, include the following: the circle of legal successors within the third inheritance order is restricted and does not encompass deceased's paternal- and maternal-uncle brothers and sisters aunts-brothers and sisters an their descendants; deceased 's grandfathers and grandmothers can not inherit when in competition with the deceased's spouse. The author criticises the above legislative solution on the ground of legal policy, since the text of the Law on Inheritance was inspired by the former socialist way of thinking about the institution of family that had to be atomised The relevant basis, consequently, has been the wrong conception of domination of the category of socialist ownership. The change of legal and economic basis of society where private property is taking over points at the need of changing the inheritance law regime in the Republic of Srpska in order to better preserving private ownership, while taking into account the importance of blood relationship as far as succession by operation of law is concerned. That is why, according to the author of the present article, it is unacceptable that a spouse can exclude deceased's grandfathers and grandmothers from the inheritance by operation of law.",
publisher = "Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke",
title = "Treći nasledni red u pravu Republike Srpske, Third inheritance order in the law of the Republic of srpska",
pages = "388-375",
number = "3-4",
volume = "90",
url = "conv_828"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2004). Treći nasledni red u pravu Republike Srpske. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 90(3-4), 375-388.
conv_828

Đurđević D. Treći nasledni red u pravu Republike Srpske. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. 2004;90(3-4):375-388.
conv_828 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Treći nasledni red u pravu Republike Srpske" in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 90, no. 3-4 (2004):375-388,
conv_828 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/213
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Momenat merodavan za ocenu da li je zaveštanje u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima
T1  - Eligible moment for the estimation whether the testament is contrary to public policy and good customs
EP  - 326
IS  - 10
SP  - 313
VL  - 53
UR  - conv_1330
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2004",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Momenat merodavan za ocenu da li je zaveštanje u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima, Eligible moment for the estimation whether the testament is contrary to public policy and good customs",
pages = "326-313",
number = "10",
volume = "53",
url = "conv_1330"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2004). Momenat merodavan za ocenu da li je zaveštanje u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 53(10), 313-326.
conv_1330

Đurđević D. Momenat merodavan za ocenu da li je zaveštanje u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima. in Pravni život. 2004;53(10):313-326.
conv_1330 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Momenat merodavan za ocenu da li je zaveštanje u suprotnosti sa javnim poretkom i dobrim običajima" in Pravni život, 53, no. 10 (2004):313-326,
conv_1330 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
AU  - Tešić, Nenad
PY  - 2002
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/182
PB  - Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
T1  - Dragoljub D. Stojanović i Oliver B. Antić: Uvod u građansko pravo
T1  - Dragoljub Stojanović and Oliver Antić: Introduction to civil law
EP  - 440
IS  - 3
SP  - 437
VL  - 88
UR  - conv_816
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan and Tešić, Nenad",
year = "2002",
publisher = "Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke",
title = "Dragoljub D. Stojanović i Oliver B. Antić: Uvod u građansko pravo, Dragoljub Stojanović and Oliver Antić: Introduction to civil law",
pages = "440-437",
number = "3",
volume = "88",
url = "conv_816"
}

Đurđević, D.,& Tešić, N.. (2002). Dragoljub D. Stojanović i Oliver B. Antić: Uvod u građansko pravo. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke
Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 88(3), 437-440.
conv_816

Đurđević D, Tešić N. Dragoljub D. Stojanović i Oliver B. Antić: Uvod u građansko pravo. in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. 2002;88(3):437-440.
conv_816 .

Đurđević, Dejan, Tešić, Nenad, "Dragoljub D. Stojanović i Oliver B. Antić: Uvod u građansko pravo" in Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 88, no. 3 (2002):437-440,
conv_816 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 2001
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/159
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Smanjenje naslednog dela supružnika u drugom naslednom redu do jedne četvrtine
T1  - Reduction of the succession share in the second succession order to 1/4
EP  - 172
IS  - 10
SP  - 151
VL  - 50
UR  - conv_1303
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "2001",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Smanjenje naslednog dela supružnika u drugom naslednom redu do jedne četvrtine, Reduction of the succession share in the second succession order to 1/4",
pages = "172-151",
number = "10",
volume = "50",
url = "conv_1303"
}

Đurđević, D.. (2001). Smanjenje naslednog dela supružnika u drugom naslednom redu do jedne četvrtine. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 50(10), 151-172.
conv_1303

Đurđević D. Smanjenje naslednog dela supružnika u drugom naslednom redu do jedne četvrtine. in Pravni život. 2001;50(10):151-172.
conv_1303 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Smanjenje naslednog dela supružnika u drugom naslednom redu do jedne četvrtine" in Pravni život, 50, no. 10 (2001):151-172,
conv_1303 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đurđević, Dejan
PY  - 1998
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/122
AB  - U prvom naslednom redu kao naslednici se uvek javljaju ostaviočevi potomci, dok ostaviočev supružnik može nasleđivati ili istovremeno s njima i dobiti deo zaostavštine u svojinu, ili pak, dobiti samo pravo udovičkog užitka na delu zaostavštine. Autor analizira kako je u francuskom, austrijskom, nemačkom, švajcarskom i engleskom pravu uređen naslednopravni položaj supružnika u prvom naslednom redu, da bi na kraju uporedio dobre i loše strane svakog od pomenutih rešenja.
AB  - Descendants of fathers with another woman have priority in inheriting while their spouses can share inheritance with them or get the right to widow's enjoyment of part of the inheritance. The author analyzes the French, Austrian, German, Swiss and English law related to the inheritance position of spouses in the first inheritance circle, so that at the end he would compare good and bad sides of every mentioned solution.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Supružnik kao naslednik prvog naslednog reda u uporednom pravu
T1  - Spouse as an inheritor of the first circle in comparative law
EP  - 103
IS  - 3
SP  - 103
UR  - conv_1229
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đurđević, Dejan",
year = "1998",
abstract = "U prvom naslednom redu kao naslednici se uvek javljaju ostaviočevi potomci, dok ostaviočev supružnik može nasleđivati ili istovremeno s njima i dobiti deo zaostavštine u svojinu, ili pak, dobiti samo pravo udovičkog užitka na delu zaostavštine. Autor analizira kako je u francuskom, austrijskom, nemačkom, švajcarskom i engleskom pravu uređen naslednopravni položaj supružnika u prvom naslednom redu, da bi na kraju uporedio dobre i loše strane svakog od pomenutih rešenja., Descendants of fathers with another woman have priority in inheriting while their spouses can share inheritance with them or get the right to widow's enjoyment of part of the inheritance. The author analyzes the French, Austrian, German, Swiss and English law related to the inheritance position of spouses in the first inheritance circle, so that at the end he would compare good and bad sides of every mentioned solution.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Supružnik kao naslednik prvog naslednog reda u uporednom pravu, Spouse as an inheritor of the first circle in comparative law",
pages = "103-103",
number = "3",
url = "conv_1229"
}

Đurđević, D.. (1998). Supružnik kao naslednik prvog naslednog reda u uporednom pravu. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(3), 103-103.
conv_1229

Đurđević D. Supružnik kao naslednik prvog naslednog reda u uporednom pravu. in Strani pravni život. 1998;(3):103-103.
conv_1229 .

Đurđević, Dejan, "Supružnik kao naslednik prvog naslednog reda u uporednom pravu" in Strani pravni život, no. 3 (1998):103-103,
conv_1229 .