Mirković, Zoran

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0009-0002-1238-5414
  • Mirković, Zoran (17)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Pravni fakultet kao alma mater - povodom dve pedesetogodišnjice

Popović, Dejan; Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Dejan
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1412
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pravni fakultet kao alma mater - povodom dve pedesetogodišnjice
EP  - 192
IS  - 1
SP  - 185
VL  - 71
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23107A
UR  - conv_601
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Dejan and Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pravni fakultet kao alma mater - povodom dve pedesetogodišnjice",
pages = "192-185",
number = "1",
volume = "71",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23107A",
url = "conv_601"
}
Popović, D.,& Mirković, Z.. (2023). Pravni fakultet kao alma mater - povodom dve pedesetogodišnjice. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 71(1), 185-192.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23107A
conv_601
Popović D, Mirković Z. Pravni fakultet kao alma mater - povodom dve pedesetogodišnjice. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2023;71(1):185-192.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23107A
conv_601 .
Popović, Dejan, Mirković, Zoran, "Pravni fakultet kao alma mater - povodom dve pedesetogodišnjice" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 71, no. 1 (2023):185-192,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23107A .,
conv_601 .

Osnivanje i počeci časopisa anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu

Popović, Dejan; Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Dejan
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1434
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Osnivanje i počeci časopisa anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
EP  - 615
IS  - 3
SP  - 607
VL  - 71
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23307A
UR  - conv_609
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Dejan and Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Osnivanje i počeci časopisa anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
pages = "615-607",
number = "3",
volume = "71",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23307A",
url = "conv_609"
}
Popović, D.,& Mirković, Z.. (2023). Osnivanje i počeci časopisa anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 71(3), 607-615.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23307A
conv_609
Popović D, Mirković Z. Osnivanje i počeci časopisa anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2023;71(3):607-615.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23307A
conv_609 .
Popović, Dejan, Mirković, Zoran, "Osnivanje i počeci časopisa anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 71, no. 3 (2023):607-615,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23307A .,
conv_609 .
1

Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1340
AB  - Tekst je posvećen radu na kodifikaciji građanskog zakonika u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji dugom gotovo deceniju i po, koji, na kraju, nije doveo do usvajanja zakonika i mišljenju Mihaila Konstantinovića o tome radu. Najpre su ukratko izložene činjenice o ambijentu i prilikama u kojima je započet rad na kodifikaciji, o glavnim akterima, njihovim stavovima, metodu kodifikovanja i ishodu toga rada - nastanku Predosnove građanskog zakonika za Kraljevinu Jugoslaviju. Mišljenje Mihaila Konstantinovića o tom radu počinje istorijom nastanka srpskog Građanskog zakonika, kako se desilo da austrijski Građanski zakonik potisne francuski Code civile. Izložen je način na koji je Konstantinović branio svoj stav da je bilo pogrešno što je za osnovu za rad na jedinstvenom građanskom zakoniku bio uzet austrijski Građanski zakonik. Navedeni su Konstantinovićevi razlozi zašto je za osnovu trebalo uzeti Opšti imovinski zakonik za Crnu Goru iz 1888. godine, koji je napisao Valtazar Bogišić.
AB  - The paper analyses the work on the codification of the civil code in interwar Yugoslavia and Mihailo Konstantinović's opinion of that work, which lasted almost a decade and a half but did not lead to the adoption of the code. The paper describes the environment and circumstances in which the work on codification began, the main actors, their positions, the method of codification, and the outcome of that work - the creation of The Pre-Draft of the Civil Code for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Mihailo Konstantinović's opinion on that work begins with the history of the creation of the Serbian Civil Code, and how it happened that the Austrian Civil Code was used as the basis, as opposed to the French Civil Code. Konstantinović's arguments for why it was wrong to use the Austrian Civil Code, instead of the 1888 Montenegrin General Property Code are presented.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji
T1  - Mihailo Konstantinović on working on the Civil Code in inter-war Yugoslavia
EP  - 91
IS  - poseban
SP  - 79
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK03A
UR  - conv_556
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Tekst je posvećen radu na kodifikaciji građanskog zakonika u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji dugom gotovo deceniju i po, koji, na kraju, nije doveo do usvajanja zakonika i mišljenju Mihaila Konstantinovića o tome radu. Najpre su ukratko izložene činjenice o ambijentu i prilikama u kojima je započet rad na kodifikaciji, o glavnim akterima, njihovim stavovima, metodu kodifikovanja i ishodu toga rada - nastanku Predosnove građanskog zakonika za Kraljevinu Jugoslaviju. Mišljenje Mihaila Konstantinovića o tom radu počinje istorijom nastanka srpskog Građanskog zakonika, kako se desilo da austrijski Građanski zakonik potisne francuski Code civile. Izložen je način na koji je Konstantinović branio svoj stav da je bilo pogrešno što je za osnovu za rad na jedinstvenom građanskom zakoniku bio uzet austrijski Građanski zakonik. Navedeni su Konstantinovićevi razlozi zašto je za osnovu trebalo uzeti Opšti imovinski zakonik za Crnu Goru iz 1888. godine, koji je napisao Valtazar Bogišić., The paper analyses the work on the codification of the civil code in interwar Yugoslavia and Mihailo Konstantinović's opinion of that work, which lasted almost a decade and a half but did not lead to the adoption of the code. The paper describes the environment and circumstances in which the work on codification began, the main actors, their positions, the method of codification, and the outcome of that work - the creation of The Pre-Draft of the Civil Code for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Mihailo Konstantinović's opinion on that work begins with the history of the creation of the Serbian Civil Code, and how it happened that the Austrian Civil Code was used as the basis, as opposed to the French Civil Code. Konstantinović's arguments for why it was wrong to use the Austrian Civil Code, instead of the 1888 Montenegrin General Property Code are presented.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji, Mihailo Konstantinović on working on the Civil Code in inter-war Yugoslavia",
pages = "91-79",
number = "poseban",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK03A",
url = "conv_556"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2022). Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(poseban), 79-91.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK03A
conv_556
Mirković Z. Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(poseban):79-91.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK03A
conv_556 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. poseban (2022):79-91,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK03A .,
conv_556 .

Measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in Serbia in the first half of the 19th century

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1383
AB  - The paper provides an introduction covering the absence of measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in the Ottoman Empire, the measures practiced in the Austrian Empire, the terminology used for measures against the spreading of the disease in the Serbian language, etc. This is followed by a section that covers the plague during the First Serbian Uprising and the remembrance of its disastrous consequences. The central part of the paper focuses on the measures against cholera and the plague taken by the Principality of Serbia, starting the 1830s. Regulations modeled after the Austrian counterparts passed in 1839 and 1841, establishing a cordon sanitaire toward the Ottoman Empire.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in Serbia in the first half of the 19th century
EP  - 1227
IS  - 4
SP  - 1193
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22409A
UR  - conv_593
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The paper provides an introduction covering the absence of measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in the Ottoman Empire, the measures practiced in the Austrian Empire, the terminology used for measures against the spreading of the disease in the Serbian language, etc. This is followed by a section that covers the plague during the First Serbian Uprising and the remembrance of its disastrous consequences. The central part of the paper focuses on the measures against cholera and the plague taken by the Principality of Serbia, starting the 1830s. Regulations modeled after the Austrian counterparts passed in 1839 and 1841, establishing a cordon sanitaire toward the Ottoman Empire.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in Serbia in the first half of the 19th century",
pages = "1227-1193",
number = "4",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22409A",
url = "conv_593"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2022). Measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in Serbia in the first half of the 19th century. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(4), 1193-1227.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22409A
conv_593
Mirković Z. Measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in Serbia in the first half of the 19th century. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(4):1193-1227.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22409A
conv_593 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Measures against the plague and other contagious diseases in Serbia in the first half of the 19th century" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 4 (2022):1193-1227,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22409A .,
conv_593 .

Lattmann Christopher: Der Teufel, die Hexe und der Rechtsgelehrte. Crimen magiae und Hexenprozess in Jean Bodins "De la Démonomanie des Sorciers", Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M., 2019

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1292
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Lattmann Christopher: Der Teufel, die Hexe und der Rechtsgelehrte. Crimen magiae und Hexenprozess in Jean Bodins "De la Démonomanie des Sorciers", Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M., 2019
EP  - 670
IS  - 3
SP  - 667
VL  - 69
UR  - conv_548
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2021",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Lattmann Christopher: Der Teufel, die Hexe und der Rechtsgelehrte. Crimen magiae und Hexenprozess in Jean Bodins "De la Démonomanie des Sorciers", Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M., 2019",
pages = "670-667",
number = "3",
volume = "69",
url = "conv_548"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2021). Lattmann Christopher: Der Teufel, die Hexe und der Rechtsgelehrte. Crimen magiae und Hexenprozess in Jean Bodins "De la Démonomanie des Sorciers", Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M., 2019. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 69(3), 667-670.
conv_548
Mirković Z. Lattmann Christopher: Der Teufel, die Hexe und der Rechtsgelehrte. Crimen magiae und Hexenprozess in Jean Bodins "De la Démonomanie des Sorciers", Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M., 2019. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2021;69(3):667-670.
conv_548 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Lattmann Christopher: Der Teufel, die Hexe und der Rechtsgelehrte. Crimen magiae und Hexenprozess in Jean Bodins "De la Démonomanie des Sorciers", Studien zur europäischen Rechtsgeschichte, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M., 2019" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69, no. 3 (2021):667-670,
conv_548 .

Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika međuratne Jugoslavije

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1302
AB  - Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika biće analiziran na osnovu četiri pitanja. 1) Učešće u radu Privatno-pravnog odseka, kasnije Komisije za izradu građanskog zakonika. Zaduženja su podeljena 29. maja 1921. godine. Ž. Perić je bio zadužen da napiše glavu VIII o pravu nasledstva (§§ 531-551), zadružno pravo, glavu XIII o zakonskom redu nasleđivanja (§§ 727-761) i glavu XV o zauzimanju nasledstva u državinu. 2) Mišljenje Ž. Perića o metodu kodifikovanja koji je bio primenjen. 3) Perićevo mišljenje o zakonskoj terminologiji izrađenog projekta koji je nazvan Predosnova građanskog zakonika Kraljevine Jugoslavije. 4) Ž. Perić je napisao obrazloženje (motive) 1-319. paragrafa Predosnove, koje je službeno objavilo Ministarstvo pravde 1939. godine.
AB  - Živojin Perić's work on codifying the civil code was analyzed through four questions. 1) Participation in the work of the body for drafting the Civil Code and its work on the text of the Code. 2) Perić's opinion on the codification method that was applied. 3) Perić's opinion on the legal terminology in the 1934 Draft Civil Code for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. 4) Perić wrote the explanation (motives) 1-319. paragraph of the Draft Civil Code, which was officially published by the Ministry of Justice in 1939.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika međuratne Jugoslavije
T1  - The work of Živojin Perić on the codification of the Civil Code of interwar Yugoslavia
EP  - 32
IS  - 1
SP  - 1
VL  - 69
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21101A
UR  - conv_534
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika biće analiziran na osnovu četiri pitanja. 1) Učešće u radu Privatno-pravnog odseka, kasnije Komisije za izradu građanskog zakonika. Zaduženja su podeljena 29. maja 1921. godine. Ž. Perić je bio zadužen da napiše glavu VIII o pravu nasledstva (§§ 531-551), zadružno pravo, glavu XIII o zakonskom redu nasleđivanja (§§ 727-761) i glavu XV o zauzimanju nasledstva u državinu. 2) Mišljenje Ž. Perića o metodu kodifikovanja koji je bio primenjen. 3) Perićevo mišljenje o zakonskoj terminologiji izrađenog projekta koji je nazvan Predosnova građanskog zakonika Kraljevine Jugoslavije. 4) Ž. Perić je napisao obrazloženje (motive) 1-319. paragrafa Predosnove, koje je službeno objavilo Ministarstvo pravde 1939. godine., Živojin Perić's work on codifying the civil code was analyzed through four questions. 1) Participation in the work of the body for drafting the Civil Code and its work on the text of the Code. 2) Perić's opinion on the codification method that was applied. 3) Perić's opinion on the legal terminology in the 1934 Draft Civil Code for the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. 4) Perić wrote the explanation (motives) 1-319. paragraph of the Draft Civil Code, which was officially published by the Ministry of Justice in 1939.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika međuratne Jugoslavije, The work of Živojin Perić on the codification of the Civil Code of interwar Yugoslavia",
pages = "32-1",
number = "1",
volume = "69",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21101A",
url = "conv_534"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2021). Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika međuratne Jugoslavije. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 69(1), 1-32.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21101A
conv_534
Mirković Z. Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika međuratne Jugoslavije. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2021;69(1):1-32.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21101A
conv_534 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Rad Živojina Perića na kodifikovanju građanskog zakonika međuratne Jugoslavije" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69, no. 1 (2021):1-32,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21101A .,
conv_534 .
2

Popović Dragoljub: Constitutional History of Serbia, Balkan Studies Library, Volume 30, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, 2021

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1289
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Popović Dragoljub: Constitutional History of Serbia, Balkan Studies Library, Volume 30, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, 2021
EP  - 933
IS  - 4
SP  - 927
VL  - 69
UR  - conv_552
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2021",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Popović Dragoljub: Constitutional History of Serbia, Balkan Studies Library, Volume 30, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, 2021",
pages = "933-927",
number = "4",
volume = "69",
url = "conv_552"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2021). Popović Dragoljub: Constitutional History of Serbia, Balkan Studies Library, Volume 30, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, 2021. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 69(4), 927-933.
conv_552
Mirković Z. Popović Dragoljub: Constitutional History of Serbia, Balkan Studies Library, Volume 30, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, 2021. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2021;69(4):927-933.
conv_552 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Popović Dragoljub: Constitutional History of Serbia, Balkan Studies Library, Volume 30, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, 2021" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69, no. 4 (2021):927-933,
conv_552 .

Istorija novčane kazne u Srbiji (1804-1860. godine)

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/897
AB  - Autor nastoji da prikaže razvoj novčane kazne u Srbiji od 1804, kada je počeo Prvi srpski ustanak i osnovana srpska javna vlast, do 1860. godine, kada je donet Krivični zakonik Kneževine Srbije. Duboki koreni novčane kazne sežu do instituta “globe” u srpskom srednjovekovnom krivičnom pravu i u osmanskom pravu. Istraživanje posebnu pažnju usmerava na vreme od početka dvadesetih godina XIX veka, kada srpska javna vlast preuzima krivično gonjenje i kažnjavanje od osmanskih vlasti. Autor pokušava da odgovori na pitanja: šta se dešava sa globama, kako nastaju novčane kazne u savremenom smislu reči, u kojoj meri su novčane kazne pogađale osuđene?.
AB  - The author is trying to show the development of fines in Serbia since 1804, when the First Serbian uprising started and the public authority was established, to 1860, when the Criminal Code of the Principality of Serbia was enacted. The roots of fine go back to the similar institute in Serbian medieval criminal law and the Ottoman law. The study pays special attention to the beginning of the nineteenth century, when the Serbian public authorities took over the prosecution and punishment from the Ottoman authorities. The author is trying to answer several questions: what happened with fines, when did they appear, to which extent did they affected the convicted?.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Crimen (Beograd)
T1  - Istorija novčane kazne u Srbiji (1804-1860. godine)
T1  - The history of fines in Serbia (1804-1860)
EP  - 137
IS  - 2
SP  - 128
VL  - 7
UR  - conv_2771
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Autor nastoji da prikaže razvoj novčane kazne u Srbiji od 1804, kada je počeo Prvi srpski ustanak i osnovana srpska javna vlast, do 1860. godine, kada je donet Krivični zakonik Kneževine Srbije. Duboki koreni novčane kazne sežu do instituta “globe” u srpskom srednjovekovnom krivičnom pravu i u osmanskom pravu. Istraživanje posebnu pažnju usmerava na vreme od početka dvadesetih godina XIX veka, kada srpska javna vlast preuzima krivično gonjenje i kažnjavanje od osmanskih vlasti. Autor pokušava da odgovori na pitanja: šta se dešava sa globama, kako nastaju novčane kazne u savremenom smislu reči, u kojoj meri su novčane kazne pogađale osuđene?., The author is trying to show the development of fines in Serbia since 1804, when the First Serbian uprising started and the public authority was established, to 1860, when the Criminal Code of the Principality of Serbia was enacted. The roots of fine go back to the similar institute in Serbian medieval criminal law and the Ottoman law. The study pays special attention to the beginning of the nineteenth century, when the Serbian public authorities took over the prosecution and punishment from the Ottoman authorities. The author is trying to answer several questions: what happened with fines, when did they appear, to which extent did they affected the convicted?.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Crimen (Beograd)",
title = "Istorija novčane kazne u Srbiji (1804-1860. godine), The history of fines in Serbia (1804-1860)",
pages = "137-128",
number = "2",
volume = "7",
url = "conv_2771"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2016). Istorija novčane kazne u Srbiji (1804-1860. godine). in Crimen (Beograd)
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd., 7(2), 128-137.
conv_2771
Mirković Z. Istorija novčane kazne u Srbiji (1804-1860. godine). in Crimen (Beograd). 2016;7(2):128-137.
conv_2771 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Istorija novčane kazne u Srbiji (1804-1860. godine)" in Crimen (Beograd), 7, no. 2 (2016):128-137,
conv_2771 .

Grk Georgije Zaharijadis - ne suđeni srpski zakonopisac

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/848
AB  - Ovo je prvi tekst na srpskom jeziku posvećen grku Georgiju Zaharijadisu, koji je 1829. godine prevodio francuski Code civil sa nemačkog prevoda na srpski jezik i tako postao prvi, istina nesuđeni, pisac građanskog zakonika u Srbiji. Veliki srpski prosvetitelj Vuk S. Karadžić se veoma negativno izrazio o ovome radu, tvrdeći da prevodilac nije znao ni srpski ni nemački jezik. Autor teksta otvara pitanje da li je ova tvrdnja tačna ili nije. Srećna je okolnost da su sačuvana dela i deo prepiske Georgija Zaharijadisa, koji svedoče da rad ovoga čoveka nije bio ni malen ni beznačajan, i da bi ga trebalo iscrpnije predstaviti naučnoj javnosti.
AB  - This is the first text in the Serbian language dedicated to Greek George Zaharijadis, who in 1829 translated the French Civil Code in Serbian language, using as basis its German translation, and thus became the first, though not meant to be, writer of the civil code in Serbia. The great Serbian educator Vuk S. Karadžić heavily criticized this translation, claiming that the interpreter understood neither Serbian nor German. Is this claim of Vuk Karadžić substantial or is it unfair and severe? To understand this we must answer the following questions: Who was actually George Zaharijadis? Is it true that the Greek spoke neither Serbian nor German? Did Vuk Karadžić know George Zaharijadis? The author tries to answer this question using the scarce preserved data about life of George Zaharijadis. Fortunately, the works and partly also the correspondence of George Zaharijadis are preserved, and give us evidence that this pedagogue, philologist and translator, a great erudite, besides his native Greek, spoke also Old Slavic-Serbian and German language, and that he belonged to the small group of highly educated men of his time.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Grk Georgije Zaharijadis - ne suđeni srpski zakonopisac
T1  - Greek George Zaharijadis: Not meant to be Serbian law writer
EP  - 1079
IS  - 3
SP  - 1069
VL  - 49
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns49-9358
UR  - conv_2570
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Ovo je prvi tekst na srpskom jeziku posvećen grku Georgiju Zaharijadisu, koji je 1829. godine prevodio francuski Code civil sa nemačkog prevoda na srpski jezik i tako postao prvi, istina nesuđeni, pisac građanskog zakonika u Srbiji. Veliki srpski prosvetitelj Vuk S. Karadžić se veoma negativno izrazio o ovome radu, tvrdeći da prevodilac nije znao ni srpski ni nemački jezik. Autor teksta otvara pitanje da li je ova tvrdnja tačna ili nije. Srećna je okolnost da su sačuvana dela i deo prepiske Georgija Zaharijadisa, koji svedoče da rad ovoga čoveka nije bio ni malen ni beznačajan, i da bi ga trebalo iscrpnije predstaviti naučnoj javnosti., This is the first text in the Serbian language dedicated to Greek George Zaharijadis, who in 1829 translated the French Civil Code in Serbian language, using as basis its German translation, and thus became the first, though not meant to be, writer of the civil code in Serbia. The great Serbian educator Vuk S. Karadžić heavily criticized this translation, claiming that the interpreter understood neither Serbian nor German. Is this claim of Vuk Karadžić substantial or is it unfair and severe? To understand this we must answer the following questions: Who was actually George Zaharijadis? Is it true that the Greek spoke neither Serbian nor German? Did Vuk Karadžić know George Zaharijadis? The author tries to answer this question using the scarce preserved data about life of George Zaharijadis. Fortunately, the works and partly also the correspondence of George Zaharijadis are preserved, and give us evidence that this pedagogue, philologist and translator, a great erudite, besides his native Greek, spoke also Old Slavic-Serbian and German language, and that he belonged to the small group of highly educated men of his time.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Grk Georgije Zaharijadis - ne suđeni srpski zakonopisac, Greek George Zaharijadis: Not meant to be Serbian law writer",
pages = "1079-1069",
number = "3",
volume = "49",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns49-9358",
url = "conv_2570"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2015). Grk Georgije Zaharijadis - ne suđeni srpski zakonopisac. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 49(3), 1069-1079.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns49-9358
conv_2570
Mirković Z. Grk Georgije Zaharijadis - ne suđeni srpski zakonopisac. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2015;49(3):1069-1079.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns49-9358
conv_2570 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Grk Georgije Zaharijadis - ne suđeni srpski zakonopisac" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 49, no. 3 (2015):1069-1079,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns49-9358 .,
conv_2570 .

Kapetan Miša i njegovo zdanje

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/687
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Kapetan Miša i njegovo zdanje
EP  - 341
IS  - 1
SP  - 336
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_293
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Kapetan Miša i njegovo zdanje",
pages = "341-336",
number = "1",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_293"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2013). Kapetan Miša i njegovo zdanje. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 61(1), 336-341.
conv_293
Mirković Z. Kapetan Miša i njegovo zdanje. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(1):336-341.
conv_293 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Kapetan Miša i njegovo zdanje" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 1 (2013):336-341,
conv_293 .

Kazna lišenja slobode u Srbiji 1804-1860. godine

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad, 2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/677
AB  - Tekst je posvećen kazni lišenja slobode u Srbiji u prvoj polovini XIX veka, tj. od početka Prvog srpskog ustanka 1804. godine do donošenja Krivičnog zakonika 1860. godine. Do 1804. godine nije postojala kazna lišenja slobode u novovekovnom smislu reči. U vremenu od 1804. do 1813. godine postojao je 'haps', a ustaničke vlasti su gradile i prave tamnice radi kažnjavanja. Od početka 20-tih godina XIX veka, kada su nastali prvi srpski sudovi, pored hapsa, pojavljuje se i robija, u teškom gvožđu. Međutim, kvalitativne razlike između hapsa i robije nije bilo. Ustrojstvo okružnih sudova, od 26. januara 1840. godine, predvidelo je više oblika kazne lišenja slobode, ali u praksi se izricanje kazne lišenja slobode svodilo na večnu robiju ili vremensku robiju. Od početka 40-tih godina XIX kazna lišenja slobode sve se učestalije primenjivala i širilo se polje njene primene. Za najteža krivična dela, umesto zaprećene smrtne kazne i kazne trčanja kroz šibe, često je izricana kazna lišenja slobode, bilo od sudova bilo od najviše vlasti u postupku pomilovanja. Kazna lišenja slobode izvršavala se ili kod policijskih vlasti (kazne kraćeg trajanja) ili u kaznenim zavodima, kad su osnovani (kazna lišenja slobode u dužem trajanju). Krajem tridesetih godina otvorio se problem izdržavanja kazne lišenja slobode ženskih osoba i problem umobolnih lica počinilaca krivičnih dela. Rano se pojavljuju i množe propisi o izvršenju kazni lišenja slobode, koji su trebalo da reše brojna praktična i načelna pitanja u vezi izvršenja ove kazne. Konačno, 20. decembra 1851. godine je izdato Ustrojstvo ogledne ekonomije i kaznenog zavoda u Topčideru, koje je propisalo postupak prema osuđenicima, njihovom radu, kaznama, ophođenju stražara itd. Uočava se novi kazneni cilj - prinudno obrazovanje i popravljanje kroz rad. Na kraju ovog perioda, 1858. godine pojavio se prvi teorijski rad o kaznenim zavodima i Projekat zakona o izvršenju kazni lišenja slobode. Ovaj projekat bio je izrađen na širokoj osnovi, sa pravilima za izvršenje svake kazne lišenja slobode, ali nije usvojen zbog nedostatka sredstava.
AB  - This text is on freedom deprivation punishment in Serbia during the first half of 19th century, i.e. since the beginning of the First Serbian uprising in 1804 and till passing the Criminal law in 1860. Author first emphasises that the freedom deprivation punishment doesn't have long tradition, although in medieval Serbia and under Turkish rule existed imprisonment in dungeon, but it was foremost some form of custody before a trial, and subsequently as keeping a prisoner after the verdict until its effectuation. It wasn't a freedom deprivation punishment in modern sense. During 1804 - 1813 there was so called 'haps' i.e. apprehension, though Uprising authorities built also 'real' prisons for punishment purpose. Imprisonment of culprits was a condition for compulsory labour, which could be very useful utilized under given circumstances. Since the beginning 1820-ties when first Serbian courts were established, beside 'haps' appears also imprisonment in heavy shackles. However there was no substantial difference between apprehension and imprisonment. In this time the sentence to imprisonment was combined with the punishment with beating (or sometimes with the flogging at the end of imprisonment). The Regulation of County courts from January 26th 1840 mentions several forms of freedom deprivation punishment, but in praxis freedom deprivation was reduced on either 'eternal' imprisonment or time-sentenced imprisonment. Since the beginning of 1840-ties freedom deprivation was more frequently used as punishment and its implementation was continually spreading. For heaviest crimes was instead death penalty and running gauntlet sentenced freedom deprivation, either from courts or from supreme authority in the amnesty process. Imprisonment was effectuated either at police reformatories (for shorter penalties) or at the penitentiary institutions (for longer imprisonment). By the end of 1830-ties an issue of imprisonment of female perpetrators emerged, together with the problem of freedom deprivation punishment for mentally ill committers of criminal acts. Relatively early and in increasing number appeared regulations on effectuation of freedom deprivation punishments, intended to solve numerous practical and principle questions about realization of this penalty. Finally on December 20th 1851 was issued the Structure of Experimental Economy in Topčider Penitentiary, which regulated treatment of convicts, their work, penalties, behavior of guards etc. A new punishment purpose has become noticeable - compulsory re-education and remission through work, as a difference to previous aims: sheer intimidation and neutralization of public danger. At the end of herein observed time, in the year 1858 appeared first theoretical work on penitentiary institutions and Project of Law on Effectuation of Freedom Deprivation Penalties. This project was elaborated on broad fundaments, with regulations for each form of freedom deprivation penalty, but wasn't accepted due to the lack of financial means.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Kazna lišenja slobode u Srbiji 1804-1860. godine
T1  - Freedom deprivation punishment in Serbia during 1804-1860
EP  - 170
IS  - 1
SP  - 155
VL  - 47
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns47-3637
UR  - conv_2563
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Tekst je posvećen kazni lišenja slobode u Srbiji u prvoj polovini XIX veka, tj. od početka Prvog srpskog ustanka 1804. godine do donošenja Krivičnog zakonika 1860. godine. Do 1804. godine nije postojala kazna lišenja slobode u novovekovnom smislu reči. U vremenu od 1804. do 1813. godine postojao je 'haps', a ustaničke vlasti su gradile i prave tamnice radi kažnjavanja. Od početka 20-tih godina XIX veka, kada su nastali prvi srpski sudovi, pored hapsa, pojavljuje se i robija, u teškom gvožđu. Međutim, kvalitativne razlike između hapsa i robije nije bilo. Ustrojstvo okružnih sudova, od 26. januara 1840. godine, predvidelo je više oblika kazne lišenja slobode, ali u praksi se izricanje kazne lišenja slobode svodilo na večnu robiju ili vremensku robiju. Od početka 40-tih godina XIX kazna lišenja slobode sve se učestalije primenjivala i širilo se polje njene primene. Za najteža krivična dela, umesto zaprećene smrtne kazne i kazne trčanja kroz šibe, često je izricana kazna lišenja slobode, bilo od sudova bilo od najviše vlasti u postupku pomilovanja. Kazna lišenja slobode izvršavala se ili kod policijskih vlasti (kazne kraćeg trajanja) ili u kaznenim zavodima, kad su osnovani (kazna lišenja slobode u dužem trajanju). Krajem tridesetih godina otvorio se problem izdržavanja kazne lišenja slobode ženskih osoba i problem umobolnih lica počinilaca krivičnih dela. Rano se pojavljuju i množe propisi o izvršenju kazni lišenja slobode, koji su trebalo da reše brojna praktična i načelna pitanja u vezi izvršenja ove kazne. Konačno, 20. decembra 1851. godine je izdato Ustrojstvo ogledne ekonomije i kaznenog zavoda u Topčideru, koje je propisalo postupak prema osuđenicima, njihovom radu, kaznama, ophođenju stražara itd. Uočava se novi kazneni cilj - prinudno obrazovanje i popravljanje kroz rad. Na kraju ovog perioda, 1858. godine pojavio se prvi teorijski rad o kaznenim zavodima i Projekat zakona o izvršenju kazni lišenja slobode. Ovaj projekat bio je izrađen na širokoj osnovi, sa pravilima za izvršenje svake kazne lišenja slobode, ali nije usvojen zbog nedostatka sredstava., This text is on freedom deprivation punishment in Serbia during the first half of 19th century, i.e. since the beginning of the First Serbian uprising in 1804 and till passing the Criminal law in 1860. Author first emphasises that the freedom deprivation punishment doesn't have long tradition, although in medieval Serbia and under Turkish rule existed imprisonment in dungeon, but it was foremost some form of custody before a trial, and subsequently as keeping a prisoner after the verdict until its effectuation. It wasn't a freedom deprivation punishment in modern sense. During 1804 - 1813 there was so called 'haps' i.e. apprehension, though Uprising authorities built also 'real' prisons for punishment purpose. Imprisonment of culprits was a condition for compulsory labour, which could be very useful utilized under given circumstances. Since the beginning 1820-ties when first Serbian courts were established, beside 'haps' appears also imprisonment in heavy shackles. However there was no substantial difference between apprehension and imprisonment. In this time the sentence to imprisonment was combined with the punishment with beating (or sometimes with the flogging at the end of imprisonment). The Regulation of County courts from January 26th 1840 mentions several forms of freedom deprivation punishment, but in praxis freedom deprivation was reduced on either 'eternal' imprisonment or time-sentenced imprisonment. Since the beginning of 1840-ties freedom deprivation was more frequently used as punishment and its implementation was continually spreading. For heaviest crimes was instead death penalty and running gauntlet sentenced freedom deprivation, either from courts or from supreme authority in the amnesty process. Imprisonment was effectuated either at police reformatories (for shorter penalties) or at the penitentiary institutions (for longer imprisonment). By the end of 1830-ties an issue of imprisonment of female perpetrators emerged, together with the problem of freedom deprivation punishment for mentally ill committers of criminal acts. Relatively early and in increasing number appeared regulations on effectuation of freedom deprivation punishments, intended to solve numerous practical and principle questions about realization of this penalty. Finally on December 20th 1851 was issued the Structure of Experimental Economy in Topčider Penitentiary, which regulated treatment of convicts, their work, penalties, behavior of guards etc. A new punishment purpose has become noticeable - compulsory re-education and remission through work, as a difference to previous aims: sheer intimidation and neutralization of public danger. At the end of herein observed time, in the year 1858 appeared first theoretical work on penitentiary institutions and Project of Law on Effectuation of Freedom Deprivation Penalties. This project was elaborated on broad fundaments, with regulations for each form of freedom deprivation penalty, but wasn't accepted due to the lack of financial means.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Kazna lišenja slobode u Srbiji 1804-1860. godine, Freedom deprivation punishment in Serbia during 1804-1860",
pages = "170-155",
number = "1",
volume = "47",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns47-3637",
url = "conv_2563"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2013). Kazna lišenja slobode u Srbiji 1804-1860. godine. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 47(1), 155-170.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns47-3637
conv_2563
Mirković Z. Kazna lišenja slobode u Srbiji 1804-1860. godine. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2013;47(1):155-170.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns47-3637
conv_2563 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Kazna lišenja slobode u Srbiji 1804-1860. godine" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 47, no. 1 (2013):155-170,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns47-3637 .,
conv_2563 .
3

Osnivanje 'Doma za s' uma sišavše'

Mirković, Zoran; Stanimirović, Vojislav

(Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš, 2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
AU  - Stanimirović, Vojislav
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/612
AB  - Tekst je posvećen stopedesetogodišnjici osnivanja ustanove za smeštaj i lečenje duševno obolelih ('Doma za s’ uma sišavše') - 3. marta 1861. godine. Najpre se daje uvod u razvoj srpske medicine od srednjeg veka pa do polovine XIX veka. Značajnu ulogu u tom periodu ima verska medicina i manastirske bolnice. Neki od manastira su se gotovo specijalizovali za lečenje duševnih bolesti. Godine 1839. u Kneževini Srbiji su se desila tri incidenta sa duševno obolelim licima i to je dovelo do ozbiljne reakcije nadležnih organa. Zakonski predlog da duševno oboleli budu smešteni u manastiru Studenica nije bio prihvatljiv za mitropolita, crkvenog poglavara. Novi zakonski projekt iz 1861. godine imao je više sreće - usvojen je 3. marta pod naslovom 'Ustrojenije Doma za s’ uma sišavše'. Ovaj Dom je bio smešten u takozvanoj 'Doktorovoj kuli'. I ustanova i zgrada postoje i danas. Iz skromnog 'Doma za s’ uma sišavše' razvila se današnja Specijalna bolnica za neuropsihijatrijske bolesti 'Dr Laza Lazarević', a 'Doktorova kula' nalazi se u okviru kompleksa Kliničkog centra Srbije.
AB  - The text is dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the institution for the nursing and treatment of the mentally ill ('Lunatic Asylum') - 3rd March 1861. First, the development of the Serbian medical science from the Middle Ages until the first half of the 19th century is outlined. Religion-related medicine and monasterial hospitals played a significant role in that period. Some monasteries were almost specialized for the treatment of the mentally ill. In 1839, three incidents with mentally ill occurred in the Principality of Serbia, which led to a serious response of the authorities. The legal proposal that the mentally ill should be placed in the Studenica Monastery was not acceptable for the Mitropole, the church leader. A new legal project was proposed in 1861, passed on March 3rd - 'The Establishment of the Lunatic Asylum'. This Asylum was placed in the so-called Doctor’s Tower. Both the institution and the building exist even today. Today’s Special Hospital for Neuropsychiatrical Diseases 'Dr Laza Lazarevic' has developed from the modest 'Lunatic Asylum', and the Doctor’s Tower is still within the complex of the Clinical Center of Serbia.
PB  - Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš
T2  - Teme
T1  - Osnivanje 'Doma za s' uma sišavše'
T1  - Establishment of the 'Lunatic asylum'
EP  - 1354
IS  - 3
SP  - 1339
VL  - 36
UR  - conv_1780
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran and Stanimirović, Vojislav",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Tekst je posvećen stopedesetogodišnjici osnivanja ustanove za smeštaj i lečenje duševno obolelih ('Doma za s’ uma sišavše') - 3. marta 1861. godine. Najpre se daje uvod u razvoj srpske medicine od srednjeg veka pa do polovine XIX veka. Značajnu ulogu u tom periodu ima verska medicina i manastirske bolnice. Neki od manastira su se gotovo specijalizovali za lečenje duševnih bolesti. Godine 1839. u Kneževini Srbiji su se desila tri incidenta sa duševno obolelim licima i to je dovelo do ozbiljne reakcije nadležnih organa. Zakonski predlog da duševno oboleli budu smešteni u manastiru Studenica nije bio prihvatljiv za mitropolita, crkvenog poglavara. Novi zakonski projekt iz 1861. godine imao je više sreće - usvojen je 3. marta pod naslovom 'Ustrojenije Doma za s’ uma sišavše'. Ovaj Dom je bio smešten u takozvanoj 'Doktorovoj kuli'. I ustanova i zgrada postoje i danas. Iz skromnog 'Doma za s’ uma sišavše' razvila se današnja Specijalna bolnica za neuropsihijatrijske bolesti 'Dr Laza Lazarević', a 'Doktorova kula' nalazi se u okviru kompleksa Kliničkog centra Srbije., The text is dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the institution for the nursing and treatment of the mentally ill ('Lunatic Asylum') - 3rd March 1861. First, the development of the Serbian medical science from the Middle Ages until the first half of the 19th century is outlined. Religion-related medicine and monasterial hospitals played a significant role in that period. Some monasteries were almost specialized for the treatment of the mentally ill. In 1839, three incidents with mentally ill occurred in the Principality of Serbia, which led to a serious response of the authorities. The legal proposal that the mentally ill should be placed in the Studenica Monastery was not acceptable for the Mitropole, the church leader. A new legal project was proposed in 1861, passed on March 3rd - 'The Establishment of the Lunatic Asylum'. This Asylum was placed in the so-called Doctor’s Tower. Both the institution and the building exist even today. Today’s Special Hospital for Neuropsychiatrical Diseases 'Dr Laza Lazarevic' has developed from the modest 'Lunatic Asylum', and the Doctor’s Tower is still within the complex of the Clinical Center of Serbia.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš",
journal = "Teme",
title = "Osnivanje 'Doma za s' uma sišavše', Establishment of the 'Lunatic asylum'",
pages = "1354-1339",
number = "3",
volume = "36",
url = "conv_1780"
}
Mirković, Z.,& Stanimirović, V.. (2012). Osnivanje 'Doma za s' uma sišavše'. in Teme
Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš., 36(3), 1339-1354.
conv_1780
Mirković Z, Stanimirović V. Osnivanje 'Doma za s' uma sišavše'. in Teme. 2012;36(3):1339-1354.
conv_1780 .
Mirković, Zoran, Stanimirović, Vojislav, "Osnivanje 'Doma za s' uma sišavše'" in Teme, 36, no. 3 (2012):1339-1354,
conv_1780 .

Pravila o poklonu u srpskom srednjovekovnom pravu

Mirković, Zoran; Đurđević, Marko

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2011)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
AU  - Đurđević, Marko
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/609
AB  - Rimsko-vizantijsko pravo bilo je značajno izvorište prava srednjovekovne srpske države. Takvo pravno nasleđe, zajedno s hrišćanskom verom, je našlo izraz već u prvom srpskom zakonskom zborniku - Zakonopravilu. Nastao radom prvog srpskog arhiepiskopa Save, ovaj zbornik pravnih propisa ostavio je neizbrisiv trag u pravnom životu Srba počev od srednjeg veka, sve do prvih pisanih zakona u Srbiji u trećoj i četvrtoj deceniji XIX veka. Rimsko-vizantijski koncept dominantan je u propisima Zakonopravila o ugovoru o poklonu, čija analiza zauzima veći deo prostora u ovom radu. Principi na kojima je ovaj koncept bio zasnovan: dobrovoljnost, forma i posebni materijalnopravni uslovi koji su bili potrebni za nastanak ugovora, načelna neopozivosti i izuzetna opozivost - postavljeni su u pravilima Prohirona, kao glavnog temelja na koji se oslanjalo Zakonopravilo. Tek neznatno, ona su trpela uticaje sredine u kojoj su primenjivana. Analizira se i regulisanje poklona u zakonodavstvu cara Dušana (tačnije, Skraćenoj Sintagmi), Zakonu o rudnicima despota Stefana Lazarevića, a sagledavaju se i pojedini sačuvani primeri ugovora o poklonu. Pored verovatnog utvrđivanja punoletstva po odredbama običajnog prava kao uslovi za punovažnost poklona, u jednom periodu srpske istorije pojavljuje se uzdarje, tj. obdarenikova protivčinidba darodavcu, koja se sastojala u predaji stvari neznatne vrednosti u odnosu na dar. Autori zaključuju da su rimsko-vizantijska pravila o ugovoru o poklonu, postavljena još u Zakonopravilu pod uticajem Prohirona, nastavila da žive, kako kroz zakonodavstvo, tako i u praksi, i tokom narednih vekova. Običaj ih je možda tek neznatno modifikovao u ponekom detalju (kao, na primer, određivanje uzrasta koji se tražio za punovažnost raspolaganja putem ugovora o poklonu), ali je temelj, u osnovi postavljen u XIII veku, nastavi da drži zgradu ove pravne ustanove sve do u praskozorje prve moderne srpske kodifikacije građanskog prava u Građanskom zakoniku od 1844. godine.
AB  - The Roman-Byzantine law was one of the pillars of the medieval Serbian state. Together with the Christian faith, it served as the basis for the first Serbian legal collection, known as Zakonopravilo - Nomocanon. Compiled by the Serbian Archbishop Sava (later known as St. Sava), this collection of legislative texts left an indelible mark on Serbian legal culture for a quite long period of time, more precisely from the Middle Ages until the occurrence of the first written laws in the first half of the nineteenth century. It included certain provisions related to gift or donation. These provisions were based on the Roman-Byzantine legal concepts and ideas. The most important principles of the Roman-Byzantine gift, as established in Prohiron and received in Zakonopravilo, were: voluntariness of the gratuitous disposition (animus donandi), its irrevocability in principle, and revocability as an exception. The main features of the Roman-Byzantine gift were only slightly altered in their Serbian version. These minor alterations occurred by reason of specificities of the setting in which the received rules on the gratuitous disposition applied. The authors point particularly to a specific type of donation, that is a gift-in-reciprocation, which includes negligible consideration of the recipient of the gift. This counter-performance of the donee must be insignificant in comparison to the value of the donor's gratuitous disposition. The rules of Serbian medieval law on gift, as received from the Roman-Byzantine sources, shared the fate of Zakonopravilo. They were mainly accepted in the latter medieval Serbian legislations, and stayed in force for several centuries, until the enactment of the first Serbian civil codification in 1844.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pravila o poklonu u srpskom srednjovekovnom pravu
T1  - Rules on gift in Serbian medieval law
EP  - 90
IS  - 2
SP  - 63
VL  - 59
UR  - conv_231
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran and Đurđević, Marko",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Rimsko-vizantijsko pravo bilo je značajno izvorište prava srednjovekovne srpske države. Takvo pravno nasleđe, zajedno s hrišćanskom verom, je našlo izraz već u prvom srpskom zakonskom zborniku - Zakonopravilu. Nastao radom prvog srpskog arhiepiskopa Save, ovaj zbornik pravnih propisa ostavio je neizbrisiv trag u pravnom životu Srba počev od srednjeg veka, sve do prvih pisanih zakona u Srbiji u trećoj i četvrtoj deceniji XIX veka. Rimsko-vizantijski koncept dominantan je u propisima Zakonopravila o ugovoru o poklonu, čija analiza zauzima veći deo prostora u ovom radu. Principi na kojima je ovaj koncept bio zasnovan: dobrovoljnost, forma i posebni materijalnopravni uslovi koji su bili potrebni za nastanak ugovora, načelna neopozivosti i izuzetna opozivost - postavljeni su u pravilima Prohirona, kao glavnog temelja na koji se oslanjalo Zakonopravilo. Tek neznatno, ona su trpela uticaje sredine u kojoj su primenjivana. Analizira se i regulisanje poklona u zakonodavstvu cara Dušana (tačnije, Skraćenoj Sintagmi), Zakonu o rudnicima despota Stefana Lazarevića, a sagledavaju se i pojedini sačuvani primeri ugovora o poklonu. Pored verovatnog utvrđivanja punoletstva po odredbama običajnog prava kao uslovi za punovažnost poklona, u jednom periodu srpske istorije pojavljuje se uzdarje, tj. obdarenikova protivčinidba darodavcu, koja se sastojala u predaji stvari neznatne vrednosti u odnosu na dar. Autori zaključuju da su rimsko-vizantijska pravila o ugovoru o poklonu, postavljena još u Zakonopravilu pod uticajem Prohirona, nastavila da žive, kako kroz zakonodavstvo, tako i u praksi, i tokom narednih vekova. Običaj ih je možda tek neznatno modifikovao u ponekom detalju (kao, na primer, određivanje uzrasta koji se tražio za punovažnost raspolaganja putem ugovora o poklonu), ali je temelj, u osnovi postavljen u XIII veku, nastavi da drži zgradu ove pravne ustanove sve do u praskozorje prve moderne srpske kodifikacije građanskog prava u Građanskom zakoniku od 1844. godine., The Roman-Byzantine law was one of the pillars of the medieval Serbian state. Together with the Christian faith, it served as the basis for the first Serbian legal collection, known as Zakonopravilo - Nomocanon. Compiled by the Serbian Archbishop Sava (later known as St. Sava), this collection of legislative texts left an indelible mark on Serbian legal culture for a quite long period of time, more precisely from the Middle Ages until the occurrence of the first written laws in the first half of the nineteenth century. It included certain provisions related to gift or donation. These provisions were based on the Roman-Byzantine legal concepts and ideas. The most important principles of the Roman-Byzantine gift, as established in Prohiron and received in Zakonopravilo, were: voluntariness of the gratuitous disposition (animus donandi), its irrevocability in principle, and revocability as an exception. The main features of the Roman-Byzantine gift were only slightly altered in their Serbian version. These minor alterations occurred by reason of specificities of the setting in which the received rules on the gratuitous disposition applied. The authors point particularly to a specific type of donation, that is a gift-in-reciprocation, which includes negligible consideration of the recipient of the gift. This counter-performance of the donee must be insignificant in comparison to the value of the donor's gratuitous disposition. The rules of Serbian medieval law on gift, as received from the Roman-Byzantine sources, shared the fate of Zakonopravilo. They were mainly accepted in the latter medieval Serbian legislations, and stayed in force for several centuries, until the enactment of the first Serbian civil codification in 1844.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pravila o poklonu u srpskom srednjovekovnom pravu, Rules on gift in Serbian medieval law",
pages = "90-63",
number = "2",
volume = "59",
url = "conv_231"
}
Mirković, Z.,& Đurđević, M.. (2011). Pravila o poklonu u srpskom srednjovekovnom pravu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 59(2), 63-90.
conv_231
Mirković Z, Đurđević M. Pravila o poklonu u srpskom srednjovekovnom pravu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2011;59(2):63-90.
conv_231 .
Mirković, Zoran, Đurđević, Marko, "Pravila o poklonu u srpskom srednjovekovnom pravu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59, no. 2 (2011):63-90,
conv_231 .

Marie-Janine Calic: Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20. Jahrhunderts, Verlag C.H. Beck, Munchen, 2010

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2011)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/599
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Marie-Janine Calic: Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20. Jahrhunderts, Verlag C.H. Beck, Munchen, 2010
EP  - 430
IS  - 1
SP  - 424
VL  - 59
UR  - conv_228
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2011",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Marie-Janine Calic: Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20. Jahrhunderts, Verlag C.H. Beck, Munchen, 2010",
pages = "430-424",
number = "1",
volume = "59",
url = "conv_228"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2011). Marie-Janine Calic: Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20. Jahrhunderts, Verlag C.H. Beck, Munchen, 2010. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 59(1), 424-430.
conv_228
Mirković Z. Marie-Janine Calic: Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20. Jahrhunderts, Verlag C.H. Beck, Munchen, 2010. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2011;59(1):424-430.
conv_228 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Marie-Janine Calic: Geschichte Jugoslawiens im 20. Jahrhunderts, Verlag C.H. Beck, Munchen, 2010" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59, no. 1 (2011):424-430,
conv_228 .

Die Anfange des Rechtsstudiums im Serbien der neuzeit und die Juristenausbildung in der Habsburgermonarchie (ein Beispiel des rechtstransfers)

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2010)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/502
AB  - The Higher School (La Haute Ecole) was founded in Belgrade on 1st (old calendar), i.e. 12th of September 1808 (actual calendar). Despite the fact that the School has already been a subject of research, some of the questions remained disputable. One of them relates to its character, that is to the issue of whether it is acceptable to consider the School to be a predecessor of the University of Belgrade, and especially of its Faculty of Law, or not. In order to review that controversy, the author compares the system of higher education and the legal studies in the region of that time. The founding fathers of the Higher School and its first professors completed their legal studies in the Hapsburg Monarchy, so the author pays special attention primarily to the Austrian system of legal education after the educational and university reforms performed by Maria Theresia, expecting that it may explain the chief influences upon the Belgrade Higher School profile. He also points to social circumstances and needs of the rising Serbian state to obtain educated officials and pubic servants, as it barely missed them after the long lasting Turkish occupation. The author determines the comparison criteria: curricula, length of schooling, number of teachers, academic titles and methods of lecturing, and finds many elements in common with the legal educational model at Austrian Royal Academies. He comes to conclusion that the Belgrade Higher School was shaped according to the modified system of Hungarian legal academies, regulated by the Ratio educationis totiusque rei litterariae per regnum Hungariae et provincias eidem ad nexas of 1777 and Ratio educationis of 1806. In addition, the author uses these criteria to compare the Belgrade High School (1808-1813) with the Lyceum in which it was transformed in 1838, showing that the curricula of the later legal studies were not essentialy different nor more developed than in 1808. .
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Die Anfange des Rechtsstudiums im Serbien der neuzeit und die Juristenausbildung in der Habsburgermonarchie (ein Beispiel des rechtstransfers)
T1  - Establishment of legal studies in modern Serbia and legal education in Habsburg Monarchy: An example of legal transplants
EP  - 162
IS  - 3
SP  - 151
VL  - 58
UR  - conv_209
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2010",
abstract = "The Higher School (La Haute Ecole) was founded in Belgrade on 1st (old calendar), i.e. 12th of September 1808 (actual calendar). Despite the fact that the School has already been a subject of research, some of the questions remained disputable. One of them relates to its character, that is to the issue of whether it is acceptable to consider the School to be a predecessor of the University of Belgrade, and especially of its Faculty of Law, or not. In order to review that controversy, the author compares the system of higher education and the legal studies in the region of that time. The founding fathers of the Higher School and its first professors completed their legal studies in the Hapsburg Monarchy, so the author pays special attention primarily to the Austrian system of legal education after the educational and university reforms performed by Maria Theresia, expecting that it may explain the chief influences upon the Belgrade Higher School profile. He also points to social circumstances and needs of the rising Serbian state to obtain educated officials and pubic servants, as it barely missed them after the long lasting Turkish occupation. The author determines the comparison criteria: curricula, length of schooling, number of teachers, academic titles and methods of lecturing, and finds many elements in common with the legal educational model at Austrian Royal Academies. He comes to conclusion that the Belgrade Higher School was shaped according to the modified system of Hungarian legal academies, regulated by the Ratio educationis totiusque rei litterariae per regnum Hungariae et provincias eidem ad nexas of 1777 and Ratio educationis of 1806. In addition, the author uses these criteria to compare the Belgrade High School (1808-1813) with the Lyceum in which it was transformed in 1838, showing that the curricula of the later legal studies were not essentialy different nor more developed than in 1808. .",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Die Anfange des Rechtsstudiums im Serbien der neuzeit und die Juristenausbildung in der Habsburgermonarchie (ein Beispiel des rechtstransfers), Establishment of legal studies in modern Serbia and legal education in Habsburg Monarchy: An example of legal transplants",
pages = "162-151",
number = "3",
volume = "58",
url = "conv_209"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2010). Die Anfange des Rechtsstudiums im Serbien der neuzeit und die Juristenausbildung in der Habsburgermonarchie (ein Beispiel des rechtstransfers). in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 58(3), 151-162.
conv_209
Mirković Z. Die Anfange des Rechtsstudiums im Serbien der neuzeit und die Juristenausbildung in der Habsburgermonarchie (ein Beispiel des rechtstransfers). in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2010;58(3):151-162.
conv_209 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Die Anfange des Rechtsstudiums im Serbien der neuzeit und die Juristenausbildung in der Habsburgermonarchie (ein Beispiel des rechtstransfers)" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58, no. 3 (2010):151-162,
conv_209 .

Pravne studije krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka i Beogradska velika škola 1808-1813. godine

Mirković, Zoran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2008)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2008
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/383
AB  - Velika škola osnovana u Beogradu 1/13. septembra 1808. godine već je bila predmet brojnih istraživanja, ali su neka važna pitanja ostala nerešena. Osnovno među njima je pitanje karaktera Velike škole, odnosno da li se ona može tretirati kao preteča Univerziteta u Beogradu, a naročito njegovog Pravnog fakulteta. Do sada je izostalo detaljnije sagledavanje višeg i visokog obrazovanja onoga vremena u oblasti pravnih studija u okruženju što bi moglo da olakša odgovor na postavljeno pitanje. U radu se daje uporedni pogled na sisteme pravnog obrazovanja u Ruskom i Austrijskom carstvu, koji su mogli biti eventualni modeli za ugledanje. Posebna se pažnja posvećuje pravnim studijama u Austrijskom carstvu, koje su pohađali i završili profesori beogradske Velike škole, kao i oni koji su mogli imati uticaja na njen nastanak i profil. Postavljaju se kriterijumi za poređenje nastavni planovi, dužina trajanja nastave, broj nastavnika, akademske titule i način predavanja. U radu se po sličnim kriterijumima upoređuje i Velika škola (1808-1813) s potonjim Licejem u vreme kada je počinjao s radom (1838). Autor zastupa stanovište da se na osnovu tih poređenja beogradska Velika škola može tretirati kao preteča Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, pa i Univerziteta u Beogradu, a da je bila ustrojena slično kao i austrijske (ugarske) kraljevske akademije.
AB  - The Higher School (La Haute Ecole) was founded in Belgrade, on 1st (the Old - Julian Calendar), i.e. 13th of September 1808 (Today's - Gregorian Calendar). Despite the fact that the School has already been a subject of research, some of the questions remained unanswered. One of them relates to the character of the Higher School, that is to the issue of whether it is justified to consider the School to be a predecessor of the University of Belgrade, and especially of its Faculty of Law, or not. The method of approaching this issue may be to look into the high and higher education and the legal studies models in the region of that time. This paper offers a comparative perspective of the educational systems in Russian and Austrian empires, that both could have served as a model for the system of education in Serbia. The founding fathers of the Higher School and its first professors completed their legal studies in Austria, so the author pays special attention to the Austrian system of legal education of that time. The author determines the comparison criteria: curricula, length of schooling, number of teachers academic titles and methods of lecturing, and finds many elements in common with the legal educational model at Austrian Royal Academies. In addition the author uses these criteria to compare the Belgrade Higher School (1808-1813) with the Lyceum. Namely, the Higher School was transformed into the Lyceum in 1838 and many of the Serbian historians were inclined to link the beginning of the university education in Serbia to the year of 1838 as the year of change. However, the author shows that the legal studies curricula before and after 1838 were essentially alike. The overall conclusion is that the Higher School in Belgrade was shaped according to the Hapsburg model of education, with the main goal to prepare officers for the state administration, lasting three years and teaching specialized legal subjects for year and a half.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pravne studije krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka i Beogradska velika škola 1808-1813. godine
T1  - The Belgrade Higher School (1808-1813) and legal studies in the late XVIII and at the beginning of XIX century
EP  - 149
IS  - 1
SP  - 126
VL  - 56
UR  - conv_120
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Velika škola osnovana u Beogradu 1/13. septembra 1808. godine već je bila predmet brojnih istraživanja, ali su neka važna pitanja ostala nerešena. Osnovno među njima je pitanje karaktera Velike škole, odnosno da li se ona može tretirati kao preteča Univerziteta u Beogradu, a naročito njegovog Pravnog fakulteta. Do sada je izostalo detaljnije sagledavanje višeg i visokog obrazovanja onoga vremena u oblasti pravnih studija u okruženju što bi moglo da olakša odgovor na postavljeno pitanje. U radu se daje uporedni pogled na sisteme pravnog obrazovanja u Ruskom i Austrijskom carstvu, koji su mogli biti eventualni modeli za ugledanje. Posebna se pažnja posvećuje pravnim studijama u Austrijskom carstvu, koje su pohađali i završili profesori beogradske Velike škole, kao i oni koji su mogli imati uticaja na njen nastanak i profil. Postavljaju se kriterijumi za poređenje nastavni planovi, dužina trajanja nastave, broj nastavnika, akademske titule i način predavanja. U radu se po sličnim kriterijumima upoređuje i Velika škola (1808-1813) s potonjim Licejem u vreme kada je počinjao s radom (1838). Autor zastupa stanovište da se na osnovu tih poređenja beogradska Velika škola može tretirati kao preteča Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, pa i Univerziteta u Beogradu, a da je bila ustrojena slično kao i austrijske (ugarske) kraljevske akademije., The Higher School (La Haute Ecole) was founded in Belgrade, on 1st (the Old - Julian Calendar), i.e. 13th of September 1808 (Today's - Gregorian Calendar). Despite the fact that the School has already been a subject of research, some of the questions remained unanswered. One of them relates to the character of the Higher School, that is to the issue of whether it is justified to consider the School to be a predecessor of the University of Belgrade, and especially of its Faculty of Law, or not. The method of approaching this issue may be to look into the high and higher education and the legal studies models in the region of that time. This paper offers a comparative perspective of the educational systems in Russian and Austrian empires, that both could have served as a model for the system of education in Serbia. The founding fathers of the Higher School and its first professors completed their legal studies in Austria, so the author pays special attention to the Austrian system of legal education of that time. The author determines the comparison criteria: curricula, length of schooling, number of teachers academic titles and methods of lecturing, and finds many elements in common with the legal educational model at Austrian Royal Academies. In addition the author uses these criteria to compare the Belgrade Higher School (1808-1813) with the Lyceum. Namely, the Higher School was transformed into the Lyceum in 1838 and many of the Serbian historians were inclined to link the beginning of the university education in Serbia to the year of 1838 as the year of change. However, the author shows that the legal studies curricula before and after 1838 were essentially alike. The overall conclusion is that the Higher School in Belgrade was shaped according to the Hapsburg model of education, with the main goal to prepare officers for the state administration, lasting three years and teaching specialized legal subjects for year and a half.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pravne studije krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka i Beogradska velika škola 1808-1813. godine, The Belgrade Higher School (1808-1813) and legal studies in the late XVIII and at the beginning of XIX century",
pages = "149-126",
number = "1",
volume = "56",
url = "conv_120"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2008). Pravne studije krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka i Beogradska velika škola 1808-1813. godine. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 56(1), 126-149.
conv_120
Mirković Z. Pravne studije krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka i Beogradska velika škola 1808-1813. godine. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2008;56(1):126-149.
conv_120 .
Mirković, Zoran, "Pravne studije krajem XVIII i početkom XIX veka i Beogradska velika škola 1808-1813. godine" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 56, no. 1 (2008):126-149,
conv_120 .

O baštinskim (svojinskim) odnosima u ustaničkoj Srbiji

Mirković, Zoran

(Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd, 2004)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Mirković, Zoran
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/237
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - O baštinskim (svojinskim) odnosima u ustaničkoj Srbiji
T1  - About patrimonial (ownership) relations in the rebel Serbia
EP  - 450
IS  - 5-8
SP  - 440
VL  - 41
UR  - conv_1886
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Mirković, Zoran",
year = "2004",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "O baštinskim (svojinskim) odnosima u ustaničkoj Srbiji, About patrimonial (ownership) relations in the rebel Serbia",
pages = "450-440",
number = "5-8",
volume = "41",
url = "conv_1886"
}
Mirković, Z.. (2004). O baštinskim (svojinskim) odnosima u ustaničkoj Srbiji. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 41(5-8), 440-450.
conv_1886
Mirković Z. O baštinskim (svojinskim) odnosima u ustaničkoj Srbiji. in Pravo i privreda. 2004;41(5-8):440-450.
conv_1886 .
Mirković, Zoran, "O baštinskim (svojinskim) odnosima u ustaničkoj Srbiji" in Pravo i privreda, 41, no. 5-8 (2004):440-450,
conv_1886 .