Приказ основних података о документу

Legal effects of the fraud originating from the co-surety on the validity of the surety contract and/or the rights of the surety: The victim of the fraud

dc.creatorDabić, Snežana
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:15:09Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:15:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1232
dc.description.abstractKada je prevarom sajemca naveden na zaključenje ugovora o jemstvu, jemac se može naći u prilično nezavidnoj poziciji jer je krug sredstava koje uspešno može da upotrebi da se zaštiti vrlo ograničen. Naime, kod prevare trećeg, punovažnost ugovora se može osporiti samo izuzetno: ako je saugovarač kriv za prevaru ili je ugovor dobročin, što je vrlo diskutabilno kada je reč o ugovoru o jemstvu. Još su manji izgledi za poništenje pozivanjem na pravila o zabludi: zabluda o solventnosti dužnika (kao najčešća) predstavlja zabludu o motivu koja je samo izuzetno pravno relevantna. Konačno, pravo na naknadu štete od sajemca - autora prevare može biti ograničenog dometa: najpre, postoji rizik da će šteta moći da se naknadi; potom, može se doći i do apsurdne situacije da prevareni jemac ne može odbiti regresni zahtev od sajemca - autora prevare (koji je platio dug), ali bi nakon toga mogao da se koristi pravom na naknadu štete.sr
dc.description.abstractIn case a surety concludes a contract due to fraudulent acts of his co-surety, he may find himself in a rather unenviable position. Remedies for his protection are very limiting. Namely, third parties' fraud only exceptionally leads to the annulment of the contract: if the contracting party is guilty of fraud; or the contract is gratuitous, which is very questionable for surety contract. The chances for annulment are even fewer if we apply the rules of mistake: mistake as to the debtor solvency represents a mistake as to the motif which is only exceptionally legally relevant. Finally, the right to ask damages from co-surety can also be of limited nature: firstly, there is a risk that the damages cannot be compensated; secondly, an absurd situation may occur that the victim of the fraud cannot reject the contribution claim from the co-surety but he may later on ask damages from him.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectzabluda o solventnosti dužnikasr
dc.subjectpunovažnost ugovorasr
dc.subjectprevara od trećegsr
dc.subjectodnos između sajemacasr
dc.subjectjemstvosr
dc.subjectvalidity of the contracten
dc.subjectthird party's frauden
dc.subjectthe relation between co-suretiesen
dc.subjectsuretyen
dc.subjectmistake as to the solvency of the debtoren
dc.titleUticaj prevare koja potiče od sajemca na punovažnost ugovora o jemstvu i prava jemca - žrtve prevaresr
dc.titleLegal effects of the fraud originating from the co-surety on the validity of the surety contract and/or the rights of the surety: The victim of the frauden
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage145
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other68(1): 126-145
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage126
dc.citation.volume68
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/AnaliPFB2001128D
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/197/1229.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_508
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу