TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1375
AB  - U ovom radu, autor analizira pravila kojima su regulisana javna preduzeća. Nakon izlaganja o terminološkim problemima, data je definicija javnih preduzeća. Ukazano je na nepotrebnost postojanja javnih preduzeća kao posebne vrste privrednih subjekata, kao i na to da je potrebno sačiniti usaglašenu strategiju u pogledu budućnosti svih javnih preduzeća, a ne samo onih čiji je osnivač država. Takođe, istaknuta je i potreba usaglašavanja zakona, kao i neophodnost prilagođavanja pravila o organima javnih preduzeća potrebama više osni vača. Dalje su prikazane razlike između pravila o upravljanju javnim preduzećima i privrednim društvima. Autor zaključuje da je neophodno načelno primeniti opšta pravila i na javna preduzeća, pri čemu se pojedina specijalna pravila mogu predvideti opštim ili posebnim zakonom. Na kraju, obrađeno je i pitanje uravnotežene zastupljenosti polova u organima upravljanja i nadzora javnih preduzeća.
AB  - In this paper, the author analyses rules which regulate public enterprises. The definition of public enterprises is provided after presenting the terminological issues. The paper points out that the existence of public enterprises as a special type of business entities is unnecessary, as well as that coordinated strategy regarding the future of all public enterprises, not only those founded by the state, should be drawn up. Also, the need to harmonize laws is highlighted as well as the necessity of adjusting the rules regarding the organization of public enterprises to the needs of multiple founders. Furthermore, the differences between the rules on the management of public enterprises and commercial companies are described. The author concludes that, in principle, it is necessary to apply general rules to public enterprises as well, whereby any special rules may be stipulated by general or special law. Finally, the issue of gender balance on management and supervisory boards of public enterprises is also examined.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Javna preduzeća - stari i novi izazovi
T1  - Public enterprises: Old and new challenges
EP  - 694
IS  - 4
SP  - 675
VL  - 60
DO  - 10.55836/PiP_22404A
UR  - conv_2369
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U ovom radu, autor analizira pravila kojima su regulisana javna preduzeća. Nakon izlaganja o terminološkim problemima, data je definicija javnih preduzeća. Ukazano je na nepotrebnost postojanja javnih preduzeća kao posebne vrste privrednih subjekata, kao i na to da je potrebno sačiniti usaglašenu strategiju u pogledu budućnosti svih javnih preduzeća, a ne samo onih čiji je osnivač država. Takođe, istaknuta je i potreba usaglašavanja zakona, kao i neophodnost prilagođavanja pravila o organima javnih preduzeća potrebama više osni vača. Dalje su prikazane razlike između pravila o upravljanju javnim preduzećima i privrednim društvima. Autor zaključuje da je neophodno načelno primeniti opšta pravila i na javna preduzeća, pri čemu se pojedina specijalna pravila mogu predvideti opštim ili posebnim zakonom. Na kraju, obrađeno je i pitanje uravnotežene zastupljenosti polova u organima upravljanja i nadzora javnih preduzeća., In this paper, the author analyses rules which regulate public enterprises. The definition of public enterprises is provided after presenting the terminological issues. The paper points out that the existence of public enterprises as a special type of business entities is unnecessary, as well as that coordinated strategy regarding the future of all public enterprises, not only those founded by the state, should be drawn up. Also, the need to harmonize laws is highlighted as well as the necessity of adjusting the rules regarding the organization of public enterprises to the needs of multiple founders. Furthermore, the differences between the rules on the management of public enterprises and commercial companies are described. The author concludes that, in principle, it is necessary to apply general rules to public enterprises as well, whereby any special rules may be stipulated by general or special law. Finally, the issue of gender balance on management and supervisory boards of public enterprises is also examined.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Javna preduzeća - stari i novi izazovi, Public enterprises: Old and new challenges",
pages = "694-675",
number = "4",
volume = "60",
doi = "10.55836/PiP_22404A",
url = "conv_2369"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2022). Javna preduzeća - stari i novi izazovi. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 60(4), 675-694.
https://doi.org/10.55836/PiP_22404A
conv_2369

Lepetić J. Javna preduzeća - stari i novi izazovi. in Pravo i privreda. 2022;60(4):675-694.
doi:10.55836/PiP_22404A
conv_2369 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Javna preduzeća - stari i novi izazovi" in Pravo i privreda, 60, no. 4 (2022):675-694,
https://doi.org/10.55836/PiP_22404A .,
conv_2369 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1326
AB  - This paper elaborates on the protection of creditors in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions, according to Directive 2019/2121/EU as regards these cross-border operations. After presenting the protection mechanisms available to creditors in cross-border operations prior to the adoption of the 2019 Directive, as well as the risks faced by creditors in such events, the author presents the system of creditor protection introduced by the Directive. Both creditor protection mechanisms in the broader sense (which are not designed exclusively for creditors) a nd the ones in the narrower sense (which are created only for their protection) are presented in the central portion of the paper. Among the latter group, the general protection mechanisms available for each cross-border operation are analysed, followed by the mechanisms that are specific to individual operations.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Creditor protection in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions
EP  - 742
IS  - 3
SP  - 713
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22303A
UR  - conv_583
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This paper elaborates on the protection of creditors in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions, according to Directive 2019/2121/EU as regards these cross-border operations. After presenting the protection mechanisms available to creditors in cross-border operations prior to the adoption of the 2019 Directive, as well as the risks faced by creditors in such events, the author presents the system of creditor protection introduced by the Directive. Both creditor protection mechanisms in the broader sense (which are not designed exclusively for creditors) a nd the ones in the narrower sense (which are created only for their protection) are presented in the central portion of the paper. Among the latter group, the general protection mechanisms available for each cross-border operation are analysed, followed by the mechanisms that are specific to individual operations.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Creditor protection in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions",
pages = "742-713",
number = "3",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22303A",
url = "conv_583"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2022). Creditor protection in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(3), 713-742.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22303A
conv_583

Lepetić J. Creditor protection in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(3):713-742.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22303A
conv_583 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Creditor protection in cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 3 (2022):713-742,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22303A .,
conv_583 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jovanović, Marko
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1252
AB  - Pandemija korona virusa nametnula je velike izazove u svim sferama života, pa tako i u pravu. Pravne norme su morale da se prilagode tzv. "novoj normalnosti" i reše mnoga sporna pitanja koja je pandemija nametnula. U ovom radu autori razmatraju jedan specifičan vid uticaja pandemije na privredno pravo - dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava, do koga je, u Republici Srbiji, došlo stupanjem na snagu nekoliko uredaba i zakona usvojenih u sklopu pokušaja umanjivanja ili otklanjanja štetnih posledica pandemije na poslovanje privrednih subjekata. Institut dobrovoljnog ograničenja slobode transfera sredstava ispitan je sa stanovišta kompanijskog i prava stranih ulaganja. Nakon analize zabrane isplate dobiti, autori zaključuju da je u uslovima pandemije donošenje nestandardnih mera nužno; da se ove mere moraju donositi brzinom koju diktira pandemija, ali da prilikom njihovog formulisanja ipak treba voditi računa da dugoročna šteta ne nadvlada kratkoročnu dobit.
AB  - Corona virus pandemic posed great challenges in all spheres of life. Quite naturally, law had to face those challenges, adapt to the "new normal" and bring viable solutions to many problems created by the pandemic. In this paper the authors focus on one specific manifestation of the influence of pandemic on business law - voluntary abstention of business entities from enjoying free transfer of funds. In the Republic of Serbia, this abstention came to effect with entry into force of several laws and bylaws enacted with the aim of neutralizing the negative consequences of the pandemic on economy and business. The voluntary abstention is analysed from the standpoint of company law and the rules on protection of foreign direct investment. After evaluating the prohibition on profit distribution to shareholders, the authors conclude that the enactment of atypical, non-standard measures is necessary during the pandemic and that these measures need to be adopted promptly enough to timely address the problems that they are supposed to solve, but during their enactment one must bear in mind that the short-term benefits should not be off set by long-term damage.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava u poslovanju privrednih subjekata u uslovima pandemije
T1  - Voluntary abstention of business entities from enjoying free transfer of funds during pandemic
EP  - 522
IS  - 4
SP  - 489
VL  - 59
DO  - 10.5937/PiP2104489J
UR  - conv_2349
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Jovanović, Marko and Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Pandemija korona virusa nametnula je velike izazove u svim sferama života, pa tako i u pravu. Pravne norme su morale da se prilagode tzv. "novoj normalnosti" i reše mnoga sporna pitanja koja je pandemija nametnula. U ovom radu autori razmatraju jedan specifičan vid uticaja pandemije na privredno pravo - dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava, do koga je, u Republici Srbiji, došlo stupanjem na snagu nekoliko uredaba i zakona usvojenih u sklopu pokušaja umanjivanja ili otklanjanja štetnih posledica pandemije na poslovanje privrednih subjekata. Institut dobrovoljnog ograničenja slobode transfera sredstava ispitan je sa stanovišta kompanijskog i prava stranih ulaganja. Nakon analize zabrane isplate dobiti, autori zaključuju da je u uslovima pandemije donošenje nestandardnih mera nužno; da se ove mere moraju donositi brzinom koju diktira pandemija, ali da prilikom njihovog formulisanja ipak treba voditi računa da dugoročna šteta ne nadvlada kratkoročnu dobit., Corona virus pandemic posed great challenges in all spheres of life. Quite naturally, law had to face those challenges, adapt to the "new normal" and bring viable solutions to many problems created by the pandemic. In this paper the authors focus on one specific manifestation of the influence of pandemic on business law - voluntary abstention of business entities from enjoying free transfer of funds. In the Republic of Serbia, this abstention came to effect with entry into force of several laws and bylaws enacted with the aim of neutralizing the negative consequences of the pandemic on economy and business. The voluntary abstention is analysed from the standpoint of company law and the rules on protection of foreign direct investment. After evaluating the prohibition on profit distribution to shareholders, the authors conclude that the enactment of atypical, non-standard measures is necessary during the pandemic and that these measures need to be adopted promptly enough to timely address the problems that they are supposed to solve, but during their enactment one must bear in mind that the short-term benefits should not be off set by long-term damage.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava u poslovanju privrednih subjekata u uslovima pandemije, Voluntary abstention of business entities from enjoying free transfer of funds during pandemic",
pages = "522-489",
number = "4",
volume = "59",
doi = "10.5937/PiP2104489J",
url = "conv_2349"
}

Jovanović, M.,& Lepetić, J.. (2021). Dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava u poslovanju privrednih subjekata u uslovima pandemije. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 59(4), 489-522.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2104489J
conv_2349

Jovanović M, Lepetić J. Dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava u poslovanju privrednih subjekata u uslovima pandemije. in Pravo i privreda. 2021;59(4):489-522.
doi:10.5937/PiP2104489J
conv_2349 .

Jovanović, Marko, Lepetić, Jelena, "Dobrovoljno ograničenje slobode transfera sredstava u poslovanju privrednih subjekata u uslovima pandemije" in Pravo i privreda, 59, no. 4 (2021):489-522,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2104489J .,
conv_2349 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1203
AB  - U ovom radu analizirane su odredbe Zakona o stečaju o medijaciji. Autor prvo ukazuje na postojanje specijalnog zakonskog režima za medijaciju sporova u vezi sa utvrđivanjem potraživanja, koji se razlikuje od opšteg režima medijacije. Nakon toga, analizira odredbe o pokretanju postupka medijacije, posebno se posvećujući pitanju ko prema važećim rešenjima Zakona o stečaju može da podnese predlog za rešavanje spora putem medijacije i kakva je uloga odbora poverilaca s tim u vezi. Zatim se bavi pitanjem trajanja i okončanja medijacije, ukazujući na nedoslednosti domaćeg rešenja. Dalje se osvrće i na pitanje troškova postupka medijacije u vezi sa stečajnim postupkom. U zaključku, autor se zalaže za ukidanje ograničenja u pogledu aktivne legitimacije za podnošenje predloga za rešavanje spornog odnosa medijacijom, predviđanje dodatne nadležnosti odbora poverilaca u fazi okončanja postupka medijacije za rešavanje sporova povodom osporenih potraživanja u kojem učestvuje stečajni upravnik i predviđanje jedinstvenog režima medijacije za rešavanje sporova u vezi sa stečajnim postupkom.
AB  - In this paper, the author analyses the Insolvency Act's provisions on mediation. Firstly, the author points out the existence of a special legal regime for mediation of disputes related to the determination of claims, which differs from the general regime of mediation. Afterwards, the provisions on initiating mediation proceedings are analysed, with the special emphasis on the persons authorized to submit proposal for resolving a dispute in the mediation procedure according to the provisions of the Insolvency Act as well as the role of the creditors' committee in this regard. Then, the author analyses the issue of the duration and termination of mediation, pointing out the inconsistencies of the domestic solution. Furthermore, the issue of the costs of mediation proceedings in connection with insolvency proceedings is addressed shortly. In conclusion, the author advocates the abolition of restrictions on active legitimacy for submitting proposals for resolving disputes through mediation, prescribing additional competencies of the creditors' committee at the final stage of the mediation procedure in relation to the disputed claims in which the insolvency administrator participates, and providing a single regime of mediation for disputes regarding insolvency proceedings resolution.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Osporena potraživanja i medijacija u srpskom stečajnom pravu - de lege lata i de lege ferenda
T1  - Disputed claims and mediation in Serbian insolvency law: De lege lata and de lege ferenda
EP  - 176
IS  - 3
SP  - 156
VL  - 58
DO  - 10.5937/PiP2003156L
UR  - conv_2327
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2020",
abstract = "U ovom radu analizirane su odredbe Zakona o stečaju o medijaciji. Autor prvo ukazuje na postojanje specijalnog zakonskog režima za medijaciju sporova u vezi sa utvrđivanjem potraživanja, koji se razlikuje od opšteg režima medijacije. Nakon toga, analizira odredbe o pokretanju postupka medijacije, posebno se posvećujući pitanju ko prema važećim rešenjima Zakona o stečaju može da podnese predlog za rešavanje spora putem medijacije i kakva je uloga odbora poverilaca s tim u vezi. Zatim se bavi pitanjem trajanja i okončanja medijacije, ukazujući na nedoslednosti domaćeg rešenja. Dalje se osvrće i na pitanje troškova postupka medijacije u vezi sa stečajnim postupkom. U zaključku, autor se zalaže za ukidanje ograničenja u pogledu aktivne legitimacije za podnošenje predloga za rešavanje spornog odnosa medijacijom, predviđanje dodatne nadležnosti odbora poverilaca u fazi okončanja postupka medijacije za rešavanje sporova povodom osporenih potraživanja u kojem učestvuje stečajni upravnik i predviđanje jedinstvenog režima medijacije za rešavanje sporova u vezi sa stečajnim postupkom., In this paper, the author analyses the Insolvency Act's provisions on mediation. Firstly, the author points out the existence of a special legal regime for mediation of disputes related to the determination of claims, which differs from the general regime of mediation. Afterwards, the provisions on initiating mediation proceedings are analysed, with the special emphasis on the persons authorized to submit proposal for resolving a dispute in the mediation procedure according to the provisions of the Insolvency Act as well as the role of the creditors' committee in this regard. Then, the author analyses the issue of the duration and termination of mediation, pointing out the inconsistencies of the domestic solution. Furthermore, the issue of the costs of mediation proceedings in connection with insolvency proceedings is addressed shortly. In conclusion, the author advocates the abolition of restrictions on active legitimacy for submitting proposals for resolving disputes through mediation, prescribing additional competencies of the creditors' committee at the final stage of the mediation procedure in relation to the disputed claims in which the insolvency administrator participates, and providing a single regime of mediation for disputes regarding insolvency proceedings resolution.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Osporena potraživanja i medijacija u srpskom stečajnom pravu - de lege lata i de lege ferenda, Disputed claims and mediation in Serbian insolvency law: De lege lata and de lege ferenda",
pages = "176-156",
number = "3",
volume = "58",
doi = "10.5937/PiP2003156L",
url = "conv_2327"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2020). Osporena potraživanja i medijacija u srpskom stečajnom pravu - de lege lata i de lege ferenda. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 58(3), 156-176.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2003156L
conv_2327

Lepetić J. Osporena potraživanja i medijacija u srpskom stečajnom pravu - de lege lata i de lege ferenda. in Pravo i privreda. 2020;58(3):156-176.
doi:10.5937/PiP2003156L
conv_2327 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Osporena potraživanja i medijacija u srpskom stečajnom pravu - de lege lata i de lege ferenda" in Pravo i privreda, 58, no. 3 (2020):156-176,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2003156L .,
conv_2327 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1095
AB  - Autor u ovom radu analizira nagrađivanje akcionara glasovima za lojalnost. U radu se akcije za lojalnost definišu u užem i u širem smislu. Posebno je razmatrano značenje pojma lojalnosti, budući da je reč o uslovu za nagrađivanje akcionara. Imajući u vidu rešenja reprezentativnih pravnih sistema, autor daje predloge za reformu domaćeg prava. Konkretno, zalaže se za uvođenje mogućnosti nagrađivanja lojalnih akcionara glasovima za lojalnost. Na kraju, autor ukazuje na to da, osim unošenja odredbe koja se odnosi na nagrađivanje akcionara u zakon kojim su regulisana privredna društva, treba promeniti i relevantne odredbe zakona kojim je regulisano tržište kapitala i zakona kojim se uređuje preuzimanje akcionarskih društava, da bi reforma bila uspešna. Sprovođenje reforme bi omogućilo da se lojalnost u kompanijskom pravu ne vezuje samo sa posebne dužnosti već i za specijalna prava koja akcionar može da stekne kao nagradu za lojalnost društvu.
AB  - In this paper, the author analyses shareholders' multiple voting rights as a reward for their loyalty. Firstly, the definition of loyalty shares is provided both in the narrow and wider sense. Furthermore, the notion of loyalty as a condition for being rewarded, as well as the criteria for determining loyalty in company law, is specially examined. Bearing in mind the solutions in representative comparative legal systems, the author proposes the reform of national company law. Finally, the author points to the fact that the reward provision should be included in the Serbian Companies Act while the relevant provisions of the Capital Market Act and Takeover Act should be amended in order to allow successful reform. Implementation of the reform would allow loyalty in company law, not only linked to special duties, but also to special rights that a shareholder can acquire as a reward for loyalty to the company.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Dodatni glasovi kao nagrada lojalnim akcionarima - predlog za reformu
T1  - Multiple votes as a reward to loyal shareholders: A reform proposal
EP  - 158
IS  - 1
SP  - 140
VL  - 67
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1901147L
UR  - conv_483
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Autor u ovom radu analizira nagrađivanje akcionara glasovima za lojalnost. U radu se akcije za lojalnost definišu u užem i u širem smislu. Posebno je razmatrano značenje pojma lojalnosti, budući da je reč o uslovu za nagrađivanje akcionara. Imajući u vidu rešenja reprezentativnih pravnih sistema, autor daje predloge za reformu domaćeg prava. Konkretno, zalaže se za uvođenje mogućnosti nagrađivanja lojalnih akcionara glasovima za lojalnost. Na kraju, autor ukazuje na to da, osim unošenja odredbe koja se odnosi na nagrađivanje akcionara u zakon kojim su regulisana privredna društva, treba promeniti i relevantne odredbe zakona kojim je regulisano tržište kapitala i zakona kojim se uređuje preuzimanje akcionarskih društava, da bi reforma bila uspešna. Sprovođenje reforme bi omogućilo da se lojalnost u kompanijskom pravu ne vezuje samo sa posebne dužnosti već i za specijalna prava koja akcionar može da stekne kao nagradu za lojalnost društvu., In this paper, the author analyses shareholders' multiple voting rights as a reward for their loyalty. Firstly, the definition of loyalty shares is provided both in the narrow and wider sense. Furthermore, the notion of loyalty as a condition for being rewarded, as well as the criteria for determining loyalty in company law, is specially examined. Bearing in mind the solutions in representative comparative legal systems, the author proposes the reform of national company law. Finally, the author points to the fact that the reward provision should be included in the Serbian Companies Act while the relevant provisions of the Capital Market Act and Takeover Act should be amended in order to allow successful reform. Implementation of the reform would allow loyalty in company law, not only linked to special duties, but also to special rights that a shareholder can acquire as a reward for loyalty to the company.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Dodatni glasovi kao nagrada lojalnim akcionarima - predlog za reformu, Multiple votes as a reward to loyal shareholders: A reform proposal",
pages = "158-140",
number = "1",
volume = "67",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1901147L",
url = "conv_483"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2019). Dodatni glasovi kao nagrada lojalnim akcionarima - predlog za reformu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 67(1), 140-158.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1901147L
conv_483

Lepetić J. Dodatni glasovi kao nagrada lojalnim akcionarima - predlog za reformu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2019;67(1):140-158.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1901147L
conv_483 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Dodatni glasovi kao nagrada lojalnim akcionarima - predlog za reformu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 67, no. 1 (2019):140-158,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1901147L .,
conv_483 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1119
AB  - U radu se razmatraju ugovori o glasanju akcionara u kontekstu jedinstva članskih prava, odnosno nerazdvajanja upravljačkih i ekonomskih prava akcionara. Na početku, autor definiše ugovore o glasanju akcionara, navodeći karakteristike i vrste tih ugovora. Dalje razmatra ugovore o glasanju kao vrstu ugovora akcionara, a onda i kao oblik kolektivnog angažovanja akcionara. Nakon toga, daje kratak pregled uporednopravnih rešenja u vezi sa ugovorima o glasanju. U centralnom delu rada analizirana su rešenja srpskog Zakona o privrednim društvima i dati konkretni predlozi za poboljšanje postojećih rešenja usled uočenih nedostataka. Na kraju, autor se, između ostalog, zalaže za proširenje odredaba o ugovorima o glasanju, koje bi trebalo da se odnose i na povezana lica sa društvom i sa članovima uprave, kao i za predviđanje prekršajne odgovornosti akcionara u vezi sa ugovorima o glasanju.
AB  - In this paper, the author analyzes shareholders' voting agreements with regard to the "unity of membership" as non-decoupling voting rights from economic rights of shareholders. Firstly, voting agreements of shareholders are defined and listed in different categories considering their characteristics. Secondly, voting agreements are analyzed as one type of shareholders' agreements and additionally as a form of concerted activity of shareholders. Furthermore, a review of comparative legal solutions regarding voting agreements is provided. In the central part of the paper the author discusses the relevant provisions of Serbian Companies Act and proposes concrete solutions for improving existing provisions due to the observed deficiencies. Finally, among other things, the author advocates the broadening of provisions on voting agreements in order to comprehend the persons connected to the company and the directors as well as prescribing the misdemeanor liability of shareholders in relation to voting agreements.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Jedinstvo članskih prava i ugovori o glasanju akcionara
T1  - "Unity of membership" and shareholders' voting agreements
EP  - 248
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 225
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_2277
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "U radu se razmatraju ugovori o glasanju akcionara u kontekstu jedinstva članskih prava, odnosno nerazdvajanja upravljačkih i ekonomskih prava akcionara. Na početku, autor definiše ugovore o glasanju akcionara, navodeći karakteristike i vrste tih ugovora. Dalje razmatra ugovore o glasanju kao vrstu ugovora akcionara, a onda i kao oblik kolektivnog angažovanja akcionara. Nakon toga, daje kratak pregled uporednopravnih rešenja u vezi sa ugovorima o glasanju. U centralnom delu rada analizirana su rešenja srpskog Zakona o privrednim društvima i dati konkretni predlozi za poboljšanje postojećih rešenja usled uočenih nedostataka. Na kraju, autor se, između ostalog, zalaže za proširenje odredaba o ugovorima o glasanju, koje bi trebalo da se odnose i na povezana lica sa društvom i sa članovima uprave, kao i za predviđanje prekršajne odgovornosti akcionara u vezi sa ugovorima o glasanju., In this paper, the author analyzes shareholders' voting agreements with regard to the "unity of membership" as non-decoupling voting rights from economic rights of shareholders. Firstly, voting agreements of shareholders are defined and listed in different categories considering their characteristics. Secondly, voting agreements are analyzed as one type of shareholders' agreements and additionally as a form of concerted activity of shareholders. Furthermore, a review of comparative legal solutions regarding voting agreements is provided. In the central part of the paper the author discusses the relevant provisions of Serbian Companies Act and proposes concrete solutions for improving existing provisions due to the observed deficiencies. Finally, among other things, the author advocates the broadening of provisions on voting agreements in order to comprehend the persons connected to the company and the directors as well as prescribing the misdemeanor liability of shareholders in relation to voting agreements.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Jedinstvo članskih prava i ugovori o glasanju akcionara, "Unity of membership" and shareholders' voting agreements",
pages = "248-225",
number = "4-6",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_2277"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2019). Jedinstvo članskih prava i ugovori o glasanju akcionara. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 57(4-6), 225-248.
conv_2277

Lepetić J. Jedinstvo članskih prava i ugovori o glasanju akcionara. in Pravo i privreda. 2019;57(4-6):225-248.
conv_2277 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Jedinstvo članskih prava i ugovori o glasanju akcionara" in Pravo i privreda, 57, no. 4-6 (2019):225-248,
conv_2277 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1039
AB  - Autor u ovom radu analizira pravilo jedna akcija - jedan glas dajući odgovor na pitanje da li je vreme za promene u srpskom kompanijskom pravu. Nakon određenja svrhe pravila jedna akcija - jedan glas kao mehanizma za uspostavljanje ravnoteže između upravljačkih prava akcionara i ekonomskog rizika koji akcionari snose, autor iznosi argumente za i protiv uvođenja, odnosno zadržavanja i napuštanja ovog pravila u nacionalnom pravu. U radu su analizirana dva tipa sistema glasanja u akcionarskim društvima - proporcionalni i neproporcionalni, uz prikaz uporednopravnih rešenja i dešavanja na nivou Evropske unije. Autor zaključuje da treba modifikovati rešenje koje je prihvaćeno u srpskom kompanijskom pravu, između ostalog, radi popularizovanja forme akcionarskog društva i usklađivanja pravila jedna akcija - jedan glas sa drugim institutima koji su prihvaćeni u domaćem pravu, pre svega, instituta posebnih dužnosti kontrolnog akcionara. Prema mišljenju autora, jedna akcija - jedan glas bi trebalo da bude dispozitivno, a ne imperativno pravilo. Takođe, slične promene su se desile u pojedinim uporednim zakonodavstvima. Na kaju, predložena promena bi bila u skladu sa tendencijama u pravu Evropske unije u vezi sa podsticanjem dugoročnog angažovanja akcionara.
AB  - In this paper, the author analyses one share - one vote rule and answers the question if it is a time for change in Serbian company law. After defining the purpose of one share - one vote rule as a mechanism for creating the balance between shareholders' voting rights and economic risk borne by shareholders, the author brings forward the arguments for and against introducing as well as retaining and waiving the one share - one vote rule in national law. The author analyses two types of voting system in joint stock companies - proportional and disproportionate. Furthermore, the author provides a purview of comparative legal solutions and latest developments at the EU level. The author concludes that the solution accepted in Serbian company law should be modified, in order to, inter alia, promote the joint stock company and harmonize the one share - one vote rule with other introduced concepts in national law, especially the concept of special duties of controlling shareholders. In the opinion of the author one share - one vote should not be mandatory but a default rule. Besides, similar changes have occurred in respective comparative legislations. Finally, the change would be in accordance with the tendencies in the EU law with regard to enhancing long-term shareholder engagement.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Jedna akcija - jedan glas - da li je vreme za promene
T1  - One share: One vote: Time for change?
EP  - 1215
IS  - 3
SP  - 1195
VL  - 52
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns52-19816
UR  - conv_2579
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Autor u ovom radu analizira pravilo jedna akcija - jedan glas dajući odgovor na pitanje da li je vreme za promene u srpskom kompanijskom pravu. Nakon određenja svrhe pravila jedna akcija - jedan glas kao mehanizma za uspostavljanje ravnoteže između upravljačkih prava akcionara i ekonomskog rizika koji akcionari snose, autor iznosi argumente za i protiv uvođenja, odnosno zadržavanja i napuštanja ovog pravila u nacionalnom pravu. U radu su analizirana dva tipa sistema glasanja u akcionarskim društvima - proporcionalni i neproporcionalni, uz prikaz uporednopravnih rešenja i dešavanja na nivou Evropske unije. Autor zaključuje da treba modifikovati rešenje koje je prihvaćeno u srpskom kompanijskom pravu, između ostalog, radi popularizovanja forme akcionarskog društva i usklađivanja pravila jedna akcija - jedan glas sa drugim institutima koji su prihvaćeni u domaćem pravu, pre svega, instituta posebnih dužnosti kontrolnog akcionara. Prema mišljenju autora, jedna akcija - jedan glas bi trebalo da bude dispozitivno, a ne imperativno pravilo. Takođe, slične promene su se desile u pojedinim uporednim zakonodavstvima. Na kaju, predložena promena bi bila u skladu sa tendencijama u pravu Evropske unije u vezi sa podsticanjem dugoročnog angažovanja akcionara., In this paper, the author analyses one share - one vote rule and answers the question if it is a time for change in Serbian company law. After defining the purpose of one share - one vote rule as a mechanism for creating the balance between shareholders' voting rights and economic risk borne by shareholders, the author brings forward the arguments for and against introducing as well as retaining and waiving the one share - one vote rule in national law. The author analyses two types of voting system in joint stock companies - proportional and disproportionate. Furthermore, the author provides a purview of comparative legal solutions and latest developments at the EU level. The author concludes that the solution accepted in Serbian company law should be modified, in order to, inter alia, promote the joint stock company and harmonize the one share - one vote rule with other introduced concepts in national law, especially the concept of special duties of controlling shareholders. In the opinion of the author one share - one vote should not be mandatory but a default rule. Besides, similar changes have occurred in respective comparative legislations. Finally, the change would be in accordance with the tendencies in the EU law with regard to enhancing long-term shareholder engagement.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Jedna akcija - jedan glas - da li je vreme za promene, One share: One vote: Time for change?",
pages = "1215-1195",
number = "3",
volume = "52",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns52-19816",
url = "conv_2579"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2018). Jedna akcija - jedan glas - da li je vreme za promene. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 52(3), 1195-1215.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns52-19816
conv_2579

Lepetić J. Jedna akcija - jedan glas - da li je vreme za promene. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2018;52(3):1195-1215.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns52-19816
conv_2579 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Jedna akcija - jedan glas - da li je vreme za promene" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 52, no. 3 (2018):1195-1215,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns52-19816 .,
conv_2579 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1072
AB  - Autor u ovom radu daje odgovor na pitanje šta se podrazumeva pod aktivizmom akcionara, imajući u vidu ulogu akcionara u korporativnom upravljanju. Nakon definisanja aktivizma akcionara i analiziranja njegovih oblika, autor posebno ukazuje na potrebu razlikovanja poželjnog i nepoželjnog aktivizma akcionara. S obzirom na to da pasivni akcionari ne bi trebalo da imaju ključnu ulogu u korporativnom upravljanju, važno je pronaći adekvatan metod za podsticanje aktivizma akcionara. Kao prethodna pitanja, analizirana su prava akcionara čijim se vršenjem akcionari angažuju, kao i sam pojam akcionara u srpskom pravu. Autor dalje razmatra pojavu razdvajanja upravljačkih i ekonomskih prava i njen uticaj na aktivizam akcionara. Na kraju, uzimajući u obzir da je pravo glasa ključno upravljačko pravo akcionara, u radu su posebno analizirani isključenje prava glasa akcionara i moderni načini kupovine glasova: tzv. prazno glasanje, negativno glasanje i skriveno preobražajno vlasništvo.
AB  - In this paper, the author gives an answer to the question of what is meant by shareholder activism, in light of the role of shareholders in corporate governance. After defining shareholder activism and analyzing its forms, the author indicates the need for differentiation of desirable and undesirable activism of shareholders. Considering the fact that passive shareholders should not play a key role in corporate governance, it is important to find an adequate method to encourage shareholder activism. Shareholders' rights and the notion of shareholder in Serbian law are analyzed as preliminary issues since the engagement of shareholders is manifested by the exercise of their rights. The author further discusses the issue of decoupling voting rights form economic rights and its impact on shareholder activism. Finally, suspension of voting rights as well as the following forms of modern vote buying, the so called empty voting, negative voting and hidden (morphable) ownership, are considered in this paper having in mind that voting rights are key rights in relation to the shareholder monitoring.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Aktivizam akcionara
T1  - Shareholder activism
EP  - 123
IS  - 10-12
SP  - 105
VL  - 56
UR  - conv_2265
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Autor u ovom radu daje odgovor na pitanje šta se podrazumeva pod aktivizmom akcionara, imajući u vidu ulogu akcionara u korporativnom upravljanju. Nakon definisanja aktivizma akcionara i analiziranja njegovih oblika, autor posebno ukazuje na potrebu razlikovanja poželjnog i nepoželjnog aktivizma akcionara. S obzirom na to da pasivni akcionari ne bi trebalo da imaju ključnu ulogu u korporativnom upravljanju, važno je pronaći adekvatan metod za podsticanje aktivizma akcionara. Kao prethodna pitanja, analizirana su prava akcionara čijim se vršenjem akcionari angažuju, kao i sam pojam akcionara u srpskom pravu. Autor dalje razmatra pojavu razdvajanja upravljačkih i ekonomskih prava i njen uticaj na aktivizam akcionara. Na kraju, uzimajući u obzir da je pravo glasa ključno upravljačko pravo akcionara, u radu su posebno analizirani isključenje prava glasa akcionara i moderni načini kupovine glasova: tzv. prazno glasanje, negativno glasanje i skriveno preobražajno vlasništvo., In this paper, the author gives an answer to the question of what is meant by shareholder activism, in light of the role of shareholders in corporate governance. After defining shareholder activism and analyzing its forms, the author indicates the need for differentiation of desirable and undesirable activism of shareholders. Considering the fact that passive shareholders should not play a key role in corporate governance, it is important to find an adequate method to encourage shareholder activism. Shareholders' rights and the notion of shareholder in Serbian law are analyzed as preliminary issues since the engagement of shareholders is manifested by the exercise of their rights. The author further discusses the issue of decoupling voting rights form economic rights and its impact on shareholder activism. Finally, suspension of voting rights as well as the following forms of modern vote buying, the so called empty voting, negative voting and hidden (morphable) ownership, are considered in this paper having in mind that voting rights are key rights in relation to the shareholder monitoring.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Aktivizam akcionara, Shareholder activism",
pages = "123-105",
number = "10-12",
volume = "56",
url = "conv_2265"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2018). Aktivizam akcionara. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 56(10-12), 105-123.
conv_2265

Lepetić J. Aktivizam akcionara. in Pravo i privreda. 2018;56(10-12):105-123.
conv_2265 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Aktivizam akcionara" in Pravo i privreda, 56, no. 10-12 (2018):105-123,
conv_2265 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lukić, Natalija
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1033
AB  - Autori se u ovom radu bave analizom krivičnog dela zloupotrebe poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti koje je nedavno uvedeno u naše krivično zakonodavstvo. Uzimajući u obzir relevantne odredbe zakona iz oblasti kompanijskog prava, autori ukazuju na domen primene pomenute inkriminacije, posebno obrazlažući koji se sve subjekti mogu smatrati zastupnicima, odnosno starateljima. Autori zaključuju da je biće tog krivičnog dela neprecizno formulisano jer zakonodavac ne predviđa u čemu se sastoji radnja izvršenja i predlažu da to bude zloupotreba zastupničkih ovlašćenja i povreda posebnih dužnosti prema privrednom društvu. Pažnja je posvećena i pitanjima primene instituta pristanka povređenog u odnosu na tu inkriminaciju i analizi rizičnih poslova koji pod određenim uslovima takođe mogu isključiti postojanje tog krivičnog dela.
AB  - In this paper the authors analyse abuse of trust in the economy, a criminal offence recently introduced into Serbian criminal law legislature. Taking into account the relevant provisions of laws in regards to companies, the authors refer to the scope of application of this crime and thoroughly explain categories of persons that may be considered representatives and trustees as perpetrators. The authors conclude that this criminal offence is imprecisely defined, considering the fact that the criminal law legislator does not prescribe the action of crime. Therefore, they suggest that this element of criminal offence should include abuse of representative powers and breach of duties to companies. Finally, the authors devote attention to the consent of the injured in relation to this criminal offence and to high-risk activities which, under certain conditions, may also exclude the existence of this criminal offence.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Zloupotreba poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti - (ne)uspeli pokušaj osavremenjivanja krivičnog prava
T1  - Abuse of trust in the economy: (Un)successful attempt of modernizing criminal law
EP  - 138
IS  - 2
SP  - 106
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AlaniPFB1802106L
UR  - conv_456
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lukić, Natalija and Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Autori se u ovom radu bave analizom krivičnog dela zloupotrebe poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti koje je nedavno uvedeno u naše krivično zakonodavstvo. Uzimajući u obzir relevantne odredbe zakona iz oblasti kompanijskog prava, autori ukazuju na domen primene pomenute inkriminacije, posebno obrazlažući koji se sve subjekti mogu smatrati zastupnicima, odnosno starateljima. Autori zaključuju da je biće tog krivičnog dela neprecizno formulisano jer zakonodavac ne predviđa u čemu se sastoji radnja izvršenja i predlažu da to bude zloupotreba zastupničkih ovlašćenja i povreda posebnih dužnosti prema privrednom društvu. Pažnja je posvećena i pitanjima primene instituta pristanka povređenog u odnosu na tu inkriminaciju i analizi rizičnih poslova koji pod određenim uslovima takođe mogu isključiti postojanje tog krivičnog dela., In this paper the authors analyse abuse of trust in the economy, a criminal offence recently introduced into Serbian criminal law legislature. Taking into account the relevant provisions of laws in regards to companies, the authors refer to the scope of application of this crime and thoroughly explain categories of persons that may be considered representatives and trustees as perpetrators. The authors conclude that this criminal offence is imprecisely defined, considering the fact that the criminal law legislator does not prescribe the action of crime. Therefore, they suggest that this element of criminal offence should include abuse of representative powers and breach of duties to companies. Finally, the authors devote attention to the consent of the injured in relation to this criminal offence and to high-risk activities which, under certain conditions, may also exclude the existence of this criminal offence.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Zloupotreba poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti - (ne)uspeli pokušaj osavremenjivanja krivičnog prava, Abuse of trust in the economy: (Un)successful attempt of modernizing criminal law",
pages = "138-106",
number = "2",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AlaniPFB1802106L",
url = "conv_456"
}

Lukić, N.,& Lepetić, J.. (2018). Zloupotreba poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti - (ne)uspeli pokušaj osavremenjivanja krivičnog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 66(2), 106-138.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AlaniPFB1802106L
conv_456

Lukić N, Lepetić J. Zloupotreba poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti - (ne)uspeli pokušaj osavremenjivanja krivičnog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(2):106-138.
doi:10.5937/AlaniPFB1802106L
conv_456 .

Lukić, Natalija, Lepetić, Jelena, "Zloupotreba poverenja u obavljanju privredne delatnosti - (ne)uspeli pokušaj osavremenjivanja krivičnog prava" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 2 (2018):106-138,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AlaniPFB1802106L .,
conv_456 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/963
AB  - Autor u ovom radu analizira odluke Suda pravde Evropske unije u vezi sa zlatnim akcijama. Specijalna prava države Sud u svojim odlukama kvalifikuje kao nacionalne/državne mere, navodeći da je reč o mehanizmu kojim se odstupa od uobičajenog postupanja u kompanijskom pravu. Nakon analize zlatnih akcija kao ograničenja slobodnog kretanja kapitala i/ili prava nastanjivanja predviđenih Ugovorom o funkcionisanju Evropske unije, autor se osvrće na razliku između postupanja države kao regulatora i države kao akcionara. Na kraju, autor analizira uticaj odredaba o osnovnim slobodama na sistem svojinskih odnosa država članica. Autor zaključuje da nije značajno kojim instrumentima su predviđene zlatne akcije, već da li je država koristila atribut vlasti prilikom njihovog nastanka. Autor se zalaže za primenu testa dejstva specijalnih prava na ulagače prilikom ocene da li je reč o ograničenjima osnovnih sloboda.
AB  - In this paper, the author analyzes judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning golden shares. The Court qualifies special rights of the state as national/state measures, specifying that golden shares are mechanism which derogates from normal course of business in general company law. After analyzing golden shares as restrictions on the movement of capital and/or the freedom of establishment prescribed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the author brings forward the difference between the actions of the state as a regulator and its actions as a shareholder. Finally, the author analyzes the effect of the Treaty rules concerning fundamental freedoms on the Member States' systems of property ownership. The author concludes that the type of the instrument in which special rights are provided for is not relevant - it is crucial whether the state has used the attribute of power while establishing them. The author advocates the application of the effect-based test when assessing whether golden shares restrict fundamental freedoms.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Zlatne akcije između privatnog i javnog prava u praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije
T1  - Private v. Public law: Golden shares in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union
EP  - 139
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 118
VL  - 55
UR  - conv_2205
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Autor u ovom radu analizira odluke Suda pravde Evropske unije u vezi sa zlatnim akcijama. Specijalna prava države Sud u svojim odlukama kvalifikuje kao nacionalne/državne mere, navodeći da je reč o mehanizmu kojim se odstupa od uobičajenog postupanja u kompanijskom pravu. Nakon analize zlatnih akcija kao ograničenja slobodnog kretanja kapitala i/ili prava nastanjivanja predviđenih Ugovorom o funkcionisanju Evropske unije, autor se osvrće na razliku između postupanja države kao regulatora i države kao akcionara. Na kraju, autor analizira uticaj odredaba o osnovnim slobodama na sistem svojinskih odnosa država članica. Autor zaključuje da nije značajno kojim instrumentima su predviđene zlatne akcije, već da li je država koristila atribut vlasti prilikom njihovog nastanka. Autor se zalaže za primenu testa dejstva specijalnih prava na ulagače prilikom ocene da li je reč o ograničenjima osnovnih sloboda., In this paper, the author analyzes judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning golden shares. The Court qualifies special rights of the state as national/state measures, specifying that golden shares are mechanism which derogates from normal course of business in general company law. After analyzing golden shares as restrictions on the movement of capital and/or the freedom of establishment prescribed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the author brings forward the difference between the actions of the state as a regulator and its actions as a shareholder. Finally, the author analyzes the effect of the Treaty rules concerning fundamental freedoms on the Member States' systems of property ownership. The author concludes that the type of the instrument in which special rights are provided for is not relevant - it is crucial whether the state has used the attribute of power while establishing them. The author advocates the application of the effect-based test when assessing whether golden shares restrict fundamental freedoms.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Zlatne akcije između privatnog i javnog prava u praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije, Private v. Public law: Golden shares in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union",
pages = "139-118",
number = "4-6",
volume = "55",
url = "conv_2205"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2017). Zlatne akcije između privatnog i javnog prava u praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 55(4-6), 118-139.
conv_2205

Lepetić J. Zlatne akcije između privatnog i javnog prava u praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije. in Pravo i privreda. 2017;55(4-6):118-139.
conv_2205 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Zlatne akcije između privatnog i javnog prava u praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije" in Pravo i privreda, 55, no. 4-6 (2017):118-139,
conv_2205 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/933
AB  - U ovom radu autor se bavi pravom akcionara na sudsku zaštitu, konkretno pravom akcionara na kolektivnu tužbu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je i kolektivnoj zaštiti investitora. U prvom delu rada autor definiše kolektivnu tužbu i navodi njene najznačajnije karakteristike. Potom analizira kolektivnu tužbu u pravu tržišta kapitala i kompanijskom pravu. Posebno se analizira kolektivna tužba kao sredstvo pravne zaštite nesaglasnih akcionara. Osvrće se na sličnosti i razlike kolektivne i derivativne tužbe. Na kraju, autor zaključuje da su akcionarima i ulagačima u našem pravu prema zakonima kojima se regulišu privredna društva i tržište kapitala dostupni mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite, ali i da treba poboljšati pravila kojima su oni uređeni.
AB  - The focus in this paper is on the shareholders' litigation rights, precisely the right of shareholder to file a collective action. Furthermore, the particular emphasis is on the collective redress concerning investor protection. To start with, the author defines collective action and presents its most important characteristics. Afterwards, the author analyzes collective actions in company law as well as in capital market law. Collective action is particularly examined as a remedy available to dissenting shareholders. The author points to the similarities and differences between collective and derivative action. Finally, the author concludes that collective redress mechanisms are available to shareholders and investors in Serbian law and calls for the improvement of the rules governing them.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite u kompanijskom pravu i pravu tržišta kapitala - kolektivna tužba akcionara
T1  - Collective redress mechanisms in company and capital market law: Shareholder's collective action
EP  - 162
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 144
VL  - 54
UR  - conv_2169
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2016",
abstract = "U ovom radu autor se bavi pravom akcionara na sudsku zaštitu, konkretno pravom akcionara na kolektivnu tužbu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je i kolektivnoj zaštiti investitora. U prvom delu rada autor definiše kolektivnu tužbu i navodi njene najznačajnije karakteristike. Potom analizira kolektivnu tužbu u pravu tržišta kapitala i kompanijskom pravu. Posebno se analizira kolektivna tužba kao sredstvo pravne zaštite nesaglasnih akcionara. Osvrće se na sličnosti i razlike kolektivne i derivativne tužbe. Na kraju, autor zaključuje da su akcionarima i ulagačima u našem pravu prema zakonima kojima se regulišu privredna društva i tržište kapitala dostupni mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite, ali i da treba poboljšati pravila kojima su oni uređeni., The focus in this paper is on the shareholders' litigation rights, precisely the right of shareholder to file a collective action. Furthermore, the particular emphasis is on the collective redress concerning investor protection. To start with, the author defines collective action and presents its most important characteristics. Afterwards, the author analyzes collective actions in company law as well as in capital market law. Collective action is particularly examined as a remedy available to dissenting shareholders. The author points to the similarities and differences between collective and derivative action. Finally, the author concludes that collective redress mechanisms are available to shareholders and investors in Serbian law and calls for the improvement of the rules governing them.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite u kompanijskom pravu i pravu tržišta kapitala - kolektivna tužba akcionara, Collective redress mechanisms in company and capital market law: Shareholder's collective action",
pages = "162-144",
number = "4-6",
volume = "54",
url = "conv_2169"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2016). Mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite u kompanijskom pravu i pravu tržišta kapitala - kolektivna tužba akcionara. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 54(4-6), 144-162.
conv_2169

Lepetić J. Mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite u kompanijskom pravu i pravu tržišta kapitala - kolektivna tužba akcionara. in Pravo i privreda. 2016;54(4-6):144-162.
conv_2169 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite u kompanijskom pravu i pravu tržišta kapitala - kolektivna tužba akcionara" in Pravo i privreda, 54, no. 4-6 (2016):144-162,
conv_2169 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
AU  - Petrov, Vladan
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/922
AB  - Obavezno članstvo u privrednim komorama je tema koja trenutno zaokuplja stručnu i nestručnu javnost u Srbiji. Autori su u ovom radu pokušali da odgovore na pitanje da li je obavezno članstvo u Privrednoj komori Srbije ustavno utemeljeno ili nije. Da bi dali adekvatan odgovor, u radu je prvo analiziran pojam i pravna priroda privredne komore, a zatim su predstavljene karakteristike javnopravnog i privatnopravnog modela komorskih sistema. Nakon toga, predstavljeno je Rešenje Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije iz 2010. godine o neprihvatanju inicijativa za pokretanje postupka za utvrđivanje neustavnosti odredaba čl. 8 i 9 Zakona o privrednim komorama iz 2001. godine. Na kraju, dat je pregled relevantnih presuda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava.
AB  - Mandatory membership in chambers of commerce is a current issue in Serbia which preoccupies not only the law experts but also the entities entitled to run businesses and public in general. The authors tried to answer the question if compulsory business membership in Serbian Chamber of Commerce is constitutional or not. After analyzing the concept and legal nature of chambers of commerce, in order to answer this question adequately, the authors bring forward characteristics of public law and private law model of chamber systems. Furthermore, they present the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia rendered in 2010 considering the initiatives to institute proceedings of assessing the constitutionality of the articles 8 and 9 of the Law on Chamber of Commerce of 2001. Finally, the authors analyze the relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravna priroda privrednih komora
T1  - Legal nature of chambers of commerce
EP  - 23
IS  - 10-12
SP  - 5
VL  - 54
UR  - conv_2195
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko and Petrov, Vladan and Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Obavezno članstvo u privrednim komorama je tema koja trenutno zaokuplja stručnu i nestručnu javnost u Srbiji. Autori su u ovom radu pokušali da odgovore na pitanje da li je obavezno članstvo u Privrednoj komori Srbije ustavno utemeljeno ili nije. Da bi dali adekvatan odgovor, u radu je prvo analiziran pojam i pravna priroda privredne komore, a zatim su predstavljene karakteristike javnopravnog i privatnopravnog modela komorskih sistema. Nakon toga, predstavljeno je Rešenje Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije iz 2010. godine o neprihvatanju inicijativa za pokretanje postupka za utvrđivanje neustavnosti odredaba čl. 8 i 9 Zakona o privrednim komorama iz 2001. godine. Na kraju, dat je pregled relevantnih presuda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava., Mandatory membership in chambers of commerce is a current issue in Serbia which preoccupies not only the law experts but also the entities entitled to run businesses and public in general. The authors tried to answer the question if compulsory business membership in Serbian Chamber of Commerce is constitutional or not. After analyzing the concept and legal nature of chambers of commerce, in order to answer this question adequately, the authors bring forward characteristics of public law and private law model of chamber systems. Furthermore, they present the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia rendered in 2010 considering the initiatives to institute proceedings of assessing the constitutionality of the articles 8 and 9 of the Law on Chamber of Commerce of 2001. Finally, the authors analyze the relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravna priroda privrednih komora, Legal nature of chambers of commerce",
pages = "23-5",
number = "10-12",
volume = "54",
url = "conv_2195"
}

Vasiljević, M., Petrov, V.,& Lepetić, J.. (2016). Pravna priroda privrednih komora. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 54(10-12), 5-23.
conv_2195

Vasiljević M, Petrov V, Lepetić J. Pravna priroda privrednih komora. in Pravo i privreda. 2016;54(10-12):5-23.
conv_2195 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, Petrov, Vladan, Lepetić, Jelena, "Pravna priroda privrednih komora" in Pravo i privreda, 54, no. 10-12 (2016):5-23,
conv_2195 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/867
AB  - Povezana lica predstavljaju aktuelnu temu u oblasti poslovnog prava. Definisana su različito u više zakona kojima je ta oblast uređena. U ovom radu analizirana su povezana lica u kompanijskom pravu (opšta i posebna pravila), računovodstvenom pravu (imajući u vidu uticaj na kompanijsko pravo), pravu tržišta kapitala, stečajnom pravu i pravu preuzimanja. Autor zaključuje da zakonska rešenja nisu usatašena ni smisaono ni terminološki. Ne osporavajući potrebu da povezana lica budu posebno definisana u zakonima kojima se regulišu specijalizovana društva (banke, investicioni fondovi, društva za osturanje), autor se zalaže za sistemski pristup ovom pitanju i načelno jedinstveno definisanje povezanih lica. Na kraju, autor analizira i odGovornost povezanih lica u kontekstu instituta kompanijskopravnih dužnosti.
AB  - The concept of related parties represents current topic in the field of business law. Related parties are defined differently in several acts which regulate that area. In this article, the author analyzes different notions of related parties, specifically in company law (general and specific rules), accountancy law (considering the influence on company law), capital market law, bankruptcy law and takeover law. The author concludes that the legislative solutions are not harmonized in terms of their meaning and terminology. Without denying the need for special regulation of related parties in the laws governing specialized companies (banks, investment companies, insurance companies), the author calls for a systematic approach to this issue and generally unique definition of related parties. Finally, the author analyzes the liability of related parties with regards to company law duties.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Povezana lica u poslovnom pravu
T1  - Related parties in business law
EP  - 39
IS  - 10-12
SP  - 19
VL  - 53
UR  - conv_2166
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Povezana lica predstavljaju aktuelnu temu u oblasti poslovnog prava. Definisana su različito u više zakona kojima je ta oblast uređena. U ovom radu analizirana su povezana lica u kompanijskom pravu (opšta i posebna pravila), računovodstvenom pravu (imajući u vidu uticaj na kompanijsko pravo), pravu tržišta kapitala, stečajnom pravu i pravu preuzimanja. Autor zaključuje da zakonska rešenja nisu usatašena ni smisaono ni terminološki. Ne osporavajući potrebu da povezana lica budu posebno definisana u zakonima kojima se regulišu specijalizovana društva (banke, investicioni fondovi, društva za osturanje), autor se zalaže za sistemski pristup ovom pitanju i načelno jedinstveno definisanje povezanih lica. Na kraju, autor analizira i odGovornost povezanih lica u kontekstu instituta kompanijskopravnih dužnosti., The concept of related parties represents current topic in the field of business law. Related parties are defined differently in several acts which regulate that area. In this article, the author analyzes different notions of related parties, specifically in company law (general and specific rules), accountancy law (considering the influence on company law), capital market law, bankruptcy law and takeover law. The author concludes that the legislative solutions are not harmonized in terms of their meaning and terminology. Without denying the need for special regulation of related parties in the laws governing specialized companies (banks, investment companies, insurance companies), the author calls for a systematic approach to this issue and generally unique definition of related parties. Finally, the author analyzes the liability of related parties with regards to company law duties.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Povezana lica u poslovnom pravu, Related parties in business law",
pages = "39-19",
number = "10-12",
volume = "53",
url = "conv_2166"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2015). Povezana lica u poslovnom pravu. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 53(10-12), 19-39.
conv_2166

Lepetić J. Povezana lica u poslovnom pravu. in Pravo i privreda. 2015;53(10-12):19-39.
conv_2166 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Povezana lica u poslovnom pravu" in Pravo i privreda, 53, no. 10-12 (2015):19-39,
conv_2166 .

TY  - THES
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena D.
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=1762
UR  - https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/2640
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:9396/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=513383601
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/15
AB  - Predmet doktorske disertacije predstavlja istraživanje pravnog režima i sadržaja dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa u kompanijskom pravu, kao i posledica povrede tih dužnosti. Istraživanje je fokusirano na sukob interesa koji se odnosi na konkretizaciju dužnosti lojalnosti, dok su ostali primeri sukoba interesa u širem smislu kojima je cilj prvenstveno zaštita nekih drugih interesa, a ne interesa privrednog društva, izvan predmeta ove doktorske disertacije (npr. naknade, preuzimanje, probijanje pravne ličnosti). Predmet istraživanja je sukob interesa u društvima kapitala, ali ne i društvima lica, kako iz razloga obuhvata predmeta disertacije, tako i iz materijalnopravnih razloga koji proizilaze iz različite prirode i svojstava društava kapitala i društava lica.  Sukob interesa u kompanijskopravnom smislu definisan je, između ostalog, kao sukob ličnog interesa lica sa posebnim dužnostima prema društvu i interesa privrednog društva. Pored analize interesa lica sa posebnim dužnostima i interesa privrednog društva, predmet ove doktorske disertacije je analiza sistema posebnih dužnosti u kompanijskom pravu, subjekata dužnosti, kao i lica prema kojima dužnosti postoje, a sve to u cilju određivanja položaja dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa u sistemu dužnosti u okviru kompanijskog prava. Analizirane dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa su dužnost prijavljivanja pravnog posla ili radnje u kojima postoji lični interes ili interes povezanog lica i dužnost izbegavanja sukoba interesa. Na kraju, predmet ove doktorske disertacije su i posledice povrede dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa.  S obzirom na to da je sistem posebnih dužnosti u srpskom kompanijskom pravu transplantiran iz anglosaksonskih pravnih sistema, opšti cilj istraživanja je bolje razumevanje kompanijskopravnog režima sukoba interesa, odnosno dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa u domaćem kompanijskom pravu.
AB  - The subject of the present doctoral dissertation is a study of the regulation and the scope of duties in relation to the conflict of interest in company law, as well as of the civil consequences of breach of these duties. The research is focused on the conflict of interest relating to the concretization of duty of loyalty, while other examples of conflict of interest in a broader sense, which are aimed primarily at the protection of other interests, not the interest of the company, remain beyond the scope of this dissertation (e.g. remuneration, takeover, piercing the corporate veil). The subject of the research is conflict of interest in corporations, not the one in partnerships, which is due to the scope of the subject matter and substantive reasons arising from the different nature and features of corporations and partnerships.  In the context of company law, conflict of interest is, inter alia, defined as a conflict between personal interest of a person owing duties to the company and the company’s interest. In addition to analysing of the interests of persons owing duties to a company and the interest of the company, the present dissertation aims to examine the system of company law duties, the subjects of duties, as well as persons towards whom duties exist, and all of this with a view to determine the position of duties in relation to the conflict of interest in the system of duties within the company law. The duties relating to conflict of interest that are analyzed are the duty to declare personal interest or interest of a related party in transaction or arrangement and the duty to avoid conflict of interest. Finally, the subject of this dissertation includes the civil consequences of breach of duties in relation to conflict of interest.  Given the fact that the system of special duties in the Serbian company law has been transplanted from the common law legal systems, the general objective of the research is to better understand company law regulation of conflict of interest, i.e. duties in relation to the conflict of interest in domestic company law.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet
T1  - Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa
UR  - t-2357
ER  - 

@phdthesis{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena D.",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Predmet doktorske disertacije predstavlja istraživanje pravnog režima i sadržaja dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa u kompanijskom pravu, kao i posledica povrede tih dužnosti. Istraživanje je fokusirano na sukob interesa koji se odnosi na konkretizaciju dužnosti lojalnosti, dok su ostali primeri sukoba interesa u širem smislu kojima je cilj prvenstveno zaštita nekih drugih interesa, a ne interesa privrednog društva, izvan predmeta ove doktorske disertacije (npr. naknade, preuzimanje, probijanje pravne ličnosti). Predmet istraživanja je sukob interesa u društvima kapitala, ali ne i društvima lica, kako iz razloga obuhvata predmeta disertacije, tako i iz materijalnopravnih razloga koji proizilaze iz različite prirode i svojstava društava kapitala i društava lica.  Sukob interesa u kompanijskopravnom smislu definisan je, između ostalog, kao sukob ličnog interesa lica sa posebnim dužnostima prema društvu i interesa privrednog društva. Pored analize interesa lica sa posebnim dužnostima i interesa privrednog društva, predmet ove doktorske disertacije je analiza sistema posebnih dužnosti u kompanijskom pravu, subjekata dužnosti, kao i lica prema kojima dužnosti postoje, a sve to u cilju određivanja položaja dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa u sistemu dužnosti u okviru kompanijskog prava. Analizirane dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa su dužnost prijavljivanja pravnog posla ili radnje u kojima postoji lični interes ili interes povezanog lica i dužnost izbegavanja sukoba interesa. Na kraju, predmet ove doktorske disertacije su i posledice povrede dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa.  S obzirom na to da je sistem posebnih dužnosti u srpskom kompanijskom pravu transplantiran iz anglosaksonskih pravnih sistema, opšti cilj istraživanja je bolje razumevanje kompanijskopravnog režima sukoba interesa, odnosno dužnosti u vezi sa sukobom interesa u domaćem kompanijskom pravu., The subject of the present doctoral dissertation is a study of the regulation and the scope of duties in relation to the conflict of interest in company law, as well as of the civil consequences of breach of these duties. The research is focused on the conflict of interest relating to the concretization of duty of loyalty, while other examples of conflict of interest in a broader sense, which are aimed primarily at the protection of other interests, not the interest of the company, remain beyond the scope of this dissertation (e.g. remuneration, takeover, piercing the corporate veil). The subject of the research is conflict of interest in corporations, not the one in partnerships, which is due to the scope of the subject matter and substantive reasons arising from the different nature and features of corporations and partnerships.  In the context of company law, conflict of interest is, inter alia, defined as a conflict between personal interest of a person owing duties to the company and the company’s interest. In addition to analysing of the interests of persons owing duties to a company and the interest of the company, the present dissertation aims to examine the system of company law duties, the subjects of duties, as well as persons towards whom duties exist, and all of this with a view to determine the position of duties in relation to the conflict of interest in the system of duties within the company law. The duties relating to conflict of interest that are analyzed are the duty to declare personal interest or interest of a related party in transaction or arrangement and the duty to avoid conflict of interest. Finally, the subject of this dissertation includes the civil consequences of breach of duties in relation to conflict of interest.  Given the fact that the system of special duties in the Serbian company law has been transplanted from the common law legal systems, the general objective of the research is to better understand company law regulation of conflict of interest, i.e. duties in relation to the conflict of interest in domestic company law.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet",
title = "Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa",
url = "t-2357"
}

Lepetić, J. D.. (2014). Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet..
t-2357

Lepetić JD. Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa. 2014;.
t-2357 .

Lepetić, Jelena D., "Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa" (2014),
t-2357 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/800
AB  - U ovom radu autor se bavi pravom akcionara na individualnu tužbu. Nakon uvodnog dela o pojmu individualne tužbe u našem i uporednim pravima, autor analizira odgovornost lica sa posebnim dužnostima za prouzrokovanu štetu akcionarima. Osvrće se na uslove odgovornosti i pitanje protivpravnosti u kompanijskom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je (ne)opravdanosti prava akcionara na naknadu štete zbog pada vrednosti akcija ili izostanku rasta te vrednosti (refleksna šteta). Autor zaključuje da je potrebno izmeniti Zakon o privrednim društvima i isključiti pravo na naknadu refleksne štete akcionarima ukoliko je društvo (ili akcionari derivativno) u mogućnosti da podnese tužbu zbog povrede posebnih dužnosti. Na kraju, autor se bavi pitanjem odgovornosti društva za štetu koju su članovi njegovih organa prouzrokovali akcionarima.
AB  - The focus of this paper is on the right of shareholder to file an individual suit. At the outset, the notion of shareholder's personal claim is examined from the perspective of both the Serbian and comparative law, followed by the author's analysis of the issues of liability of persons with company law duties for damages inflicted upon the shareholders' assets in breach of their duties. The particular emphasis of the paper is on the conditions related to the liability regime and the wrongfulness in Serbian Company Law, as well as the issue of (in)adequacy of shareholder's right to damages because of decrease or no increase in the share value (reflective loss). Following this discussion, the paper delineates the potential amendments in the Serbian Companies Act pertaining to exclusion of shareholder's right to damages for reflective loss in situations where the company (or shareholders derivatively) has a standing to sue the wrongdoer for the breach of company law duties. Finally, the author touches upon the company liability issues for damages inflicted to the shareholders by members of its organs, concluding on the topic of the actual extent of protection given under the Serbian Company Law and inadequacies of the accepted solutions that the existing regime provides.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pravo akcionara na individualnu tužbu
T1  - Shareholder's personal action
EP  - 204
IS  - 1
SP  - 187
VL  - 62
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1401187L
UR  - conv_331
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2014",
abstract = "U ovom radu autor se bavi pravom akcionara na individualnu tužbu. Nakon uvodnog dela o pojmu individualne tužbe u našem i uporednim pravima, autor analizira odgovornost lica sa posebnim dužnostima za prouzrokovanu štetu akcionarima. Osvrće se na uslove odgovornosti i pitanje protivpravnosti u kompanijskom pravu. Posebna pažnja posvećena je (ne)opravdanosti prava akcionara na naknadu štete zbog pada vrednosti akcija ili izostanku rasta te vrednosti (refleksna šteta). Autor zaključuje da je potrebno izmeniti Zakon o privrednim društvima i isključiti pravo na naknadu refleksne štete akcionarima ukoliko je društvo (ili akcionari derivativno) u mogućnosti da podnese tužbu zbog povrede posebnih dužnosti. Na kraju, autor se bavi pitanjem odgovornosti društva za štetu koju su članovi njegovih organa prouzrokovali akcionarima., The focus of this paper is on the right of shareholder to file an individual suit. At the outset, the notion of shareholder's personal claim is examined from the perspective of both the Serbian and comparative law, followed by the author's analysis of the issues of liability of persons with company law duties for damages inflicted upon the shareholders' assets in breach of their duties. The particular emphasis of the paper is on the conditions related to the liability regime and the wrongfulness in Serbian Company Law, as well as the issue of (in)adequacy of shareholder's right to damages because of decrease or no increase in the share value (reflective loss). Following this discussion, the paper delineates the potential amendments in the Serbian Companies Act pertaining to exclusion of shareholder's right to damages for reflective loss in situations where the company (or shareholders derivatively) has a standing to sue the wrongdoer for the breach of company law duties. Finally, the author touches upon the company liability issues for damages inflicted to the shareholders by members of its organs, concluding on the topic of the actual extent of protection given under the Serbian Company Law and inadequacies of the accepted solutions that the existing regime provides.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pravo akcionara na individualnu tužbu, Shareholder's personal action",
pages = "204-187",
number = "1",
volume = "62",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1401187L",
url = "conv_331"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2014). Pravo akcionara na individualnu tužbu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 62(1), 187-204.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1401187L
conv_331

Lepetić J. Pravo akcionara na individualnu tužbu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2014;62(1):187-204.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1401187L
conv_331 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Pravo akcionara na individualnu tužbu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 62, no. 1 (2014):187-204,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1401187L .,
conv_331 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Živković, Uroš
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/795
AB  - Otvaranje stečajnog postupka nad jednom od strana u arbitražnom postupku dovodi do brojnih praktičnih problema koja nisu rešena na izričit način u okviru srpskog pozitivnog prava. Autori su, imajući u vidu postojeću uporednu praksu i doktrinu, pokušali da na sistematičan način prikažu probleme koji mogu nastati u interakciji arbitražnog i stečajnog postupka i ukažu na potencijalna rešenja koja su konzistentna sa postojećim zakonodavnim okvirom - posebno imajući u vidu Zakon stečaju i Zakon o arbitraži Republike Srbije. U radu je analiziran i razjašnjen odabrani krug problema koji se mogu pojaviti kako u procesnom tako i materijalnom smislu, a koji se odnose na pitanja arbitrabilnosti, mogućnosti za paralelno vođenje stečajnog i arbitražnog postupka i povezane procesne praznine koje postoje ili se mogu javiti u srpskom pravu.
AB  - Opening of bankruptcy proceedings over one of the parties to the pending arbitration opens up numerous practical problems that remain unresolved within the current framework of Serbian legislation. Bearing in mind that key procedural aspects of the possible interaction between these diverging proceedings are not explicitly covered by the applicable statutes, the existing international and comparative practice as well as doctrinal writings on the topic have shaped the motivation of the authors to address selected issues in this troublesome relationship between the bankruptcy and arbitration from the standpoint of Serbian law. The analysis of the issues covered - from the perspective of applicable Serbian Bankruptcy and Arbitration Acts - includes delineation of the notion of arbitrability, possibilities of parallel bankruptcy and arbitration proceedings and procedural gaps that may appear or already exist in the context of insolvent party acting as either a claimant or respondent in arbitration. The paper concludes with summarization of vital problems and their precise identification while addressing possible solutions that would be in line with the applicable laws in the Republic of Serbia.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Posledice otvaranja stečaja na arbitražni postupak u pravu Srbije
T1  - Effects of bankruptcy upon arbitral proceedings in the Serbian law
EP  - 468
IS  - 7-9
SP  - 453
VL  - 52
UR  - conv_2136
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Živković, Uroš and Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Otvaranje stečajnog postupka nad jednom od strana u arbitražnom postupku dovodi do brojnih praktičnih problema koja nisu rešena na izričit način u okviru srpskog pozitivnog prava. Autori su, imajući u vidu postojeću uporednu praksu i doktrinu, pokušali da na sistematičan način prikažu probleme koji mogu nastati u interakciji arbitražnog i stečajnog postupka i ukažu na potencijalna rešenja koja su konzistentna sa postojećim zakonodavnim okvirom - posebno imajući u vidu Zakon stečaju i Zakon o arbitraži Republike Srbije. U radu je analiziran i razjašnjen odabrani krug problema koji se mogu pojaviti kako u procesnom tako i materijalnom smislu, a koji se odnose na pitanja arbitrabilnosti, mogućnosti za paralelno vođenje stečajnog i arbitražnog postupka i povezane procesne praznine koje postoje ili se mogu javiti u srpskom pravu., Opening of bankruptcy proceedings over one of the parties to the pending arbitration opens up numerous practical problems that remain unresolved within the current framework of Serbian legislation. Bearing in mind that key procedural aspects of the possible interaction between these diverging proceedings are not explicitly covered by the applicable statutes, the existing international and comparative practice as well as doctrinal writings on the topic have shaped the motivation of the authors to address selected issues in this troublesome relationship between the bankruptcy and arbitration from the standpoint of Serbian law. The analysis of the issues covered - from the perspective of applicable Serbian Bankruptcy and Arbitration Acts - includes delineation of the notion of arbitrability, possibilities of parallel bankruptcy and arbitration proceedings and procedural gaps that may appear or already exist in the context of insolvent party acting as either a claimant or respondent in arbitration. The paper concludes with summarization of vital problems and their precise identification while addressing possible solutions that would be in line with the applicable laws in the Republic of Serbia.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Posledice otvaranja stečaja na arbitražni postupak u pravu Srbije, Effects of bankruptcy upon arbitral proceedings in the Serbian law",
pages = "468-453",
number = "7-9",
volume = "52",
url = "conv_2136"
}

Živković, U.,& Lepetić, J.. (2014). Posledice otvaranja stečaja na arbitražni postupak u pravu Srbije. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 52(7-9), 453-468.
conv_2136

Živković U, Lepetić J. Posledice otvaranja stečaja na arbitražni postupak u pravu Srbije. in Pravo i privreda. 2014;52(7-9):453-468.
conv_2136 .

Živković, Uroš, Lepetić, Jelena, "Posledice otvaranja stečaja na arbitražni postupak u pravu Srbije" in Pravo i privreda, 52, no. 7-9 (2014):453-468,
conv_2136 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/718
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja
T1  - Shareholder's right to ask questions
EP  - 225
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 207
VL  - 50
UR  - conv_2090
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja, Shareholder's right to ask questions",
pages = "225-207",
number = "4-6",
volume = "50",
url = "conv_2090"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2013). Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 50(4-6), 207-225.
conv_2090

Lepetić J. Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja. in Pravo i privreda. 2013;50(4-6):207-225.
conv_2090 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja" in Pravo i privreda, 50, no. 4-6 (2013):207-225,
conv_2090 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/632
AB  - Inside information is the central concept of the notion of public disclosure of inside information as well as of insider dealing. This paper aims to determine whether the notion of inside information is the same within the two concepts and whether it should be. Two hypotheses have been analyzed - firstly, the need to separate the unique concept of inside information, which has been accepted in Serbian and EU law, and secondly, the need to limit the issuer’s broad discretion with regard to the issue of delaying public disclosure. Finally, the concept of delaying public disclosure of inside information in connection with problem of rumors and 'leaked' information has been looked into in details.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Public disclosure of inside information
EP  - 206
IS  - 3
SP  - 188
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_278
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Inside information is the central concept of the notion of public disclosure of inside information as well as of insider dealing. This paper aims to determine whether the notion of inside information is the same within the two concepts and whether it should be. Two hypotheses have been analyzed - firstly, the need to separate the unique concept of inside information, which has been accepted in Serbian and EU law, and secondly, the need to limit the issuer’s broad discretion with regard to the issue of delaying public disclosure. Finally, the concept of delaying public disclosure of inside information in connection with problem of rumors and 'leaked' information has been looked into in details.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Public disclosure of inside information",
pages = "206-188",
number = "3",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_278"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2012). Public disclosure of inside information. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 60(3), 188-206.
conv_278

Lepetić J. Public disclosure of inside information. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(3):188-206.
conv_278 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Public disclosure of inside information" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 3 (2012):188-206,
conv_278 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/617
AB  - Državni protekcionizam u kompanijskom pravu je postao aktuelna tema od izuzetnog značaja u svetlu ekonomskih kriza i množenja inostranih državnih fondova. U ovom radu autor ukazuje na postojeće probleme neadekvatne primene instituta zlatnih akcija kao oblika državnog protekcionizma u Srbiji. Nakon definisanja državnog protekcionizma i pregleda njegovih oblika, autor definiše zlatne akcije, utvrđuje njihove karakteristike i pravnu prirodu. Akcenat je stavljen na korišćenje zlatnih akccja u praksi iako nisu predviđene zakonom. Na taj način otvara se pitanje da li se država može ponašati kao bilo koji drugi pravni subjekat, nezavisno od njenog atributa vlasti, imajući u vidu postupanje države kao akcionara uopšte. Na kraju, autor ukazuje na potrebu zakonskog regulisanja zlatnih akcija u pravu Srbije zakonom kojim se reguliše pitanje privatizacije.
AB  - Economic protectionism in company law has become a current issue of great importance in the light of financial crises and multiplication of sovereign wealth funds. In this paper, the author indicates existing problems related to inadequate application of golden shares as a form of state protectionism in Serbia. After providing the definition of economic protectionism and list of its forms, the author defines golden shares and determines their characteristics and legal nature. ne use of golden shares in practice has been emphasized due to the fact that they are not prescribed by law. ne example of its application leads to the issue whether the state can behave as any other subject of law independently of its attribute of power considering the behavior of state as shareholder in general. At the end, the author points to the need for the regulation of golden shares by law on privatization in Serbia.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Zlatne akcije u kompanijskom pravu Srbije
T1  - Golden shares in the company law of Serbia
EP  - 178
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 164
VL  - 49
UR  - conv_2060
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Državni protekcionizam u kompanijskom pravu je postao aktuelna tema od izuzetnog značaja u svetlu ekonomskih kriza i množenja inostranih državnih fondova. U ovom radu autor ukazuje na postojeće probleme neadekvatne primene instituta zlatnih akcija kao oblika državnog protekcionizma u Srbiji. Nakon definisanja državnog protekcionizma i pregleda njegovih oblika, autor definiše zlatne akcije, utvrđuje njihove karakteristike i pravnu prirodu. Akcenat je stavljen na korišćenje zlatnih akccja u praksi iako nisu predviđene zakonom. Na taj način otvara se pitanje da li se država može ponašati kao bilo koji drugi pravni subjekat, nezavisno od njenog atributa vlasti, imajući u vidu postupanje države kao akcionara uopšte. Na kraju, autor ukazuje na potrebu zakonskog regulisanja zlatnih akcija u pravu Srbije zakonom kojim se reguliše pitanje privatizacije., Economic protectionism in company law has become a current issue of great importance in the light of financial crises and multiplication of sovereign wealth funds. In this paper, the author indicates existing problems related to inadequate application of golden shares as a form of state protectionism in Serbia. After providing the definition of economic protectionism and list of its forms, the author defines golden shares and determines their characteristics and legal nature. ne use of golden shares in practice has been emphasized due to the fact that they are not prescribed by law. ne example of its application leads to the issue whether the state can behave as any other subject of law independently of its attribute of power considering the behavior of state as shareholder in general. At the end, the author points to the need for the regulation of golden shares by law on privatization in Serbia.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Zlatne akcije u kompanijskom pravu Srbije, Golden shares in the company law of Serbia",
pages = "178-164",
number = "4-6",
volume = "49",
url = "conv_2060"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2012). Zlatne akcije u kompanijskom pravu Srbije. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 49(4-6), 164-178.
conv_2060

Lepetić J. Zlatne akcije u kompanijskom pravu Srbije. in Pravo i privreda. 2012;49(4-6):164-178.
conv_2060 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "Zlatne akcije u kompanijskom pravu Srbije" in Pravo i privreda, 49, no. 4-6 (2012):164-178,
conv_2060 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/552
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - O pojmu insider-a u pravu Evropske unije
T1  - About the concept of insider in the European Union law
EP  - 687
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 672
VL  - 48
UR  - conv_2041
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2011",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "O pojmu insider-a u pravu Evropske unije, About the concept of insider in the European Union law",
pages = "687-672",
number = "4-6",
volume = "48",
url = "conv_2041"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2011). O pojmu insider-a u pravu Evropske unije. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 48(4-6), 672-687.
conv_2041

Lepetić J. O pojmu insider-a u pravu Evropske unije. in Pravo i privreda. 2011;48(4-6):672-687.
conv_2041 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "O pojmu insider-a u pravu Evropske unije" in Pravo i privreda, 48, no. 4-6 (2011):672-687,
conv_2041 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/516
AB  - Rešenja do kojih je došao Vrhovni sud Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (SAD), stvarajući različite teorije o odgovornosti insider-a, uticala su u velikoj meri na prava zemalja širom sveta. U poslednje vreme čak ni SAD ne prihvataju čisto fiducijarni pristup zaštite na polju insider trading-a. Upravo su odluke pomenutog Suda i danas inspiracija za nove ideje i konkretne predloge za izmenu zakonskih rešenja. Autor je ukazao na aktuelne probleme definisanja pojma insider-a i povlašćene informacije u praksi. Istaknut je značaj razlikovanja povoljne od nepovoljne povlašćene informacije i različite (ne)potrebe sankcionisanja korišćenja informacija u zavisnosti od vrste. Analizom svih kategorija lica koja mogu biti pravno odgovorna kao insider-i autor dolazi do zaključka ko se zaista može smatrati insider-om u pravu SAD-a.
AB  - Solutions reached by the Supreme Court of the United States of America (USA), creating various theories of insider liability, affected the legislation of countries world-wide to a large extent. Lately, even USA does not accept pure fiduciary protection approach in the field of insider trading. Decisions of the said Court are even today an inspiration for new ideas and specific proposals for amendments to legal solutions. The author points out current problems in defining the concept of insider and inside information in practice. The importance of distinguishing positive from negative inside information and existing or non-existing needs to sanction using information depending on the type, is emphasized. Analyzing all categories of persons who may be subject to legal liability as insiders, the author comes to the conclusion who may really be considered as insider in the law of USA.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - O pojmu insider-a u pravu Sjedinjenih Američkih Država
T1  - About the concept of insider in the law of the United States of America
EP  - 170
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 159
VL  - 47
UR  - conv_2008
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Rešenja do kojih je došao Vrhovni sud Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (SAD), stvarajući različite teorije o odgovornosti insider-a, uticala su u velikoj meri na prava zemalja širom sveta. U poslednje vreme čak ni SAD ne prihvataju čisto fiducijarni pristup zaštite na polju insider trading-a. Upravo su odluke pomenutog Suda i danas inspiracija za nove ideje i konkretne predloge za izmenu zakonskih rešenja. Autor je ukazao na aktuelne probleme definisanja pojma insider-a i povlašćene informacije u praksi. Istaknut je značaj razlikovanja povoljne od nepovoljne povlašćene informacije i različite (ne)potrebe sankcionisanja korišćenja informacija u zavisnosti od vrste. Analizom svih kategorija lica koja mogu biti pravno odgovorna kao insider-i autor dolazi do zaključka ko se zaista može smatrati insider-om u pravu SAD-a., Solutions reached by the Supreme Court of the United States of America (USA), creating various theories of insider liability, affected the legislation of countries world-wide to a large extent. Lately, even USA does not accept pure fiduciary protection approach in the field of insider trading. Decisions of the said Court are even today an inspiration for new ideas and specific proposals for amendments to legal solutions. The author points out current problems in defining the concept of insider and inside information in practice. The importance of distinguishing positive from negative inside information and existing or non-existing needs to sanction using information depending on the type, is emphasized. Analyzing all categories of persons who may be subject to legal liability as insiders, the author comes to the conclusion who may really be considered as insider in the law of USA.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "O pojmu insider-a u pravu Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, About the concept of insider in the law of the United States of America",
pages = "170-159",
number = "4-6",
volume = "47",
url = "conv_2008"
}

Lepetić, J.. (2010). O pojmu insider-a u pravu Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 47(4-6), 159-170.
conv_2008

Lepetić J. O pojmu insider-a u pravu Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. in Pravo i privreda. 2010;47(4-6):159-170.
conv_2008 .

Lepetić, Jelena, "O pojmu insider-a u pravu Sjedinjenih Američkih Država" in Pravo i privreda, 47, no. 4-6 (2010):159-170,
conv_2008 .