TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Mirjana
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1349
AB  - This article contains a critical analysis of the existing Serbian legal provisions that limit the possibility of a major asset disposition as a way of restructuring companies. In this regard, the authors have identified three main problems affecting such asset deals in Serbia, which can be considered regulatory barriers to this type of restructuring. The three problems are: the specific regulation of necessary shareholder approval and appraisal rights, the unavoidable assumption of liabilities by the purchaser (the buyer or the transferee) and the inadequate implementation of the EU Transfer of Undertakings Directive concerning employee protection. The solutions adopted in Serbian law are analyzed using a comparative approach, especially based on the rules adopted in Europe, including South-East Europe and the U.S. as a reference. It is interesting to show how different influences from these other jurisdictions have led to the specific (unique) development of the Serbian regulation with regard to dispositions of major assets. The ultimate goal of the present article is to examine the possibility and the need for harmonization of these issues on the regional (supranational) level.
PB  - Walter de Gruyter Gmbh, Berlin
T2  - European Company and Financial Law Review
T1  - Regulatory Barriers to Corporate Restructuring Through Disposition of Major Assets - A Serbian Perspective
EP  - 271
IS  - 2
SP  - 239
VL  - 19
DO  - 10.1515/ecfr-2022-0009
UR  - conv_3230
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Mirjana and Radović, Vuk",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This article contains a critical analysis of the existing Serbian legal provisions that limit the possibility of a major asset disposition as a way of restructuring companies. In this regard, the authors have identified three main problems affecting such asset deals in Serbia, which can be considered regulatory barriers to this type of restructuring. The three problems are: the specific regulation of necessary shareholder approval and appraisal rights, the unavoidable assumption of liabilities by the purchaser (the buyer or the transferee) and the inadequate implementation of the EU Transfer of Undertakings Directive concerning employee protection. The solutions adopted in Serbian law are analyzed using a comparative approach, especially based on the rules adopted in Europe, including South-East Europe and the U.S. as a reference. It is interesting to show how different influences from these other jurisdictions have led to the specific (unique) development of the Serbian regulation with regard to dispositions of major assets. The ultimate goal of the present article is to examine the possibility and the need for harmonization of these issues on the regional (supranational) level.",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter Gmbh, Berlin",
journal = "European Company and Financial Law Review",
title = "Regulatory Barriers to Corporate Restructuring Through Disposition of Major Assets - A Serbian Perspective",
pages = "271-239",
number = "2",
volume = "19",
doi = "10.1515/ecfr-2022-0009",
url = "conv_3230"
}

Radović, M.,& Radović, V.. (2022). Regulatory Barriers to Corporate Restructuring Through Disposition of Major Assets - A Serbian Perspective. in European Company and Financial Law Review
Walter de Gruyter Gmbh, Berlin., 19(2), 239-271.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2022-0009
conv_3230

Radović M, Radović V. Regulatory Barriers to Corporate Restructuring Through Disposition of Major Assets - A Serbian Perspective. in European Company and Financial Law Review. 2022;19(2):239-271.
doi:10.1515/ecfr-2022-0009
conv_3230 .

Radović, Mirjana, Radović, Vuk, "Regulatory Barriers to Corporate Restructuring Through Disposition of Major Assets - A Serbian Perspective" in European Company and Financial Law Review, 19, no. 2 (2022):239-271,
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2022-0009 .,
conv_3230 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1267
AB  - Imaju li privredna društva jasno određen cilj? Da li je taj cilj jedinstven za sva privredna društva? Može li privredno društvo da formuliše svoj cilj i da postupa u skladu sa njim? Da li je ovo oblast u kojoj zakonodavac treba da interveniše, do koje mere i na koji način? Kakvu ulogu treba i može da ima samo privredno društvo prilikom određivanja sopstvenog cilja? Ovo su sámo neka od pitanja na koja autor u ovom radu pokušava da dâ odgovor, imajući u vidu brojne teorijske rasprave, kao i uporedna i domaća zakonodavna rešenja. Dilema između primene akcionarske teorije i multiinteresne (stejkholderske) teorije predstavlja jednu od najvećih kontroverzi savremenog kompanijskog prava. Aktuelna pandemija je samo dodatno apostrofirala osnovne probleme ovih teorija. Imajući u vidu da se konačni odgovori u ovoj oblasti ne mogu dati, autor sagledava domaća rešenja, kako bi dao preporuke za njihovo tumačenje.
AB  - What is the purpose of companies? Is that purpose unique for all companies? Is a company allowed to formulate its own purpose and to make decisions in accordance with that purpose? Is this the area where the lawmaker should intervene, to what extent and in which manner? What role should or could a company have in determining its own purpose? These are some of the questions to which the author is trying to find the answers, taking into consideration a number of theoretical discussions, as well as comparative and domestic legislative movements. Dilemma between the shareholder theory and the stakeholders' theory represents one of the most controversial topics in modern company law. The COVID pandemic has additionally emphasized the basic problems of these theories. Bearing in mind that definite solutions in this area cannot be given, the author analyses relevant Serbian statutory provisions, in order to make certain suggestions for their adequate interpretation.
T2  - Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava
T1  - Cilj privrednog društva sa osvrtom na aktuelnu pandemiju
T1  - Corporate purpose with a look on COVID-19 pandemic
EP  - 58
IS  - 2
SP  - 25
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.5937/RKSPP2102025R
UR  - conv_2861
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Imaju li privredna društva jasno određen cilj? Da li je taj cilj jedinstven za sva privredna društva? Može li privredno društvo da formuliše svoj cilj i da postupa u skladu sa njim? Da li je ovo oblast u kojoj zakonodavac treba da interveniše, do koje mere i na koji način? Kakvu ulogu treba i može da ima samo privredno društvo prilikom određivanja sopstvenog cilja? Ovo su sámo neka od pitanja na koja autor u ovom radu pokušava da dâ odgovor, imajući u vidu brojne teorijske rasprave, kao i uporedna i domaća zakonodavna rešenja. Dilema između primene akcionarske teorije i multiinteresne (stejkholderske) teorije predstavlja jednu od najvećih kontroverzi savremenog kompanijskog prava. Aktuelna pandemija je samo dodatno apostrofirala osnovne probleme ovih teorija. Imajući u vidu da se konačni odgovori u ovoj oblasti ne mogu dati, autor sagledava domaća rešenja, kako bi dao preporuke za njihovo tumačenje., What is the purpose of companies? Is that purpose unique for all companies? Is a company allowed to formulate its own purpose and to make decisions in accordance with that purpose? Is this the area where the lawmaker should intervene, to what extent and in which manner? What role should or could a company have in determining its own purpose? These are some of the questions to which the author is trying to find the answers, taking into consideration a number of theoretical discussions, as well as comparative and domestic legislative movements. Dilemma between the shareholder theory and the stakeholders' theory represents one of the most controversial topics in modern company law. The COVID pandemic has additionally emphasized the basic problems of these theories. Bearing in mind that definite solutions in this area cannot be given, the author analyses relevant Serbian statutory provisions, in order to make certain suggestions for their adequate interpretation.",
journal = "Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava",
title = "Cilj privrednog društva sa osvrtom na aktuelnu pandemiju, Corporate purpose with a look on COVID-19 pandemic",
pages = "58-25",
number = "2",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.5937/RKSPP2102025R",
url = "conv_2861"
}

Radović, V.. (2021). Cilj privrednog društva sa osvrtom na aktuelnu pandemiju. in Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 3(2), 25-58.
https://doi.org/10.5937/RKSPP2102025R
conv_2861

Radović V. Cilj privrednog društva sa osvrtom na aktuelnu pandemiju. in Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava. 2021;3(2):25-58.
doi:10.5937/RKSPP2102025R
conv_2861 .

Radović, Vuk, "Cilj privrednog društva sa osvrtom na aktuelnu pandemiju" in Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 3, no. 2 (2021):25-58,
https://doi.org/10.5937/RKSPP2102025R .,
conv_2861 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1188
AB  - Srpsko kompanijsko pravo daje članovima privrednih društava pravo da zahtevaju od suda da naloži pokretanje postupka likvidacije. U ovom radu autor analizira materijalne uslove koji moraju biti ispunjeni da bi sud doneo ovakvu odluku. Najvećim delom rad se bavi razlozima (materijalnopravnim pretpostavkama) za prestanak, i to prevashodno blokadom društva i ugnjetavanjem manjine. Ova tema je aktuelna iz najmanje tri razloga. Prvo, u sudskoj praksi su sve češći slučajevi pokretanja ovakvih postupaka, a o mnogim spornim pitanjima još uvek nisu zauzeti zajednički stavovi. Drugo, u domaćoj teoriji se nedovoljno razume suština ovog prava članova, te se ono gotovo isključivo vezuje za prava manjinskih članova. Treće, zakonske odredbe su veoma neprecizne i široko formulisane, te omogućavaju raznovrsna tumačenja. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da objasni suštinu svakog od razloga za prestanak privrednog društva po ovom osnovu, sa posebnim osvrtom na njihovo razumevanje u uporednoj sudskoj praksi.
AB  - Serbian company law recognizes the right of shareholders to seek judicial dissolution of the company. In this article, the author analyzes material conditions for ordering dissolution, with a special emphasis on deadlock and oppression. There are at least three reasons why this topic is very important for Serbia. Firstly, judicial cases involving dissolution request by shareholders are more often, and unfortunately at this point there are many open questions still not resolved in practice. Secondly, in domestic literature this right is almost exclusively associated with shareholders' minority rights, and that is only partially correct. Thirdly, legal norms dealing with this right are very imprecise and broadly formulated, and therefore can be interpreted in different ways. This article tries to clarify the essence of each reason for judicial dissolution of a company requested by shareholders, particularly by using experiences in comparative judicial practice.
T2  - Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava
T1  - Nevoljni prestanak privrednog društva zbog blokade i ugnjetavanja manjine
T1  - Involuntary dissolution for deadlock and oppression
EP  - 120
IS  - 1
SP  - 101
VL  - 2
DO  - 10.5937/RKSPP2001101R
UR  - conv_2858
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Srpsko kompanijsko pravo daje članovima privrednih društava pravo da zahtevaju od suda da naloži pokretanje postupka likvidacije. U ovom radu autor analizira materijalne uslove koji moraju biti ispunjeni da bi sud doneo ovakvu odluku. Najvećim delom rad se bavi razlozima (materijalnopravnim pretpostavkama) za prestanak, i to prevashodno blokadom društva i ugnjetavanjem manjine. Ova tema je aktuelna iz najmanje tri razloga. Prvo, u sudskoj praksi su sve češći slučajevi pokretanja ovakvih postupaka, a o mnogim spornim pitanjima još uvek nisu zauzeti zajednički stavovi. Drugo, u domaćoj teoriji se nedovoljno razume suština ovog prava članova, te se ono gotovo isključivo vezuje za prava manjinskih članova. Treće, zakonske odredbe su veoma neprecizne i široko formulisane, te omogućavaju raznovrsna tumačenja. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da objasni suštinu svakog od razloga za prestanak privrednog društva po ovom osnovu, sa posebnim osvrtom na njihovo razumevanje u uporednoj sudskoj praksi., Serbian company law recognizes the right of shareholders to seek judicial dissolution of the company. In this article, the author analyzes material conditions for ordering dissolution, with a special emphasis on deadlock and oppression. There are at least three reasons why this topic is very important for Serbia. Firstly, judicial cases involving dissolution request by shareholders are more often, and unfortunately at this point there are many open questions still not resolved in practice. Secondly, in domestic literature this right is almost exclusively associated with shareholders' minority rights, and that is only partially correct. Thirdly, legal norms dealing with this right are very imprecise and broadly formulated, and therefore can be interpreted in different ways. This article tries to clarify the essence of each reason for judicial dissolution of a company requested by shareholders, particularly by using experiences in comparative judicial practice.",
journal = "Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava",
title = "Nevoljni prestanak privrednog društva zbog blokade i ugnjetavanja manjine, Involuntary dissolution for deadlock and oppression",
pages = "120-101",
number = "1",
volume = "2",
doi = "10.5937/RKSPP2001101R",
url = "conv_2858"
}

Radović, V.. (2020). Nevoljni prestanak privrednog društva zbog blokade i ugnjetavanja manjine. in Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 2(1), 101-120.
https://doi.org/10.5937/RKSPP2001101R
conv_2858

Radović V. Nevoljni prestanak privrednog društva zbog blokade i ugnjetavanja manjine. in Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava. 2020;2(1):101-120.
doi:10.5937/RKSPP2001101R
conv_2858 .

Radović, Vuk, "Nevoljni prestanak privrednog društva zbog blokade i ugnjetavanja manjine" in Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, 2, no. 1 (2020):101-120,
https://doi.org/10.5937/RKSPP2001101R .,
conv_2858 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1115
AB  - Krajem 2018. godine usvojene su četvrte izmene Zakona o stečaju. Sadržinski one se vezuju za pet stečajnopravnih tema: 1) mogućnost ostvarivanja direktne komunikacije između poverilaca i stečajnog upravnika; 2) pravo poverioca predlagača da predloži stečajnog upravnika; 3) davanje većih ovlašćenja skupštini poverilaca u postupku kontrole imenovanog stečajnog upravnika; 4) preciziranje kriterijuma za određivanje visine predujma troškova; i 5) proširenje kruga aktivno legitimisanih lica za podnošenje plana reorganizacije. U ovom radu autor kritički analizira sve ove promene i zaključuje da su novouvedene odredbe, najvećim delom, nejasne, neprecizne i nedorečene, te da u praksi mogu stvoriti pravnu neizvesnost. Kako bi se ovo zaobišlo, autor je predložio na koji način treba pravilno tumačiti sporna pitanja.
AB  - At the end of 2018 fourth amendments to the Law on bankruptcy have been adopted. Looking at the content of these changes, they can be classified into five bankruptcy law issues: 1) the possibility to establish direct line of communication between creditors and bankruptcy trustee; 2) the right of the creditor who initiated the bankruptcy proceeding to nominate bankruptcy trustee; 3) authority of the general meeting of creditors in connection with the process of supervising the elected bankruptcy trustee; 4) determination of the maximum level of advance payment of bankruptcy costs; and 5) right to propose the reorganization plan. In this paper the author has critically analyzed all these changes and concluded that these norms are mostly unclear, imprecise and understated, which means that in the practice they can lead to legal uncertainty. In order to avoid misunderstandings, the author has suggested how these norms are supposed to be interpreted.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravna analiza poslednjih izmena Zakona o stečaju - korak napred, dva koraka unazad
T1  - Legal analysis of the last changes to the law on bankruptcy from 2018
EP  - 626
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 608
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_2285
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Krajem 2018. godine usvojene su četvrte izmene Zakona o stečaju. Sadržinski one se vezuju za pet stečajnopravnih tema: 1) mogućnost ostvarivanja direktne komunikacije između poverilaca i stečajnog upravnika; 2) pravo poverioca predlagača da predloži stečajnog upravnika; 3) davanje većih ovlašćenja skupštini poverilaca u postupku kontrole imenovanog stečajnog upravnika; 4) preciziranje kriterijuma za određivanje visine predujma troškova; i 5) proširenje kruga aktivno legitimisanih lica za podnošenje plana reorganizacije. U ovom radu autor kritički analizira sve ove promene i zaključuje da su novouvedene odredbe, najvećim delom, nejasne, neprecizne i nedorečene, te da u praksi mogu stvoriti pravnu neizvesnost. Kako bi se ovo zaobišlo, autor je predložio na koji način treba pravilno tumačiti sporna pitanja., At the end of 2018 fourth amendments to the Law on bankruptcy have been adopted. Looking at the content of these changes, they can be classified into five bankruptcy law issues: 1) the possibility to establish direct line of communication between creditors and bankruptcy trustee; 2) the right of the creditor who initiated the bankruptcy proceeding to nominate bankruptcy trustee; 3) authority of the general meeting of creditors in connection with the process of supervising the elected bankruptcy trustee; 4) determination of the maximum level of advance payment of bankruptcy costs; and 5) right to propose the reorganization plan. In this paper the author has critically analyzed all these changes and concluded that these norms are mostly unclear, imprecise and understated, which means that in the practice they can lead to legal uncertainty. In order to avoid misunderstandings, the author has suggested how these norms are supposed to be interpreted.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravna analiza poslednjih izmena Zakona o stečaju - korak napred, dva koraka unazad, Legal analysis of the last changes to the law on bankruptcy from 2018",
pages = "626-608",
number = "4-6",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_2285"
}

Radović, V.. (2019). Pravna analiza poslednjih izmena Zakona o stečaju - korak napred, dva koraka unazad. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 57(4-6), 608-626.
conv_2285

Radović V. Pravna analiza poslednjih izmena Zakona o stečaju - korak napred, dva koraka unazad. in Pravo i privreda. 2019;57(4-6):608-626.
conv_2285 .

Radović, Vuk, "Pravna analiza poslednjih izmena Zakona o stečaju - korak napred, dva koraka unazad" in Pravo i privreda, 57, no. 4-6 (2019):608-626,
conv_2285 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
AU  - Radulović, Branko
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1013
AB  - Similar to other countries, Serbia has established an expedited corporate restructuring framework introducing prearranged reorganization plans in the Law on Bankruptcy. New procedure has been widely used since the law came into effect, but with mostly dismal results. The reason for the widespread use lies in the fact that this procedure incorporates all key components of a hybrid procedure-debtor in possession, a moratorium and the possibility to impose the plan on dissenting creditors within the class. As a rule, prearranged reorganization plans are not feasible. Debtors' owners in Serbia are unwilling to give up their equity and despite being unfeasible, creditors tend to support these plans as they are not willing to accept debt write-offs and/or debt-to equity swaps. This article examines the deficiencies of the procedure and suggests further reforms.
PB  - Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg
T2  - European Business Organization Law Review
T1  - Prearranged Reorganization Plans in Serbia: Form Over Substance
EP  - 413
IS  - 2
SP  - 393
VL  - 19
DO  - 10.1007/s40804-018-0099-1
UR  - conv_2991
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk and Radulović, Branko",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Similar to other countries, Serbia has established an expedited corporate restructuring framework introducing prearranged reorganization plans in the Law on Bankruptcy. New procedure has been widely used since the law came into effect, but with mostly dismal results. The reason for the widespread use lies in the fact that this procedure incorporates all key components of a hybrid procedure-debtor in possession, a moratorium and the possibility to impose the plan on dissenting creditors within the class. As a rule, prearranged reorganization plans are not feasible. Debtors' owners in Serbia are unwilling to give up their equity and despite being unfeasible, creditors tend to support these plans as they are not willing to accept debt write-offs and/or debt-to equity swaps. This article examines the deficiencies of the procedure and suggests further reforms.",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg",
journal = "European Business Organization Law Review",
title = "Prearranged Reorganization Plans in Serbia: Form Over Substance",
pages = "413-393",
number = "2",
volume = "19",
doi = "10.1007/s40804-018-0099-1",
url = "conv_2991"
}

Radović, V.,& Radulović, B.. (2018). Prearranged Reorganization Plans in Serbia: Form Over Substance. in European Business Organization Law Review
Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg., 19(2), 393-413.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0099-1
conv_2991

Radović V, Radulović B. Prearranged Reorganization Plans in Serbia: Form Over Substance. in European Business Organization Law Review. 2018;19(2):393-413.
doi:10.1007/s40804-018-0099-1
conv_2991 .

Radović, Vuk, Radulović, Branko, "Prearranged Reorganization Plans in Serbia: Form Over Substance" in European Business Organization Law Review, 19, no. 2 (2018):393-413,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0099-1 .,
conv_2991 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vuković, Igor
AU  - Kovačević, Ljubinka
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1011
AB  - The role of a whistle-blower is most commonly taken on by an employee, whose duty of loyalty to the employer is in conflict with disclosure of the employer's wrongdoing. This requires a balance between the interests of the parties to the employment relationship, on the one hand, and the public interest, on the other hand. It was taken into account in Serbian law when defining the legal status of whistle-blowers, from the fragmented protection of civil servants to the adoption of the Law on Protection of Whistle-blowers (2014). After elaboration of the evolution of protection, authors identify and analyze essential elements of the whistle-blowing concept, as well as its basic functions in Serbian and foreign law. This is followed by critical re-evaluation of the key aspects of protection of whistle-blowers in the legislation and case law of the Republic of Serbia (the circle of protected persons, motives for disclosure of information, damaging actions, the burden of proof and the gradual approach in whistle-blowing). The conclusion is that Serbia has achieved a slow but steady progress in the legal protection of whistle-blowers, and that there is need for further improvement, since certain legal solutions may separate the guarantee of protection of whistle-blowers from the purpose for which it was established.
PB  - Babes-Bolyai Univ, Cluj-Napoca
T2  - Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
T1  - Legal status of whistle-blowers in the republic of Serbia: from fragmented protection of civil servants to the full-scale protection model
EP  - 122
IS  - 53E
SP  - 107
DO  - 10.24193/tras.53E.7
UR  - conv_2938
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vuković, Igor and Kovačević, Ljubinka and Radović, Vuk",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The role of a whistle-blower is most commonly taken on by an employee, whose duty of loyalty to the employer is in conflict with disclosure of the employer's wrongdoing. This requires a balance between the interests of the parties to the employment relationship, on the one hand, and the public interest, on the other hand. It was taken into account in Serbian law when defining the legal status of whistle-blowers, from the fragmented protection of civil servants to the adoption of the Law on Protection of Whistle-blowers (2014). After elaboration of the evolution of protection, authors identify and analyze essential elements of the whistle-blowing concept, as well as its basic functions in Serbian and foreign law. This is followed by critical re-evaluation of the key aspects of protection of whistle-blowers in the legislation and case law of the Republic of Serbia (the circle of protected persons, motives for disclosure of information, damaging actions, the burden of proof and the gradual approach in whistle-blowing). The conclusion is that Serbia has achieved a slow but steady progress in the legal protection of whistle-blowers, and that there is need for further improvement, since certain legal solutions may separate the guarantee of protection of whistle-blowers from the purpose for which it was established.",
publisher = "Babes-Bolyai Univ, Cluj-Napoca",
journal = "Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences",
title = "Legal status of whistle-blowers in the republic of Serbia: from fragmented protection of civil servants to the full-scale protection model",
pages = "122-107",
number = "53E",
doi = "10.24193/tras.53E.7",
url = "conv_2938"
}

Vuković, I., Kovačević, L.,& Radović, V.. (2018). Legal status of whistle-blowers in the republic of Serbia: from fragmented protection of civil servants to the full-scale protection model. in Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Babes-Bolyai Univ, Cluj-Napoca.(53E), 107-122.
https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.53E.7
conv_2938

Vuković I, Kovačević L, Radović V. Legal status of whistle-blowers in the republic of Serbia: from fragmented protection of civil servants to the full-scale protection model. in Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences. 2018;(53E):107-122.
doi:10.24193/tras.53E.7
conv_2938 .

Vuković, Igor, Kovačević, Ljubinka, Radović, Vuk, "Legal status of whistle-blowers in the republic of Serbia: from fragmented protection of civil servants to the full-scale protection model" in Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, no. 53E (2018):107-122,
https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.53E.7 .,
conv_2938 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/998
AB  - Pravo nesaglasnih akcionara predstavlja kontroverzan institut prava akcionarskih društava, zbog čega ga prihvata relativno mali broj država. U ovom radu autori prvo analiziraju ciljeve koji se žele postići uvođenjem instituta prava nesaglasnih akcionara. U tom pogledu, prvo su prikazana tradicionalna, a nakon toga i moderna objašnjenja za uvođenje, odnosno zadržavanje tog instituta. U drugom delu rada se pravo nesaglasnih akcionara posmatra kritički, i to prevashodno iz ugla problema koje stvara akcionarskom društvu. Nakon toga je identifikovano i nekoliko potencijalnih uzročnika neefikasnosti korišćenja tog prava. Sagledavanje prednosti i nedostataka prava nesaglasnih akcionara je posebno značajno za Srbiju kako bi se izveo zaključak o tome u kojoj meri su naša rešenja usklađena sa osnovnim postulatima na kojima taj institut treba da počiva.
AB  - Shareholders' right to appraisal represents a controversial topic of corporation law, which is why a relatively small number of countries accept it. In this article, the authors analyze the goals that are supposed to be achieved with the introduction of shareholders' appraisal rights. In this respect, traditional and modern explanations for the introduction or maintaining of this right have been presented. In the second part of this article, shareholders' right to appraisal has been critically examined, mostly from corporations' perspective. Afterwards, several potential causes of inefficiency of using this right have been identified. Perceiving pros and cons of shareholders' right to appraisal is of particular importance for Serbia, in order to draw a conclusion about harmonization of our legislative solutions with the theoretical foundations of this right.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara
T1  - Theoretical foundations of shareholders' right to appraisal
EP  - 27
IS  - 3
SP  - 7
VL  - 65
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V
UR  - conv_430
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko and Radović, Vuk",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Pravo nesaglasnih akcionara predstavlja kontroverzan institut prava akcionarskih društava, zbog čega ga prihvata relativno mali broj država. U ovom radu autori prvo analiziraju ciljeve koji se žele postići uvođenjem instituta prava nesaglasnih akcionara. U tom pogledu, prvo su prikazana tradicionalna, a nakon toga i moderna objašnjenja za uvođenje, odnosno zadržavanje tog instituta. U drugom delu rada se pravo nesaglasnih akcionara posmatra kritički, i to prevashodno iz ugla problema koje stvara akcionarskom društvu. Nakon toga je identifikovano i nekoliko potencijalnih uzročnika neefikasnosti korišćenja tog prava. Sagledavanje prednosti i nedostataka prava nesaglasnih akcionara je posebno značajno za Srbiju kako bi se izveo zaključak o tome u kojoj meri su naša rešenja usklađena sa osnovnim postulatima na kojima taj institut treba da počiva., Shareholders' right to appraisal represents a controversial topic of corporation law, which is why a relatively small number of countries accept it. In this article, the authors analyze the goals that are supposed to be achieved with the introduction of shareholders' appraisal rights. In this respect, traditional and modern explanations for the introduction or maintaining of this right have been presented. In the second part of this article, shareholders' right to appraisal has been critically examined, mostly from corporations' perspective. Afterwards, several potential causes of inefficiency of using this right have been identified. Perceiving pros and cons of shareholders' right to appraisal is of particular importance for Serbia, in order to draw a conclusion about harmonization of our legislative solutions with the theoretical foundations of this right.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara, Theoretical foundations of shareholders' right to appraisal",
pages = "27-7",
number = "3",
volume = "65",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V",
url = "conv_430"
}

Vasiljević, M.,& Radović, V.. (2017). Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 65(3), 7-27.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V
conv_430

Vasiljević M, Radović V. Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2017;65(3):7-27.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V
conv_430 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, Radović, Vuk, "Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 65, no. 3 (2017):7-27,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V .,
conv_430 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/970
AB  - Pravo nesaglasnih akcionara (pravo na izlazak iz društva uz pravičnu cenu) predstavlja kontroverzan institut prava akcionarskih društava, zbog čega ga prihvata relativno mali broj država, među kojima i Srbija. U ovom članku autor se fokusira samo na jedan aspekt ovog prava - uslove za njegovo ostvarivanje. Nakon uvodnih izlaganja, u članku su prvo analizirani materijalni uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara, tj. korporativne promene koje omogućavaju pravo na izlazak, a posle njih i procesni uslovi koje akcionar mora da ispuni da bi imao pravo na izlazak iz društva (obaveštenje o nameri, nesaglasnost u odnosu na usvojenu odluku i podnošenje zahteva društvu). Konačno, autor je u radu ukazao i na nelogičnost proširenja ovog prava na članove društva sa ograničenom odgovornošću. U zaključku je iznet stav da se de lege ferenda treba založiti za restriktivnije definisanje korporativnih promena koje daju akcionarima pravo na izlazak iz društva, propisivanje dodatnih procesnih uslova za ostvarivanje ovog prava i sužavanje primene ovog instituta samo na akcionarska društva.
AB  - Shareholder's right to appraisal (right to exit the company with the equitable price) represents a controversial topic of corporation law, which is why relatively small number of countries, including Serbia, accept it. In this article, the author analyses only one aspect of this right - conditions for its exercising. After introductory remarks, the first part of this article explores triggering events, i.e. fundamental corporate changes that trigger the appraisal rights. The second part deals with procedural requirements that a shareholder must fulfill in order to have the right to exit the company (objection prior to shareholder meeting, voting against the proposal and request for appraisal). Finally, the author emphasizes that appraisal rights should not be given to members of limited liability company. In conclusion it is recommended that Serbian law should de lege ferenda: 1) narrow appraisal-triggering corporate events, 2) introduce additional procedural requirements for exercising the right to exit and 3) not apply this right to members of limited liability company.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara
T1  - Conditions for exercising shareholder's right to appraisal
EP  - 70
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 49
VL  - 55
UR  - conv_2202
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Pravo nesaglasnih akcionara (pravo na izlazak iz društva uz pravičnu cenu) predstavlja kontroverzan institut prava akcionarskih društava, zbog čega ga prihvata relativno mali broj država, među kojima i Srbija. U ovom članku autor se fokusira samo na jedan aspekt ovog prava - uslove za njegovo ostvarivanje. Nakon uvodnih izlaganja, u članku su prvo analizirani materijalni uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara, tj. korporativne promene koje omogućavaju pravo na izlazak, a posle njih i procesni uslovi koje akcionar mora da ispuni da bi imao pravo na izlazak iz društva (obaveštenje o nameri, nesaglasnost u odnosu na usvojenu odluku i podnošenje zahteva društvu). Konačno, autor je u radu ukazao i na nelogičnost proširenja ovog prava na članove društva sa ograničenom odgovornošću. U zaključku je iznet stav da se de lege ferenda treba založiti za restriktivnije definisanje korporativnih promena koje daju akcionarima pravo na izlazak iz društva, propisivanje dodatnih procesnih uslova za ostvarivanje ovog prava i sužavanje primene ovog instituta samo na akcionarska društva., Shareholder's right to appraisal (right to exit the company with the equitable price) represents a controversial topic of corporation law, which is why relatively small number of countries, including Serbia, accept it. In this article, the author analyses only one aspect of this right - conditions for its exercising. After introductory remarks, the first part of this article explores triggering events, i.e. fundamental corporate changes that trigger the appraisal rights. The second part deals with procedural requirements that a shareholder must fulfill in order to have the right to exit the company (objection prior to shareholder meeting, voting against the proposal and request for appraisal). Finally, the author emphasizes that appraisal rights should not be given to members of limited liability company. In conclusion it is recommended that Serbian law should de lege ferenda: 1) narrow appraisal-triggering corporate events, 2) introduce additional procedural requirements for exercising the right to exit and 3) not apply this right to members of limited liability company.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara, Conditions for exercising shareholder's right to appraisal",
pages = "70-49",
number = "4-6",
volume = "55",
url = "conv_2202"
}

Radović, V.. (2017). Uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 55(4-6), 49-70.
conv_2202

Radović V. Uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara. in Pravo i privreda. 2017;55(4-6):49-70.
conv_2202 .

Radović, Vuk, "Uslovi za ostvarivanje prava nesaglasnih akcionara" in Pravo i privreda, 55, no. 4-6 (2017):49-70,
conv_2202 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/924
AB  - Kodeksi korporativnog upravljanja nastali su kao instrument samoregulacije, čija je primena zavisila isključivo od volje društava. U ovom članku autor pokazuje kako se vremenom menjao odnos zakonodavca prema njima, i to prvo zakonskim prepoznavanjem kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja, zatim uvođenjem obaveze njegove primene od strane svakog javnog akcionarskog društva, kao i obaveze objavljivanja obrazloženja za svako odstupanje od preporuka sadržanih u njemu. Na ovaj način su se kodeksi udaljili od svoje izvorno samoregulatorne prirode i više ili manje približili državnoj regulaciji. U perspektivi se očekuju dalje zakonske intervencije u pravcu jačanja obaveznosti primene kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja, na koje ni Srbija neće ostati imuna.
AB  - Corporate governance codes have been developed as an instrument of selfregulation, and its implementation was based on the premise that companies will voluntarily adhere to the code (principle of voluntary implementation). In this article, the author is showing how the legislator has changed over time the attitude towards them, mostly by recognizing corporate governance codes in the law, by introducing the obligation of its application by every public corporation, as well as the obligation to explain every deviation from the 'comply or explain' rules contained in the code. With these developments the codes have shifted away from their original self-regulatory and non-statutory nature, and became more or less close to state regulation. In the future, legal interventions in the field of developing stronger enforcement instruments of corporate governance codes are expected, and Serbia will not stay immune to these changes.
PB  - Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš
T2  - Teme
T1  - O približavanju kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja zakonskoj regulativi
T1  - Corporate governance codes: Leaning toward legal regulation
EP  - 1137
IS  - 3
SP  - 1121
VL  - 40
UR  - conv_1792
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Kodeksi korporativnog upravljanja nastali su kao instrument samoregulacije, čija je primena zavisila isključivo od volje društava. U ovom članku autor pokazuje kako se vremenom menjao odnos zakonodavca prema njima, i to prvo zakonskim prepoznavanjem kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja, zatim uvođenjem obaveze njegove primene od strane svakog javnog akcionarskog društva, kao i obaveze objavljivanja obrazloženja za svako odstupanje od preporuka sadržanih u njemu. Na ovaj način su se kodeksi udaljili od svoje izvorno samoregulatorne prirode i više ili manje približili državnoj regulaciji. U perspektivi se očekuju dalje zakonske intervencije u pravcu jačanja obaveznosti primene kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja, na koje ni Srbija neće ostati imuna., Corporate governance codes have been developed as an instrument of selfregulation, and its implementation was based on the premise that companies will voluntarily adhere to the code (principle of voluntary implementation). In this article, the author is showing how the legislator has changed over time the attitude towards them, mostly by recognizing corporate governance codes in the law, by introducing the obligation of its application by every public corporation, as well as the obligation to explain every deviation from the 'comply or explain' rules contained in the code. With these developments the codes have shifted away from their original self-regulatory and non-statutory nature, and became more or less close to state regulation. In the future, legal interventions in the field of developing stronger enforcement instruments of corporate governance codes are expected, and Serbia will not stay immune to these changes.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš",
journal = "Teme",
title = "O približavanju kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja zakonskoj regulativi, Corporate governance codes: Leaning toward legal regulation",
pages = "1137-1121",
number = "3",
volume = "40",
url = "conv_1792"
}

Radović, V.. (2016). O približavanju kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja zakonskoj regulativi. in Teme
Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš., 40(3), 1121-1137.
conv_1792

Radović V. O približavanju kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja zakonskoj regulativi. in Teme. 2016;40(3):1121-1137.
conv_1792 .

Radović, Vuk, "O približavanju kodeksa korporativnog upravljanja zakonskoj regulativi" in Teme, 40, no. 3 (2016):1121-1137,
conv_1792 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
AU  - Tešić, Nenad
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/820
AB  - In this paper, the authors introduce a notion of creditor s supplemental rights that so far has been insufficiently explored by legal theory. The authors see the supplemental rights as a variety of subordinated (secondary) rights that commonly with creditor s principle right (main prestation) stands on the active side of an obligational relationship (obligation in a wider sense). Such rights follow the faith of the principal right, whereby they may not be disposed of separately. In addition to the circumstances of their onset by operation of law and their limited duration, a joint characteristic of such rights is the absence of their correlation with the debtor s duties. If we may say that these qualities appear with other secondary rights (Lat. genus proximum), one feature distinguishes supplemental rights from the other of the similar kind - an influence on debtor's proprietary sphere. Through this influence the supplemental rights indirectly assure a claim, contributing thereby to accomplishment of the (subsidiary) goal of an obligation - satisfaction of claim - by either removing the obstacles for the satisfaction, or by preserving and strengthening the prospects for such satisfaction (Lat. differentia specifica). Accordingly, the authors recognize three separate types of supplemental rights: rights by which a creditor removes obstacles for the satisfaction of claim; rights by which a creditor protects his prospects for the satisfaction of claim; and rights by which a creditor enhances his prospects for the satisfaction of claim. .
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - On creditor's supplemental rights
EP  - 169
IS  - 3
SP  - 141
VL  - 63
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1503141R
UR  - conv_383
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk and Tešić, Nenad",
year = "2015",
abstract = "In this paper, the authors introduce a notion of creditor s supplemental rights that so far has been insufficiently explored by legal theory. The authors see the supplemental rights as a variety of subordinated (secondary) rights that commonly with creditor s principle right (main prestation) stands on the active side of an obligational relationship (obligation in a wider sense). Such rights follow the faith of the principal right, whereby they may not be disposed of separately. In addition to the circumstances of their onset by operation of law and their limited duration, a joint characteristic of such rights is the absence of their correlation with the debtor s duties. If we may say that these qualities appear with other secondary rights (Lat. genus proximum), one feature distinguishes supplemental rights from the other of the similar kind - an influence on debtor's proprietary sphere. Through this influence the supplemental rights indirectly assure a claim, contributing thereby to accomplishment of the (subsidiary) goal of an obligation - satisfaction of claim - by either removing the obstacles for the satisfaction, or by preserving and strengthening the prospects for such satisfaction (Lat. differentia specifica). Accordingly, the authors recognize three separate types of supplemental rights: rights by which a creditor removes obstacles for the satisfaction of claim; rights by which a creditor protects his prospects for the satisfaction of claim; and rights by which a creditor enhances his prospects for the satisfaction of claim. .",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "On creditor's supplemental rights",
pages = "169-141",
number = "3",
volume = "63",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1503141R",
url = "conv_383"
}

Radović, V.,& Tešić, N.. (2015). On creditor's supplemental rights. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 63(3), 141-169.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1503141R
conv_383

Radović V, Tešić N. On creditor's supplemental rights. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2015;63(3):141-169.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1503141R
conv_383 .

Radović, Vuk, Tešić, Nenad, "On creditor's supplemental rights" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 63, no. 3 (2015):141-169,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1503141R .,
conv_383 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/859
AB  - Moderan koncept regulisanja materije korporativnog upravljanja se danas zasniva na postojanju 'primeni ili objasni' pravila. Ta pravila društvima daju pravo da ih primene ili da ih ne primene, u kom slučaju nastaje obaveza informisanja javnosti o razlozima zbog kojih je doneta takva odluka. Ceo sistem se bazira na kvalitetu izveštavanja za slučaj odstupanja, jer ako on ne funkcioniše, ni kodeksi korporativnog upravljanja ne mogu da ostvare ciljeve koji su pred njih postavljeni. Uporedna i domaća korporativna praksa pokazuje u ovom pogledu brojne nedostatke, zbog čega se i čine veliki napori kako bi se oni otklonili. Najnovija Preporuka Evropske komisije o 'primeni ili objasni ' pravilima predstavlja prvi značajniji pokušaj uređivanja ove materije na nadnacionalnom nivou. U ovom članku autor se zalaže za razvoj 'kulture odstupanja' od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila, kako bi društva postala svesna da odstupanje nije samo po sebi loše, jer omogućava prilagođavanje jedinstvenih pravila korporativnog upravljanja specifičnim karakteristikama konkretnog društva. Pravilan razvoj ovakve prakse može voditi efikasnijem upravljanju akcionarskim društvima, ali i stalnom dizanju standarda dobre prakse korporativnog upravljanja. Tema je od posebnog značaja za Srbiju, imajući u vidu da srpska društva gotovo uvek daju pozitivnu godišnju izjavu o korporativnom upravljanju, što znači da formalno ne odstupaju od pravila kodeksa koji primenjuju. Međutim, realnost je sasvim drugačija.
AB  - Modern concept of corporate governance regulation is based on the existence of 'comply or explain' rules. They offer to companies the choice between application and non-application, and in later case com­panies are required to inform public by giving meaningful explanation for making that decision. The whole system is founded on the quality of reporting in case of departure, because if it is not working, corporate governance codes cannot achieve goals they were meant to accomplish. Comparative and national corporate practice shows number of deficien­cies in this regard, which is why great efforts have been made in order to remove them. The newest European Commission Recommendation about 'comply or explain' rules represents the first important attempt to regu­late this topic on supranational level. In this article, the author advocates for development of culture of departure from 'comply or explain' rules, so that the companies become aware that departure is not per se bad, because it enables adjustment of uniform rules of corporate governance to the specificities of a concrete company. This approach can result in more efficient governance of companies, and permanent development of more demanding good corporate governance standards. This topic is of great importance for Serbia, taking into consideration the fact that Ser­bian companies almost always give positive annual corporate governance statement, which means that they are formally completely in accordance with the rules of the applicable corporate governance code. However, the reality is somewhat different.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Razvoj kulture odstupanja od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila korporativnog upravljanja
T1  - Development of culture of departure from 'comply or explain' rules of corporate governance
EP  - 44
IS  - 2
SP  - 23
VL  - 63
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1502023R
UR  - conv_368
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Moderan koncept regulisanja materije korporativnog upravljanja se danas zasniva na postojanju 'primeni ili objasni' pravila. Ta pravila društvima daju pravo da ih primene ili da ih ne primene, u kom slučaju nastaje obaveza informisanja javnosti o razlozima zbog kojih je doneta takva odluka. Ceo sistem se bazira na kvalitetu izveštavanja za slučaj odstupanja, jer ako on ne funkcioniše, ni kodeksi korporativnog upravljanja ne mogu da ostvare ciljeve koji su pred njih postavljeni. Uporedna i domaća korporativna praksa pokazuje u ovom pogledu brojne nedostatke, zbog čega se i čine veliki napori kako bi se oni otklonili. Najnovija Preporuka Evropske komisije o 'primeni ili objasni ' pravilima predstavlja prvi značajniji pokušaj uređivanja ove materije na nadnacionalnom nivou. U ovom članku autor se zalaže za razvoj 'kulture odstupanja' od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila, kako bi društva postala svesna da odstupanje nije samo po sebi loše, jer omogućava prilagođavanje jedinstvenih pravila korporativnog upravljanja specifičnim karakteristikama konkretnog društva. Pravilan razvoj ovakve prakse može voditi efikasnijem upravljanju akcionarskim društvima, ali i stalnom dizanju standarda dobre prakse korporativnog upravljanja. Tema je od posebnog značaja za Srbiju, imajući u vidu da srpska društva gotovo uvek daju pozitivnu godišnju izjavu o korporativnom upravljanju, što znači da formalno ne odstupaju od pravila kodeksa koji primenjuju. Međutim, realnost je sasvim drugačija., Modern concept of corporate governance regulation is based on the existence of 'comply or explain' rules. They offer to companies the choice between application and non-application, and in later case com­panies are required to inform public by giving meaningful explanation for making that decision. The whole system is founded on the quality of reporting in case of departure, because if it is not working, corporate governance codes cannot achieve goals they were meant to accomplish. Comparative and national corporate practice shows number of deficien­cies in this regard, which is why great efforts have been made in order to remove them. The newest European Commission Recommendation about 'comply or explain' rules represents the first important attempt to regu­late this topic on supranational level. In this article, the author advocates for development of culture of departure from 'comply or explain' rules, so that the companies become aware that departure is not per se bad, because it enables adjustment of uniform rules of corporate governance to the specificities of a concrete company. This approach can result in more efficient governance of companies, and permanent development of more demanding good corporate governance standards. This topic is of great importance for Serbia, taking into consideration the fact that Ser­bian companies almost always give positive annual corporate governance statement, which means that they are formally completely in accordance with the rules of the applicable corporate governance code. However, the reality is somewhat different.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Razvoj kulture odstupanja od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila korporativnog upravljanja, Development of culture of departure from 'comply or explain' rules of corporate governance",
pages = "44-23",
number = "2",
volume = "63",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1502023R",
url = "conv_368"
}

Radović, V.. (2015). Razvoj kulture odstupanja od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila korporativnog upravljanja. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 63(2), 23-44.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1502023R
conv_368

Radović V. Razvoj kulture odstupanja od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila korporativnog upravljanja. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2015;63(2):23-44.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1502023R
conv_368 .

Radović, Vuk, "Razvoj kulture odstupanja od 'primeni ili objasni' pravila korporativnog upravljanja" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 63, no. 2 (2015):23-44,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1502023R .,
conv_368 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/880
AB  - Posrednički ugovor o putovanju je jedan od tri turistička ugovora uređena Zakonom o obligacionim odnosima. Premda ovaj ugovor ne spada u pravno komplikovane ugovore, dva osnovna razloga su opredelila autora za njegovo detaljnije proučavanje: 1) ovo je ugovor koji ima veliki praktičan značaj, jer ih putnici često zaključuju sa turističkim agencijama; i 2) trenutno je u toku pisanje Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije, te je ovo prilika da se važeća rešenja još jednom preispitaju. Pravna analiza je pokazala značajne nedostatke u pozitivnopravnoj regulativi ovog ugovora, te je u ovom radu autor predložio kako bi ove odredbe trebalo de lege ferenda formulisati. Konačno, poseban značaj u radu se pridaje situaciji kada putnik zaključuje posrednički ugovor sa turističkom agencijom koja je u isto vreme i trgovinski zastupnik individualnog pružaoca turističkih usluga.
AB  - Intermediary travel contract is one out of three travel contracts regulated by the Law on obligations. Although this is not a legally sophisticated contract, two main reasons have motivated the author to explore it in more detail: 1) this contract has a great practical significance, since the travellers often conclude them with travel agencies; and 2) writing the new Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia is currently in progress, so this is an opportunity to reexamine the content of its provisions. The legal analysis has shown significant mistakes in de lege lata regulation of this contract. Therefore, in this article the author has suggested the way these provisions should de lege ferenda be formulated. Finally, special attention has been drawn to a situation when a traveller is concluding an intermediary travel contract with a travel agency that is at the same time an agent of a travel organizer or an individual provider of separate tourist services.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Posrednički ugovor o putovanju
T1  - Intermediary travel contract
EP  - 392
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 362
VL  - 53
UR  - conv_2150
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Posrednički ugovor o putovanju je jedan od tri turistička ugovora uređena Zakonom o obligacionim odnosima. Premda ovaj ugovor ne spada u pravno komplikovane ugovore, dva osnovna razloga su opredelila autora za njegovo detaljnije proučavanje: 1) ovo je ugovor koji ima veliki praktičan značaj, jer ih putnici često zaključuju sa turističkim agencijama; i 2) trenutno je u toku pisanje Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije, te je ovo prilika da se važeća rešenja još jednom preispitaju. Pravna analiza je pokazala značajne nedostatke u pozitivnopravnoj regulativi ovog ugovora, te je u ovom radu autor predložio kako bi ove odredbe trebalo de lege ferenda formulisati. Konačno, poseban značaj u radu se pridaje situaciji kada putnik zaključuje posrednički ugovor sa turističkom agencijom koja je u isto vreme i trgovinski zastupnik individualnog pružaoca turističkih usluga., Intermediary travel contract is one out of three travel contracts regulated by the Law on obligations. Although this is not a legally sophisticated contract, two main reasons have motivated the author to explore it in more detail: 1) this contract has a great practical significance, since the travellers often conclude them with travel agencies; and 2) writing the new Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia is currently in progress, so this is an opportunity to reexamine the content of its provisions. The legal analysis has shown significant mistakes in de lege lata regulation of this contract. Therefore, in this article the author has suggested the way these provisions should de lege ferenda be formulated. Finally, special attention has been drawn to a situation when a traveller is concluding an intermediary travel contract with a travel agency that is at the same time an agent of a travel organizer or an individual provider of separate tourist services.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Posrednički ugovor o putovanju, Intermediary travel contract",
pages = "392-362",
number = "4-6",
volume = "53",
url = "conv_2150"
}

Radović, V.. (2015). Posrednički ugovor o putovanju. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 53(4-6), 362-392.
conv_2150

Radović V. Posrednički ugovor o putovanju. in Pravo i privreda. 2015;53(4-6):362-392.
conv_2150 .

Radović, Vuk, "Posrednički ugovor o putovanju" in Pravo i privreda, 53, no. 4-6 (2015):362-392,
conv_2150 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/761
AB  - Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja spada u kategoriju individualnih članskih prava akcionara, koje je neposredno vezano za pravo učešća u radu skupštine. Predmet analize ovog članka su uslovi za ostvarivanje ovog prava. U uvodnim delovima, autor je ukazao na značaj i načine informisanja akcionara, objasnio pravnu prirodu prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja i prikazao novu regulativu ovog prava na međunarodnom i nacionalnom planu. Centralni deo rada je podeljen u dve glave: prva obrađuje pitanje ko je imalac prava na postavljanje pitanja, dok druga analizira uslove za vršenje ovog prava. Za Srbiju je proučavanje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja značajno i aktuelno, jer novi Zakon o privrednim društvima iz 2011. godine po prvi put detaljno uređuje ovu materiju. Za akcionare se kao osnovno postavlja pitanje uslova za vršenje ovog prava, tj. granica njegovog korišćenja. Autor se u ovom radu kritički osvrnuo na važeću regulativu.
AB  - Law on Business Organizations from 2011 has significantly improved the regulation of shareholders' right to ask questions in Serbia. In contrast to the previous law from 2004, that has completely transferred regulation to companies which is why there was no guarantee for exercising this right, new law contains detailed norms in this respect. They are written under the dominant influence of German law and are completely harmonized with the Shareholders' Rights Directive. All important issues of shareholders' right to ask questions have been regulated mostly with imperative norms (subject of the right, conditions for exercising this right, debtor of this obligation, court protection, etc.). Corporations have a lot of freedom to adjust exercising this right to their needs, but only by giving more rights to shareholders. Limiting the scope of this right is possible only in certain, precisely defined areas. Although the general impression of the new regulation is very positive, there are certain aspects which can be criticized. Some of them can be cured by adequate judicial interpretation, while others cannot be cured without changes to the law. In the area of conditions for exercising this right, the most important deficiency is the fact that the law has not determined when the right to ask questions can be exercised, and that stands in obvious disharmony with the adopted conception to regulate all important aspects of this right. Contrary to conditions, which basically have been properly formulated, other aspects of legislation regarding this shareholders' right contain more profound obscurities that go beyond the scope of this paper.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Uslovi za vršenje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja
T1  - Conditions for exercising shareholders' right to ask questions
EP  - 83
IS  - 1
SP  - 62
VL  - 62
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1401062R
UR  - conv_325
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Pravo akcionara na postavljanje pitanja spada u kategoriju individualnih članskih prava akcionara, koje je neposredno vezano za pravo učešća u radu skupštine. Predmet analize ovog članka su uslovi za ostvarivanje ovog prava. U uvodnim delovima, autor je ukazao na značaj i načine informisanja akcionara, objasnio pravnu prirodu prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja i prikazao novu regulativu ovog prava na međunarodnom i nacionalnom planu. Centralni deo rada je podeljen u dve glave: prva obrađuje pitanje ko je imalac prava na postavljanje pitanja, dok druga analizira uslove za vršenje ovog prava. Za Srbiju je proučavanje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja značajno i aktuelno, jer novi Zakon o privrednim društvima iz 2011. godine po prvi put detaljno uređuje ovu materiju. Za akcionare se kao osnovno postavlja pitanje uslova za vršenje ovog prava, tj. granica njegovog korišćenja. Autor se u ovom radu kritički osvrnuo na važeću regulativu., Law on Business Organizations from 2011 has significantly improved the regulation of shareholders' right to ask questions in Serbia. In contrast to the previous law from 2004, that has completely transferred regulation to companies which is why there was no guarantee for exercising this right, new law contains detailed norms in this respect. They are written under the dominant influence of German law and are completely harmonized with the Shareholders' Rights Directive. All important issues of shareholders' right to ask questions have been regulated mostly with imperative norms (subject of the right, conditions for exercising this right, debtor of this obligation, court protection, etc.). Corporations have a lot of freedom to adjust exercising this right to their needs, but only by giving more rights to shareholders. Limiting the scope of this right is possible only in certain, precisely defined areas. Although the general impression of the new regulation is very positive, there are certain aspects which can be criticized. Some of them can be cured by adequate judicial interpretation, while others cannot be cured without changes to the law. In the area of conditions for exercising this right, the most important deficiency is the fact that the law has not determined when the right to ask questions can be exercised, and that stands in obvious disharmony with the adopted conception to regulate all important aspects of this right. Contrary to conditions, which basically have been properly formulated, other aspects of legislation regarding this shareholders' right contain more profound obscurities that go beyond the scope of this paper.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Uslovi za vršenje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja, Conditions for exercising shareholders' right to ask questions",
pages = "83-62",
number = "1",
volume = "62",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1401062R",
url = "conv_325"
}

Radović, V.. (2014). Uslovi za vršenje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 62(1), 62-83.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1401062R
conv_325

Radović V. Uslovi za vršenje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2014;62(1):62-83.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1401062R
conv_325 .

Radović, Vuk, "Uslovi za vršenje prava akcionara na postavljanje pitanja" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 62, no. 1 (2014):62-83,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1401062R .,
conv_325 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/791
AB  - Ugovor o organizovanju putovanja, kao najznačajniji ugovor u turizmu, nije jednostavno definisati. Njegove osnovne karakteristike nisu univerzalno prepoznatljive, jer međunarodni i nacionalni izvori ne sadrže uniformna rešenja. Poređenjem definicija ovog ugovora sadržanih u Briselskoj konvenciji, Direktivi o paket aranžmanima i Predlogu nove direktive o paket aranžmanima, autor uočava progresivan razvoj međunarodne regulative, ali i prilagođavanje pojma ovog ugovora novim okolnostima. Ugovor o organizovanju putovanja je u srpskom pravu paralelno uređen Zakonom o obligacionim odnosima i Zakonom o zaštiti potrošača. Ova dva zakona sadrže u osnovi različite definicije ovog ugovora, što je od velikog praktičnog značaja, jer je time aktuelizovano pitanje da li se Zakon o obligacionim odnosima uopšte primenjuje na ovaj ugovor nakon stupanja na snagu Zakona o zaštiti potrošača. U ovom članku, autor analizira osnovne karakteristike ugovora o organizovanju putovanja, a nakon toga utvrđuje u kojoj meri srpski propisi integrišu takve teorijske koncepcije. Na kraju su date preporuke za redefinisanje pojma ovog ugovora u pozitivnopravnim propisima.
AB  - The organized travel contract, as the most important contract in the area of tourism, is not easy to define. Major features of this contract are not universally recognizable, because international and national sources of law do not share uniform ideas. By comparing the definitions of organized travel contract in Brussels convention (CCV), Directive on package travel, package holidays and package tours and Proposal for new directive on package travel, the author determines the progressive development of international regulation, as well as the adaptation of this contract to new circumstances. In Serbian law the organized travel contract is regulated by the Law on obligations and Law on consumer protection. These two laws contain basically different definitions of this contract, which is of great practical significance, because by delineating the definitions we are answering the question whether the Law on obligations is applicable after entering into force of the Law on consumer protection. In this article, the author analyzes the basic characteristics of organized travel contract, and afterwards explores whether the Serbian regulation implements these ideas. At the end, the author concludes that the Serbian current regulation of this topic has to be improved and suggests the ways of future development.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Širenje pojma ugovora o organizovanju putovanja
T1  - Broadening the concept of organized travel contract
EP  - 321
IS  - 7-9
SP  - 297
VL  - 52
UR  - conv_2130
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Ugovor o organizovanju putovanja, kao najznačajniji ugovor u turizmu, nije jednostavno definisati. Njegove osnovne karakteristike nisu univerzalno prepoznatljive, jer međunarodni i nacionalni izvori ne sadrže uniformna rešenja. Poređenjem definicija ovog ugovora sadržanih u Briselskoj konvenciji, Direktivi o paket aranžmanima i Predlogu nove direktive o paket aranžmanima, autor uočava progresivan razvoj međunarodne regulative, ali i prilagođavanje pojma ovog ugovora novim okolnostima. Ugovor o organizovanju putovanja je u srpskom pravu paralelno uređen Zakonom o obligacionim odnosima i Zakonom o zaštiti potrošača. Ova dva zakona sadrže u osnovi različite definicije ovog ugovora, što je od velikog praktičnog značaja, jer je time aktuelizovano pitanje da li se Zakon o obligacionim odnosima uopšte primenjuje na ovaj ugovor nakon stupanja na snagu Zakona o zaštiti potrošača. U ovom članku, autor analizira osnovne karakteristike ugovora o organizovanju putovanja, a nakon toga utvrđuje u kojoj meri srpski propisi integrišu takve teorijske koncepcije. Na kraju su date preporuke za redefinisanje pojma ovog ugovora u pozitivnopravnim propisima., The organized travel contract, as the most important contract in the area of tourism, is not easy to define. Major features of this contract are not universally recognizable, because international and national sources of law do not share uniform ideas. By comparing the definitions of organized travel contract in Brussels convention (CCV), Directive on package travel, package holidays and package tours and Proposal for new directive on package travel, the author determines the progressive development of international regulation, as well as the adaptation of this contract to new circumstances. In Serbian law the organized travel contract is regulated by the Law on obligations and Law on consumer protection. These two laws contain basically different definitions of this contract, which is of great practical significance, because by delineating the definitions we are answering the question whether the Law on obligations is applicable after entering into force of the Law on consumer protection. In this article, the author analyzes the basic characteristics of organized travel contract, and afterwards explores whether the Serbian regulation implements these ideas. At the end, the author concludes that the Serbian current regulation of this topic has to be improved and suggests the ways of future development.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Širenje pojma ugovora o organizovanju putovanja, Broadening the concept of organized travel contract",
pages = "321-297",
number = "7-9",
volume = "52",
url = "conv_2130"
}

Radović, V.. (2014). Širenje pojma ugovora o organizovanju putovanja. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 52(7-9), 297-321.
conv_2130

Radović V. Širenje pojma ugovora o organizovanju putovanja. in Pravo i privreda. 2014;52(7-9):297-321.
conv_2130 .

Radović, Vuk, "Širenje pojma ugovora o organizovanju putovanja" in Pravo i privreda, 52, no. 7-9 (2014):297-321,
conv_2130 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/682
AB  - U srpskoj teoriji stečajnog prava pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu do sada nije u dovoljnoj meri problematizovano. Praktičari i teoretičari se uglavnom zaustavljaju na formulaciji da je reč o nespornom načinu pobijanja koji u praksi ne stvara probleme. Ovaj rad želi da pokaže da ovakav zaključak nije opravdan, a najverovatnije je posledica nedovoljnog korišćenja ovog načina pobijanja. Pisanje rada na ovu temu posebno opravdava činjenica da je novim Zakonom o stečaju dopunjena i delimično promenjena dosadašnja regulativa ovog pitanja. Autor je u radu prvo identifikovao osnovna otvorena pitanja pobijanja pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu, na koja uporedna stečajna zakonodavstva ne daju uniformne odgovore. U drugom delu se analizira svrha ovog načina pobijanja, pri čemu se posebno apostrofira želja za destimulisanjem vršenja određenih pravnih radnji dužnika uoči otvaranja stečajnog postupka. Treći deo rada je posvećen određivanju obuhvata pojmova pravne radnje bez naknade i uz neznatnu naknadu, koji u praksi mogu stvoriti značajne probleme. Kako pravna radnja bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu mora biti učinjena u određenom periodu pre stečajnog postupka, sledeći deo rada proučava temporalni i finansijski aspekt relevantnog perioda. U poslednjem delu su prikazani najznačajniji izuzeci od opštih pravila o pobijanju pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu.
AB  - Avoiding transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration has not yet been meaningfully disputed in Serbian theory of bankruptcy law. Practitioners and academics usually conclude that this type of avoidance is uncontroversial and does not raise problems in practice. This paper is trying to show that such conclusion is not justified, and most probably is a consequence of infrequent use of this type of avoidance. Writing of this paper is particularly justified by the fact that the new Bankruptcy Act has partially changed national regulation of this question. In introductory part of the paper, the author identifies basic, open and partially unresolved questions related to avoiding transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration, for which comparative bankruptcy legislations provide for no uniform answers. The second part of the paper examines the purpose of this type of avoidance, and concludes that principal justification is the amelioration of perverse incentives in the period leading up to bankruptcy. The third part of the paper deals with the boundaries of transactions without consideration and with insignificant consideration, a question that can raise many problems in practice. Taking into consideration that transaction must be entered into by the debtor at a relevant time before bankruptcy, the following part of the paper examines the temporal and financial aspect of the relevant period. Finally, the paper examines some of the most significant exemptions of general rules on avoidance of transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu u stečajnom postupku
T1  - Avoiding transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration in bankruptcy
EP  - 95
IS  - 1
SP  - 73
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_286
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2013",
abstract = "U srpskoj teoriji stečajnog prava pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu do sada nije u dovoljnoj meri problematizovano. Praktičari i teoretičari se uglavnom zaustavljaju na formulaciji da je reč o nespornom načinu pobijanja koji u praksi ne stvara probleme. Ovaj rad želi da pokaže da ovakav zaključak nije opravdan, a najverovatnije je posledica nedovoljnog korišćenja ovog načina pobijanja. Pisanje rada na ovu temu posebno opravdava činjenica da je novim Zakonom o stečaju dopunjena i delimično promenjena dosadašnja regulativa ovog pitanja. Autor je u radu prvo identifikovao osnovna otvorena pitanja pobijanja pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu, na koja uporedna stečajna zakonodavstva ne daju uniformne odgovore. U drugom delu se analizira svrha ovog načina pobijanja, pri čemu se posebno apostrofira želja za destimulisanjem vršenja određenih pravnih radnji dužnika uoči otvaranja stečajnog postupka. Treći deo rada je posvećen određivanju obuhvata pojmova pravne radnje bez naknade i uz neznatnu naknadu, koji u praksi mogu stvoriti značajne probleme. Kako pravna radnja bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu mora biti učinjena u određenom periodu pre stečajnog postupka, sledeći deo rada proučava temporalni i finansijski aspekt relevantnog perioda. U poslednjem delu su prikazani najznačajniji izuzeci od opštih pravila o pobijanju pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu., Avoiding transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration has not yet been meaningfully disputed in Serbian theory of bankruptcy law. Practitioners and academics usually conclude that this type of avoidance is uncontroversial and does not raise problems in practice. This paper is trying to show that such conclusion is not justified, and most probably is a consequence of infrequent use of this type of avoidance. Writing of this paper is particularly justified by the fact that the new Bankruptcy Act has partially changed national regulation of this question. In introductory part of the paper, the author identifies basic, open and partially unresolved questions related to avoiding transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration, for which comparative bankruptcy legislations provide for no uniform answers. The second part of the paper examines the purpose of this type of avoidance, and concludes that principal justification is the amelioration of perverse incentives in the period leading up to bankruptcy. The third part of the paper deals with the boundaries of transactions without consideration and with insignificant consideration, a question that can raise many problems in practice. Taking into consideration that transaction must be entered into by the debtor at a relevant time before bankruptcy, the following part of the paper examines the temporal and financial aspect of the relevant period. Finally, the paper examines some of the most significant exemptions of general rules on avoidance of transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu u stečajnom postupku, Avoiding transactions without consideration or with insignificant consideration in bankruptcy",
pages = "95-73",
number = "1",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_286"
}

Radović, V.. (2013). Pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu u stečajnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 61(1), 73-95.
conv_286

Radović V. Pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu u stečajnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(1):73-95.
conv_286 .

Radović, Vuk, "Pobijanje pravnih radnji bez naknade ili uz neznatnu naknadu u stečajnom postupku" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 1 (2013):73-95,
conv_286 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/676
AB  - U ovom članku autor analizira princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečajnom pravu. Reč je o jednoj od najznačajnijih teorija u materiji međunarodnog stečaja, koja je nastala kao odgovor na dominaciju principa teritorijalnosti u nacionalnim stečajnim zakonodavstvima. U prvom delu rada autor pojmovno određuje princip čiste univerzalnosti. Nakon toga je ukazao na najznačajnije prednosti ovog principa, koje treba da budu opravdanje za njegovo uvođenje. Takođe, prikazana su i najznačajnija ograničenja ovog principa, o kojima se mora voditi računa prilikom eventualne implementacije. Na kraju je autor definisao preduslove za primenu principa čiste univerzalnosti. Autor se u radu zalaže za neodustajanje od ovog principa u materiji međunarodnog stečaja i pored trenutne dominacije drugih teorija.
AB  - In this article the author analyzes the principle of pure universality in international bankruptcy law. This is one of the most important theories in the field of cross-border insolvency, that came up as an answer to the dominance of principle of territoriality in national bankruptcy laws. In the first part of the article, the author determines the meaning and basic characteristics of the principle of pure universality. Afterwards, the most important advantages of this principle have been elaborated. They are supposed to be the justification for its introduction. Next part of the article points out to the most significant limitations of this principle, because potencial implementation must bear them in mind. In the last part of this article the author defines the basic conditions for the application of principle of pure universality. The author of this article argumented in favour of this principle, in spite of current domination of other theories.
PB  - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
T2  - Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
T1  - Princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečaju
T1  - Principle of pure universality in international bankruptcy
EP  - 278
IS  - 2
SP  - 261
VL  - 47
DO  - 10.5937/zrpfns47-4347
UR  - conv_2565
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2013",
abstract = "U ovom članku autor analizira princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečajnom pravu. Reč je o jednoj od najznačajnijih teorija u materiji međunarodnog stečaja, koja je nastala kao odgovor na dominaciju principa teritorijalnosti u nacionalnim stečajnim zakonodavstvima. U prvom delu rada autor pojmovno određuje princip čiste univerzalnosti. Nakon toga je ukazao na najznačajnije prednosti ovog principa, koje treba da budu opravdanje za njegovo uvođenje. Takođe, prikazana su i najznačajnija ograničenja ovog principa, o kojima se mora voditi računa prilikom eventualne implementacije. Na kraju je autor definisao preduslove za primenu principa čiste univerzalnosti. Autor se u radu zalaže za neodustajanje od ovog principa u materiji međunarodnog stečaja i pored trenutne dominacije drugih teorija., In this article the author analyzes the principle of pure universality in international bankruptcy law. This is one of the most important theories in the field of cross-border insolvency, that came up as an answer to the dominance of principle of territoriality in national bankruptcy laws. In the first part of the article, the author determines the meaning and basic characteristics of the principle of pure universality. Afterwards, the most important advantages of this principle have been elaborated. They are supposed to be the justification for its introduction. Next part of the article points out to the most significant limitations of this principle, because potencial implementation must bear them in mind. In the last part of this article the author defines the basic conditions for the application of principle of pure universality. The author of this article argumented in favour of this principle, in spite of current domination of other theories.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad",
journal = "Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad",
title = "Princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečaju, Principle of pure universality in international bankruptcy",
pages = "278-261",
number = "2",
volume = "47",
doi = "10.5937/zrpfns47-4347",
url = "conv_2565"
}

Radović, V.. (2013). Princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečaju. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad., 47(2), 261-278.
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns47-4347
conv_2565

Radović V. Princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečaju. in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad. 2013;47(2):261-278.
doi:10.5937/zrpfns47-4347
conv_2565 .

Radović, Vuk, "Princip čiste univerzalnosti u međunarodnom stečaju" in Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 47, no. 2 (2013):261-278,
https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns47-4347 .,
conv_2565 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/731
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Budućnost kompanijskog prava Evropske unije - novi akcioni plan
T1  - The future of EU company law: The new action plan
EP  - 142
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 116
VL  - 50
UR  - conv_2088
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Budućnost kompanijskog prava Evropske unije - novi akcioni plan, The future of EU company law: The new action plan",
pages = "142-116",
number = "4-6",
volume = "50",
url = "conv_2088"
}

Radović, V.. (2013). Budućnost kompanijskog prava Evropske unije - novi akcioni plan. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 50(4-6), 116-142.
conv_2088

Radović V. Budućnost kompanijskog prava Evropske unije - novi akcioni plan. in Pravo i privreda. 2013;50(4-6):116-142.
conv_2088 .

Radović, Vuk, "Budućnost kompanijskog prava Evropske unije - novi akcioni plan" in Pravo i privreda, 50, no. 4-6 (2013):116-142,
conv_2088 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/659
AB  - Autor ovim člankom nastoji da razbije tri zablude prisutne u našoj posleratnoj trgovinskopravnoj nauci: prva, da postoji zakonski uređen koncept javnog skladištara, druga, da svi skladištari u Srbiji imaju pravni položaj javnih skladištara, i treća, da se osnovna razlika između javnih i privatnih skladištara sastoji u ovlašćenju za izdavanje skladišnice. U prvom delu rada se prikazuje procvat i sunovrat koncepta javnog skladištara u pravnom sistemu Srbije, dok se u drugom delu ukazuje na značaj zakonskog uređivanja javnog skladištara, pozivajući se na važeće propise koji koriste taj pojam, ali ga ne definišu. Treći deo rada je posvećen definisanju pojma javnog skladištara i objašnjenju njegovih osnovnih karakteristika. Na kraju se autor založio za donošenje zakona kojim bi se na generalan način uredio pravni položaj javnih skladištara. .
AB  - In this article the author is trying to reveal three misconceptions present in our post-war commercial law literature: first, that the concept of public warehousemen is legally recognized, second, that all warehousemen in Serbia are legally qualified as public warehousemen, and third, that the basic difference between public and private warehousemen consists in their authority to issue warehouse receipts. In introductory part of this paper the author shows the rise and fall of public warehousemen concept in Serbian legal system. The following part emphasizes the importance of regulation of public warehousemen, taking into consideration the relevant provisions that recognize and presume their existence. In the central part of this paper the focus is on the notion of public warehousemen and their basic characteristics. Finally, the author advocates for the adoption of the law that will generally regulate the legal position of public warehousemen.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Nedostajući koncept javnog skladištara
T1  - Missing concept of public warehousemen
EP  - 92
IS  - 7-9
SP  - 76
VL  - 49
UR  - conv_2071
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Autor ovim člankom nastoji da razbije tri zablude prisutne u našoj posleratnoj trgovinskopravnoj nauci: prva, da postoji zakonski uređen koncept javnog skladištara, druga, da svi skladištari u Srbiji imaju pravni položaj javnih skladištara, i treća, da se osnovna razlika između javnih i privatnih skladištara sastoji u ovlašćenju za izdavanje skladišnice. U prvom delu rada se prikazuje procvat i sunovrat koncepta javnog skladištara u pravnom sistemu Srbije, dok se u drugom delu ukazuje na značaj zakonskog uređivanja javnog skladištara, pozivajući se na važeće propise koji koriste taj pojam, ali ga ne definišu. Treći deo rada je posvećen definisanju pojma javnog skladištara i objašnjenju njegovih osnovnih karakteristika. Na kraju se autor založio za donošenje zakona kojim bi se na generalan način uredio pravni položaj javnih skladištara. ., In this article the author is trying to reveal three misconceptions present in our post-war commercial law literature: first, that the concept of public warehousemen is legally recognized, second, that all warehousemen in Serbia are legally qualified as public warehousemen, and third, that the basic difference between public and private warehousemen consists in their authority to issue warehouse receipts. In introductory part of this paper the author shows the rise and fall of public warehousemen concept in Serbian legal system. The following part emphasizes the importance of regulation of public warehousemen, taking into consideration the relevant provisions that recognize and presume their existence. In the central part of this paper the focus is on the notion of public warehousemen and their basic characteristics. Finally, the author advocates for the adoption of the law that will generally regulate the legal position of public warehousemen.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Nedostajući koncept javnog skladištara, Missing concept of public warehousemen",
pages = "92-76",
number = "7-9",
volume = "49",
url = "conv_2071"
}

Radović, V.. (2012). Nedostajući koncept javnog skladištara. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 49(7-9), 76-92.
conv_2071

Radović V. Nedostajući koncept javnog skladištara. in Pravo i privreda. 2012;49(7-9):76-92.
conv_2071 .

Radović, Vuk, "Nedostajući koncept javnog skladištara" in Pravo i privreda, 49, no. 7-9 (2012):76-92,
conv_2071 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/581
PB  - T M C Asser Press, The Hague
T2  - European Business Organization Law Review
T1  - Corporate Governance of Non-listed Companies
EP  - 356
IS  - 2
SP  - 353
VL  - 12
DO  - 10.1017/S1566752911200065
UR  - conv_2893
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2011",
publisher = "T M C Asser Press, The Hague",
journal = "European Business Organization Law Review",
title = "Corporate Governance of Non-listed Companies",
pages = "356-353",
number = "2",
volume = "12",
doi = "10.1017/S1566752911200065",
url = "conv_2893"
}

Radović, V.. (2011). Corporate Governance of Non-listed Companies. in European Business Organization Law Review
T M C Asser Press, The Hague., 12(2), 353-356.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752911200065
conv_2893

Radović V. Corporate Governance of Non-listed Companies. in European Business Organization Law Review. 2011;12(2):353-356.
doi:10.1017/S1566752911200065
conv_2893 .

Radović, Vuk, "Corporate Governance of Non-listed Companies" in European Business Organization Law Review, 12, no. 2 (2011):353-356,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752911200065 .,
conv_2893 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/559
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Prava akcionara u vezi sa dnevnim redom Skupštine Akcionarskog društva
T1  - Shareholders' rights concerning the agenda of the General meeting
EP  - 186
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 162
VL  - 48
UR  - conv_2035
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2011",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Prava akcionara u vezi sa dnevnim redom Skupštine Akcionarskog društva, Shareholders' rights concerning the agenda of the General meeting",
pages = "186-162",
number = "4-6",
volume = "48",
url = "conv_2035"
}

Radović, V.. (2011). Prava akcionara u vezi sa dnevnim redom Skupštine Akcionarskog društva. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 48(4-6), 162-186.
conv_2035

Radović V. Prava akcionara u vezi sa dnevnim redom Skupštine Akcionarskog društva. in Pravo i privreda. 2011;48(4-6):162-186.
conv_2035 .

Radović, Vuk, "Prava akcionara u vezi sa dnevnim redom Skupštine Akcionarskog društva" in Pravo i privreda, 48, no. 4-6 (2011):162-186,
conv_2035 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/532
AB  - Zajam koji akcionarsko društvo daje svojim članovima uprave predstavlja očigledan primer pravnog posla u kome članovi uprave imaju lični interes koji ne mora biti konvergentan sa interesima društva. Uporedna korporativna praksa je pokazala da je ovaj institut bio često zloupotrebljavan, što je dovodilo do višestrukih negativnih posledica po društvo i njegove akcionare. Zbog toga su poslednjih godina intenzivirane diskusije vezane za unapređenje regulative korporativnih zajmova. U prvom delu rada se analiziraju pojam i osnovne karakteristike korporativnih zajmova. Korporativni zajam je objašnjen kroz specifičnosti koje ovaj ugovor diferenciraju u odnosu na klasičan ugovor o zajmu. Nakon toga, prikazana su tri zakonska načina uređivanja korporativnih zajmova: tradicionalan, konzervativan i moderan. U trećem delu rada su izloženi najznačajniji argumenti kojima se napadaju i brane korporativni zajmovi. U poslednjem delu je ukazano na potrebu za uvođenjem specifičnih pravnih pravila koja bi uređivala materiju korporativnih zajmova u Srbiji kao i na optimalne načine na koje se to može učiniti. .
AB  - Loans to executives bring up the question of personal interest of the executives, which may be non-convergent with the interests of corporation. Comparative corporate practice has shown tendency of abusing these loans which has had multiple negative consequences on corporations and their shareholders. Therefore, discussions on the improvement of regulation of executive loans has been recently intensified. This article deals with the notion and basic characteristics of executive loans. The author compares executive loan to the ordinary loan agreement, explicates the three legal approaches towards regulating executive loans (traditional, conservative and modern), and weighs in the arguments in favor and against the executive loans. Finally, he points out the need for special regulation of executive loans in Serbia, and proposes the ways in which they should be regulated.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - O potrebi za specifičnim pravnim uređenjem korporativnih zajmova
T1  - Executive loans: Necessity for specific legal regulation
EP  - 133
IS  - 2
SP  - 108
VL  - 58
UR  - conv_198
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Zajam koji akcionarsko društvo daje svojim članovima uprave predstavlja očigledan primer pravnog posla u kome članovi uprave imaju lični interes koji ne mora biti konvergentan sa interesima društva. Uporedna korporativna praksa je pokazala da je ovaj institut bio često zloupotrebljavan, što je dovodilo do višestrukih negativnih posledica po društvo i njegove akcionare. Zbog toga su poslednjih godina intenzivirane diskusije vezane za unapređenje regulative korporativnih zajmova. U prvom delu rada se analiziraju pojam i osnovne karakteristike korporativnih zajmova. Korporativni zajam je objašnjen kroz specifičnosti koje ovaj ugovor diferenciraju u odnosu na klasičan ugovor o zajmu. Nakon toga, prikazana su tri zakonska načina uređivanja korporativnih zajmova: tradicionalan, konzervativan i moderan. U trećem delu rada su izloženi najznačajniji argumenti kojima se napadaju i brane korporativni zajmovi. U poslednjem delu je ukazano na potrebu za uvođenjem specifičnih pravnih pravila koja bi uređivala materiju korporativnih zajmova u Srbiji kao i na optimalne načine na koje se to može učiniti. ., Loans to executives bring up the question of personal interest of the executives, which may be non-convergent with the interests of corporation. Comparative corporate practice has shown tendency of abusing these loans which has had multiple negative consequences on corporations and their shareholders. Therefore, discussions on the improvement of regulation of executive loans has been recently intensified. This article deals with the notion and basic characteristics of executive loans. The author compares executive loan to the ordinary loan agreement, explicates the three legal approaches towards regulating executive loans (traditional, conservative and modern), and weighs in the arguments in favor and against the executive loans. Finally, he points out the need for special regulation of executive loans in Serbia, and proposes the ways in which they should be regulated.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "O potrebi za specifičnim pravnim uređenjem korporativnih zajmova, Executive loans: Necessity for specific legal regulation",
pages = "133-108",
number = "2",
volume = "58",
url = "conv_198"
}

Radović, V.. (2010). O potrebi za specifičnim pravnim uređenjem korporativnih zajmova. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 58(2), 108-133.
conv_198

Radović V. O potrebi za specifičnim pravnim uređenjem korporativnih zajmova. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2010;58(2):108-133.
conv_198 .

Radović, Vuk, "O potrebi za specifičnim pravnim uređenjem korporativnih zajmova" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 58, no. 2 (2010):108-133,
conv_198 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/521
AB  - Osnovni cilj ovog rada je da ukaže na prednosti uvođenja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora u pravni poredak Srbije. Diskvalifikacija je jedna od dostupnih sankcija koja se može izricati protiv članova uprave koji su prekršili neke od zakonom propisanih dužnosti, a sastoji se u privremenom isključenju tog lica iz poslovnog sveta. Uporedno-pravna analiza pokazuje da najveći broj država poznaje neki vid diskvalifikacije direktora, a mali broj među njima ovaj institut uređuje detaljno i celovito. U uvodnim delovima ovog rada autor je ukazao na višestruke ciljeve koji se ostvaruju uvođenjem instituta diskvalifikacije direktora. Reč je o profilaktičkoj sankciji koja predstavlja način zaštite akcionara, poverilaca i javnih interesa. Predstavljena si i dva moguća modela zakonskog uređivanja diskvalifikacije a izvršen je i pokušaj da se ovaj institut locira u okvire neke od postojećih grana prava (kompanijskog, stečajnog, berzanskog ili kaznenog prava). U centralnim delovima ovog rada se analiziraju osnovni elementi zakonskog uređenja diskvalifikacije: domen primene, subjekti zabrane sadržina zabrane, razlozi za diskvalifikaciju, period diskvalifikacije i pravne posledice izricanja ove sankcije. Ukazano je i na probleme unifikacije ove materije na nivou Evropske unije. Na kraju rada su date preporuke o optimalnim načinima buduće implementacije instituta diskvalifikacije direktora u srpsko pravo.
AB  - The main goal of this paper is to show the advantages of introducing directors' disqualification into Serbian legal system. Disqualification is one of the available sanctions that can be imposed against directors that haven't worked in accordance with their statutory duties, and it consists of temporary or permanent exclusion of that individual from the business world. Comparative analysis shows that vast majority of states have some kind of disqualification of directors, but only few of them regulate this question thoroughly and completely. In introductory part of this paper the author shows multiple goals that can be achieved by introducing disqualification of directors. This is a sort of prophylactic measure that serves to protect shareholders, creditors and public interests. Two possible regulatory models of directors' disqualification are introduced, and the author tries to locate this legal institute in the framework of existing branches of law (company law, bankruptcy law, securities regulation or criminal law). In central parts of this paper the focus is oriented towards basic elements of disqualification of directors such as area of application, content of the prohibition, grounds for disqualification, period of disqualification and legal consequences. It has been pointed to the problems of unification of this question on EU level. The last part of this paper contains author's recommendations in connection with desirable ways of future implementation of directors' disqualification into Serbian law.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - O opravdanosti prihvatanja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora
T1  - Necessity of accepting directors' disqualification
EP  - 56
IS  - 1-3
SP  - 26
VL  - 47
UR  - conv_2001
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Osnovni cilj ovog rada je da ukaže na prednosti uvođenja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora u pravni poredak Srbije. Diskvalifikacija je jedna od dostupnih sankcija koja se može izricati protiv članova uprave koji su prekršili neke od zakonom propisanih dužnosti, a sastoji se u privremenom isključenju tog lica iz poslovnog sveta. Uporedno-pravna analiza pokazuje da najveći broj država poznaje neki vid diskvalifikacije direktora, a mali broj među njima ovaj institut uređuje detaljno i celovito. U uvodnim delovima ovog rada autor je ukazao na višestruke ciljeve koji se ostvaruju uvođenjem instituta diskvalifikacije direktora. Reč je o profilaktičkoj sankciji koja predstavlja način zaštite akcionara, poverilaca i javnih interesa. Predstavljena si i dva moguća modela zakonskog uređivanja diskvalifikacije a izvršen je i pokušaj da se ovaj institut locira u okvire neke od postojećih grana prava (kompanijskog, stečajnog, berzanskog ili kaznenog prava). U centralnim delovima ovog rada se analiziraju osnovni elementi zakonskog uređenja diskvalifikacije: domen primene, subjekti zabrane sadržina zabrane, razlozi za diskvalifikaciju, period diskvalifikacije i pravne posledice izricanja ove sankcije. Ukazano je i na probleme unifikacije ove materije na nivou Evropske unije. Na kraju rada su date preporuke o optimalnim načinima buduće implementacije instituta diskvalifikacije direktora u srpsko pravo., The main goal of this paper is to show the advantages of introducing directors' disqualification into Serbian legal system. Disqualification is one of the available sanctions that can be imposed against directors that haven't worked in accordance with their statutory duties, and it consists of temporary or permanent exclusion of that individual from the business world. Comparative analysis shows that vast majority of states have some kind of disqualification of directors, but only few of them regulate this question thoroughly and completely. In introductory part of this paper the author shows multiple goals that can be achieved by introducing disqualification of directors. This is a sort of prophylactic measure that serves to protect shareholders, creditors and public interests. Two possible regulatory models of directors' disqualification are introduced, and the author tries to locate this legal institute in the framework of existing branches of law (company law, bankruptcy law, securities regulation or criminal law). In central parts of this paper the focus is oriented towards basic elements of disqualification of directors such as area of application, content of the prohibition, grounds for disqualification, period of disqualification and legal consequences. It has been pointed to the problems of unification of this question on EU level. The last part of this paper contains author's recommendations in connection with desirable ways of future implementation of directors' disqualification into Serbian law.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "O opravdanosti prihvatanja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora, Necessity of accepting directors' disqualification",
pages = "56-26",
number = "1-3",
volume = "47",
url = "conv_2001"
}

Radović, V.. (2010). O opravdanosti prihvatanja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 47(1-3), 26-56.
conv_2001

Radović V. O opravdanosti prihvatanja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora. in Pravo i privreda. 2010;47(1-3):26-56.
conv_2001 .

Radović, Vuk, "O opravdanosti prihvatanja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora" in Pravo i privreda, 47, no. 1-3 (2010):26-56,
conv_2001 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/482
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Da li je dozvoljena uslovna obavezna javna ponuda za preuzimanje?
T1  - About the legality of a conditional mandatory takeover bid
EP  - 72
IS  - 9-12
SP  - 68
VL  - 46
UR  - conv_1995
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2009",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Da li je dozvoljena uslovna obavezna javna ponuda za preuzimanje?, About the legality of a conditional mandatory takeover bid",
pages = "72-68",
number = "9-12",
volume = "46",
url = "conv_1995"
}

Radović, V.. (2009). Da li je dozvoljena uslovna obavezna javna ponuda za preuzimanje?. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 46(9-12), 68-72.
conv_1995

Radović V. Da li je dozvoljena uslovna obavezna javna ponuda za preuzimanje?. in Pravo i privreda. 2009;46(9-12):68-72.
conv_1995 .

Radović, Vuk, "Da li je dozvoljena uslovna obavezna javna ponuda za preuzimanje?" in Pravo i privreda, 46, no. 9-12 (2009):68-72,
conv_1995 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/476
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Dileme u vezi sa pojmom neizvršenih dvostranoobaveznih ugovora u stečaju
T1  - Dilemmas about the meaning of unexecuted two-sided contracts in bankruptcy
EP  - 432
IS  - 5-8
SP  - 410
VL  - 46
UR  - conv_1988
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2009",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Dileme u vezi sa pojmom neizvršenih dvostranoobaveznih ugovora u stečaju, Dilemmas about the meaning of unexecuted two-sided contracts in bankruptcy",
pages = "432-410",
number = "5-8",
volume = "46",
url = "conv_1988"
}

Radović, V.. (2009). Dileme u vezi sa pojmom neizvršenih dvostranoobaveznih ugovora u stečaju. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 46(5-8), 410-432.
conv_1988

Radović V. Dileme u vezi sa pojmom neizvršenih dvostranoobaveznih ugovora u stečaju. in Pravo i privreda. 2009;46(5-8):410-432.
conv_1988 .

Radović, Vuk, "Dileme u vezi sa pojmom neizvršenih dvostranoobaveznih ugovora u stečaju" in Pravo i privreda, 46, no. 5-8 (2009):410-432,
conv_1988 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/452
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Nebojša Jovanović: Berzansko pravo, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009
T1  - Nebojša Jovanović: Stock exchange law, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2009
EP  - 149
IS  - 9-12
SP  - 145
VL  - 46
UR  - conv_2000
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radović, Vuk",
year = "2009",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Nebojša Jovanović: Berzansko pravo, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009, Nebojša Jovanović: Stock exchange law, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2009",
pages = "149-145",
number = "9-12",
volume = "46",
url = "conv_2000"
}

Radović, V.. (2009). Nebojša Jovanović: Berzansko pravo, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 46(9-12), 145-149.
conv_2000

Radović V. Nebojša Jovanović: Berzansko pravo, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009. in Pravo i privreda. 2009;46(9-12):145-149.
conv_2000 .

Radović, Vuk, "Nebojša Jovanović: Berzansko pravo, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009" in Pravo i privreda, 46, no. 9-12 (2009):145-149,
conv_2000 .